Skip to main content

How to Represent Medical Ontologies in View of a Semantic Web?

  • Conference paper
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIME 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2780))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 602 Accesses

Abstract

The biomedical community has concrete needs of a future Semantic Web. An important issue is to know whether the W3C languages, will meet its requirements. This paper aims at contributing to this question in evaluating two presently available languages, Protégé and DAML+OIL, on an actual ontology under development, the brain cortex ontology. It draws conclusions on their expressiveness, compares it to other ontology languages, in particular to the next standard OWL, and the hybrid language CARIN-\(\mathcal{ALN}\), and discusses the main features that should be in a Web language for medical ontologies in view of a Semantic Web.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bechhofer, S., Horrocks, I., Goble, C., Stevens, R.: OILEd: a Reason-able Ontology Editor for the Semantic Web. In: Baader, F., Brewka, G., Eiter, T. (eds.) KI 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2174, pp. 396–408. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bowden, D.M., Martin, R.F.: NeuroNames Brain Hierarchy. Neuroimage 2, 63–83 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brinkley, J.F., Rosse, C.: Imaging informatics and the Human Brain Project: the role of structure. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 131–148 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dameron, O., Burgun, A., Morandi, X., Gibaud, B.: Modelling dependencies between relations to insure consistency of a cerebral cortex anatomy knowledge base. In: Proceedings of Medical Informatics in Europe (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Connolly, D., van Harmelen, F., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D.L., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Stein, L.A.: DAML+OIL Reference Description. In: W3C Note, December 18 (2001), http://www.w3.org/TR/daml+oil-reference

  6. Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C.M., Maler, E. (eds.): Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0, 2nd edn (2000), http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml

  7. Fellbaum, C. (ed.): WordNet: an electronic lexical database. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Fensel, D., van Harmelen, F., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D.L., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: OIL An ontology infrastructure for the semantic web. IEEE Intell Systems 16(2), 38–45 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rector. A., Nowlan W.A., and the GALEN Consortium.: The GALEN Project Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 45, 75-78 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gomez-Perez, A., Corcho, O.: Ontology languages for the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems 17(4), 54–60 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hendler, J., McGuinness, D.L.: The DARPA Agent Markup Language. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(6), 67–73 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Levy, A.Y., Rousset, M.C.: The Limits on Combining Recursive Horn Rules with Description Logics. In: AAAI/IAAI, Vol. 1 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li, Q., Shilane, P., Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: Ontology acquisition from on-line knowledge sources. In: Proc. AMIA Symp., pp. 497–501 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lindberg, D.A., Humphreys, B.L., McCray, A.T.: The Unified Medical Language System. Meth. Inf. Med. Aug 32(4), 281–291 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Noy, N.F., Sintek, M., Decker, S., Crubezy, M., Fergerson, R.W., Musen, M.A.: Creating Semantic Web Contents with Protege-2000. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(2), 60–71 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ono M., Kubik, S. and Abernathey, C.D.: Geog Thieme Verlag, Atlas of the Cerebral Sulci, Thieme Medical Publishers Inc (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dean, M., Connolly, D., van Harmelen, F., Hendler, J., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D.L., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Stein, L.A.: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference Version 1.0. In: W3C Working Draft, Mars 31 (2003), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/

  18. Beckett, D. (ed.): RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised). W3C Working Draft January 23 (2003), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/

  19. Rosse, C., Mejino, J.L., Modayur, B.R., Jakobovits, R., Hinshaw, K.P., Brinkley, J.F.: Motivation and organizational principles for anatomical knowledge representation: the digital anatomist symbolic knowledge base. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 5(1), 17–40 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rousset, M.-C., Bidault, A., Froidevaux, C., Gagliardi, H., Goasdoué, F., Reynaud, C., Safar, B.: Construction de médiateurs pour intégrer des sources d’information multiples et hétérogènes: le projet PICSEL. Revue I3: Information - Interaction - Intelligence (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sintek, M., Decker, S.: TRIPLE An RDF Query, Inference, and Transformation Language. In: DDLP 2001, Japan (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Toga, A.W.: Neuroimage databases: the good, the bad and the ugly. Nature reviews neuroscience 3, 302–309 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Biron, P.V., Malhotra, A. (eds.): Schema Part, X.M.L. 2: Datatypes. W3C Recommandation May 02 (2000), http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Golbreich, C., Dameron, O., Gibaud, B., Burgun, A. (2003). How to Represent Medical Ontologies in View of a Semantic Web?. In: Dojat, M., Keravnou, E.T., Barahona, P. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. AIME 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2780. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39907-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39907-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20129-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39907-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics