Skip to main content

Making Gender and Motherhood Through Pedagogies of Digital Health and Fitness Consumption: ‘Soon It Made Us More Active as a Family’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Dilemmas

Abstract

The relationship between gender and technology has long been the attention of feminist scholars and activists, in terms of both constituting gender (Wajcman, 2004, 2007) and, more recently, the potential of digital platforms in disseminating feminist ideas (Baer, 2016). As technology has become increasingly part of our everyday lives, questions have been raised about the impact this has on gender inequalities and the possibilities for challenging injustice. One notable area in which everyday leisure practices are being transformed by the digital is through the recent proliferation of digital technologies designed for health and fitness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to Fox (2017: 139), this shift from entities to relationalities suggests a focus towards ‘towards the capacities to do, think and feel thereby produced in bodies and collectivities of bodies. Concomitantly, this shift from an agentic human to flows of “affect” in assemblages acknowledges that things, organisations, social formations, and concepts contribute to social production as much as—if not more than—human bodies/subjects.’

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. Durham, NC/London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, H. (2016). Redoing feminism: Digital activism, body politics, and neoliberalism. Feminist Media Studies, 16(1), 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burdick, J., & Sandlin, J. (2013). Learning, becoming and the unknowable: Conceptualizations, mechanisms and the process in public pedagogy literature. Curriculum Inquiry, 43, 142–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, L. (2009). Pedagogizing families through obesity discourse. In J. Wright & V. Harwood (Eds.), Biopolitics and the “obesity epidemic”: Governing bodies (pp. 127–140). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos, P., Saguy, A., Ernsberger, P., Oliver, E., & Gesser, G. (2005). The epidemiology of overweight or obesity: Public health crisis or moral panic? International Journal of Epidemiology, 35(1), 55–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, R. (2009). The becoming of bodies: Girls, media effects and body image. Feminist Media Studies, 8(2), 163–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A. R. S. (2015). Postfeminist digital cultures: Femininity, social media, and self-representation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J., & Rich, E. (2011). Body policies and body pedagogies: Child matters in totally pedagogised schools. Journal of Education Policy, 26(3), 361–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J., Rich, E., Davies, B., & Allwood, R. (2008). Education, disordered eating and obesity discourse: Fat fabrications. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fotopoulou, A., & Kate O’Riordan, K. (2017). Training to self-care: Fitness tracking, biopedagogy and the healthy consumer. Health Sociology Review, 26(1), 54–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, et al. (2016). The micropolitics of obesity: Materialism, markets and food sovereignty. Sociology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516647668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gard, M. (2014). eHPE: A history of the future. Sport, Education and Society, 19(6), 827–845. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2014.938036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gard, M., & Wright, J. (2005). The obesity epidemic: Science, morality and ideology. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (1999). The mouse that roared: Disney and the end of innocence. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2004). Future girl: Young women in the twenty-first century. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey-Moody, A. (2013). Youth, arts and education: reassembling subjectivity through affect. Abingdon, UK/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoechsmann, M. (2010). Rootlessness, reenchantment and educating desire: A brief history of the pedagogy of consumption. In Critical pedagogies of consumption: Living and learning in the shadow of “shopocalypse” (pp. 23–35). Oxon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenway, J., & Bullen, E. (2001). Consuming children: Education-entertainment-advertising. Buckingham, UK: Open Univeristy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. L. (2002). The sign of the burger: McDonald’s and the culture of power. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (2001). “Where’s me dinner?”: Food preparation arrangements in rural Australian families. Journal of Sociology, 36, 172–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (2013). The digitally engaged patient: Self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Social Theory and Health, 11, 256–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (2014a). Beyond techno-Utopia: Critical approaches to digital health technologies. Societies, 4(4), 706–711. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc4040706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (2014b). Quantified sex: A critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps. Culture,Health and Sexuality, 17(4), 440–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2014.920528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (2015). Data assemblages, sentient schools and digitised health and physical education (response to Gard). Sport Education and Society, 20(1), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2014.962496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, J., Fraser, S., & Lindsay, J. (2010). Between provisioning and consuming? Children, mothers and ‘childhood obesity. Health Sociology Review, 19(3), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.2010.19.3.304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, G. (1990). Culture and consumption. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, A. (2009). The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B., & Brockett, R. G. (2007). The profession and practice of adult education: An introduction (updated ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millington, B. (2016). ‘Quantify the invisible’: Notes toward a future of posture. Critical Public Health, 26(4), 405–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, L. (2005). Discussion piece: A critical take on the obesity debate. Social Theory and Health, 3, 302–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, M. (2006). Consumption and everyday life. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters, R., & Schuilenburg, M. (2016). The birth of mindpolitics: Understanding nudging in public health policy. Social Theory and Health, 15(2), 138–159. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-016-0024-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petherick, L. (2015). Shaping the child as a healthy child: Health surveillance, schools, and biopedagogies. Cultural Studies – Critical Methodologies. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708615611716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, A. C., Landman, A. B., & Bates, D. W. (2014). In search of a few good apps. Journal of the Americal Medical Association, 311(18), 1851–1852. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.2564.Conflict.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rail, G., & Jette, S. (2015). Reflections on biopedagogies and/of public health: On Bio-others, rescue missions, and social justice. Cultural Studies – Critical Methodologies, 15(5), 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, E. (2017). Childhood, surveillance and mHealth technologies. In E. Taylor & T. Rooney (Eds.), Surveillance futures: Social and ethical implications of new technologies for children and young people (pp. 132–146). oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, E., & Miah, A. (2014). Understanding digital health as public pedagogy: A critical framework. Societies, 4, 296–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringrose, J. (2011). Beyond discourse? Using Deleuze and Guattari’s schizoanalysis to explore affective assemblages, heterosexually striated space, and lines of flight online and at school. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(6), 598–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00601.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruckenstein, M. (2014). Visualized and interacted life: Personal analytics and engagements with data doubles. Societies, 2, 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandlin, J. A., & McLaren, P. (Eds.). (2010a). Critical pedagogies of consumption: Living and learning in the shadow of the “shopocalypse”. Oxon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandlin, J. A., & McLaren, P. (2010b). Introduction: Exploring consumption’s pedagogy. In J. A. Sandlin & P. McLaren (Eds.), Critical pedagogies of consumption: Living and learning in the shadow of “shopocalypse” (pp. 1–20). Oxon/New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sandlin, J. A., Schultz, B. D., & Burdick, J. (2010). Handbook of public Pedagogy: Education and learning beyond schooling. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smarr, L. (2012). Quantifying your body: A how-to guide from a systems biology perspective. Biotechnology Journal, 7(8), 980–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. J. D., & Vonthethoff, B. (2016). Health by numbers? Exploring the practice and experience of datafied health. Health Sociology Review, 26(July), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2016.1196600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spring, J. (2003). Education the consumer-citizen. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, M. (2012). Health 2050: The realization of personalized medicine through crowdsourcing, the quantified self, and the participatory biocitizen. Journal of Personalized Medicine., 2(3), 93–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher, R., Bryant, I., & Johnston, R. (1997). Adult education and the postmodern challenge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman, J. (2004). Technofeminism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman, J. (2007). From women and technology to gendered technoscience. Information, Communication & Society, 10(3), 287–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, B. (2016). Coding the biodigital child: The biopolitics and pedagogic strategies of educational data science. Culture and Society, 24(3), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2016.1175499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma Rich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rich, E. (2019). Making Gender and Motherhood Through Pedagogies of Digital Health and Fitness Consumption: ‘Soon It Made Us More Active as a Family’. In: Parry, D.C., Johnson, C.W., Fullagar, S. (eds) Digital Dilemmas. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95300-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95300-7_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95299-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95300-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics