Abstract
Despite their simple syntactic form, adjective-noun combinations seem to have no straightforward semantic method that parallels the simplicity of the syntax. Conventionally, adjectives are to blame for this behaviour. Such a belief has culminated in the generally accepted view that adjectives should be semantically analyzed as belonging to a hierarchy of the following structure [1, 2]:
-
Intersective e.g. red as in That is a red rose
-
Subsective:
– Subsective-only e.g. veteran as in John is a veteran soldier
– Double or “doublet” e.g. beautiful as in Maria is a beautiful dancer
-
Non-subsective:
– Non-privative e.g. potential as in John is a potential candidate
– Privative e.g. fake as in That is a fake gun
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kamp, H., Partee, P.H.: Prototype theory and compositionality. Cognition 57, 129–191 (1995)
Siegel, M.: Capturing the adjective. PhD dissertation. The University of Massachusetts at Amherst (1976)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Abdullah, N., Frost, R. (2004). Two Set-Theoretic Approaches to the Semantics of Adjective-Noun Combinations. In: Tawfik, A.Y., Goodwin, S.D. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3060. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24840-8_52
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24840-8_52
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22004-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24840-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive