Skip to main content

Die Produktion unabhängigen Fernsehens in Großbritannien. Öffentliche Politik, Kreativität und Wachstum

  • Chapter
Handbuch Unterhaltungsproduktion
  • 2903 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Obwohl Großbritannien, wie auch andere europäische Staaten, jedes Jahr immer größere internationale Handelsdefizite vorweist, ist die Produktion von Unterhaltungssendungen und -formaten ein relativ erfolgreicher, kreativer Wirtschaftssektor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Annan, Lord (1977): Report of the Committee on the Future of Broadcasting. Cmnd 6753. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aris, A. and Bughin, J. (2005): Managing Media Companies: Harnessing Creative Value. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilton, C. (2007): Management and Creativity: From Creative Industries to Creative Management. London: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boisot, M. (1998): Knowledge Assets: Securing Competitive Advantage in the Information Economy, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. (1999): European Cable and Satellite Economics, Special Report published by Screen Digest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. (1992): Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. (2000): Creative Industries: Contracts between Art and Commerce. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. (1937): The Nature of the Firm. Reprinted in: Williamson, O. and Winter, S.: The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution and Development 1993: 18–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, T. and Price, D. (2005): Rights of Passage: British Television in the Global Market. London: BTDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dignam, C. (2007): Will small producers be drowned out by the flood of ‚super-indies‘? Independent, July 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, G. (2002): Understanding Media Economics. London and New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, G. and Vick, D. (2005): The Communications Act 2003: A new Regulatory Framework in the UK. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 11 (3): 75–94, August.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner, R. and Anderson, A. (1987): Short-term projects and Emergent Careers: Evidence from Hollywood. American Journal of Sociology 92 (4): 879–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2002): The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D. (2001), ‚What use is a public inquiry? Labour and the 1977 Annan Committee on the Future of Broadcasting‘, Media, Culture & Society, 23 (2): 195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutteridge et al. (2000): We will fight for our rights. Media Supplement: 2–3, Guardian, December 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesmondhalgh, D. (2002): The Cultural Industries. London and New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howkins, J. (2001): The Creative Economy: How People make Money from Ideas. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, W., O’Keefe, A., Scneider, P., Andari R. and Bakhshi, H. (2007): Staying Ahead: The Economic Performance of the UK’s Creative Industries. London: The Work Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • ITC (2002): Programme Supply Review. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (1996): Careers in Project Networks: the case of the Film Industry. In: Arthur, M. and Rousseau, D. (Eds.): The Boundaryless Career. Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (1993): The Origins of Order: Self-Organisation and Selection in Evolution. Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litman, B. (1998): The Economics of Television Networks: New Dimensions and New Alliances. In: Alexander A. et al.: Media Economics: Theory and Practice (2nd Ed), Mahwah, NJ: LEA: 131–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, I., Burke, C. and Stewart, K. (2006): Systems leadership: creating positive organizations. Aldershot, Burlington. VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G. and Albury, D. (2003): Innovation in the Public Sector. At http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/strategy/work_areas/innovation/index.asp.

  • Ofcom (2006a): Review of the Television Production Sector: Consultation Document. London, 10 January 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofcom (2006b): Review of the Television Production Sector: Statement. London, 25 October 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver & Ohlbaum Associates Ltd (2006): UK Television Content in the Digital Age: Opportunities and Challenges. Report for PACT. London: PACT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen B. and Wildman S. (1992): Video Economics. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • PACT (2006): Response to Ofcom Review of the Television Production Sector. London: PACT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, R. (2001): Work histories in television. In: Media, Culture & Society 23 (4): 495–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, A. (1986): Report of the Committee on Financing the BBC. Cmnd 9824. London: HSMO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, A. (2002): Risky Business: Inside the Indies. Glasgow: The Research Center (TRC) for television and Interactivity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, B. (1992): Making Capital from Culture. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saini, A. (2005): TV’s big indies aim for a growth spurt. Observer, June 12 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steemers, J. (2004): British Television in the Global Marketplace. London: BFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towse, R. (2003): A Handbook of Cultural Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. (1997): Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (1998): Our time has come. Broadcast, 30 January: 18–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Katja Lantzsch Klaus-Dieter Altmeppen Andreas Will

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage Gmbh

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Doyle, G., Paterson, R. (2010). Die Produktion unabhängigen Fernsehens in Großbritannien. Öffentliche Politik, Kreativität und Wachstum. In: Lantzsch, K., Altmeppen, KD., Will, A. (eds) Handbuch Unterhaltungsproduktion. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92252-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92252-2_2

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-16001-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-92252-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics