Skip to main content

Toleranz und Diskriminierung zwischen sozialen Gruppen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sozialpsychologie

Part of the book series: Basiswissen Psychologie ((BASPSY))

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Kapitel stellen wir die zentralen Begriffe wie Vorurteile, soziale Diskriminierung und soziale Stereotype vor und führen in klassische und moderne Ansätze zu ihrer Erklärung ein. Es werden sowohl persönlichkeitsorientierte Ansätze, die Theorie des realistischen Gruppenkonflikts als auch die Theorie der sozialen Identität vorgestellt. Ein weiterer Teil des Kapitels widmet sich grundlegenden Prozessen von Intergruppenphänomenen wie Kategorisierung, Identifikation, Gruppenmotivationen usw. Das Kapitel schließt mit der Erklärung und Ansätzen zur Reduktion von Vorurteilen und Intergruppenkonflikten ab.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., Demoulin, J. P., Leyens, A., & Maquil, A. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis in three European Countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 843–856.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Hrsg.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (S. 281–302). Orlando: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (2010). Prejudice: Its social psychology,. 2. Aufl. Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. J. (1978). Divided we fall: An analysis of relations between sections of a factory workforce. In H. Tajfel (Hrsg.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. J., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 255–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1965). Ethnocentric and other altruistic motives. In D. Levine (Hrsg.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Bd. 13). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (1969). Der Mythos von Sisyphos. Ein Versuch über das Absurde. Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. W. (1969). Motives in a conceptual analysis of attitude-related behavior. In J. Brigham & T. Weissbach (Hrsg.), Racial attitudes in America: Analyses and findings of social psychology (S. 250–260). New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, C. S., Eshleman, A., & O’Brien, L. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359–378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1992). Über soziale Arbeitsteilung. Studie über die Organisation höherer Gesellschaften. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Hrsg.), European review of social psychology (Bd. 4, S. 27–57). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellemers, N., et al. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 617–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. K., & Kelley, H. H. (1964). Significant factors in overevaluation of own-group’s product. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 223–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1947). Man for himself. An inquiry into the psychology of ethics. New York: Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias. The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia: Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J. A., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the contact hypothesis. In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (Hrsg.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (S. 1–44). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaas, L., & Manger, C. (2010). Ethnic discrimination in Germany’s labour market: A field experiment (IZA discussion paper 4741). Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, T., & Cohrs, J. C. (2008). The evolution of authoritarian processes: How to commit group members to group norms. Group Dynamics Theory, Research, and Practice, 12, 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, T., & Mummendey, A. (2001). Is there any scapegoat around? Determinants of intergroup conflict at different categorization levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1090–1102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mummendey, A., & Otten, S. (1998). Positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Hrsg.), European review of social psychology (Bd. 9, S. 107–143). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Navarrete, C. D., McDonald, M. M., Molina, L. E., & Sidanius, J. (2010). Prejudice at the nexus of race and gender: An outgroup male target hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 933–945.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Onu, D., Smith, J., & Kessler, T. (2015). Intergroup emulation: An improvement strategy for lower-status groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 210–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Mertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test and reformulation of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rabbie, J. M., & Horowitz, M. (1969). Arousal of ingroup-outgroup bias by a chance to win or loss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 269–277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, K. J., Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (2000). When are we better than them and they worse than us? A closer look at social discrimination in positive and negative domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 64–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sassenberg, K., Kessler, T., & Mummendey, A. (2003). Less negative = more positive? Social discrimination as avoidance and approach. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 48–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament. Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation. The robbers cave experiment. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M., White, B. J., & Harvey, O. J. (1955). Status in experimentally produced groups. American Journal of Sociology, 60, 370–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, C., & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Hrsg.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (S. 61–76). London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Hrsg.), Psychology of intergroup relations (1. Aufl., S. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Hrsg.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2. Aufl., S. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tausch, N., Becker, J. C., Spears, R., Christ, O., Saab, R., Singh, P., & Siddiqui, R. N. (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. Journal of personality and social psychology, 101, 129–148. doi: 10.1037/a0022728.

  • Tischendorf, K. (2007). The impact of complexity of the superordinate category to intergroup relations. Interventive field studies to school mergers. Unveröffentlichte Doktorarbeit, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (Hrsg.). (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldzus, S., & Mummendey, A. (2004). Inclusion in a superordinate category, ingroup prototypicality, and attitudes towards outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 466–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, M., Mummendey, A., & Waldzus, S. (2007). Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 331–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., & Ropp, S. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Kessler .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kessler, T., Fritsche, I. (2018). Toleranz und Diskriminierung zwischen sozialen Gruppen. In: Sozialpsychologie. Basiswissen Psychologie. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93436-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93436-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-17126-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-93436-5

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics