Skip to main content

Evaluating Cultural Property

  • Chapter
Arts & Economics

Abstract

Decisions concerning cultural property are continually being taken by governments and public administrations. Preservation implies maintaining the stock and hindering its dilapidation and deterioration. The upkeep of the stock creates costs, as the resources involved (in the case of historic monuments, especially the sites) could potentially be used for alternative purposes. The costs involved consist of missed opportunities. They are real but not monetary, and they do not show up on any balance sheet. These opportunity costs, as economists call them, are often neglected in political and administrative decisions but should be taken into account in a socially-sound decision. In addition, the preservation of cultural property also requires current funds for repairing and safeguarding the objects. In order to be able to make reasonable decisions, an evaluation of the value of the cultural heritage (compared to relevant alternatives) is required.

This chapter is based on Bruno S. Frey (1997), “Evaluating Cultural Property”, previously published in the International Journal of Cultural Property, pp. 231–246, used by permission of Oxford University Press.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Such pronouncements are a reasonable strategy for the suppliers. They therefore induce the demanders to choose between having the cultural object and not having it at all. Provided the demanders choose the first option (which is very likely to be the case), suppliers can reap a rent. Such strategic action has been analyzed in the case of public bureaucracies’ behavior vis-a-vis the parliament (see Niskanen 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See e.g. Kahneman, Slovic and Tversky 1982, Arkes and Hammond 1986, Bell, Raiffa and Tversky 1988, Dawes 1988, Frey and Eichenberger 1989a,b, Thaler 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Today’s younger generation values Jugendstil-monuments more highly than the past generation who produced it. But not all of what was called “art” in the past is considered such today.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Frey, B.S. (2003). Evaluating Cultural Property. In: Arts & Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24695-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24695-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00273-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24695-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics