Abstract
This chapter examines the new feminist intervention in India against sexual harassment (SH) through the online weapon of anonymously listing sexual offenders. The publication of the list on Facebook—known as the List of Shame (or #LoSha)—was inspired by the #metoo campaign following the Hollywood Weinstein affair and was composed through a collection of first-hand survivor narratives. A list of 70 names of alleged academic sexual offenders was first shared by a lawyer based in the US, and became viral on Facebook. This chapter will look at how this campaign used naming as a risk-taking tool to point at the lack of institutional frameworks within academic spaces. In doing so, it successfully used the online space of Facebook to create a feminist debate around the issue of sexual harassment transcending geographical and hierarchical barriers and to raise questions regarding the viability of the established feminist recourses against SH.
Using the methodological tool of situated critique (Bannerji, Thinking Through: Essays on Feminism, Marxism, and Anti-Racism. Toronto: Women’s Press, 1995), in this chapter I will utilize my own experience of participating in the list as well as in the larger feminist debate to discuss the politics of risk-taking and solidarity and the implications of list-activism. In doing so, it has re-established the role of cyberfeminism (Daniels, Women’s Studies Quarterly, 37 (1 & 2): 101–124, 2009) in India and surfaced a new intersectional autocritique of the academia based on caste, class and gender. Though questions regarding the method remain, the use of Facebook for providing survivors a voice with anonymity promises new boundaries of empowerment and fear.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Savarna refers to those belonging to the upper castes in the hierarchical caste system practised in India. Avarna refers to those in the population who are considered outside the caste system, such as the Dalits and untouchables.
- 2.
One of the accused sexual harassers in the list, who was subsequently found guilty by his university committee, was a founding member of this blog, though no mention was made of it in the statement. In ensuing debates in the comments section, questions were raised about this absence of any declaration of association. For more, see Menon (2017) comments section.
- 3.
- 4.
For a elaborated foray into the history of the Indian women’s movement, please see documented history, The History of Doing by Radha Kumar (1989), Women’s Studies in India: A Reader edited by Mary E. John (2008) and The Issues at Stake: Theory and Practice in the Contemporary Women’s Movement in India by Nandita Gandhi and Nandita Shah (1992).
- 5.
I use the term “victim” here to point at the pleasurable narrations of incidents of sexual violence which imposes the victim role on the survivor, and the portrayal of media of the survivors in that light.
- 6.
Even though the Sexual Harassment Guidelines 2013 ensures anonymity to the complainants, this is hardly the case in reality. My access to and participation in the student communities of Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi University and Ambedkar University Delhi in Delhi has always revealed to me the identity of the complainants, as it did to many others. This affects sexual harassment survivors’ decision to approach the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) and is contingent on whether they are ready to face the implications of identity revelation.
- 7.
- 8.
The #MeToo campaign was also started by black activist Tarana Burke.
- 9.
Girls in Dhabas is a primary example of our cultural contextual familiarity transcending limitations of borders online. An online campaign started in Pakistan demanding women’s access to public spaces (dhaba literally means a roadside food stall) and it had soon gained popularity in India as well.
- 10.
References
Bannerji, H. (1995). Thinking Through: Essays on Feminism, Marxism, and Anti-Racism. Toronto: Women’s Press.
Bargi, D. (2017). On Misreading the Dalit Critique of University Spaces. Economic and Political Weekly, 52(60). Power and Relationships in Academia. Retrieved May 3, 2018, from http://www.epw.in/engage/article/misreading-dalit-critique-university-space.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste (R. Nice, trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). Forms of Capital. In J. E. Richardson (Ed.) Handbook of Theory of Research for the Sociology of Education (pp 241–258). Greenword Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14–25.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power (G. Raymond & M. Adamson, trans.). UK: Polity Press.
Chadha, G. (2017). Towards Complex Feminist Solidarities after the List-Statement. Economic and Political Weekly, 52(60). Power and Relationships in Academia.
Chadha, G. (2017). Power and Relationships in Academia. Economic and Political Weekly, 52(60). Retrieved May 2, 2018, from http://www.epw.in/engage/special-features/power-relationships-academia.
Chandra, K. (2016). Caste, Representation, and Enduring Inequality. Current History, 115(780), 150–153.
Daniels, J. (2009). Rethinking Cyberfeminism(s): Race, Gender, and Embodiment. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 37(1 & 2), 101–124.
Fair, C. (2017, October 25). #himtoo: A Reckoning. Buzzfeed News. Retrieved April 29, 2018, from https://www.buzzfeed.com/christinefair/himtoo-a-reckoning?utm_term=.wrd18Wy77#.eywLZNQ44.
Fernandez, M., et al. (Eds.). (2003). Domain Errors!: Cyberfeminist Practices. Brooklyn: Autonomedia.
Gajjala, R. (Ed.). (2013). Cyberculture and the Subaltern: Weavings of the Virtual and the Real. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Gajjala, R. (Ed.). (2019). Digital Diasporas. Lanham: Lexington International.
