Abstract
Existing heritage structures are frequently composed of diverse masonry typologies, corresponding either to various structural members (e.g. arches, walls, piers) or to additions constructed in different eras. The identification of the material properties of the different masonry typologies is usually demanding due to the high cost of the necessary specialized in-situ experimental testing procedures and to the restrictions posed by the cultural value of historical buildings. This lack of information underlines the importance of probabilistic studies considering the uncertainties connected with the evaluation of the material properties. Such activities become essential in studies dealing with the conservation of built cultural heritage against hazardous events, such as earthquakes. This work investigates the seismic vulnerability assessment of large monumental structures with complex geometry. The church of Santa Maria del Mar in Barcelona is considered as a case study, and a representative macro-element of the bay structure is studied against in-plane horizontal loading through pushover analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation is used to estimate the effect of the uncertainties on the material properties, which are considered as random variables. The developed fragility curves express the safety level and the damage expected on the structure for different seismic hazard scenarios.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Unreinforced masonry buildings represent a significant amount of the built heritage in earthquake-prone regions. Past and recent seismic events have demonstrated the low capacity of these structures against horizontal loading, resulting in important losses in terms of human lives and cultural heritage. The gravity of all these losses suggests an urgent need for evaluating the seismic safety of these structures and plan proper interventions, if necessary.
Assessing the vulnerability of existing buildings is a very demanding task involving a high amount of uncertainty in the characterization of their geometry and materials. The study of masonry buildings is often compromised by the high number of uncertainties caused by the variety of structural typologies, the heterogeneity of the materials, the complex morphology of the structural members and the important transformations that, in many cases, they experience during their life. Moreover, in the case of historical constructions, the necessary inspection and experimental activities are often severely limited by their outstanding cultural value.
This paper deals with the seismic vulnerability of complex monumental buildings including the analysis of the uncertainties related to the material properties. The church of Santa Maria del Mar in Barcelona is selected as a representative case study. A two-dimensional Finite Element (FE) model of a typical bay structure of the church has been studied under transversal seismic loads. The uncertain material properties have been considered as random variables. The effect of these uncertainties have been included by analysing a sample of possible material combinations for the same structure, generated by means of a Monte Carlo Simulation. The capacity of each model has been assessed by running 200 non-linear static analyses. Four limit states have been considered for damage grade assessment and the seismic demand has been evaluated by using the N2 method. Finally, analytical fragility curves have been derived, defining the probability of occurrence of each damage grade for different seismic scenarios.
2 Methodology for the Seismic Assessment of Monumental Structures
2.1 Numerical Model
The seismic behaviour of a representative bay (Fig. 1) of the church of Santa Maria del Mar in Barcelona is studied under transversal horizontal loading. A plane-stress FE model has been prepared based on the 3D FE model presented in [1], such that the two models show equivalent response in terms of stiffness and capacity under both gravitational and horizontal in-plane loading proportional to the mass distribution, following the procedure reported in [2, 3]. The structure has been discretized by using 37780 triangular constant strain finite elements and 17749 nodes. The material model adopted for the simulation of the non-linear response of masonry is the rotating smeared cracking model available in the finite element code DIANA-FEA [4]. A parabolic stress-strain relationship has been chosen to simulate the compressive behaviour, while the model presents an exponential softening in tension. These stress-strain relationships are regularized according to the crack-bandwidth approach.
The seismic performance of the studied macro-element has been evaluated by means of a non-linear static (pushover) analysis performed in two steps. The first one includes the application of the vertical gravitational loads and the second one the seismic horizontal load proportional to the mass. A regular Newton Raphson method with an arc-length strategy has been used to solve the corresponding nonlinear equations at each step of the analysis. Both force and displacement criteria have been used to check convergence at each analysis step with a tolerance of 0.01. The performed analyses include the effect of both material and geometrical non-linearity.
2.2 Uncertainty of the Material Parameters
The mechanical parameters necessary for the structural analysis are commonly determined by in-situ or laboratory tests. These data are uncertain due to the natural variation of mechanical properties (i.e. aleatoric uncertainty) and the impossibility to achieve a complete knowledge of their variation within the structure (i.e. epistemic uncertainty). This work considers the uncertainty related to three mechanical parameters of masonry, namely the tensile strength, the compressive strength and the elastic modulus.
According to available studies on the church, four categories of structural members with similar mechanical properties can be distinguished, see Fig. 1. Among them, the vaults and the single-leaf walls have been considered as a reference material, and the mechanical properties of the rest are defined as a function of the reference ones. Six parameters have been considered and modelled as random variables. Three of them are mechanical properties of the reference material, i.e. the compressive strength fc, the tensile strength ft and the elastic modulus E. These parameters possess both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties and can vary according to a log-normal probability density function, in agreement with [5, 6]. Table 1 presents the mean (μ), log-normal mean (μln) and standard deviation (σln), which have been chosen following the suggestions in [5]. Figure 2 presents the distribution of fc, ft and E for the reference material, with the mean and standard deviation values of Table 1.
The mechanical properties of the rest of the materials of the structure have been defined to be proportional to the reference ones, with coefficients of proportionality, Cc for the columns, Wc for the three-leaf walls and heavy infill of the vaults and Ic for the light infill of the vaults. These coefficients are assumed to possess only epistemic uncertainties and, for this reason, uniform distributions have been adopted to define the corresponding random variables. Table 2 presents the ranges of variation for these coefficients. Note that these values have been selected such that the possible material parameters are in agreement with the suggestions of [7]. Finally, the tensile and compressive fracture energy have been defined as a function of the compressive strength fc as \( G_{f}^{t} = 0.025\left( {f_{c} /10} \right)^{0.7} \) and \( G_{f}^{c} = df_{c} \) according to [8, 9], with the ductility index d = 1.6 mm. For more details on the selection of the random variables see [10].
Based on the aforementioned assumptions, and for comparison purposes as will be shown in Sect. 3.1, a reference model has been developed by defining the mechanical properties according to the mean values of table C8A.2.1 of the Appendix C8A of [7], which are presented in Table 3.
2.3 Methodology for Uncertainty Analysis
2.3.1 Uncertainty Analysis
The effect of the material uncertainty on the seismic response is evaluated through a Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS). By means of MCS, N = 200 different numerical models for the same structure have been generated within the input space Rn, where n = 6 is the number of the assumed input random variables. Each random variable is distributed according to the selected probability distribution and interval of variation, see Sect. 2.2. Subsequently, a mapping model (Fig. 3) maps each sample to the results’ space \( Z \subseteq R^{m} \), where m is the number of the result variables that need to be evaluated. In this work the m variables are the peak ground accelerations for each of the four defined limit states (i.e. m = 4), which represent the seismic demand, see Sect. 2.3.2. The methodology of this study is schematized in Fig. 3 and is based on the “method C” proposed in [5].
2.3.2 Seismic Demand
The seismic demand of the analysed structure has been defined considering four limit states according to the mechanical method proposed in [11]. Those limit states (Table 4) are a function of the yield (dy) and ultimate displacements (du) of the idealized capacity curve corresponding to the equivalent single degree of freedom system. The latter idealized curve has been constructed according to [12], with the ultimate displacement identified in correspondence to a decrease of 20% of the maximum load capacity of the structure.
The acceleration spectrum used is the one proposed by the Eurocode 8 [12] considering the type of Soil D, according to the studies carried out on the foundation soil of the church [13]. The N2 method procedure [14] has been used to identify the peak ground acceleration (PGA) necessary to produce each damage limit state.
3 Results
3.1 Capacity Curves
Figure 4a shows the 200 capacity curves in terms of spectral displacement (Sd) against spectral accelerations (Sa), as well as the 16%, 50% and 84% percentile curves. The last ones are curves representing the Sa level that is not exceeded by 16%, 50% and 84% of the individual capacity curves for every Sd value, making reference to a normal distribution of Sa [15]. It is easy to distinguish two groups of capacity curves with important differences in load and displacement capacities. The first group exhibits a horizontal acceleration capacity lower than 0.08 g and a very brittle post-peak response. This low ductility is due to the collapse of the right buttress due to shear cracking, as shown in Fig. 5a. The percentile curves demonstrate that the cases resulting in this collapse mechanism are below 16% of the total analysed cases. The rest of the models predict a global collapse mechanism, characterized by cracking in the main and lateral naves and cracking at the right and left buttresses, as shown in Fig. 5b. These cases show higher capacity and ductility levels compared to the ones affected by the local collapse mechanism.
Figure 4b presents the mean, median (50% percentile) capacity curves, together with the pushover curve of the reference case having the properties presented in Table 3. The higher position of the median curve compared to the mean, implies that for each displacement the capacity curves below the median are located slightly farther from the median than the capacity curves above it. This is more evident in Fig. 4a, where the curves below the median appear significantly more dispersed than the curves above, especially in terms of spectral acceleration. Consequently, for the adopted distributions of the uncertain parameters, for the given Sd the distribution of Sa is unsymmetrical and shifted to the higher values. The capacity curve obtained with the reference model is much higher than the mean curve and the median one. This implies that samples with one or more of the input parameters below the mean push the capacity curve downwards than samples above it push it upwards. Consequently, the use of a single numerical model with deterministic mechanical properties, even though following the suggested values from the literature, would overestimate the structural capacity for the analysed case.
3.2 Seismic Fragility
The seismic fragility of the structure has been defined in terms of fragility curves, representing the probability that the structure will reach or overcome the considered limit state as a function of the PGA.
Fragility functions have been built according to the analytical formulation proposed in [16] in terms of PGA for each limit state, see Fig. 6. The vertical line for 0.04 g represents the expected PGA in the city of Barcelona.
Figure 7 illustrates the probability of damage occurrence corresponding to each limit state. The expected seismic demand in Barcelona is sufficient to reach just the first limit state (LS1), since the corresponding probability of occurrence is equal to 100%. This limit state corresponds to important damage at the buttresses above the vaults of the lateral naves for both the possible collapse mechanisms, as shown in Figs. 8 and 9. The second limit state has a probability of occurrence equal to 50%, and is associated with more cracking at the vaults and buttresses at the lateral naves for all the studied cases, as well as important shear cracking for the cases resulting in the local shear failure of the right buttress (second column of Figs. 8 and 9). A noticeably low probability is reached for the third and the fourth limit states, equal respectively to 12% and 5%. The associated damage for these two limit states are presented in the third and fourth columns of Figs. 8 and 9. The results demonstrate that for the actual earthquake demand, the probability of occurrence of the collapse is very low.
4 Conclusions
This paper presented a vulnerability assessment of the typical bay of Santa Maria del Mar church in Barcelona considering the uncertainties associated with the material properties. A plane-stress model has been constructed and studied against horizontal transversal loading. A set of uncertain material properties have been considered in the numerical analysis as random variables. The seismic demand has been defined in terms of four limit states, representing different damage grades in the structure. The adopted methodology predicts that two collapse mechanisms are possible for the analysed structure. The first is a local one, not involving one of the lateral buttresses and the second is a global collapse mechanism with damage in the main and lateral naves as well as cracking in the lateral buttresses. The obtained results, expressed in terms of fragility curves for the different limit states, show that for the seismic hazard of Barcelona the analysed tranversal bay of the church would present, in case of earthquake, important damage affecting the buttresses above the vaults of the lateral naves, but with low probability of collapse.
References
Murcia J (2008) Seismic analysis of Santa Maria del Mar Church in Barcelona. M.Sc. thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Roca P, Cervera M, Pelà L et al (2013) Continuum FE models for the analysis of Mallorca Cathedral. Eng Struct 46:653–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.08.005
Petromichelakis Y, Saloustros S, Pelà L (2014) Seismic assessment of historical masonry construction including uncertainty. In: Cunha Á, Caetano E, Ribeiro P, et al (eds) 9th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2014, pp 297–304
TNO (2017) DIsplacement method ANAlyser (DIANA FEA), release 10.1, Delft, Netherlands
CNR-DT 212/213 (2014) Guide for the Probabilistic assessment of the seismic safety of existing buildings. Rome, Italy
Park J, Towashiraporn P, Craig JI, Goodno BJ (2009) Seismic fragility analysis of low-rise unreinforced masonry structures. Eng Struct 31:125–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.07.021
Italian Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport (2009) Circolare 2 febbraio 2009, n. 617, Istruzioni per l’applicazione delle “Nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni” di cui al decreto ministeriale 14 gennaio 2008, Rome, Italy
Comite Euro-International Du Beton (1990) CEB-FIP Model code 1990: Design code
Lourenço PB (1996) Computational strategies for masonry structures. Delft University of Technology
Contrafatto FR (2017) Vulnerability assessment of monumental masonry structures including uncertainty. M.Sc. thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Lagomarsino S, Giovinazzi S (2006) Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 4:415–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-006-9024-z
EN 1998-1 (Eurocode 8) (2003) Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1 general rules seismic actions and rules for buildings
PATRIMONI-UB Estudi geotècnic en primera fase per a la diagnosi de pathologies afectant determinants sectors de la basilica de Santa Maria del Mar, a Barcelona. (in Spanish)
Fajfar P (2000) A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthq Spectra 16:573–592. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586128
Federal Emergency Management Agency (2010) HAZUS-MH MR4: technical manual, vol. earthquake model. Washington, DC
ATC-58 (2009) Guidelines for seismic performance assessment of buildings, applied technology council. Redwood City, California
Acknowledgments
This research has received the financial support from the MINECO (Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad of the Spanish Government) and the ERDF (European Regional Development Fund) through the MULTIMAS project with reference number BIA2015-63882-P. The work was also supported by the European Union within the framework of the Erasmus Mundus Advanced Master in Structural Analysis of Monuments and Historical Constructions (SAHC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 RILEM
About this paper
Cite this paper
Saloustros, S., Pelà, L., Contrafatto, F.R., Roca, P., Petromichelakis, I. (2019). Vulnerability Assessment of Monumental Masonry Structures Including Uncertainty. In: Aguilar, R., Torrealva, D., Moreira, S., Pando, M.A., Ramos, L.F. (eds) Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions. RILEM Bookseries, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99441-3_131
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99441-3_131
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99440-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99441-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)