Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Study on the Common Collaboration Platform Activation of Cloud-Based Manufacturing Supply Management System (SCM)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Big Data, Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (BCD 2018)

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 786))

  • 1965 Accesses

Abstract

It is important to study and apply the application method developed to service from the SCM module for designing SaaS level to the cloud system, which supports SCM tasks such as procurement, purchase, logistics and standard information as to industrial sectors. These industrial sectors are divided into sewing clothes manufacturing, other metal processing product manufacturing and building construction business in terms of usage targets of cloud-based common collaboration platform. In addition, based on the importance and object of works such as common collaboration process, cloud-based common collaboration platform objective model is designed by selecting development model and service model suitable for this study. The cloud-based common collaboration platform will be used by many and unspecified companies, which is provided as the form of public cloud. Target model design means SaaS level finally. In the case of module development costs of collaboration works, it is required to be studied more to the future. By the way, in the case of the common collaboration module, the SCM tasks which can be applied to all industrial sectors have been calculated, which was based on the manufacturing industry. Since the SCM-related functions provided by the cloud-based common collaboration platform are not specific to the specified companies sectors, they are available to all companies. Furthermore, the SCM-related functions provided by the cloud-based common collaboration platform are various and selected by the modules freely because they are provided at the level of the cloud SaaS. The SCM-related functions provided by the cloud-based common collaboration platform are easy to select. It is necessary to make universal service available to the enterprise unlike the government that has been carrying out the support project to the specified company sectors on a one-to-one basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bartsch, V., Ebers, M., Maurer, I.: Learning in project-based organizations: The role of project teams’ social capital for overcoming barriers to learning. Int. J. Project Manage. 31(2), 239–251 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Makhija, M.: Comparing the resource-based and market-based views of the firm: empirical evidence from Czech privatization. Strateg. Manag. J. 24(5), 433–451 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Llorens, S., Cifre, E., Martínez, I.M., Schaufeli, W.B.: Perceived collective efficacy, subjective well-being and task performance among electronic work groups an experimental study. Small Group Res. 34(1), 43–73 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Srivastava, A., Bartol, K.M., Locke, E.A.: Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Acad. Manag. J. 49(6), 1239–1251 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. National IT Industry Promotion Agency. A Study on the Common Collaboration Platform Activation of Cloud-based Manufacturing Supply Management System (SCM) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bardhan, I., Krishnan, V.V., Lin, S.: Team dispersion, information technology, and project performance. Prod. Oper. Manag. 22(6), 1478–1493 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zaheer, A., Bell, G.G.: Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 26(9), 809–825 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brettel, M., Mauer, R., Engelen, A., Küpper, D.: Corporate effectuation: entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance. J. Bus. Ventur. 27(2), 167–184 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu, Y., Hao, J.X., Dong, X.Y., Khalifa, M.: A multilevel model for effects of social capital and knowledge sharing in knowledge-intensive work teams. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 33(5), 780–790 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tasa, K., Taggar, S., Seijts, G.H.: The development of collective efficacy in teams: a multilevel and longitudinal perspective. J. Appl. Psychol. 92(1), 17–27 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsai, W., Ghoshal, S.: Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Acad. Manag. J. 41(4), 376–464 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gu, V.C., Hoffman, J.J., Cao, Q., Schniederjans, M.J.: The effects of organizational culture and environmental pressures on IT project performance: A moderation perspective. Int. J. Project Manage. 32(7), 1170–1181 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gulati, R., Sytch, M.: Does familiarity breed trust? Revisiting the antecedents of trust. Manag. Decis. Econ. 29(2–3), 165–190 (2008). Brettel, M., Mauer, R., Engelen, A., Küpper, D.: Corporate effectuation: entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance. J. Bus. Vent. 27(2), 167–184 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hackbarth, G.: The impact of organizational memory on IT systems. AMCIS 1998 Proc. 197 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Adler, P.S., Kwon, S.W.: Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Acad. Manag. Rev. 27(1), 17–40 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bandura, A.: Editorial. Am. J. Health Promot. 12(1), 8–10 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chang, H.H., Chuang, S.S.: Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing: Participant involvement as a moderator. Inf. Manag. 48(1), 9–18 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chow, W.S., Chan, L.S.: Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing. Inf. Manag. 45(7), 458–465 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, M.H., Chang, Y.C., Hung, S.C.: Social capital and creativity in R&D project teams. R&d Manag. 38(1), 21–34 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Coleman, J.S.: Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol. 94, 95–120 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. DeRue, D.S., Ashford, S.J.: Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 35(4), 627–647 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lee, J., Park, J.G., Lee, S.: Raising team social capital with knowledge and communication in information systems development projects. Int. J. Project Manage. 33(4), 797–807 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liao, S.H., Fei, W.C., Chen, C.C.: Knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability: an empirical study of Taiwan’s knowledge-intensive industries. J. Inf. Sci. 33(3), 340–359 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liebowitz, J.: Knowledge management and its link to artificial intelligence. Expert Syst. Appl. 20(1), 1–6 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Meng, X.: The effect of relationship management on project performance in construction. Int. J. Project Manage. 30(2), 188–198 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Molina-Morales, F.X., Martínez-Fernández, M.T.: Social networks: effects of social capital on firm innovation. J. Small Bus. Manage. 48(2), 258–279 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nahapiet, J., Ghoshal, S.: Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(2), 242–266 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Di Vincenzo, F., Mascia, D.: Social capital in project-based organizations: Its role, structure, and impact on project performance. Int. J. Project Manage. 30(1), 5–14 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stajkovic, A.D., Lee, D., Nyberg, A.J.: Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. J. Appl. Psychol. 94(3), 814–828 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tsai, Y.H., Ma, H.C., Lin, C.P., Chiu, C.K., Chen, S.C.: Group social capital in virtual teaming contexts: a moderating role of positive affective tone in knowledge sharing. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 86, 13–20 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. van Emmerik, H., Jawahar, I.M., Schreurs, B., De Cuyper, N.: Social capital, team efficacy and team potency: The mediating role of team learning behaviors. Career Dev. Int. 16(1), 82–99 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, S., Noe, R.A.: Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 20(2), 115–131 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wah, C.Y., Menkhoff, T., Loh, B., Evers, H.D.: Social capital and knowledge sharing in knowledge-based organizations: an empirical study. Int. J. Knowl. Manag. 3(1), 29–48 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hoegl, M., Weinkauf, K., Gemuenden, H.G.: Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: a longitudinal study. Organ. Sci. 15(1), 38–55 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu, Y., Keller, R.T., Shih, H.A.: The impact of team-member exchange, differentiation, team commitment, and knowledge sharing on R&D project team performance. R&D Manag. 41(3), 274–287 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gu, Q., Wang, G.G., Wang, L.: Social capital and innovation in R&D teams: the mediating roles of psychological safety and learning from mistakes. R&D Manag. 43(2), 89–102 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., McAfee, A.: Leading Digital: Turning Technology into Business Transformation. Harvard Business Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of IT Policy and Management, Soongsil University Graduate, School, 369, Sangdo-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Korea, 06978, South Korea

    Sanhae Kim, Hongjae Lee & Kyeong-Seok Han

  2. Graduate School of Software, Soongsil University, Seoul, Korea, South Korea

    Jong-Bae Kim

Authors
  1. Sanhae Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hongjae Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kyeong-Seok Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jong-Bae Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jong-Bae Kim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Software Engineering and Information Technology Institute, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, USA

    Roger Lee

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kim, S., Lee, H., Han, KS., Kim, JB. (2019). A Study on the Common Collaboration Platform Activation of Cloud-Based Manufacturing Supply Management System (SCM). In: Lee, R. (eds) Big Data, Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering. BCD 2018. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 786. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96803-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation