Abstract
As pointed out in the introduction, one core aspect in the scientific literature on occupational sex segregation has been the question of how to measure this phenomenon adequately. As there is a variety of different single number indices, results of relevant studies (see Anker 1998, Blau and Hendricks 1979, Hakim 1979, 1993, Jacobs 1989b, Siltanen 1990) vary widely. Sometimes, even the use of the same index leads to different results (see for example Gross (1968) or Jacobs (1989a) for occupational sex segregation in the US-labour market). This is due to the fact that empirical results of segregation research are widely determined by methodological considerations, research preferences and the quality of data sets (Hakim 1992). In consequence, the question arises whether the amount of segregation has really been recorded in an adequate empirical and theoretical manner, or whether it would rather be necessary to modify existing theories and develop ‘new’ concepts and methods for a better understanding of the phenomenon.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Steinmetz, S. (2012). The problem of the measurement of sex segregation revisited. In: The Contextual Challenges of Occupational Sex Segregation. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93056-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93056-5_3
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-17964-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-531-93056-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)