Zusammenfassung
The concept of individualization shares the problems of other strands of modernization theory, including the theories of functional differentiation, secularization, and value change. There is no doubt that certain structural and ideological developments in the labour market, the family, law, and other societal spheres have increased tendencies of individualization, not only within Western societies, but beyond their borders as well. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of conceptual and methodological clarity about how to analyze the interplay of specific societal processes that enable or prevent, increase or decrease individualization, and about how to distinguish possibly contradictory developments at different levels of social reality. In short: individualization is too often presupposed as a given fact, from which sociological research starts, rather than as a research hypothesis that has to be tested against other possibilities of societal development. Beyond that, it is too often treated as an all-encompassing trend that includes developments in the social structure as well as in the cultural realm, and at the level of agency as well as that of structure, rather than disentangling different developments that may be mutually reinforcing, but may also contradict one another and produce specific conflicts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Allert, Tilmann (1996): Die Familie: Fallstudien zur Unverwüstlichkeit einer Lebensform. Berlin.
Archer, Margaret S. (1996 [1988]): Culture and Agency. Cambridge.
Beck, Ulrich (1992): Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London.
Donnan, Hastings (1988): Marriage among Muslims. Preferences and Choices in Northern Pakistan. Delhi.
Durkheim, Emile (1997 [1897]): Suicide. Glencoe, Illinois.
Economic Survey of Pakistan (2009): Islamabad. Ministry of Finance, Pakistan.
Hildenbrand, Bruno/Bohler, Karl Friedrich/Jahn, Walther/Schmitt, Reinhold (1992): Bauernfamilien im Modernisierungsprozess. Frankfurt/Main.
Jacoby, Hanan G./Mansuri, Ghazala (2008): Watta Satta: Bride Exchange and Women's Welfare in Rural Pakistan. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Kapila, Kriti (2004): Conjugating marriage: State legislation and Gaddi kinship. In: Contribution to Indian Sociology 38, 3: 379–409.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1969): The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Boston.
Macfarlane, Alan (1986): Marriage and love in England: Modes of reproduction 1300–1840. Oxford. Mauss, Marcel (1954): The Gift. Glencoe.
Meek, C.K. (1936): Marriage by Exchange in Nigeria: A Disappearing Institution. In: Africa 9, 1: 64–74.
Merton, Robert K. (1938): Social Structure and Anomie. In: American Sociological Review 3, 5: 672–682.
Molloy, Maureen (1986): No Inclination to Mix with Strangers: Marriage Patterns with Highland Scot Migrants to Cape Breton and New Zealand, 1800–1916. In: Journal of Family History 11, 3: 221–243.
Parsons, Talcott. (1943): The kinship system of the contemporary United States. In: American Anthropologist 45, 1: 22–38.
Schweizer, Thomas/White, Douglas R. (eds.) (1998): Kinship, Networks and Exchange, Cambridge: 245–250.
Strathern, Marilyn (1984): Marriage Exchanges: Melanesian Comment. In: Annual Review of Anthropology 13: 41–74.
Tapper, Nancy (1991): Bartered Brides: Politics Gender and Marriages in an Afghanistan Tribal Society. Cambridge.
Zaman, Muhammad (2008): Socio-Cultural Security, Emotions and Exchange Marriages in an Agrarian Community. In: South Asia Research 28, 3: 285–298.
Zaman, Muhammad (2009): Exchange Marriages in the Community of Kabirwala, Pakistan: A Sociological Analysis of Kinship Structure, Agency, and Symbolic Culture. Dissertation at the University of Leipzig.
Zhang, Weiguo (2000): Dynamics of marriage exchange in Chinese rural society in transition: A study of a northern Chinese village. In: Population Studies 54, 1: 57–69.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zaman, M., Wohlrab-Sahr, M. (2010). Obstructed individualization and social anomie. In: Berger, P., Hitzler, R. (eds) Individualisierungen. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92589-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92589-9_8
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-16983-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-531-92589-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)