Abstract
The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has been given the duty of supervising the application of international refugee instruments to ensure that states implement them uniformly serving the best interests of asylum seekers and refugees. As part of its supervisory role, UNHCR provides guidance on how to interpret the Refugee Convention and how to conduct the refugee status determination process. Thus, the consistency of states’ interpretation and application of the refugee definition with UNHCR’s authoritative guidance means providing refugee status to people who fulfil the definition of refugee. This chapter focuses on lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) people in need of protection. It identifies persecution, credibility, internal flight alternative and concealment approach as decisive areas for granting or rejecting the asylum applications of LGBTI people and explores the (in)consistencies of states’ interpretation and application of these areas with the UNHCR’s guidelines on international protection, assuming that any inconsistency would mean the need for an enhanced supervisory role. The chapter questions, then, in which area(s) there is a need of enhancing the UNHCR’s supervisory role in the legal process of refugee status determination for LGBTI asylum seekers. By analysing a randomly selected 40 case research sample, the chapter preliminary identifies four inconsistencies and concludes that the UNHCR’s supervisory role needs to be enhanced in three areas: namely persecution (the enforcement requirement of the existing laws), credibility (stereotypes) and the concealment approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Refugee status determination may also be conducted by UNHCR where states are unable or unwilling to do so. UNHCR Refugees do generally enjoy international protection in a limited way including the principle of non-penalization and non-refoulement while waiting for being resettled in a third country.
- 2.
The Handbook and Guidelines on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refuge Status and in the Guidelines on International Protection (1992), Guidance Note on Refugee Claims Relating to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (2008), discussion note on the LGBTI Asylum-Seekers and Refugees (2010) and Guidelines on International Protection No.9 (2012).
- 3.
There are also other challenges such as improving state reporting, institutionalizing a constructive dialogue with State parties and the measure of enforcement (Kälin 2003, p. 631).
- 4.
The link of that database: http://www.refworld.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/rwmain?page=type&type=CASELAW.
- 5.
Among them, India (5), Nigeria (5), Egypt (4) and Malaysia (3) constitute the majority.
- 6.
Australia (14), UK (6), New Zealand (6), Canada (5), Ireland (3), South Africa (2), USA (1), Sweden (1), Poland (1) and Holland (1).
- 7.
Refugee Appeal Board Decision (Tanzania), [2011].
- 8.
Ireland (E. v. Refugee Appeals Tribunal & Ors, [2011]) and South Africa (Refugee Appeal Board Decision (Tanzania), [2011]) have inconsistent interpretations of the enforcement requirements of the existing laws while New Zealand has inconsistent interpretations of stereotypes (Refugee Appeal No. 76484, [2010]) and the discretion approach (Refugee Appeal No. 76566, [2010]).
- 9.
Refugee Appeal Board Decision (Tanzania), [2011].
- 10.
Please see Art.3 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Art.6 and 9 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Art.33(1) of Convention relating to the Status of Refugees.
- 11.
Sudan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Somalia, Nigeria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Mauritania, Qatar and United Arab Emirates.
- 12.
BQ (China), [2015]; Refugee Appeal Board Decision (Tanzania), [2011]; MD India CG v. Secretary for the Home Department, [2014] and RRT Case No. 1108582, [2012].
- 13.
Private Proceeding X, [2011].
- 14.
Guerrero v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2011].
- 15.
X.v. The Head of the Office for Foreigners, [2012].
- 16.
Refugee Appeal Board Decision (Tanzania), [2011] and E. v. Refugee Appeals Tribunal & Ors, [2011].
- 17.
- 18.
X. v. The Head of the Office for Foreigners, [2012].
- 19.
Applicant v. Minister for Security and Justice, [2013]; E.P.A v. The Refugee Appeals Tribunal, [2013] and Francis Ojo Ogunrinde v. Canada, [2012].
- 20.
The decision on the existence of general credibility is taken by the examiner only when the applicant’s statements are coherent and plausible and do not counter to generally known facts (UNHCR 1992, para.204).
- 21.
AD (Egypt), [2011].
- 22.
RRT Case No. 1003995, [2010] and RRT Case No. 0905785, [2010].
- 23.
RRT Case No. 1217632, [2013]; RRT Case No. 1109183, [2012]; RRT Case No. 1108582, [2012]; SZQAM v. Minister for Immigration, [2011]; Refugee Appeal No. 76566, [2010]; RRT Case No. 1004169, [2010]; RRT Case No. 1000978, [2010]; Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v. SZMDS, [2010]; Refugee Appeal No. 76414, [2010]; Refugee Appeal No. 76484, [2010]; X, Re, VB3-02152, [2014]; X v. Canada, [2014] and OO (Gay Men) Algeria CG v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2016].
- 24.
A case can be identified as relevant for this part only meeting the following criteria: the applicant shall add another ground for asylum and/or make changes in his/her testimony.
- 25.
MD (same-sex oriented males: risk) India CG v. Secretary for the Home Department, [2014]; AR and NH (lesbians) India v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2016]; RRT Case No. 1102720, [2011] and E. v. Refugee Appeals Tribunal & Ors, [2011].
- 26.
Private Proceeding X, [2011].
- 27.
RRT Case No. 1213081, [2014]; RRT Case No. 1102251, [2011]; RRT Case No. 1003995, [2010] and RRT Case No. 0905785, [2010].
- 28.
M.E. v. Sweden, [2015]; AE (Egypt), [2012]; AD (Egypt), [2012] and SW Jamaica v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2011].
- 29.
E.P.A v. The Refugee Appeals Tribunal, [2013]; M.A. v. Minister for Justice and Law Reform, [2010]; Applicant v. Minister for Security and Justice, [2013]; RRT Case No. 1207970, [2012]; RRT Case No. 1102877, [2012]; RRT Case No. 1102251, [2011] and RRT Case No. 0905785, [2010].
- 30.
HL (Malaysia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2012]; OO (Gay Men) Algeria CG v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2016] and LH and IP (gay men: risk) Sri Lanka CG v. The Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2015].
- 31.
AE (Egypt), [2012]; AD (Egypt), [2012].
References
Arakaki, O. (2013). Non-state actors and UNHCR’s supervisory role in international relations. In J. C. Simeon (Ed.), The UNHCR and the supervision of international refugee law (pp. 286–301). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carroll, A., & Mendos, L. R. (2017). State Sponsored Homophobia 2017: A world survey of sexual orientation laws: criminalisation, protection and recognition. International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association.
D’epifanio, M. (2011). Credibility issues of LGBTI Asylum-Seekers in the refugee status determination. Master thesis, Istanbul Bilgi University.
Fragaman, A. (1970). The refugee: A problem of definition. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 3(1), 45–69.
Goodwin-Gill, G. S., & McAdam, J. (2007). The refugee in international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hathaway, J. C. (2005). Michigan guidelines on well-founded fear. Michigan Journal of International Law, 26(2), 492–503.
Kälin, W. (2003). Supervising the 1951 Convention relating to the status of refugees: Article 35 and beyond. In E. Feller, V. Türk, & F. Nicholson (Eds.), Refugee protection in international law: UNHCR’s global consultations on international protection (pp. 613–666). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nen, E. N., & Nykänen, E. (2012). Fragmented state power and forced migration: A study on non-state actors in refugee law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Pobjoy, J. (2013). A child rights framework for assessing the status of refugee children. In S. S. Juss & C. Harvey (Eds.), Contemporary issues in refugee law (pp. 91–138). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Pollini, F. E. (2014). The difficult path towards the recognition of refugee status based on sexual orientation and gender identity analysing Brazil and the United Kingdom. ICL Journal. Retrieved February 12, 2016, from https://www.icl-journal.com/media/ICL_Thesis_Vol_8_2_14.pdf
Türk, V. (2002). UNHCR’s supervisory responsibility. New Issues in Refugee Research (Working Paper No. 67).
Türk, V. (2013). Ensuring protection to LGBTI persons of concern. Forced Migration Review, 42, 5–8.
United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. (2015). Discrimination and violence against individuals based on their sexual orientation and gender identity. Geneva: Author.
UN General Assembly. (1950). Statute of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
UNHCR. (1992). Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees.
UNHCR. (2008). UNHCR Guidance Note on Refugee Claims Relating to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity.
UNHCR. (2010). The Protection of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex Asylum-Seekers and Refugees.
UNHCR. (2012). Guidelines on International Protection No.9: Claims to Refugee Status based on Sexual Orientation and/or Gender Identity within the context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or its 1967 protocol relating to the Status of Refugees.
Weßels, J. (2011). Sexual orientation in refugee status determination (Working Paper Series No. 74). Refugee Studies Centre.
Zimmermann, A., & Mahler, C. (2011). Article 1A, Paragraph 2. In A. Zimmermann, J. Dörschner, & F. Machts (Eds.), The 1951 Convention relating to the status of refugees and its 1967 protocol. A commentary (pp. 281–467). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Case Law
AD (Egypt), NZIPT 800177 (2011).
AE (Egypt), NZIPT 800226 (2012).
Applicant v. Minister for Security and Justice, 201012342/V2 (2013).
AR and NH (lesbians) India v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, UKUT 00066 (2016).
BQ (China), NZIPT 800826 (2015).
E.P.A v. The Refugee Appeals Tribunal, IEHC 85 (2013).
Esnat Maureen Makumba v. The Minister of Home Affairs and others (2014).
E. v. Refugee Appeals Tribunal & Ors, IEHC 149 (2011).
Francis Ojo Ogunrinde v. Canada, FC 760 (2012).
Guerrero v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), FC 860 (2011).
HL (Malaysia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, EWCA Civ 834 (2012).
LH and IP (gay men: risk) Sri Lanka CG v. The Secretary of State for the Home Department, UKUT 00073 (2015).
M.A. v. Minister for Justice and Law Reform, and others, IEHC 519 (2010).
MD (same-sex oriented males: risk) India CG v. Secretary for the Home Department, UKUT 00065 (2014).
M.E. v. Sweden (Grand Chamber), Application no. 71398/12, (2015).
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v. SZMDS, HCA 16 (2010).
OO (Gay Men) Algeria CG v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, UKUT 00065 (2016).
Private Proceeding X, MA8-04150 (2011).
Refugee Appeal Board Decision (Tanzania) (2011).
Refugee Appeal No. 76414, No. 76414 (2010).
Refugee Appeal No. 76484, No. 76484 (2010).
Refugee Appeal No. 76566, No. 76566 (2010).
RRT Case No. 0905785, RRTA 150 (2010).
RRT Case No. 1000978, RRTA 493 (2010).
RRT Case No. 1003995, RRTA 580 (2010).
RRT Case No. 1004169, RRTA 723 (2010).
RRT Case No. 1102251, RRTA 390 (2011).
RRT Case No. 1102720, RRTA 714 (2011).
RRT Case No. 1102877, RRTA 101 (2012).
RRT Case No. 1108582, RRTA 247 (2012).
RRT Case No. 1109183, RRTA 567 (2012).
RRT Case No. 1207970, RRTA 757 (2012).
RRT Case No. 1217632, RRTA 870 (2013).
RRT Case No. 1213081, RRTA 75 (2014).
SW (lesbians - HJ and HT applied) Jamaica v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, CG, UKUT 00251 (2011).
SZQAM v. Minister for Immigration & Anor, FMCA 624 (2011).
Todorovic v. U.S. Attorney General, No. 09-11652 (2010).
X, Re, VB3-02152 (2014).
X v. Canada, MB3-04233 (2014).
X. v. The Head of the Office for Foreigners (unofficial English translation of the Polish original) (2012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Güler, A. (2019). Refugee Status Determination Process for LGBTI Asylum Seekers: (In)Consistencies of States’ Implementations with UNHCR’s Authoritative Guidance. In: Güler, A., Shevtsova, M., Venturi, D. (eds) LGBTI Asylum Seekers and Refugees from a Legal and Political Perspective. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91905-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91905-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91904-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91905-8
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)