Abstract
The possible, in educational terms, suggests the pedagogical potential of schooling to help children and young persons to change their perceptions about their imagined worlds of the future. It also highlights the possibilities for learning and development for all. Yet international evidence suggests that the potentials of many young people from economically and socially disadvantaged backgrounds and/or with a special educational need or disability are not currently met by many school systems. In addressing these issues, there is a considerable body of educational research in the fields of inclusion, social justice, and child and adolescent development that draws on the theoretical body of work developed by the Soviet psychologist Lev Vygotsky. Most of these studies draw on either sociocultural or cultural historical activity theory, both of which can be traced back to Vygotsky’s work on learning and development with a respective focus on semiotic mediation and speech as a cultural tool or human activity systems. Both theories attempt to provide a nondualist account of the social, cultural, and historical factors that influence human development. This has important pedagogic implications for considerations of the processes and possibilities of teaching and learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bozhovich, L. I. (2009). The social situation of child development. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 47, 59–86.
Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analyses of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in a cultural context (pp. 39–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Daniels, H. (2005). Vygotsky and educational psychology: Some preliminary remarks. Educational and Child Psychology, 22(1), 6–17.
Daniels, H. (2017). Introduction to Vygotsky (3rd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
Derry, J. (2008). Abstract rationality in education: From Vygotsky to Brandom. Studies in the Philosophy of Education, 27, 49–62.
Engeström, Y. (2009). The future of activity theory: A rough draft. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutierrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 303–328). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Holzman, L., & Newman, F. (1993). Lev Vygotsky: Revolutionary scientist. London: Routledge.
Kozulin, A. (1999). Vygotsky’s psychology: A biography of ideas. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Luria, A. R. (1981). Language and cognition. New York: Wiley.
Mahn, H. (2003). Periods in child development; Vygotsky’s perspective. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in a cultural context (pp. 119–137). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smagorinsky, P. (2011). Vygotsky’s stage theory: The psychology of art and the actor under the direction of perezhivanie. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 18(4), 319–341.
Thompson, I. (2015). Researching contradictions: Cultural historical activity theory research (CHAT) in the English classroom. English in Australia., 50(3), 21–26.
Thompson, I., & Tawell, A. (2017). Becoming other: Social and emotional development through the creative arts for young people with behavioural difficulties. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 22(1), 18–34.
Van der Veer, R. (2014). Lev Vygotsky. London: Bloomsbury.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Vol.1. Problems of general psychology (including the volume thinking and speech). New York: Plenum Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1991). Imagination and creativity in the adolescent. Soviet Psychology, 29, 73–88.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1993). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 2: The fundamentals of defectology. New York: Plenum Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Vol. 5. Child psychology. New York: Plenum Press.
Wartofsky, M. (1979). Perception, representation, and the forms of action: Towards an historical epistemology. In M. Wartofsky (Ed.), Models: Representation and the scientific understanding (pp. 188–210). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Yaroshevsky, M. (1989). Lev Vygotsky. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Thompson, I. (2022). The Possible in the Life and Work of Lev Vygotsky. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_144-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_144-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
The Possible in the Life and Work of Lev Vygotsky- Published:
- 02 June 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_144-2
-
Original
Vygotsky- Published:
- 01 August 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_144-1