Abstract
The establishment of the Croatian legal aid system in civil matters was a consequence of Croatia’s accession to the European Union. Lack of comprehensive assessment of citizens’ needs and lack of systematic research on the costs of legal aid resulted in an insufficient normative background. Uncertainty and the lack of flexibility of some of the provisions of the Legal Aid Act effectively precluded many citizens from obtaining legal aid. Matters were such that the Croatian Constitutional Court intervened by abolishing some of the Act’s key provisions. The new Legal Aid Act was supposed to cope with all the identified problems. Simplification and increased flexibility of threshold rules, in combination with policy changes with regard to financing of legal aid providers, promised a greater possibility to access justice in civil matters. This contribution assesses the extent to which the normative transformation of the Croatian legal aid system was indeed successful in achieving the goals of recent reform attempts.
This contribution is the result of research supported by the Croatian Science Foundation (project no. 6988).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Some of the defendants were statutorily obliged to appoint defense counsel, while others could apply to the court for legal aid if they could not afford one. See Articles 65, 66 Criminal Procedure Act 97.
- 2.
Legal Aid Act (2008).
- 3.
Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia (2011).
- 4.
Legal Aid Act (2013).
- 5.
Legal Aid Act Final Proposal (2013) Vlada Republike Hrvatske, Zagreb. https://vlada.gov.hr/UserDocsImages//Sjednice/Arhiva//123.%20-%206.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2018. See specifically pp 24, 25.
- 6.
Cf. Article 8 LAA 2008 and Article 14 LAA 2013.
- 7.
Legal Aid Act Final Proposal (2013), 27, 28.
- 8.
Report of the Ministry of Justice on the Functioning of the Judiciary (2016) Vlada Republike Hrvatske, Zagreb. https://pravosudje.gov.hr/vijesti/izvjesce-o-radu-sudova-za-2016-godinu/14727. Accessed 7 June 2018.
- 9.
The number includes cases in which lawyers represented clients before the courts, administrative bodies, in ADR and special types of proceedings.
- 10.
It could, however, be argued as to whether such inclusion was indeed effective. In a recent study, the number of waivers was shown to be more than five times smaller than the number of enforcement proceedings, which had been initiated due to the non-payment of court fees and which turned out to be unsuccessful for more than a year. Presumably, those court fees should have been waived, which shows that the waiver system does not function properly. See Brozović (2017).
- 11.
Statement of the Commission on Legal Aid (2013), 17 September 2013. Unpublished.
- 12.
A meeting was held in November 2014 to address the novelties in the system and to discuss various issues regarding the project proposals and their implementation.
- 13.
CEPEJ (2014, 46).
- 14.
CEPEJ (2016, 72).
- 15.
CEPEJ STAT (2017). See specifically Quantitative data (for 2013, 2012 or 2014) for exact numbers and country-specific data (for 2013, 2012 or 2014) for methodology explanations.
- 16.
CEPEJ (2016, 49).
- 17.
- 18.
CEPEJ (2016, 90). The number is slightly higher since Croatia has special misdemeanor courts, as well as a High Misdemeanor Court. If they are excluded, the number would still be high: 32.29.
- 19.
Their number has increased over the years. In 2014, Croatia had 166.5 non-court officials for every 100,000 inhabitants, i.e. 2.5 times the European average (CEPEJ 2016, 149). If specialized misdemeanor courts are excluded, the number is 137.95, which still makes it double the European average.
- 20.
Statement of the Commission on Legal Aid (2013), 17 September 2013. Unpublished.
- 21.
See State Budget of the Republic of Croatia for 2018 Proposal (2017) Croatian Parliament, Zagreb. http://www.sabor.hr/prijedlog-drzavnog-proracuna-rh-2018. Accessed 7 June 2018.
- 22.
Cf. Report of the Ministry of Justice on Legal Aid and Expenditure of State Funds (2014, p 13); Report of the Ministry of Justice on Legal Aid and Expenditure of State Funds, p 14; and Report of the Ministry of Justice on Legal Aid and Expenditure of State Funds (2016, p 14). All reports are published on the web page of the Ministry of Justice. https://pravosudje.gov.hr/vijesti/izvjesce-o-radu-sudova-za-2016-godinu/14727. Accessed 7 June 2018.
- 23.
Cf. Arts. 45 and 46 LAA 2013.
- 24.
Legal Aid Act Final Proposal (2008) Vlada Republike Hrvatske, Zagreb. http://www.sabor.hr/fgs.axd?id=11688. Accessed 7 June 2018. See specifically p 45.
- 25.
Reports are hidden within numerous other reports thematically unconnected to legal aid. There is no hyperlink on the web page giving information on legal aid.
- 26.
References
Brozović J (2017) Oslobođenje od sudskih pristojbi kao preduvjet ostvarenja prava na pristup pravosuđu. Pravni vjesnik. J Law Soc Sci Fac Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer Univ Osijek 33(3–4):41–70
CEPEJ (2014) Report on European judicial systems—edition 2014 (2012 data): efficiency and quality of justice. https://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/cepej/evaluation/2014/Rapport_2014_en.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2018
CEPEJ (2016) European judicial systems. Efficiency and quality of justice. CEPEJ STUDIES No. 23. https://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/cepej/evaluation/2016/publication/CEPEJ%20Study%2023%20report%20EN%20web.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2018
CEPEJ (2017) Statistical database. https://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/cepej/evaluation/2016/STAT/. Accessed 7 June 2018
Criminal Procedure Act (Zakon o kaznenom postupku), Official Journal, No. 110/97, 27/98, 58/99, 112/99, 58/02, 143/02, 115/06
Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia (2011), 6 April 2011, No. U-I-722/2009
Jelinić Z, Knol Radoja K (2014) Analiza hrvatskoga sustava besplatne pravne pomoći u građanskim stvarima u svjetlu dosadašnje prakse Europskoga suda za ljudska prava. Pravni vjesnik. J Law Soc Sci Fac Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer Univ Osijek 30(2):185–211
Johnsen J, Stawa G, Uzelac A (2011) Evaluation of the Croatian legal aid act and its implementation. Human Rights Centre—Centar za ljudska prava, Zagreb
Legal Aid Act (Zakon o besplatnoj pravnoj pomoći), Official Journal, No. 62/2008, 44/2011, 81/2011, 143/2013
Legal Aid Act (Zakon o besplatnoj pravnoj pomoći). Official Journal, No. 143/2013
Legal Aid Act Final Proposal (2008) Vlada Republike Hrvatske, Zagreb. http://www.sabor.hr/fgs.axd?id=11688. Accessed 7 June 2018
Legal Aid Act Final Proposal (2013) Vlada Republike Hrvatske, Zagreb. https://vlada.gov.hr/UserDocsImages//Sjednice/Arhiva//123.%20-%206.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2018
Report of the Ministry of Justice on the Functioning of the Judiciary (2016) Vlada Republike Hrvatske, Zagreb. https://pravosudje.gov.hr/vijesti/izvjesce-o-radu-sudova-za-2016-godinu/14727. Accessed 7 June 2018
Report of the Ministry of Justice on Legal Aid and Expenditure of State Funds (2009) Ministarstvo pravosuđa, Zagreb. https://pravosudje.gov.hr/pristup-informacijama-6341/strategije-planovi-i-izvjesca/izvjesce-o-ostvarivanju-prava-na-besplatnu-pravnu-pomoc-i-utrosku-sredstava/6723. Accessed 7 June 2018
Report of the Ministry of Justice on Legal Aid and Expenditure of State Funds (2010) Ministarstvo pravosuđa, Zagreb. https://pravosudje.gov.hr/pristup-informacijama-6341/strategije-planovi-i-izvjesca/izvjesce-o-ostvarivanju-prava-na-besplatnu-pravnu-pomoc-i-utrosku-sredstava/6723. Accessed 7 June 2018
Report of the Ministry of Justice on Legal Aid and Expenditure of State Funds (2011) Ministarstvo pravosuđa, Zagreb. https://pravosudje.gov.hr/pristup-informacijama-6341/strategije-planovi-i-izvjesca/izvjesce-o-ostvarivanju-prava-na-besplatnu-pravnu-pomoc-i-utrosku-sredstava/6723. Accessed 7 June 2018
Report of the Ministry of Justice on Legal Aid and Expenditure of State Funds (2012) Ministarstvo pravosuđa, Zagreb. https://pravosudje.gov.hr/pristup-informacijama-6341/strategije-planovi-i-izvjesca/izvjesce-o-ostvarivanju-prava-na-besplatnu-pravnu-pomoc-i-utrosku-sredstava/6723. Accessed 7 June 2018
Report of the Ministry of Justice on Legal Aid and Expenditure of State Funds (2013) Ministarstvo pravosuđa, Zagreb. https://pravosudje.gov.hr/pristup-informacijama-6341/strategije-planovi-i-izvjesca/izvjesce-o-ostvarivanju-prava-na-besplatnu-pravnu-pomoc-i-utrosku-sredstava/6723. Accessed 7 June 2018
Report of the Ministry of Justice on Legal Aid and Expenditure of State Funds (2014) Ministarstvo pravosuđa, Zagreb. https://pravosudje.gov.hr/pristup-informacijama-6341/strategije-planovi-i-izvjesca/izvjesce-o-ostvarivanju-prava-na-besplatnu-pravnu-pomoc-i-utrosku-sredstava/6723. Accessed 7 June 2018
Report of the Ministry of Justice on Legal Aid and Expenditure of State Funds (2015) Ministarstvo pravosuđa, Zagreb. https://pravosudje.gov.hr/pristup-informacijama-6341/strategije-planovi-i-izvjesca/izvjesce-o-ostvarivanju-prava-na-besplatnu-pravnu-pomoc-i-utrosku-sredstava/6723. Accessed 7 June 2018
Report of the Ministry of Justice on Legal Aid and Expenditure of State Funds (2016) Ministarstvo pravosuđa, Zagreb. https://pravosudje.gov.hr/pristup-informacijama-6341/strategije-planovi-i-izvjesca/izvjesce-o-ostvarivanju-prava-na-besplatnu-pravnu-pomoc-i-utrosku-sredstava/6723. Accessed 7 June 2018
Report of the Ministry of Justice on Legal Aid and Expenditure of State Funds (2017) Ministarstvo pravosuđa, Zagreb. https://vlada.gov.hr/UserDocsImages//Sjednice/2017/04%20travanj/29%20sjednica%20Vlade%20Republike%20Hrvatske//29%20-%2010.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2018
State Budget of the Republic of Croatia for 2018 Proposal (2017) Croatian Parliament, Zagreb. http://www.sabor.hr/prijedlog-drzavnog-proracuna-rh-2018. Accessed 7 June 2018
Statement of the Commission on Legal Aid (2013), 17 September 2013. Unpublished
Triva S, Dika M (2004) Građansko parnično procesno pravo. Narodne novine, Zagreb
Uzelac A, Preložnjak B (2012) The development of legal aid systems in the Western Balkans. A study of controversial reforms in Croatia and Serbia. Kritisk Iuss. Utgitt av Rettspolitisk Forening (Liber amicorum – Jon T. Johnsen) 38(3–4):261–287
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brozović, J. (2018). Transformation of the Croatian Legal Aid System: From Normative to Functional Insufficiency. In: Uzelac, A., van Rhee, C. (eds) Transformation of Civil Justice. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 70. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97358-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97358-6_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97357-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97358-6
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)