Skip to main content

Automation of the Ecodesign Process for Industry 4.0

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems in Production Engineering and Maintenance (ISPEM 2018)

Abstract

One of the key aspects of Industry 4.0 is high automation of various processes conducted through product lifecycle. In the article the authors consider the issue of final stages of product lifecycle and the automation of product assessment from ecological point-of-view in the context of Industry 4.0. The automation of product assessment is conducted by set of measures, calculated from special type of product model called Recycling Model of Product, that is also showed in the paper. The Recycling Model of Product and the assessment are conducted using dedicated module, operating in CAD 3D system environment. The assessment of example product is presented in the paper as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dekoninck, E.A., Domingo, L., O’Hare, J.A., Pigosso, D.C.A., Reyes, T., Troussier, N.: Defining the challenges for ecodesign implementation in companies: development and consolidation of a framework. J. Clean. Prod. 135, 410–425 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kara, S., Ibbotson, S., Kayis, B.: Sustainable product development in practice: an international survey. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 25(6), 848–872 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anuszewska, I.: Sustainable production patterns (SPP) in enterprises – a proposal of systemic solutions supporting the implementation of SPP in SMEs, a report on the qualitative part of the study (in Polish: Wzorce zrównoważonej produkcji (WZP) w działalności przedsiębiorstw – propozycja rozwiązań systemowych wspierających wdrażanie WZP w MSP, raport z części jakościowej badania). EFS POKL (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rodrigues, V.P., Pigosso, D.C.A., McAloone, T.C.: Measuring the implementation of ecodesign management practices: a review and consolidation of process-oriented performance indicators. J. Clean. Prod. 156, 293–309 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rojek, I., Dostatni, E., Hamrol, A.: Ecodesign of technological processes with the use of decision trees method. In: Pérez García, H., et al. (eds.) Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 649, pp. 318–327. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. McAloone, T., Bey, N.: Environmental Improvement through Product Development. A guide. Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dostatni, E., Diakun, J., Grajewski, D., Wichniarek, R., Karwasz, A.: Multi-agent system to support decision-making process in design for recycling. Soft. Comput. 20, 4347–4361 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pigosso, D.C.A., McAloone, T.C., Rozenfeld, H.: Characterization of the state-of-the-art and identification of main trends for ecodesign tools and methods: classifying three decades of research and implementation. J. Indian Inst. Sci. 94(4), 405–427 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pigosso, D.C.A., Rozenfeld, H., McAloone, T.C.: Ecodesign maturity model: a management framework to support ecodesign implementation into manufacturing companies. J. Clean. Prod. 59, 160–173 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bovea, M.D., Gallardo, A.: The influence of impact assessment methods on materials selection for eco-design. Mater. Des. 27, 209–215 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Köhler, A.R.: Challenges for eco-design of emerging technologies: the case of electronic textiles. Mater. Des. 51, 51–60 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kiurski, J.S., Maric, B.B., Oros, I.B., Keci, V.S.: The ecodesign practice in Serbian printing industry. J. Clean. Prod. 149, 1200–1209 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stadnicka, D., Zielecki, W., Sęp, J.: Industry 4.0 – assessment of implementation possibilities on the example of a selected enterprise, (In Polish: Koncepcja Przemysł 4.0 - ocena możliwości wdrożenia na przykładzie wybranego przedsiębiorstwa). In: Knosala, R. (ed.) Innovations in Management and Production Engineering (in Polish: Innowacje w zarządzaniu i inżynierii produkcji), vol. 1, pp. 472–483. Oficyna Wydawnicza Polskiego Towarzystwa Zarządzania Produkcją, Opole (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bembenek, B.: Industry clusters 4.0 within sustainable knowledge-based economy (Klastry Przemysłu 4.0 w zrównoważonej gospodarce opartej na wiedzy). Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics, vol. 491, pp. 31–44 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pejs, K., Patalas-Maliszewska, J.: Manufacturing enterprise module in 4.0 formula (in Polish: Model przedsiębiorstwa produkcyjnego w formule 4.0). In: Patalas-Maliszewska, J., Sasiadek, M., Jakubowski, J. (eds.) Production Engineering. Process Quality and Effectiveness (in Polish: Inżynieria produkcji. Jakość i efektywność procesów), vol. 11, pp. 53–64. Instytut Informatyki i Zarządzania Produkcją, Zielona Góra (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pluciński, M., Mularczyk, K.: Industry 4.0 in Polish Manufacturing Companies - Chances and Risks (in Polish: Przemysł 4.0 w polskich przedsiębiorstwach produkcyjnych – szanse i zagrożenia). In: Mazurek-Kucharska, B., Dębski, M. (eds.) Management of a small and medium-sized enterprise in Poland. Innovative strategies, tools and implementations (in Polish: Zarządzanie małym i średnim przedsiębiorstwem w Polsce), Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, vol. 17, pp. 311–314. SAN, Łódź-Warsaw (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Heng, S.: Industrie 4.0 – Upgrade des Industriestandorts Deutschland steht bevor. In: Slomka, L. (ed.) Aktuelle Themen, pp. 2–16. Deutsche Bank Research, Frankfurt am Main (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Industrie 4.0 – Volkswirtschaftliches Potenzial für Deutschland. Studie, BITKOM, Berlin (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Industrie 4.0. Chancen und Herausforderungen der vierten industriellen Revolution. Studie, PWC. https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/media/file/Industrie-4-0.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2018

  20. Wolter, M.I., Mönnig, A., Hummel, M., Schneemann, Ch., Weber, E., Zika, G., Helmrich, R., Maier, T., Neuber-Pohl, C.: Industrie 4.0 und die Folgen für Arbeitsmarkt und Wirtschaft. IAB Forschungsbericht, Aktuelle Ergebnisse aus der Projektarbeit des Instituts für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung. http://doku.iab.de/forschungsbericht/2015/fb0815.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2018

  21. Deutschland droht die Zukunft zu verschlafen. http://www.welt.de/135151615. Accessed 10 Apr 2018

  22. Kiraga, K.: Industry 4.0 - the fourth industrial revolution according to Festo (in Polish: Przemysł 4.0 – czwarta rewolucja przemysłowa według Festo). Autobusy, vol. 12, pp. 1603–1605 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Roblek, V., Mesko, M., Krapez, A.: A complex view of industry 4.0. Sage Open 6(2), 1–11 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuczmaszewski, J.: HR training for “Industry 4” (in Polish: Kształcenie kadr dla „Przemysł 4”). In: Knosala, R. (ed.) Conference materials Innowacje w Zarządzaniu i Inżynierii Produkcji, Zakopane 2018, pp. 149–154. Oficyna Wydawnicza Polskiego Towarzystwa Zarządzania Produkcją (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zawadzki, P., Żywicki, K.: Smart product design and production control for effective mass customization in the industry 4.0 concept. Manag. Prod. Eng. Rev. 7(3), 105–112 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rojek, I.: Technological process planning by the use of neural networks. Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. 31(1), 1–15 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kokot, W., Kolenda, P.: What is the Internet of Things (in Polish: Czym jest Internet Rzeczy). In: Internet Rzeczy w Polsce, IAB Polska. https://iab.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Raport-Internet-Rzeczy-w-Polsce.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2018

  28. Ziernicka-Wojtaszek, A.: Industrial revolution 4.0 and ecology and meteorology - inspirations and perspectives. Technical review. (in Polish: Rewolucja przemysłowa 4.0 a ekologia i meteorologia - inspiracje i perspektywy. Przegląd Techniczny). Gazeta inżynierska, vol. 25, pp. 14–15 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Piątek, Z.: What is Industry 4.0? - part 1 (in Polish: Czym jest Przemysł 4.0? – część 1). http://przemysl-40.pl/index.php/2017/03/22/czym-jest-przemysl-4-0/. Accessed 10 Apr 2018

  30. Brenner, W., Zarnekow, R., Wittig, H.: Intelligente Softwareagenten Grundlagen und Anwendungen. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Wooldridge, M.J.: An Introduction to Multiagent System. Wiley, Hoboken (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dostatni, E., Diakun, J., Grajewski, D., Wichniarek, R., Karwasz, A.: Functionality assessment of ecodesign support system. Manag. Prod. Eng. Rev. 6(1), 10–15 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dostatni, E., Diakun, J., Grajewski, D., Wichniarek, R., Karwasz, A.: Multi-agent system to support decision-making process in ecodesign. In: Herrero, Á., Sedano, J., Baruque, B., Quintián, H., Corchado, E. (eds.) 10th International Conference on Soft Computing Models in Industrial and Environmental Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 368, pp. 463–474. Springer, Cham (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dostatni, E., Diakun, J., Wichniarek, R., Karwasz, A., Grajewski, D.: Product variants recycling cost estimation with the use of multi-agent support system. In: Hamrol, A., Ciszak, O., Legutko, S., Jurczyk, M. (eds.) Advances in Manufacturing. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 48, pp. 311–320. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rachuri, S., Subrahmanian, E., Bouras, A., Fenves, S.J., Foufou, S., Sriram, R.D.: Information sharing and exchange in the context of product lifecycle management: role of standards. Comput. Aided Des. 40(7), 789–800 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacek Diakun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dostatni, E., Diakun, J., Grajewski, D., Wichniarek, R., Karwasz, A. (2019). Automation of the Ecodesign Process for Industry 4.0. In: Burduk, A., Chlebus, E., Nowakowski, T., Tubis, A. (eds) Intelligent Systems in Production Engineering and Maintenance. ISPEM 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 835. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97490-3_51

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics