Abstract
Decisions concerning cultural property are continually being taken by governments and public administrations. Preservation implies maintaining the stock and hindering its dilapidation and deterioration. The upkeep of the stock creates costs, as the resources involved (in the case of historic monuments, especially the sites) could potentially be used for alternative purposes. The costs involved consist of missed opportunities. They are real but not monetary, and they do not show up on any balance sheet. These opportunity costs, as economists call them, are often neglected in political and administrative decisions but should be taken into account in a socially-sound decision. In addition, the preservation of cultural property also requires current funds for repairing and safeguarding the objects. In order to be able to make reasonable decisions, an evaluation of the value of the cultural heritage (compared to relevant alternatives) is required.
This chapter is based on Bruno S. Frey (1997), “Evaluating Cultural Property”, previously published in the International Journal of Cultural Property, pp. 231–246, used by permission of Oxford University Press.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Such pronouncements are a reasonable strategy for the suppliers. They therefore induce the demanders to choose between having the cultural object and not having it at all. Provided the demanders choose the first option (which is very likely to be the case), suppliers can reap a rent. Such strategic action has been analyzed in the case of public bureaucracies’ behavior vis-a-vis the parliament (see Niskanen 1971).
See e.g. Kahneman, Slovic and Tversky 1982, Arkes and Hammond 1986, Bell, Raiffa and Tversky 1988, Dawes 1988, Frey and Eichenberger 1989a,b, Thaler 1992.
Today’s younger generation values Jugendstil-monuments more highly than the past generation who produced it. But not all of what was called “art” in the past is considered such today.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frey, B.S. (2003). Evaluating Cultural Property. In: Arts & Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24695-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24695-4_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00273-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24695-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive