Abstract
Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec, Glivec [Novartis, Basel, Switzerland], formerly referred to as STI571 or CGP57148B) represents the paradigm of a new class of anticancer agents, so-called small molecules. They have a high selectivity against a specific molecular target known to be the cause for the establishment and maintenance of the malignant phenotype. Imatinib is a rationally designed oral signal transduction inhibitor that specifically targets several protein tyrosine kinases, Abl, Arg (Abl-related gene), the stem cell factor receptor (c-KIT), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGF-R), and their oncogenic forms, most notably BCR-ABL. Imatinib has been shown to have remarkable clinical activity in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and malignant gastrointestinal stroma tumors (GIST) leading to its approval for treatment of these diseases. Treatment with imatinib is generally well tolerated with a low incidence of severe side effects. The most common adverse events include mild to moderate edema, muscle cramps, diarrhea, nausea, skin rashes, and myelosuppression. Several mechanisms of resistance have been identified. Clonal evolution, amplification, or overexpression of BCR-ABL as well as mutations in the catalytic domain, P-loop, and other mutations have been demonstrated to play a role in primary and secondary resistance to imatinib, respectively. Understanding of the underlying mechanisms of resistance has led to the development of new second- and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (see chapters on dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, and ponatinib).
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a clonal disorder of the hematopoietic stem cell. The clinical presentation often includes granulocytosis, a hypercellular bone marrow, and splenomegaly. The natural course of the disease involves three sequential phases—chronic phase (CP), progressing often through an accelerated phase (AP) into the terminal blast crisis (BC). The duration of CP is several years, while AP and BC usually last only for months. In the past, prior to the introduction of TKIs into the treatment of CML, median survival was in the range of 4–5 years (Hehlmann et al. 2007b; Sawyers 1999).
CML is characterized by the presence of the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph), a unique reciprocal translocation between the long arms of chromosomes 9 and 22, t(9:22), which is present in >90% of patients with CML and approximately 15–30% of ALL (Nowell and Hungerford 1960; Rowley 1973). On the molecular level, t(9:22) results in the generation of an oncogene, the BCR-ABL fusion gene, encoding the BCR-ABL protein which has constitutive tyrosine kinase activity (Konopka et al. 1984; Fig. 1).
Its causal role in the development of CML has been demonstrated in vitro as well as in several animal models (Daley et al. 1990; Heisterkamp et al. 1990; Lugo et al. 1990; Voncken et al. 1995).
The pathological effects of BCR-ABL include increased proliferation, protection from programmed cell death, altered stem cell adhesion, and possibly genetic instability that leads to disease progression (Deininger and Goldman 1998; Deininger et al. 2000).
Before the introduction of imatinib, standard therapy of CML was interferon-α alone or in combination with cytarabine (ara-C) leading to hematologic remissions in the majority of patients, but major cytogenetic responses—i.e., <35% Ph+ metaphases—were only seen in 6–25% of patients (Hehlmann et al. 2007b). The only curative treatment of CML is allogeneic stem cell transplantation from an HLA-compatible donor. However, it is only an option for a part of the patients and still associated with considerable morbidity and mortality (Gratwohl et al. 1998; Hehlmann et al. 2007a).
The presence of BCR-ABL in >90% of CML patients and the identification of its essential role in the pathogenesis of the disease provided the rationale of targeting this fusion protein for treatment of CML.
In the nineties of the twentieth century, first data of compounds with an effect on tyrosine kinases were published (Levitzky and Gazit 1995). Tyrphostins and other similar compounds were shown to inhibit the ABL—as well as the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase at micromolar concentrations but had only limited specificity (Anafi et al. 1993a, b; Carlo-Stella et al. 1999). This led to the rational design of further TKI with selective activity against the ABL tyrosine kinase, one of which was a 2-phenylaminopyrimidine called CGP57148B, later called STI571 or imatinib mesylate (Buchdunger et al. 1995, 1996; Druker and Lydon 2000; Druker et al. 1996).
After demonstration of specificity in vitro, in cell-based systems as well as in different animal models, this compound was tested in several phase I and phase II studies (Druker et al. 2001a; Kantarjian et al. 2002a, b). Imatinib was shown to have very high rates of hematologic remissions in CP-CML patients previously treated with interferon-α as well as in advanced stages of the disease. Cytogenetic remissions were achieved in a considerable portion of patients. Based on these good results, imatinib was approved for treatment of CML patients in CP after treatment failure with interferon-α and the advanced stages, i.e., AP and BC (Cohen et al. 2002b).
The phase III (IRIS-) trial led to establishment of imatinib as standard for first-line therapy of CP-CML (Cohen et al. 2009; Dagher et al. 2002; Hochhaus et al. 2017). The very good clinical results for imatinib of the IRIS trial were reproduced by several large phase III studies, including the German CML IV trial (Hehlmann et al. 2017). Patients who optimally respond to imatinib or next-generation TKIs have a near-normal life expectancy and, in this population, the impact of comorbidities on survival outcomes is considered as greater than that of CML itself. However, lifelong treatment is still recommended (Saußele et al. 2015, 2016; Rea and Mahon 2018).
Currently, several trials investigate the effect of stopping imatinib or second-generation TKIs in patients reaching a very good long-lasting remission based upon the results of the so-called STIM trial where it could be shown that approximately half of patients stayed in a very good molecular remission after the end of the therapy (Mahon et al. 2010; Etienne et al. 2017; Mahon et al. 2016; Rea et al. 2017). This has prompted the development of a new concept in the evaluation of CML patients known as “treatment-free remission” (Saußele et al. 2016).
Other molecular targets of imatinib are the stem cell factor receptor (c-KIT) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGF-R) (Buchdunger et al. 1995, 1996, 2000; Heinrich et al. 2002a, b).
c-KIT is expressed in a variety of human cancers, including germ cell tumors, neuroblastoma, melanoma, small cell lung cancer, breast and ovarian cancers, acute myeloid leukemia, mast cell disorders as well as malignant gastrointestinal stroma tumors (GIST). While in most of these diseases, the exact role of c-KIT expression is not defined, in mastocytosis and GISTs activating mutations of c-KIT have been identified.
Based upon data of a single open-label phase II trial and two large phase III trials by the EORTC and SWOG, imatinib received approval for treatment of metastatic/unresectable GIST (Cohen et al. 2009; Dagher et al. 2002). In addition, the role of neoadjuvant therapy and adjuvant treatment with imatinib after successful resection of primary GIST has been clearly demonstrated and led to its approval (Joensuu et al. 2012; von Mehren and Joensuu 2018). The duration of adjuvant imatinib therapy in patients with a substantial risk of recurrence should be at least 3 years. However, the optimal duration is unknown. As in CML, several resistance mutations in c-kit as well as in the PDGFRA have been identified in patients with GIST (von Mehren and Joensuu 2018).
Furthermore, imatinib has been successfully used in diseases with aberrant PDGF receptors. They have been shown to deregulate the growth of a variety of cancers, such as GIST; myeloproliferative disorders (Pardanani and Tefferi 2004), e.g., in hypereosinophilic syndrome (FIP1L1/PDGFRα-rearrangement), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), harboring the activating translocations involving the PDGF receptor beta locus on chromosome 5q33 (FIP1/PDGFR-translocation); carcinomas; melanoma; gliomas; and sarcomas, including dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (Barnhill et al. 1996; Greco et al. 2001).
In addition, in several non-malignant diseases, e.g., pulmonary veno-occlusive disease and pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis imatinib, has a positive effect on the disease (Ogawa et al. 2017). Its role in the treatment of autoimmune disease has been investigated (Hoeper et al. 2013; Moinzadeh et al. 2013).
2 Structure and Mechanisms of Action
Imatinib mesylate is designated chemically as 4-[(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)methyl]-N-[4-methyl-3-[[4-(3-pyridinyl)-2-pyrimidinyl] aminophenyl] benzamide methanesulfonate. Its molecular formula is C29H31N7O.CH4SO3, and its relative molecular mass is 589.7 (Fig. 2).
Imatinib functions as a specific competitive inhibitor of ATP. It binds with high affinity at the ATP binding site in the inactive form of the kinase domain, blocks ATP binding, and thereby inhibits kinase activity by interrupting the transfer of phosphate from ATP to tyrosine residues on substrate proteins (Cohen et al. 2002a, b, 2005; Lyseng-Williamson and Jarvis 2001; Mauro et al. 2002).
Imatinib selectively inhibits all the ABL tyrosine kinases, including BCR-ABL, cellular homolog of the Abelson murine leukemia viral oncogene product (c-ABL), v-ABL, TEL-ABL, and Abelson-related gene (ARG). In addition, it was found to potently inhibit the tyrosine kinase activity of the α- and β-platelet-derived growth factor receptors (PDGF-R) and the receptor for stem cell factor (c-KIT; CD117). The concentrations required for a 50% kinase inhibition were in the range of 0.025 μM in in vitro kinase assays and approximately 0.25 μM in intact cells. Extensive screening did not show activity against other tyrosine kinases or serine/threonine kinases (Buchdunger et al. 1995, 1996, 2000, 2001; Deininger et al. 2005; Druker and Lydon 2000; Druker et al. 1996; Heinrich et al. 2002a; Okuda et al. 2001; Table 1).
Imatinib concentrations causing a 50% reduction in kinase activity (IC50) are given.
3 Preclinical Data
In vitro studies demonstrated specific inhibition of myeloid cell lines expressing BCR-ABL without killing the parental cell lines from which they were derived (Deininger et al. 1997; Druker et al. 1996; Gambacorti-Passerini et al. 1997). Continuous treatment with imatinib inhibited tumor formation in syngeneic mice as well as in a nude mouse model after inoculation of BCR-ABL-expressing cells in a dose-dependent manner, treated intraperitoneally or with oral administration of STI571, respectively (Druker et al. 1996; le Coutre et al. 1999). Activity on primary CML cells could be demonstrated, and a >90% reduction of BCR-ABL-expressing colonies in colony-forming assays from peripheral blood or bone marrow from CML patients was achieved at a concentration of imatinib of 1 μM while normal colonies did not show growth inhibition (Deininger et al. 1997; Druker et al. 1996; Gambacorti-Passerini et al. 1997).
4 Clinical Data in CML
4.1 Phase I Trials
In 1998, a phase I clinical trial with imatinib was initiated. This study was a dose escalation trial designed to determine the maximally tolerated dose, with clinical benefit as a secondary endpoint. 83 patients with CP-CML who had failed standard therapy with interferon-α (IFN-α) or were intolerant to it were enrolled. One-third of patients had signs of early progression to AP. They received escalating oral doses of imatinib, ranging from 25 to 1000 mg/day. Clinical features of patients were typical of the disease. Dose-limiting toxicity was not reached, although a higher frequency of severe toxicities was encountered at imatinib doses >750 mg/day. The most common adverse events were nausea (43%), myalgia (41%), edema (39%), and diarrhea (25%). After 29 patients were enrolled, therapeutic doses of 300 mg or more per day were reached. 53 of 54 patients achieved a complete hematologic response, reaching normal blood counts typically within four weeks of treatment. 51 of these 53 patients maintained normal blood counts after one year of therapy. Furthermore, these patients had a 31% rate of major cytogenetic responses (MCyR; <35% Ph+ metaphases) and a 13% rate of complete cytogenetic responses (CCyR; eradication of Ph+ bone marrow cells) (Druker 2008; Druker et al. 2001b).
In another phase I trial, patients with myeloid and lymphoid blast crisis and patients with relapsed or refractory Ph+ lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) were treated with daily doses of 300–1000 mg of imatinib. 55% of patients with myeloid blast crisis responded to therapy (45% of patients with <5% blasts in the bone marrow, and 11% reached a complete remission with full recovery of peripheral blood counts, respectively) but only in 18% response was maintained longer than one year.
Of 20 patients with Ph+ ALL or lymphoid blast crisis, 70% responded, 20% reached a complete hematologic remission. Nevertheless, all but one relapsed between days 45 and 117 (Druker et al. 2001a).
Based on the results of the phase I trials, the use of imatinib was expanded to large phase II and phase III clinical trials.
4.2 Phase II Studies
Three open-label, single-arm phase II studies using imatinib as a single agent were conducted in patients with Ph+ CML in three clinical settings: CML-CP after IFN-α failure or with intolerance to the drug, CML-AP, and CML-BC. Imatinib was administered orally once daily. Initially, all patients received 400 mg/day. Early in the study, however, the imatinib dose was increased to 600 mg daily for CML-AP and CML-BC trials. Patients with resistant or progressive disease receiving a dose of 400 or 600 mg/day could receive doses of 600 or 800 mg daily (administered as 400 mg twice daily).
In 532 patients with CP-CML who had failed IFN-α therapy, 95% of patients reached a complete hematologic response, with CCR rates of 41% and major cytogenetic remission (MCR) of 60%. The estimated rates of freedom from progression to accelerated or blastic phase and overall survival at 6 years were 61 and 76%, respectively (Druker 2008; Hochhaus et al. 2008; Kantarjian et al. 2002a).
For patients in BC and with Ph+ ALL, the studies confirmed the results of the phase I trial. Response rates were also high; however, relapses were seen frequently. The majority of patients in BC relapsed during the first year of treatment. Hematologic responses were observed in 52% of patients (n = 260) with myeloid BC, with a median response duration of 10 months. Interestingly, 48% of patients in this trial developed new cytogenetic abnormalities during treatment, demonstrating clonal evolution (Druker et al. 2001a; Ottmann et al. 2002; Sawyers et al. 2002).
The efficacy in patients with AP CML was intermediate between CP and BC. Of 181 patients with AP, 82% showed a hematologic response, 53% reached a CHR which was sustained in 69%. Major cytogenetic remissions were seen in 24% of patients with a CCR rate of 17% (Talpaz et al. 2002).
The treatment results in advanced phase CML and Ph+ ALL underline the necessity of combination therapies with conventional chemotherapy as well as the use of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
The results of the phase I and phase II trials led to the approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of imatinib for the treatment of CML in advanced phase and after failure of IFN therapy in CP CML (Cohen et al. 2002b; Deininger et al. 2005; Druker 2008).
4.3 Phase III Study (IRIS Trial)
In a landmark phase III study, the International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS) trial, imatinib and the combination of IFN plus cytarabine were compared in newly diagnosed CP-CML patients. More than 1000 patients were accrued in less than 7 months. 553 patients were randomized to each of the two treatments, imatinib at 400 mg per day or interferon-α plus Ara-C. There were no significant differences in prognostic or clinical features between the two treatment arms. After a median follow-up of 19 months, patients randomized to imatinib had significantly better results for CHR, MCR, and CCR, as well as progression-free survival than patients treated with interferon-α plus Ara-C (O’Brien et al. 2003a, b).
The remarkable superiority of imatinib led to early disclosure of study results. Thereafter, most patients were crossed over from interferon-α plus Ara-C to the imatinib arm.
The IRIS trial is now a long-term follow-up study of patients who received imatinib as initial therapy. After a follow-up of 5 years, the overall survival for newly diagnosed CP patients treated with imatinib was 89%. An estimated 93% of imatinib-treated patients remained free from disease progression to the AP or BC. The estimated annual rate of treatment failure was 3.3% in the first year, 7.5% in year two, 4.8% in year three, 1.5% in year four, and 0.9% in year five. The progression rate did not increase over time (Druker et al. 2006; Hochhaus et al. 2017; Fig. 3). Survival rates in the IRIS trial were especially high in patients who had a major molecular response at 12 months or 18 months and those with low Sokal scores. These results are consistent with previous reports from IRIS and other studies as, e.g., the CML IV trial showing that early response to TKI therapy is a valuable prognostic marker for long-term outcome (Hochhaus et al. 2017; Hehlmann et al. 2017).
Most of the side effects of imatinib were mild to moderate, with the most common being edema, muscle cramps, diarrhea, nausea, skin rashes, and myelosuppression (Druker et al. 2006; Hochhaus et al. 2017). Serious adverse cardiac events were reported in 7.1%. No new safety signals were observed after the 5-year analysis. Quality of life was far better in patients treated with imatinib (Hahn et al. 2003).
Rates of hematologic and cytogenetic responses are shown in Table 2. A recent update at 10.9 years showed an estimated overall survival of 83.3% which is similar to the rate of 84% reported among patients who were treated with imatinib-based regimens in the German CML IV study, which was initiated shortly after IRIS to investigate alternative dosing strategies and drug combinations in patients with newly diagnosed CML in first chronic phase (Hehlmann et al. 2017). The estimated EFS at 10.9 years was 79.6%.
The estimated rate without progression to AP or BC is 93%. A CCR was achieved by 456 of 553 (82%) of patients on first-line imatinib (O’Brien et al. 2008).
Monitoring of residual disease by quantitative RT-PCR in complete cytogenetic responders showed that the risk of disease progression was inversely correlated with the reduction of BCR-ABL mRNA compared with pre-therapeutic levels (Hughes et al. 2003). The rates of major molecular remissions as well as the depth of molecular responses increase over time with a downward trend of relapse (O’Brien et al. 2008).
Investigation of pharmacokinetics in the imatinib-treated patients showed a correlation between imatinib trough plasma concentrations with clinical responses, EFS, and adverse events. Patients with high imatinib exposure had better rates of CCR, major molecular responses, and event-free survival (Larsen et al. 2008).
The results of the IRIS trial have led to FDA approval of imatinib for first-line treatment of patients with CP-CML in 2002 (Cohen et al. 2002b, 2005; Druker et al. 2001b).
5 Treatment Recommendations for the Use of Imatinib in Chronic Phase CML
Based upon the results achieved in the phase I, II, and III trials with imatinib, expert panels of the European Leukemia Net and the NCCN have developed guidelines for monitoring and treatment of CP-CML with imatinib (http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/cml.pdf; Baccarani et al. 2013; http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/cml.pdf; Table 3).
While the IRIS trial was performed, new guidelines for CML treatment were published and new BCR-ABL1 inhibitors dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib were developed. Nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib have been approved as first-line therapies in patients with CML in chronic phase based on results from phase III trials showing higher response rates than the comparator imatinib.
In case of suboptimal response to imatinib, a mutation analysis should be performed and treatment with a 2nd generation TKI such as dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib or third-generation TKI as ponatinib should be discussed as they are approved in this setting (see according chapters). Furthermore, the option of allogeneic stem cell transplantation should be considered. New third-generation TKI are currently under investigation.
6 Imatinib in Combination with Other Drugs
In order to further optimize the efficacy of imatinib in CML, a number of approaches have been investigated in phase II trials. Increase in the dose of imatinib monotherapy to 800 mg/d in CP-CML has shown earlier complete cytogenetic responses but is associated with more side effects (Cortes et al. 2003; Hehlmann et al. 2011; Hehlmann et al. 2017). In addition, imatinib in combination with other agents, such as interferon-α, cytarabine, and homoharringtonine, has been examined. Patients treated with combination therapy reached faster cytogenetic remission, but also experienced higher rates of toxicity, in particular myelotoxicity (Baccarani et al. 2003, 2004; Gardembas et al. 2003). Several major phase III trials compared standard dose imatinib with increased doses and combinations with cytarabine or interferon. In these trials, the induction of faster cytogenetic as well as molecular remissions could be shown in patients receiving higher dosages of imatinib. However, the increased dosage if imatinib as well as when used in combination with cytarabine was more toxic than standard dose (Hehlmann et al. 2017; Preudhomme et al. 2010).
7 Imatinib: Other Targets
Other molecular targets of imatinib are the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGF-R) and the stem cell factor receptor (c-KIT) (Buchdunger et al. 1995, 2000; Heinrich et al. 2002a).
Aberrant PDGF receptors have been shown to deregulate the growth of a variety of cancers, such as myeloproliferative disorders (Pardanani and Tefferi 2004), e.g., in hypereosinophilic syndrome (FIP1L1/PDGFR-rearrangement) (Jovanovic et al. 2007), CMML involving the 5q33 translocations (Jovanovic et al. 2007), carcinomas, melanoma, gliomas, and sarcomas, including dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (Barnhill et al. 1996; Greco et al. 2001).
c-KIT is expressed in a variety of human malignancies, including germ cell tumors, neuroblastoma, melanoma, small cell lung cancer, breast and ovarian cancer, acute myeloid leukemia, mast cell disorders, and malignant GIST.
In most of these diseases, the exact role of c-KIT expression is not defined in mastocytosis and GISTs, activating mutations of c-KIT have been identified (Heinrich et al. 2003a, b).
In approximately 60% of cases of GIST, there are mutations in c-kit105 in the juxtamembrane domain. In most of the remaining cases, mutations in exon 13 and exon 9 have been found. The mutations lead to constitutive activation of the receptor without its ligand (Lux et al. 2000). Imatinib at a dosage of 400 mg once or twice daily was investigated in the EORTC 62,005 and S0033 trials. Both studies confirmed the benefit of imatinib 400 mg once daily, which was first reported in the B2222 study, (CR rates 3–6%, PR rates 45–48%, and SD rates 26–32%) (Verweij et al. 2004; Casali et al. 2015; Demetri 2002). No OS difference (47–55 months) was demonstrated between the 400 and 800 mg doses, establishing 400 mg once daily as the standard dose. Pooled analysis of the two EORTC trials showed that patients with exon 9 mutations treated with the higher imatinib dose had a longer PFS. These patients should therefore receive 2 mg × 400 mg, if tolerated. In the BFR14 trial patients were randomly assigned to stop therapy after 1, 3, or 5 years. Patients who stopped therapy had a shorter PFS compared with those who remained on treatment. These data support uninterrupted treatment with imatinib (von Mehren and Joentsuu 2018).
After approval of imatinib in metastatic GIST, the role of adjuvant treatment after successful resection was investigated.
In two of three randomized trials, adjuvant imatinib administered for 1 or 2 years improved recurrence-free survival compared with observation or placebo. However, an overall survival benefit was not demonstrated in either study. In the third trial, GIST patients with a high risk for relapse were randomized to receive adjuvant imatinib for 1 or 3 years after surgery, respectively. After a median follow-up of 7.5 years, patients who received 3 years of imatinib had longer recurrence-free survival while OS was comparable between both arms. In all three studies, patients with KIT exon 11 deletion mutations had the most benefit from adjuvant imatinib (Corless et al. 2014; Joensuu et al. 2012). Two further phase III trials are ongoing. Patients with a substantial risk for relapse should be treated for at least 3 years with imatinib. However, the optimal duration remains unknown. Mutation analysis of kit and PDGFRA is mandatory prior to initiation of adjuvant therapy because GISTs with PDGFRA D842 V mutation or lacking a mutation in KIT or PDGFRA are unlikely to benefit from adjuvant imatinib (see for review von Mehren and Joensuu 2018) (Table 4).
8 Side Effects/Toxicity
Hematologic side effects of imatinib are shown in Tables 5 and 6. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, or anemia was seen in all phase II trials and the phase III study. While grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in first-line treatment of CP-CML in about 17%, in accelerated and blastic phase, it could be detected in approximately 60% of patients. In addition, in advanced phase, CML thrombocytopenia and anemia are more frequently than in CP-CML (first or second line).
Typical non-hematologic side effects in phase II trials of imatinib in CML are shown in Table 5 (Cohen et al. 2002b, 2005; Guilhot 2004). In the IRIS trial, most of the side effects of imatinib were mild to moderate, with the most common being edema, muscle cramps, diarrhea, nausea, skin rashes, and myelosuppression as shown in Table 5 (Druker et al. 2006; O’Brien et al. 2003b).
Recently, it has been suggested that imatinib may cause cardiotoxicity (Kerkela et al. 2006). However, a preexisting condition predisposing to congestive heart failure (CHF) could not be excluded in these patients. Furthermore, a follow-up examination of the Novartis database of imatinib clinical trials including >5600 years of exposure to imatinib found an incidence of CHF in imatinib recipients of 0.2% cases per year with a possible or probable relationship to the drug. In the IRIS trial, the incidence of cardiac failure and left ventricular dysfunction was estimated at 0.04% per year in the imatinib arm compared to 0.75% in interferon-a- and ara-C-treated patients (Hatfield et al. 2007). The final analysis after a median follow-up of 10.9 years showed cardiac SAEs, regardless of study drug relationship in 7.1% of patients treated with frontline imatinib. Serious events of a second neoplasm could be seen in 11.3%. No new safety signals were observed since the 5-year analysis (Hochhaus et al. 2017).
In an early trial in GIST, adverse events were similar to CML patients and included edema, fluid retention, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, myalgia, skin rash, bone marrow suppression, bleeding, and elevations in aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, or bilirubin. Gastrointestinal bleeding or intratumoral hemorrhage occurred in seven patients (5%) and was not correlated with thrombocytopenia or tumor bulk. Other non-hematologic side effects included fatigue and gastrointestinal complaints which were usually mild to moderate. The most common laboratory abnormality was anemia. Fluid retention and skin rash were reported more often in patients treated with 800 mg/day. Based upon these data, escalation of imatinib dosing up to 800 mg/day for patients with progressive disease was approved (Blanke et al. 2008; Heinrich et al. 2008). However, 26% of patients receiving imatinib for 3 years in the adjuvant setting discontinued treatment for causes other than relapse (Joensuu et al. 2012).
9 Clinical Pharmacology and Drug Interactions
Imatinib AUC is dose proportional at the recommended daily dose range of 400 and 600 mg. Within 7 days, approximately 81% of the dose is eliminated, 68% in feces, and 13% in urine.
Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4) is the major enzyme responsible for imatinib metabolism, and both imatinib and CGP74588 appear to be potent in vitro CYP2D6 inhibitors. Imatinib plasma concentrations may be altered when the drug is administered with inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A4. When CYP3A4 inhibitors, e.g., itroconazole, ketoconazole, erythromycin, or clarithromycin, are co-administered with imatinib, its metabolization may be decreased. CYP3A4 inducers, such as dexamethasone, phenytoin, rifampicin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, may increase imatinib metabolism. Furthermore, increased plasma concentrations of drugs which are substrates of CYP3A4, e.g., simvastatin, cyclosporine, and others, may be the result of imatinib use (Cohen et al. 2002b, 2005; Lyseng-Williamson and Jarvis 2001; Mauro et al. 2002).
In a small number of children with Ph+ ALL imatinib plasma levels as well as of its metabolite CGP74588 were measured. Imatinib plasma levels were similar to those in adult patients. However, AUC of CGP74588 was only 5–24% of the parent drug’s AUC, and it was eliminated much faster than in adults indicating a lesser role of the metabolite in antileukemic activity (Marangon et al. 2009).
In the phase III (IRIS) trial, the correlation of imatinib pharmacokinetics and the response to treatment as well as to side effects could be shown (Larsen et al. 2008).
10 Biomarkers
10.1 CML
10.1.1 Disease Progression and Imatinib Resistance
Resistance to imatinib includes de novo resistance and relapse after an initial response. The frequent and durable responses in CP-CML are caused by the selective inhibition of BCR-ABL by imatinib. In accelerated and blastic phase CML as well as in Ph+ ALL, the combination of high numbers of proliferating tumor cells and genomic instability may lead to secondary genetic alterations, independent of BCR-ABL (von Bubnoff et al. 2003). In the majority of patients who respond to imatinib and then relapse, reactivation of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase could be shown. This indicates that BCR-ABL-dependent mechanisms either prevent imatinib from reaching its target or render the target insensitive to BCR-ABL. In the former category are mechanisms such as increased drug efflux through the multidrug resistance gene or protein binding of imatinib while the latter include mutations in the catalytic domain, the P-loop, and other mutations (Druker 2008; Gorre et al. 2001). Over 70 point mutations have been demonstrated to play a role in primary and secondary resistance to imatinib, respectively (Hochhaus et al. 2011; Fig. 4).
Gene amplification or overexpression of BCR-ABL as reason for resistance is seen occasionally (Shah et al. 2008; Shah and Sawyers 2003).
Understanding the underlying mechanisms of resistance has led to the development and investigation of new second- and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Mueller 2009; Schiffer 2007) (see chapters bosutinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, and ponatinib).
10.2 GIST
Other molecular targets of imatinib are the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGF-R) and the stem cell factor receptor (c-KIT) (Buchdunger et al. 1995, 2000; Heinrich et al. 2002a).
In GISTs, activating mutations of c-KIT and PDGF-R have been identified (Heinrich et al. 2003a, b).
In approximately 60% of cases of GIST, there are mutations in c-kit105 in the juxtamembrane domain. In most of the remaining cases, mutations in exon 13 and exon 9 have been found. The mutations lead to constitutive activation of the receptor without its ligand (Lux et al. 2000). The mutational status is being used for the choice and duration of adjuvant therapy. In case of a PDGFRA D842V mutation, no adjuvant therapy is indicated. In the presence of wild-type kit, the situation has to be discussed on an individual base. In exon-11 and all mutations except exon-9 mutations, adjuvant therapy should be performed with 400 mg imatinib while in the presence of exon-9-mutations, 800 mg/d should be used (Joensuu et al. 2012; von Mehren and Joentsuu 2018).
11 Summary and Perspectives
The development of imatinib mesylate resembles the progress made in molecular biology over the past 30 years and has changed the landscape of cancer treatment leading toward causative treatment not only of CML and GIST but also for other malignancies.
After identification of the critical role of BCR-ABL in the pathogenesis of CML, less than 15 years went by until the development of imatinib which became the standard of care for patients in CP-CML. It has specific activity against a limited number of targets and has been shown to be highly effective not only in CML but also in other hematologic malignancies and solid tumors such as GIST. Side effects of treatment are mild to moderate. In addition to the originator product, after running out of the patent rights there are several generic versions of imatinib available in the EU and in the USA. The understanding of mechanisms of resistance and disease progression has furthermore lead to the development of second- and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors which are even more effective in first-line therapy of CP-CML and have each a distinct profile of side effects.
References
Anafi M, Gazit A, Gilon C, Neriah YB, Levitzki A (1993a) Tyrphostin-induced differentiation of mouse erythroleukemia cells. FEBS Lett 330:260–264
Anafi M, Gazit A, Zehavi A, Ben-Neriah Y, Levitzki A (1993b) Tyrphostin-induced inhibition of p210bcr-abl tyrosine kinase activity induces K562 to differentiate. Blood 82:3524–3529
Baccarani M, Russo D, Rosti G, Martinelli G (2003) Interferon-alfa for chronic myeloid leukemia. Semin Hematol 40:22–33
Baccarani M, Martinelli G, Rosti G, Trabacchi E, Testoni N, Bassi S, Amabile M, Soverini S, Castagnetti F, Cilloni D et al (2004) Imatinib and pegylated human recombinant interferon-alpha2b in early chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 104:4245–4251
Baccarani M, Deininger MW, Rosti G, Hochhaus A, Soverini S, Apperley JF, Cervantes F, Clark RE, Cortes JE, Guilhot F et al (2013) European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013. Blood 122:872–884
Barnhill RL, Xiao M, Graves D, Antoniades HN (1996) Expression of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-A, PDGF-B and the PDGF-alpha receptor, but not the PDGF-beta receptor, in human malignant melanoma in vivo. Br J Dermatol 135:898–904
Blanke CD, Rankin C, Demetri GD, Ryan CW, von Mehren M, Benjamin RS, Raymond AK, Bramwell VH, Baker LH, Maki RG et al (2008) Phase III randomized, intergroup trial assessing imatinib mesylate at two dose levels in patients with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors expressing the kit receptor tyrosine kinase: S0033. J Clin Oncol 26:626–632
Branford S, Hughes T (2006) Detection of BCR-ABL mutations and resistance to imatinib mesylate. Methods Mol Med 125:93–106
Buchdunger E, Zimmermann J, Mett H, Meyer T, Muller M, Regenass U, Lydon NB (1995) Selective inhibition of the platelet-derived growth factor signal transduction pathway by a protein-tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the 2-phenylaminopyrimidine class. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:2558–2562
Buchdunger E, Zimmermann J, Mett H, Meyer T, Muller M, Druker BJ, Lydon NB (1996) Inhibition of the Abl protein-tyrosine kinase in vitro and in vivo by a 2-phenylaminopyrimidine derivative. Cancer Res 56:100–104
Buchdunger E, Cioffi CL, Law N, Stover D, Ohno-Jones S, Druker BJ, Lydon NB (2000) Abl protein-tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571 inhibits in vitro signal transduction mediated by c-kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 295:139–145
Buchdunger E, Matter A, Druker BJ (2001) Bcr-Abl inhibition as a modality of CML therapeutics. Biochim Biophys Acta 1551:M11–M18
Carlo-Stella C, Regazzi E, Sammarelli G, Colla S, Garau D, Gazit A, Savoldo B, Cilloni D, Tabilio A, Levitzki A, Rizzoli V (1999) Effects of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor AG957 and an Anti-Fas receptor antibody on CD34(+) chronic myelogenous leukemia progenitor cells. Blood 93:3973–3982
Casali PG, Le Cesne A, Poveda Velasco A, et al (2015) Time to definitive failure to the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor in localized GI stromal tumors treated with imatinib as an adjuvant: A European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group Intergroup randomized trial in collaboration with the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group, UNICANCER, French Sarcoma Group, Italian Sarcoma Group, and Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas. J Clin Oncol 33:4276–4283
Cohen MH, Dagher R, Griebel DJ, Ibrahim A, Martin A, Scher NS, Sokol GH, Williams GA, Pazdur R (2002a) US Food and Drug Administration drug approval summaries: imatinib mesylate, mesna tablets, and zoledronic acid. Oncologist 7:393–400
Cohen MH, Williams G, Johnson JR, Duan J, Gobburu J, Rahman A, Benson K, Leighton J, Kim SK, Wood R et al (2002b) Approval summary for imatinib mesylate capsules in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 8:935–942
Cohen MH, Johnson JR, Pazdur R (2005) U.S. Food and Drug Administration drug approval summary: conversion of imatinib mesylate (STI571; Gleevec) tablets from accelerated approval to full approval. Clin Cancer Res 11:12–19
Cohen MH, Farrell A, Justice R, Pazdur R (2009) Approval summary: imatinib mesylate in the treatment of metastatic and/or unresectable malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Oncologist
Corless CL, Ballman KV, Antonescu CR et al (2014) Pathologic and molecular features correlate with long-term outcome after adjuvant therapy of resected primary GI stromal tumor: the ACOSOG Z900 trial. J Clin Oncol 32:1563–1570
Cortes J, Giles F, O’Brien S, Thomas D, Garcia-Manero G, Rios MB, Faderl S, Verstovsek S, Ferrajoli A, Freireich EJ et al (2003) Result of high-dose imatinib mesylate in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia after failure of interferon-alpha. Blood 102:83–86
Dagher R, Cohen M, Williams G, Rothmann M, Gobburu J, Robbie G, Rahman A, Chen G, Staten A, Griebel D, Pazdur R (2002) Approval summary: imatinib mesylate in the treatment of metastatic and/or unresectable malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Clin Cancer Res 8:3034–3038
Daley GQ, Van Etten RA, Baltimore D (1990) Induction of chronic myelogenous leukemia in mice by the P210bcr/abl gene of the Philadelphia chromosome. Science 247:824–830
Deininger MW, Goldman JM (1998) Chronic myeloid leukemia. Curr Opin Hematol 5:302–308
Deininger MW, Goldman JM, Lydon N, Melo JV (1997) The tyrosine kinase inhibitor CGP57148B selectively inhibits the growth of BCR-ABL-positive cells. Blood 90:3691–3698
Deininger MW, Goldman JM, Melo JV (2000) The molecular biology of chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 96:3343–3356
Deininger M, Buchdunger E, Druker BJ (2005) The development of imatinib as a therapeutic agent for chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 105:2640–2653
Demetri GD (2002) Identification and treatment of chemoresistant inoperable or metastatic GIST: experience with the selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib mesylate (STI571). Eur J Cancer 38(Suppl 5):S52–S59
Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Blanke CD, Van den Abbeele AD, Eisenberg B, Roberts PJ, Heinrich MC, Tuveson DA, Singer S, Janicek M et al (2002) Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. N Engl J Med 347:472–480
Druker BJ (2008) Translation of the Philadelphia chromosome into therapy for CML. Blood 112:4808–4817
Druker BJ, Lydon NB (2000) Lessons learned from the development of an abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor for chronic myelogenous leukemia. J Clin Invest 105:3–7
Druker BJ, Tamura S, Buchdunger E, Ohno S, Segal GM, Fanning S, Zimmermann J, Lydon NB (1996) Effects of a selective inhibitor of the Abl tyrosine kinase on the growth of BCR-ABL positive cells. Nat Med 2:561–566
Druker BJ, Sawyers CL, Kantarjian H, Resta DJ, Reese SF, Ford JM, Capdeville R, Talpaz M (2001a) Activity of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in the blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the Philadelphia chromosome. N Engl J Med 344:1038–1042
Druker BJ, Talpaz M, Resta DJ, Peng B, Buchdunger E, Ford JM, Lydon NB, Kantarjian H, Capdeville R, Ohno-Jones S, Sawyers CL (2001b) Efficacy and safety of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 344:1031–1037
Druker BJ, Guilhot F, O’Brien SG, Gathmann I, Kantarjian H, Gattermann N, Deininger MW, Silver RT, Goldman JM, Stone RM et al (2006) Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 355:2408–2417
Etienne G, Guilhot J, Rea D, Rigal-Huguet F, Nicolini F, Charbonnier A, Guerci-Bresler A, Legros L, Varet B, Gardembas M, Dubruille V, Tulliez M, Noel MP, Ianotto JC, Villemagne B, Carré M, Guilhot F, Rousselot P, Mahon FX (2017) Long-term follow-up of the french stop imatinib (STIM1) study in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 35(3):298–305. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.68.2914 Epub 2016 Oct 31
Gambacorti-Passerini C, Le Coutre P, Mologni L, Fanelli M, Bertazolli C, Marchesi E, Di Nicola M, Biondi A, Corneo GM, Belotti D et al (1997) Inhibition of the ABL kinase activity blocks the proliferation of BCR/ABL + leukemic cells and induces apoptosis. Blood Cells Mol Dis 23:380–394
Gardembas M, Rousselot P, Tulliez M, Vigier M, Buzyn A, Rigal-Huguet F, Legros L, Michallet M, Berthou C, Cheron N et al (2003) Results of a prospective phase 2 study combining imatinib mesylate and cytarabine for the treatment of Philadelphia-positive patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase. Blood 102:4298–4305
Gorre ME, Mohammed M, Ellwood K, Hsu N, Paquette R, Rao PN, Sawyers CL (2001) Clinical resistance to STI-571 cancer therapy caused by BCR-ABL gene mutation or amplification. Science 293:876–880
Gratwohl A, Hermans J, Goldman JM, Arcese W, Carreras E, Devergie A, Frassoni F, Gahrton G, Kolb HJ, Niederwieser D et al (1998) Risk assessment for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia before allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation. Chronic leukemia working party of the European group for blood and marrow transplantation. Lancet 352:1087–1092
Greco A, Roccato E, Miranda C, Cleris L, Formelli F, Pierotti MA (2001) Growth-inhibitory effect of STI571 on cells transformed by the COL1A1/PDGFB rearrangement. Int J Cancer 92:354–360
Guilhot F (2004) Indications for imatinib mesylate therapy and clinical management. Oncologist 9:271–281
Hahn EA, Glendenning GA, Sorensen MV, Hudgens SA, Druker BJ, Guilhot F, Larson RA, O’Brien SG, Dobrez DG, Hensley ML, Cella D (2003) Quality of life in patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia on imatinib versus interferon alfa plus low-dose cytarabine: results from the IRIS Study. J Clin Oncol 21:2138–2146
Hatfield A, Owen S, Pilot PR (2007) In reply to ‘Cardiotoxicity of the cancer therapeutic agent imatinib mesylate’. Nat Med 13, 13: author reply 15–16
Hehlmann R, Berger U, Pfirrmann M, Heimpel H, Hochhaus A, Hasford J, Kolb HJ, Lahaye T, Maywald O, Reiter A et al (2007a) Drug treatment is superior to allografting as first-line therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 109:4686–4692
Hehlmann R, Hochhaus A, Baccarani M (2007b) Chronic myeloid leukaemia. Lancet 370:342–350
Hehlmann R, Lauseker M, Jung-Munkwitz S, Leitner A, Muller MC, Pletsch N, Proetel U, Haferlach C, Schlegelberger B, Balleisen L et al (2011) Tolerability-adapted imatinib 800 mg/d versus 400 mg/d versus 400 mg/d plus interferon-alpha in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 29:1634–1642
Hehlmann R, Lauseker M, Saußele S, Pfirrmann M, Krause S, Kolb HJ, Neubauer A, Hossfeld DK, Nerl C, Gratwohl A, Baerlocher GM, Heim D, Brümmendorf TH, Fabarius A, Haferlach C, Schlegelberger B, Müller MC, Jeromin S, Proetel U, Kohlbrenner K, Voskanyan A, Rinaldetti S, Seifarth W, Spieß B, Balleisen L, Goebeler MC, Hänel M, Ho A, Dengler J, Falge C, Kanz L, Kremers S, Burchert A, Kneba M, Stegelmann F, Köhne CA, Lindemann HW, Waller CF, Pfreundschuh M, Spiekermann K, Berdel WE, Müller L, Edinger M, Mayer J, Beelen DW, Bentz M, Link H, Hertenstein B, Fuchs R, Wernli M, Schlegel F, Schlag R, de Wit M, Trümper L, Hebart H, Hahn M, Thomalla J, Scheid C, Schafhausen P, Verbeek W, Eckart MJ, Gassmann W, Pezzutto A, Schenk M, Brossart P, Geer T, Bildat S, Schäfer E, Hochhaus A, Hasford J (2017) Assessment of imatinib as first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia: 10-year survival results of the randomized CML study IV and impact of non-CML determinants. Leukemia 31(11):2398–2406. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2017.253 Epub 2017 Aug 14
Heinrich MC, Blanke CD, Druker BJ, Corless CL (2002a) Inhibition of KIT tyrosine kinase activity: a novel molecular approach to the treatment of KIT-positive malignancies. J Clin Oncol 20:1692–1703
Heinrich MC, Rubin BP, Longley BJ, Fletcher JA (2002b) Biology and genetic aspects of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: KIT activation and cytogenetic alterations. Hum Pathol 33:484–495
Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Demetri GD, Blanke CD, von Mehren M, Joensuu H, McGreevey LS, Chen CJ, Van den Abbeele AD, Druker BJ et al (2003a) Kinase mutations and imatinib response in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. J Clin Oncol 21:4342–4349
Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Duensing A, McGreevey L, Chen CJ, Joseph N, Singer S, Griffith DJ, Haley A, Town A et al (2003b) PDGFRA activating mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Science 299:708–710
Heinrich MC, Owzar K, Corless CL, Hollis D, Borden EC, Fletcher CD, Ryan CW, von Mehren M, Blanke CD, Rankin C et al (2008) Correlation of kinase genotype and clinical outcome in the North American Intergroup Phase III Trial of imatinib mesylate for treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor: CALGB 150105 Study by Cancer and Leukemia Group B and Southwest Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 26:5360–5367
Heisterkamp N, Jenster G, ten Hoeve J, Zovich D, Pattengale PK, Groffen J (1990) Acute leukaemia in BCR/ABL transgenic mice. Nature 344:251–253
Hochhaus A, Druker B, Sawyers C, Guilhot F, Schiffer CA, Cortes J, Niederwieser DW, Gambacorti-Passerini C, Stone RM, Goldman J et al (2008) Favorable long-term follow-up results over 6 years for response, survival, and safety with imatinib mesylate therapy in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia after failure of interferon-alpha treatment. Blood 111:1039–1043
Hochhaus A, La Rosee P, Muller MC, Ernst T, Cross NC (2011) Impact of BCR-ABL mutations on patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Cell Cycle 10:250–260
Hochhaus A, Larson RA, Guilhot F, Radich JP, Branford S, Hughes TP, Baccarani M, Deininger MW, Cervantes F, Fujihara S, Ortmann CE, Menssen HD, Kantarjian H, O’Brien SG, Druker BJ, Investigators IRIS (2017) Long-term outcomes of imatinib treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 376(10):917–927. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1609324
Hoeper MM, Barst RJ, Bourge RC, Feldman J, Ghofrani HA, Galié N, Gómez-Sánchez MA, Grimminger F, Grünig E, Hassoun PM et al (2013) Imatinib mesylate as add-on therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension results of the randomized IMPRES study. Circulation 127(10):1128–1138
Hughes TP, Kaeda J, Branford S, Rudzki Z, Hochhaus A, Hensley ML, Gathmann I, Bolton AE, van Hoomissen IC, Goldman JM, Radich JP (2003) Frequency of major molecular responses to imatinib or interferon alfa plus cytarabine in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 349:1423–1432
Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, Hartmann JT, Pink D, Schutte J, Ramadori G, Hohenberger P, Duyster J, Al-Batran SE et al (2012) One versus three years of adjuvant imatinib for operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a randomized trial. JAMA 307:1265–1272
Jovanovic JV, Score J, Waghorn K, Cilloni D, Gottardi E, Metzgeroth G, Erben P, Popp H, Walz C, Hochhaus A et al (2007) Low-dose imatinib mesylate leads to rapid induction of major molecular responses and achievement of complete molecular remission in FIP1L1-PDGFRA-positive chronic eosinophilic leukemia. Blood 109:4635–4640
Kantarjian H, Sawyers C, Hochhaus A, Guilhot F, Schiffer C, Gambacorti-Passerini C, Niederwieser D, Resta D, Capdeville R, Zoellner U et al (2002a) Hematologic and cytogenetic responses to imatinib mesylate in chronic myelogenous leukemia. N Engl J Med 346:645–652
Kantarjian HM, O’Brien S, Cortes JE, Smith TL, Rios MB, Shan J, Yang Y, Giles FJ, Thomas DA, Faderl S et al (2002b) Treatment of philadelphia chromosome-positive, accelerated-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia with imatinib mesylate. Clin Cancer Res 8:2167–2176
Kerkela R, Grazette L, Yacobi R, Iliescu C, Patten R, Beahm C, Walters B, Shevtsov S, Pesant S, Clubb FJ et al (2006) Cardiotoxicity of the cancer therapeutic agent imatinib mesylate. Nat Med 12:908–916
Konopka JB, Watanabe SM, Witte ON (1984) An alteration of the human c-abl protein in K562 leukemia cells unmasks associated tyrosine kinase activity. Cell 37:1035–1042
Larsen RA, Druker BJ, Guilhot F, O’Brien SG, Riviere GJ, Krahnke T, Gathmann I, Wang Y et al (2008) Imatinib pharmacokinetics and its correlation with response and safety in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia: a subanalysis of the IRIS study. Blood 111:4022–4028
Le Coutre P, Mologni L, Cleris L, Marchesi E, Buchdunger E, Giardini R, Formelli F, Gambacorti-Passerini C (1999) In vivo eradication of human BCR/ABL-positive leukemia cells with an ABL kinase inhibitor. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:163–168
Levitzky A, Gazit A (1995) Tyrosine kinase inhibition: an approach to drug development. Science 267:1782–1788
Lugo TG, Pendergast AM, Muller AJ, Witte ON (1990) Tyrosine kinase activity and transformation potency of BCR-ABL oncogene products. Science 247:1079–1082
Lux ML, Rubin BP, Biase TL, Chen CJ, Maclure T, Demetri GD, Xiao S, Singer S, Fletcher CD, Fletcher JA (2000) Kit extracellular and kinase domain mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Am J Pathol 156:791–795
Lyseng-Williamson K, Jarvis B (2001) Imatinib. Drugs 61:1765–1774
Mahon FX, Rea D, Guilhot J, Guilhot F, Huguet F, Nicolini F, Legros L, Charbonnier A, Guerci A, Varet B et al (2010) Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia who have maintained complete molecular remission for at least 2 years: the prospective, multicentre Stop Imatinib (STIM) trial. Lancet Oncol 11:1029–1035
Mahon FX, Richter J, Guilhot J, Hjorth-Hansen H, Almeida A, Janssen JWM, Mayer J, Porkka K, Panayiotidis P, Stromberg U, Berger MG, Diamond J, Ehrencrona H, Kairisto V, Machova Polakova K, Mueller MC, Mustjoki S, Hochhaus A, Pfirrmann M, Saussele S (2016) Cessation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia patients with deep molecular response: results of the Euro-Ski trial. Blood, 128, abstract 787
Marangon E, Citterio M, Sala F, Barisone E, Lippi AA, Rizzari C, Biondi A, D’Incalci M, Zucchetti M (2009) Pharmacokinetic profile of imatinib mesylate and N-demethyl-imatinib (CGP74588) in children with newly diagnosed Ph + acute leukemias. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 63:563–566
Mauro MJ, O’Dwyer M, Heinrich MC, Druker BJ (2002) STI571: a paradigm of new agents for cancer therapeutics. J Clin Oncol 20:325–334
Moinzadeh P, Hunzelmann N, Krieg T (2013) Pharmacology and rationale for imatinib in the treatment of scleroderma. J Exp Pharmacol 5:15–22
Mueller BA (2009) Imatinib and its successors: how modern chemistry has changed drug development. Curr Pharm Design 15:120–133
NCCN Practice Guidelines in Oncology, v. 3 (2018). https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cml.pdf
NCCN_Practice_Guidelines_in_Oncology, v. 1 (2018). https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/#site
Nowell PC, Hungerford DA (1960) A minute chromosome in human chronic granulocytic leukemia. Science 132:1497
O’Brien SG, Guilhot F, Goldman J, Hochhaus A, Hughes T, Radich J, Rudoltz M, Filian J, Gathmann I, Druker B et al (2008) International randomized study of interferon versus STI571 (IRIS) 7-year follow-up: sustained survival, low rate of transformation and increased rate of major molecular response (MMR) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) treated with imatinib (IM). Blood 112:76
O’Brien S, Giles F, Talpaz M, Cortes J, Rios MB, Shan J, Thomas D, Andreeff M, Kornblau S, Faderl S et al (2003a) Results of triple therapy with interferon-alpha, cytarabine, and homoharringtonine, and the impact of adding imatinib to the treatment sequence in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia in early chronic phase. Cancer 98:888–893
O’Brien SG, Guilhot F, Larson RA, Gathmann I, Baccarani M, Cervantes F, Cornelissen JJ, Fischer T, Hochhaus A, Hughes T et al (2003b) Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 348:994–1004
Ogawa A, Miyaji K, Matsubara H (2017) Efficacy and safety of long-term imatinib therapy for patients with pulmonary veno-occlusive disease and pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis. Respir Med 131:215–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2017.08.032 Epub 2017 Sep 12
Okuda K, Weisberg E, Gilliland DG, Griffin JD (2001) ARG tyrosine kinase activity is inhibited by STI571. Blood 97:2440–2448
Ottmann OG, Druker BJ, Sawyers CL, Goldman JM, Reiffers J, Silver RT, Tura S, Fischer T, Deininger MW, Schiffer CA et al (2002) A phase 2 study of imatinib in patients with relapsed or refractory Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoid leukemias. Blood 100:1965–1971
Pardanani A, Tefferi A (2004) Imatinib targets other than BCR/ABL and their clinical relevance in myeloid disorders. Blood 104:1931–1939
Preudhomme C, Guilhot J, Nicolini FE, Guerci-Bresler A, Rigal-Huguet F, Maloisel F, Coiteux V, Gardembas M, Berthou C, Vekhoff A et al (2010) Imatinib plus peginterferon alfa-2a in chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 363:2511–2521
Rea D, Nicolini FE, Tulliez M, Guilhot F, Guilhot J, Guerci-Bresler A, Gardembas M, Coiteux V, Guillerm G, Legros L, Etienne G, Pignon JM, Villemagne B, Escoffre-Barbe M, Ianotto JC, Charbonnier A, Johnson-Ansah H, Noel MP, Rousselot P, Mahon FX; France Intergroupe des Leucémies Myéloïdes Chroniques (2017) Discontinuation of dasatinib or nilotinib in chronic myeloid leukemia: interim analysis of the STOP 2G-TKI study. Blood. 16;129(7):846–854. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-09-742205 Epub 2016 Dec 8
Rea D, Mahon FX (2018) How I manage relapse of chronic myeloid leukaemia after stopping tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Br J Haematol 180(1):24–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.14973 Epub 2017 Oct 19
Rowley JD (1973) A new consistent abnormality in chronic myelogenous leukaemia identified by quinacrine fluorescence and Giemsa staining. Nature 243:290–293
Saußele S, Krauss MP, Hehlmann R, Lauseker M, Proetel U, Kalmanti L, Hanfstein B, Fabarius A, Kraemer D, Berdel WE, Bentz M, Staib P, de Wit M, Wernli M, Zettl F, Hebart HF, Hahn M, Heymanns J, Schmidt-Wolf I, Schmitz N, Eckart MJ, Gassmann W, Bartholom€aus A, Pezzutto A, Leibundgut EO, Heim D, Krause SW, Burchert A, Hofmann WK, Hasford J, Hochhaus A, Pfirrmann M, M€uller MC Schweizerische Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Klinische Krebsforschung and the German CML Study Group (2015) Impact of comorbidities on overall survival in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: results of the randomized CML study IV. Blood 126:42–49
Saußele S, Richter J, Hochhaus A, Hochhaus A, Mahon FX (2016) The concept of treatment-free remission in chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 30(8):1638–1647. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2016.115 Epub 2016 May 2
Sawyers CL (1999) Chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 340:1330–1340
Sawyers CL, Hochhaus A, Feldman E, Goldman JM, Miller CB, Ottmann OG, Schiffer CA, Talpaz M, Guilhot F, Deininger MW et al (2002) Imatinib induces hematologic and cytogenetic responses in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in myeloid blast crisis: results of a phase II study. Blood 99:3530–3539
Schiffer CA (2007) BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myelogenous leukemia. N Engl J Med 357:258–265
Shah NP, Sawyers CL (2003) Mechanisms of resistance to STI571 in Philadelphia chromosome-associated leukemias. Oncogene 22:7389–7395
Shah NP, Kantarjian HM, Kim DW, Rea D, Dorlhiac-Llacer PE, Milone JH, Vela-Ojeda J, Silver RT, Khoury HJ, Charbonnier A et al (2008) Intermittent target inhibition with dasatinib 100 mg once daily preserves efficacy and improves tolerability in imatinib-resistant and intolerant chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 26:3204–3212
Talpaz M, Silver RT, Druker BJ, Goldman JM, Gambacorti-Passerini C, Guilhot F, Schiffer CA, Fischer T, Deininger MW, Lennard AL et al (2002) Imatinib induces durable hematologic and cytogenetic responses in patients with accelerated phase chronic myeloid leukemia: results of a phase 2 study. Blood 99:1928–1937
Verweij J, Casali PG, Zalcberg J, et al. (2004) Progression-free survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumours with high-dose imatinib: Randomised trial. Lancet 364:1127–1134
von Bubnoff N, Peschel C, Duyster J (2003) Resistance of Philadelphia-chromosome positive leukemia towards the kinase inhibitor imatinib (STI571, Glivec): a targeted oncoprotein strikes back. Leukemia 17:829–838
von Mehren M, Joensuu H. (2018) Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. J Clin Oncol. 10; 36(2):136–143. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.74.9705 Epub 2017 Dec 8
van Oosterom AT, Judson I, Verweij J, et al. (2001) Safety and efficacy of imatinib (STI571) in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours: A phase I study. Lancet 358:1421–1423
Voncken JW, Kaartinen V, Pattengale PK, Germeraad WT, Groffen J, Heisterkamp N (1995) BCR/ABL P210 and P190 cause distinct leukemia in transgenic mice. Blood 86:4603–4611
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Waller, C.F. (2018). Imatinib Mesylate. In: Martens, U. (eds) Small Molecules in Hematology. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 212. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91439-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91439-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91438-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91439-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)