Skip to main content

A Unified Action Language Framework

  • Conference paper
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (Canadian AI 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3060))

  • 1540 Accesses

Abstract

Action languages are simple formal languages for describing the effects of actions. Although they have been useful formalisms for reasoning about actions and planning, no precise definition has been given to specify exactly what constitutes an action language. In this paper, we introduce a logical framework that unifies existing action languages. The framework is based on a simple modal logic with one-step temporal modalities and a causal operator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baral, C., Tran, N.: Representation and reasoning about evolution of the world in the context of reasoning about actions. In: Proceedings of The Workshop onNonmonotonic Reasoning, Action, and Change (NRAC 2003), August 2003, pp. 31–36 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eiter, T., Faber, W., Leone, N., Pfeifer, G., Polleres, A.: Answer set planning under action costs. In: Flesca, S., Greco, S., Leone, N., Ianni, G. (eds.) JELIA 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2424, pp. 541–544. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Gelfond, M., Baral, C., Gonzalez, G.: Alan:An action language for non-markovian domains. In: IJCAI 2003 Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Action and Change, NRAC 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Action languages. Linköping Electronic Articles in Computer and Information Science 3(16), 1–16 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Giunchiglia, E., Lifschitz, V.: Action languages, temporal action logics and the situation calculus. Linköping Electronic Articles in Computer and Information Science 4(40), 1–19 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lichtenstein, O., Pnueli, A.: Propositional temporal logics: Decidability and completeness. Logic Journal of the IGPL 8(1), 55–85 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. McCain, N., Turner, H.: Causal theories of action and change. In: Proceedings of AAAI 1997, pp. 460–465 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hunter, A. (2004). A Unified Action Language Framework. In: Tawfik, A.Y., Goodwin, S.D. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3060. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24840-8_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24840-8_48

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22004-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24840-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics