Abstract
Central to this chapter are the concepts of research and procedural ethics. Because Photovoice research focusses so closely on creating egalitarian, participatory processes and the implications of participant generated knowledge, rarely is enough time spent considering the potential ethical challenges inherent in participatory action research. Thinking about ethics early when using Photovoice is beneficial as the process can positively contribute to the design, procedures and outcomes of a project. Yet, the relationship between ethics, feminist participatory research and radical social work is a contested space meriting further discussion. The chapter begins with a brief history of research ethics and discusses the concept of feminist relational ethics. This discussion is extended to consider the potential for distress researcher and participant, the raising of false hopes, the risks of speaking for others and matters of (self)representation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A recent example is the furore over a ‘debate’ held on breakfast television in Australia about the needs of Aboriginal children. With the discussion held with 3 white, middle class journalists, every ethical principle of journalism was breached in less than 5 minutes. For more see https://www.sbs.com.au/nitv/article/2018/03/13/why-are-white-people-sunrise-no-experience-calling-indigenous-child-removals.
- 2.
In the Appendices you can find templates for a participant information sheet, a consent form and an image release from.
- 3.
The stand out exception to this, is the book by Derek Clifford and Beverley Burke, Anti-oppressive Ethics and Values in Social Work.
Useful Resources
Banks, S., & Armstrong, A. (2012). Ethics in community-based participatory research. National Coordinating Centre for Public Engagement and the Centre, Durham University, UK. Available at https://www.publicengagement.ac.uk/sites/default/files/publication/cbpr_cases_booklet_revised_title_from_ben_4.4.13_19.59.pdf.
Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics. http://jswve.org/.
The Stanford Prison Experiment documentary, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjS6j3BO_t4.
To view a copy of the consent form signed by participants in the Stanford Prison Experiment, see http://pdf.prisonexp.org/consent.pdf.
References
Brandt, B. (1978). Racism and research: The case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. The Hastings Centre Report, 8(6), 21–29.
Brown, D. (2017, May 16). ‘You’ve got bad blood’: The horror of the Tuskegee syphilis experiment. Retrieved March 11, 2018, from The Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2017/05/16/youve-got-bad-blood-the-horror-of-the-tuskegee-syphilis-experiment/?utm_term=.3440aa46a861.
Brown, L., & Strega, S. (2005). Transgressive possibilities. In L. Brown & S. Strega (Eds.), Research as resistance: Critical, indigenous and anti-oppressive approaches (pp. 1–18). Toronto: Canadian Scholar’s Press.
Butot, M. (2004). Love as emancipatory praxis: An exploration of practitioners’ conceptualisations of love in critical social work practice (Master’s Thesis). University of Victoria, Victoria, BC.
Charmaz, K. (2002). Stories and silences: Disclosures and self in chronic illness. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(3), 302–328.
Clifford, D., & Burke, B. (2009). Anti-oppressive ethics and values in social work. Basingstoke and Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Congress, E., & McAuliffe, D. (2006). Social work ethics: Professional codes in Australia and the United States. International Social Work, 49(2), 151–164.
Creighton, G., Oliffe, J., Ferlatte, O., Bottorff, J., Broom, A., & Jenkins, E. (2018). Photovoice ethics: Critical reflections from men’s mental health research. Qualitative Health Research, 28(3), 446–455.
Davys, A., & Beddoe, L. (2010). Best practice in professional supervision: A guide for the helping professions. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Ferguson, I., & Woodward, R. (2009). Radical social work in practice: Making a difference. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
Ferguson, I., Ioakimidis, V., & Lavalette, M. (2018). Global social work in a political context: Radical perspectives. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Fraser, H., & Jarldorn, M. (2015). Narrative research and resistance: A cautionary tale. In S. Strega & L. Brown (Eds.), Research as resistance: Revisiting critical, indigenous and anti-oppressive appraoches (2nd ed., pp. 153–175). Toronto: Canadian Scholar’s Press Inc.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.
Gonzales-Prendes, A. (2011). Dissonance between personal and professional values: Resolution of an ethical dilemma. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 8(2), 5–14.
Gray, M. (2007). There are no answers only choices: Teaching ethical decision making in social work. Australian Social Work, 60(2), 222–238.
Gringeri, C., Wahab, S., & Anderson-Nathe, B. (2010). What makes it feminist? Mapping the landscape of feminist social work research. Affilia, 25(4), 390–405.
Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280.
Gustafson, D., & Brunger, F. (2014). Ethics, “vulnerability”, and feminist participatory action research with a disability community. Qualitiative Health Research, 24(7), 997–1005.
Hallowell, L., Lawton, J., & Gregory, S. (2005). Reflections on research: The realities of doing research in the social sciences. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
Harley, A. (2012). Picturing reality: Power, ethics, and politics in using Photovoice. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(4), 320–339.
Holtby, A., Klein, K., Cook, K., & Travers, R. (2015). To be seen or not to be seen: Photovoice, queer and trans youth, and the dilemma of representation. Action Research, 13(4), 317–335.
Jarldorn, M. (2014). The politics of research ethics in social work: Reflections from a first time researcher. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 11(2), 52–60. Available at http://jswve.org/download/2014/articles/52-JSWVE-11-2-The-Politics-of-Research-Ethics-in-Social-Work.pdf.
Jarldorn, M. (2016). Picturing creative approaches to social work research: Using photography to promote social change. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 28(4), 5–16.
Jarldorn, M. (2018). Radically rethinking imprisonment: A Photovoice exploration of life in and after prison in South Australia. Doctoral thesis, Flinders University, South Australia. Available at https://theses.flinders.edu.au/view/90c3de9e-5a3f-4f64-8cc2-353aafdf04b7/1.
Johnston, G. (2016). Champions for social change: Photovoice ethics in practice and ‘false hopes’ for policy and social change. Global Public Health, 11(5–6), 799–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2016.1170176.
Jones, J. (1993). Bad blood: The Tuskegee syphilis experiment. New York: The Free Press.
McKendrick, D., & Webb, S. (2014). Taking a political stance in social work. Critical and Radical Social Work, 2(3), 357–369.
Morrison, Z. (2007). “Feeling heavy”: Vicarious trauma and other issues facing those who work in the sexual assault field. Melbourne: Australian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault, Australian Institute of Family Studies.
NHMRC. (2007). National statement on ethical conduct in human research. National Health and Medical Research Council. Updated May, 2015. Available at https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/e72.
Patil, T., & Ennis, G. (2018). Critically reflecting on the Australian Association of Social Workers Code of Ethics: Learning from a social work field placement. The British Journal of Social Work (Online First). https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx101.
Pitt, P. (2014). ‘The project cannot be approved in its current form’: Feminist visual research meets the Human Research Ethics Committee. Australian Education Research, 41, 311–325.
Quixley, S., & Doostkhah, S. (2007). Conservatising youth work? Dangers of adopting a code of ethics. Retrieved March 31, 2018, from Youth Affairs Network Queensland. Available at http://www.yanq.org.au/uploads/1/4/1/7/14174316/conservatising_youth_work.pdf.
Regehr, C., & Antle, B. (1997). Coercive influences: Informed consent in court-mandated social work practice. Social Work, 42(3), 300–306.
Rippey-Massat, C., & Lundy, M. (1997). Empowering research particpants. Affilia, 12(1), 33–56.
Sakamoto, I., & Pitner, R. (2005). Use of critical consciousness in anti-oppressive social work practice: Disentangling power dynamics at personal and structural levels. British Journal of Social Work, 35(4), 425–452.
Schuman, S., Olansky, S., Rivers, E., Smith, C., & Rambo, D. (1955). Untreated syphilis in the male Negro: Background and current status of patients in the Tuskegee study. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 2(5), 543–558.
Smith, A., & Pitts, M. (2007). Researching the margins: An introduction. In M. Pitts & A. Smith (Eds.), Researching the margins: Strategies for ethical and vigorous research with marginalised communities (pp. 3–44). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sykes, P., & Piper, H. (2010). Ethical research, academic freedom and the role of ethics committees and review procedures in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 33(3), 205–213.
Vaughan, C. (2016). Different lenses: Navigating ethics in cross-cultural research using Photovoice. In D. Warr, M. Guillemin, S. Cox, & J. Waycott (Eds.), Ethics and visual research methods: Theory, methodology and practice (pp. 19–30). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wang, C. (1999). Photovoice: A participatory action research strategy applied to women’s health. Journal of Women’s Health, 8(2), 185–192.
Wang, C., & Burris, M. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health, Education & Behaviour, 24(3), 369–387.
Wang, C., & Redwood-Jones, Y. (2001). Photovoice ethics: Perspectives from Flint Photovoice. Health Education & Behavior, 28(5), 560–572.
Warr, D., Guillemin, M., Cox, S., & Waycott, J. (2016). Ethical issues in visual research and the value of stories. In D. Warr, S. Cox, M. Guillemin, & J. Waycott (Eds.), Ethics and visual research methods: Theory, methodology, and practice (pp. 1–16). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Weinberg, M., & Campbell, C. (2014). From codes to contextual collaborations: Shifting the thinking about ethics in social work. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 25(1), 37–49.
Winkworth, G., McArthur, M., Layton, M., & Thompson, L. (2010). Someone to check in on me: Social capital, social support and vulnerable parents with very young children in the Australian Capital Territory. Child and Family Social Work, 15(2), 206–215.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jarldorn, M. (2019). Ethics and Ethical Dilemmas with Photovoice and Participatory Action Research. In: Photovoice Handbook for Social Workers. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94511-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94511-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94510-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94511-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)