Abstract
Since the end of the Cold War the global security conditions have changed, leading to a continuing increase in the numbers of private suppliers operating in crisis areas and particularly in international interventions. The scope of services offered by private providers in the security sector ranges from consultation, training and logistic support to land mine clearance and combat missions. This results in a blurring of boundaries between military and civil tasks. A rising attention to private security companies (PSCs) cannot only be observed in the media, but also among scientific researchers and — in an early stage - in political debates. The use of PSCs in international interventions by some governments promotes further reflections on this form of security provision. As the war in Iraq has recently shown, the topic is of immediate relevance, supported by the fact that members of the coalition of the willing, and in particular the United States of America (USA), employ nearly 20,000 workers of private security firms. The conjunction of civil — particularly humanitarian — actors and military powers, which is defined by the term civil-military cooperation (CIMIC), entails a bunch of difficulties specifically in the settings of peace support operations (PSOs).
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
There is an effort by Spearin (2001), but he only describes the activities of PSCs in the international context, too.
Cook (2002), e.g., talks about private military firms, but also means private security firms, and calls them ‘today’s mercenaries’.
See also Schreier/ Caparini (2005) who think that Singers’s typology is a good starting point for their research.
Discussions on the use of PSC on the domestic market for the fulfilment of functions for the interior security are mapped in Schreier/ Caparini (2005: 80–86).
Sørensen (2001) analyses the statements of Hobbes on internal security dilemmas and their role in the international relations to offer an introduction to the discussions about the monopoly on the use of force.
Concerning the status of PSCs, Oulton/ Lehmann (2001) give the solution that the so-called SOFAs (Status of Force Agreements) can be extended to PSCs, which would give them the official protection as civilians.
By contrast, Sandoz (1999a, 1999b) sees all private security firms as ‘new mercenaries’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Herbst, K. (2007). Private Security Companies and Civil-Military Cooperation. In: Jäger, T., Kümmel, G. (eds) Private Military and Security Companies. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90313-2_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90313-2_17
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-14901-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-531-90313-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)