Abstract
This paper presented an empirical study which investigated a dynamic adjustment of interpersonal distance in a cooperative situation. In the experiment, three factors of the “task”, “orientation”, and “gender combination” were emphasized. Ninety-six data of interpersonal distances were obtained under four different conditions from twenty-four participants.
First, ANOVA and multiple comparisons revealed that the factors of the “task”, “orientation”, and “gender combination” had statistically significant influences on the adjustment of interpersonal distance. In particular, the results indicated that (1) preferred interpersonal distances were shortened when a dyad initiated a “cooperative task”, (2) preferred interpersonal distance of “side-by-side” was shorter than “face-to-face”, and (3) interpersonal distance of “female-female” pair was shorter than “male-male” pair and it was also shorter than “heterogeneous gender” pair.
Furthermore, correlation analyses, under “face-to-face” condition, revealed that, (1) evaluators who had longer interpersonal distances of “no task” shortened larger amount of their interpersonal distances when a dyad initiated a cooperation, and more interestingly, (2) a larger divergence of preferred interpersonal distances of “no task” condition among each dyad derived a larger amount of shortening of interpersonal distance when a dyad initiated a cooperation. The result also suggested that interpersonal distance of an evaluator and an approacher had a significant correlation under “cooperative task” condition.
Finally, beyond a self-centered view of personal space, this paper suggested an interesting view of phenomenon of adjusting interpersonal distance, from a dynamic interactive process of an evaluator and a confederate. An implication to the design of spatial behavior of social assistive robots was also discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiello JR (1987) Human spatial behavior. In: Stokels D, Altman I (eds) Handbook of environmental psychology. Wiley, New York, pp 385–504
Dorsey M, Meisels M (1969) Personal space and self-protection. J Pers Soc Psychol 11:93–97
Evans GW, Lepore SJ, Schroeder A (1996) The role of interior design elements in human responses to crowding. J Pers Soc Psychol 70:41–46
Garzotto F, Gelsomini M, Kinoe Y (2017) Puffy: a mobile inflatable interactive companion for children with neurodevelopmental disorder. In: Bernhaupt R (eds) Human-computer interaction - INTERACT 2017, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 10514. Springer, pp 467–492
Gifford R (1982) Projected interpersonal distances and orientation choices: personality, sex, and social situation. Soc Psychol Q 45:145–152
Hayduk LA (1983) Personal space: where we now stand. Psychol Bull 94(2):293–335
Horowitz MJ, Duff DF, Stratton LO (1964) Body-buffer zone: exploration of personal space. Arch Gen Psychiatry 11:651–656
Kinoe Y, Mizuno N (2015) Situational transformation of personal space. In: Yamamoto S (eds) Human interface and the management of information, Information and knowledge in context, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 9173. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 15–24
Kinoe Y (2018) Interpersonal distancing in cooperation. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on human-computer interaction (in press)
Mead R, Matarić MJ (2017) Autonomous human–robot proxemics: socially aware navigation based on interaction potential. Auton Robot 41(5):1189–1201
Rosenfeld P, Giacalone R, Kennedy J (1987) Of status and suits: personal space invasions in an administrative setting. Soc Behav Pers 15:97–100
Sinha SP, Mukherjee N (1995) The effect of perceived cooperation on personal space requirements. J Soc Psychol 136(5):655–657
Sommer R (2002) Personal space in a digital age. In: Bechtel RB, Churchman A (eds) Handbook of environmental psychology. Wiley, New York, pp 385–504
Sommer R: Personal space: the behavioral basis of design. Bosko Books (2008). Updated
Tedesco JF, Fromme DK (1974) Cooperation, competition, and personal space. Sociometry 37:116–121
Acknowledgement
We thank all the study participants, and Namiko M., who devotedly supported for conducting experiments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kinoe, Y. (2019). Dynamic Adjustment of Interpersonal Distance in Cooperative Task. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 827. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96059-3_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96059-3_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96058-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96059-3
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)