Abstract
An experimental comparison of ‘Edge-Element Association (EEA)’ and ‘Marginalized Contour (MCo)’ approaches for 3D model-based vehicle tracking in traffic scenes is complicated by the different shape and motion models with which they have been implemented originally. It is shown that the steering-angle motion model originally associated with EEA allows more robust tracking than the angular-velocity motion model originally associated with MCo. Details of the shape models can also make a difference, depending on the resolution of the images. Performance differences due to the choice of motion and shape model can outweigh the differences due to the choice of the tracking algorithm. Tracking failures of the two approaches, however, usually do not happen at the same frames, which can lead to insights into the relative strengths and weaknesses of the two approaches.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dahlkamp, H., Ottlik, A., Nagel, H.-H.: Comparison of Edge-driven Algorithms for Model-based Motion Estimation. In: MacLean, W.J. (ed.) SCVMA 2004. LNCS, vol. 3667, pp. 38–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Dahlkamp, H.: Untersuchung eines Erwartungswert-Maximierung (EM)-Kontur-Algorithmus zur Fahrzeugverfolgung. Diplomarbeit, Institut für Algorithmen und Kognitive Systeme, Fakultät für Informatik der Universität Karlsruhe (TH) (January 2004)
Haag, M., Nagel, H.-H.: Combination of Edge Element and Optical Flow Estimates for 3D-Model-Based Vehicle Tracking in Traffic Image Sequences. International Journal of Computer Vision 35(3), 295–319 (1999)
Leuck, H., Nagel, H.-H.: Automatic Differentiation Facilitates OF-Integration into Steering-Angle-Based Road Vehicle Tracking. In: Proc. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 1999), Fort Collins, Colorado/USA, June 23-25, vol. 2, pp. 360–365. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1999)
Magee, D.R.: Tracking Multiple Vehicles Using Foreground, Background and Motion Models. Image and Vision Computing 22(2), 143–155 (2004)
Nagel, H.-H., Middendorf, M., Leuck, H.: Quantitativer Vergleich zweier Kinematik-Modelle für die Verfolgung von Straßenfahrzeugen in Video-Sequenzen. In: Posch, S., Ritter, H. (eds.) Dynamische Perzeption, Proceedings in Artificial Intelligence. Sankt Augustin: infix, vol. 8, pp. 71–88 (1998) (in German)
Pece, E.C.: Generative-model-based Tracking by Cluster Analysis of Image Differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 39(3-4), 181–194 (2002)
Pece, A.E.C., Worrall, A.D.: Tracking with the EM Contour Algorithm. In: Heyden, A., Sparr, G., Nielsen, M., Johansen, P. (eds.) ECCV 2002. LNCS, vol. 2350, pp. 3–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Pece, A.E.C.: The Kalman-EM Contour Tracker. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Statistical and Computational Theories of Vision (SCTV 2003), Nice, France, October 12 (2003), http://www.stat.ucla.edu/~yuille/meetings/2003workshop.php
Reuter, P.: Nutzung des Optischen Flusses bei der modellgestützten Verfolgung von Fußgängern in Videobildfolgen. Diplomarbeit, Institut für Algorithmen und Kognitive Systeme, Fakultät für Informatik der Universität Karlsruhe (TH), Oktober (2003)
Stauffer, C., Grimson, W.E.L.: Learning Patterns of Activity Using Real-Time Tracking. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI) 22(8), 747–757 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dahlkamp, H., Pece, A.E.C., Ottlik, A., Nagel, HH. (2004). Differential Analysis of Two Model-Based Vehicle Tracking Approaches. In: Rasmussen, C.E., Bülthoff, H.H., Schölkopf, B., Giese, M.A. (eds) Pattern Recognition. DAGM 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3175. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28649-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28649-3_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22945-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28649-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive