Abstract
Thanks to its brilliant melding of film noir, science fiction, and cyberpunk motifs, not to mention its stirring music and unprecedented visual density, Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner (1982/2007) has become an influential cultural icon. What really sets the film apart from most movies, however, are the ways in which it encourages philosophical questions. Virtually all commentators agree that “What does it mean to be human?” – understood as asking something like “What characterizes the real (or authentic) human being?” – is the central philosophical question the film raises. Attempting to answer that question can be a fertile approach to the film, with moral implications for how to think about the qualifications for inclusion in the human community. That is not, however, the only way to appreciate the philosophical significance of Blade Runner. The film also encourages viewers to ponder the question, “What fundamental experiences constitute the uniquely human mode of self-consciousness?” Showing how the latter question leads to a richer appreciation of Blade Runner as philosophy is the aim of this chapter.
References
Andersen, Nathan. 2005. Is film the alien other to philosophy? Philosophy as film in Mulhall’s On Film. Film and Philosophy 9: 1–11.
Barad, Judith. 2009. Blade Runner and Sartre: The boundaries of humanity. In The philosophy of Neo-Noir, ed. M.T. Conard, 21–34. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
Bukatman, Scott. 2012. Blade runner. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Carroll, Noel. 2006. Philosophizing through the moving image: The case of Serene Velocity. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (1): 173–185.
Cavell, Stanley. 1979. The world viewed: Reflections on the ontology of film, enlarged edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Coplan, Amy, and David Davies, eds. 2015. Blade runner. London: Routledge.
Descartes, René. 1998. Discourse on method, and Meditations on first philosophy. 4th ed. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Dick, Philip K. 1980. Philip K. Dick on philosophy: A brief interview. In The shifting realities of Philip K. Dick: Selected literary and philosophical writings, ed. L. Sutin, 44–47. New York: Vintage Books, 1995.
Francavilla, Joseph. 1997. The android as Doppelgänger. In Retrofitting Blade Runner: Issues in Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner and Philip K. Dick’s Do androids dream of electric sheep? ed. Judith B. Kerman, 2nd ed., 4–15. Bowling Green: Bowling Green University Press.
Kerman, Judith B., ed. 1997. Retrofitting Blade Runner: Issues in Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner and Philip K. Dick’s Do androids dream of electric sheep? 2nd ed. Bowling Green: Bowling Green University Press.
Knapp, Laurence F., and Andrea F. Kulas, eds. 2005. Ridley Scott: Interviews. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
Kolb, William M. 1997. Script to screen: Blade Runner in perspective. In Retrofitting Blade Runner: Issues in Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner and Philip K. Dick’s Do androids dream of electric sheep? ed. J.B. Kerman, 2nd ed., 132–153. Bowling Green: Bowling Green University Press.
Livingston, Paisley. 2006. Theses on cinema as philosophy. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (1): 11–18.
Locke, John. 1690. An essay concerning human understanding, 2 Vols. New York: Dover Publications, 1959.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1945. The film and the new psychology. In Sense and non-sense, 48–59. Trans. H. Dreyfus, and P. Dreyfus. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1964.
Morrison, Rachela. 1990. Casablanca meets Star Wars: The Blakean dialectics of Blade Runner. Literature Film Quarterly 18 (1): 2–10.
Mulhall, Stephen. 1994. Picturing the human (Body and soul): A reading of Blade Runner. Film and Philosophy 1: 87–104.
———. 2015. On film. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
Pate, Anthony. 2009. Nietzsche’s Übermensch in the hyperreal flux: An analysis of Blade Runner, Fight Club, and Miami Vice. Dissertations and Graduate Research Overview, Paper 15. http://digitalcommons.ric.edu/etd/15. Accessed 12 Aug 2019.
Peary, Danny. 1984. Directing Alien and Blade Runner: An interview with Ridley Scott. In Ridley Scott: Interviews, ed. L.F. Knapp and A.F. Kulas, 42–55. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2005.
Redmond, Sean. 2008. Studying Blade Runner. Leighton Buzzard: Auteur.
Russell, Bruce. 2000. The philosophical limits of film. Film and Philosophy 4 (Special Interest Edition on the Films of Woody Allen): 163–167.
Salamoff, Paul J. 2018. Why the theatrical cut is the truest version of Blade Runner. In The Cyberpunk Nexus: Exploring the Blade Runner universe, ed. L. Tambone and J. Bongiorno, 100–110. Edwardsville: Sequart.
Sammon, Paul M. 1982. The arts. Omni 4 (8): 24, 140.
———. 2017. Future Noir: The making of Blade Runner, revised & updated edition. New York: HarperCollins.
Shanahan, Timothy. 2014. Philosophy and Blade Runner. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2019. What am I to you? In Blade Runner 2049: A philosophical exploration, ed. T. Shanahan and P. Smart, 228–247. London: Routledge.
Smith, Murray. 2006. Film, art, argument, and ambiguity. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (1): 33–42.
Wartenberg, Thomas E. 2006. Beyond mere illustration: How films can be philosophy. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (1): 19–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Shanahan, T. (2024). Blade Runner as Philosophy: What Does It Mean to Be Human?. In: Kowalski, D.A., Lay, C., S. Engels, K. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Popular Culture as Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97134-6_43-3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97134-6_43-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97134-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97134-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
as Philosophy: What Does It Mean to Be Human?- Published:
- 05 October 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97134-6_43-3
-
as Philosophy: What Does It Mean to Be Human?
- Published:
- 05 August 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97134-6_43-2
-
Original
as Philosophy: The Replicants Are Us (Almost)- Published:
- 06 November 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97134-6_43-1