Gandhi, N., & Shah, N. (1992). The Issues at Stake: Theory and Practice in the Contemporary Women’s Movement. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
Ghosh, A. (2017, November 7). The Civil War in Indian Feminism—A Critical Glance. Sabrang. Retrieved May 2, 2017, from https://sabrangindia.in/article/civil-war-indian-feminism-%E2%80%93-critical-glance.
Gopal, P. (2018, May 7). No Poetry After Auschwitz? Outlook: The Magazine. Retrieved April 28, 2018, from https://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/no-poetry-after-auschwitz/300086.
Independent. (2018, April 13). Asifa Bano: Outrage Spreads Across India Over Rape of Eight-Year-Old Girl. Retrieved May 3, 2018, from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/asifa-bano-latest-india-rape-murder-girl-eight-year-old-muslim-hindu-kashmir-protest-a8302381.html.
Indian Express. (2017, October 27). Important to Name Perpetrators, Says V Geetha on Raya Sarkar’s Crowd-Sourced List of Sexual Harassers. Retrieved April 28, 2018, from http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2017/oct/27/important-to-name-perpetrators-says-v-geetha-on-raya-sarkars-crowd-sourced-list-of-sexual-harasser-1684340.html.
John, M. E. (Ed.). (2008). Women’s Studies in India: A Reader. New Delhi: Penguin Books.
Kolko, B., et al. (Eds.). (2000). Race in Cyberspace. London: Routledge.
Kumar, R. (1989). The History of Doing: An Illustrated Account of Movements for Women’s Rights and Feminism in India, 1800–1990. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
Lodhia, S. (2015). From “Living Corpse” to India’s Daughter: Exploring the Social, Political and Legal Landscape of the 2012 Delhi Gang Rape. Women’s Studies International Forum, 50, 89–101.
Mandhani, A. (2018, March 9). Alternate Law Forum Founder Lawrence Liang Found Guilty of Sexual Harassment by Ambedkar University Committee. Retrieved April 30, 2018, from http://www.livelaw.in/alternate-law-forum-founder-lawrence-liang-found-guilty-sexual-harassment-ambedkar-university-committee/.
Menon, N. (1995). The Impossibility of Justice: Female Foeticide and Feminist Discourse on Abortion. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 29(1 & 2), 369–392.
Menon, N. (2017). Statement by Feminists on Facebook Campaign to “Name and Shame”. Retrieved February 21, 2018, from https://kafila.online/2017/10/24/statement-by-feminists-on-facebook-campaign-to-name-and-shame/.
Raj, A., & McDougal, L. (2014). Sexual Violence and Rape in India. The Lancet, 383(9920), 865.
Roy, S. (2017, November 1). Whose Feminism Is It Anyway? The Wire. Retrieved May 2, 2018, from https://thewire.in/gender/whose-feminism-anyway.
Sarkar, R. (2018). Interview with the author over email, conducted on 28 April 2018.
Shandilya, K. (2015). Nirbhaya’s Body: The Politics of Protest in the Aftermath of the 2012 Gangrape. Gender & History, 27(2), 465–486.
Shah, N. (2017, November 5). Digital Native: Rebellion by Google Doc. Indian Express. Retrieved from http://indianexpress.com/article/technology/digital-native-rebellion-by-google-doc-4921956/.
Shukla, M., & Kundu, A. (2017, October 28). Et tu ‘Feminists’?: A Response to the Kafila Signatories. Round Table India. Retrieved May 2, 2018, from https://roundtableindia.co.in/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9216:et-tu-feminists-a-response-to-the-kafila-signatories&catid=119:feature&Itemid=132.
Siapera, E. (2019). Online Misogyny as Witch Hunt: Primitive Accumulation in the Age of Techno-capitalism. Gender Hate Online. Cham, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sollee, K. J. (2017). Witches, Sluts, Feminists: Conjuring the Sex Positive. Berkeley: Stone Bridge Press.
Subramanian, S. (2015). From the Streets to the Web: Looking at Feminist Activism on Social Media. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(17), 71–78.
The Diplomat. (2016, May 19). India: Violence Against Dalits on the Rise. Retrieved May 2, 2018, from https://thediplomat.com/2016/05/india-violence-against-dalits-on-the-rise/.
United Nations. (2013). Violence Against Women: Input to the UN Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women in Connection with Her Visit to India Between 22 April – 1 May 2013. Retrieved April 28, 2018, from http://idsn.org/wp-content/uploads/user_folder/pdf/New_files/India/2013/India_submission_on_Violence_against_Dalit_Women_-_SR_on_VAW_India_2013.pdf.
Verso Report. (2018). Where Freedom Starts: Sex Power Violence #metoo. London: Verso.
Visvanathan, S. (2018, May 7). The Chilly Justice of the Gulag. Outlook: The Magazine. Retrieved April 28, 2018, from https://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/the-chilly-justice-of-the-gulag/299993.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chakraborty, A. (2019). Politics of #LoSha: Using Naming and Shaming as a Feminist Tool on Facebook. In: Ging, D., Siapera, E. (eds) Gender Hate Online. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96226-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96226-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96225-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96226-9
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)