Abstract
Grapevine somatic embryogenesis is a precious tool in breeding programs as well as in functional genomics studies, embryo tissues being the best sources for regeneration of genetically modified plants. It has also been proposed as a strategy aimed at induction of somaclonal variation, separation of periclinal chimeras, cryopreservation, virus eradication. A reliable technique for the production of somatic embryos and regenerated plantlets from an ample number of Vitis genotypes is an essential pre-requisite for any application of somatic embryogenesis. Main developmental phases can be identified: (a) Induction of callogenesis and embryogenic competence in cultured explants; (b) Culture of embryogenic calli and expression of the embryogenic program; (c) Long term culture of embryogenic callus and preservation of the embryogenic ability of the cultures or re-initiation of embryogenic calli from somatic embryos; (d) Development of somatic embryos into plantlets. The protocol for grapevine plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis described in this chapter proved efficient for many cultivars; details are also given on the steps requiring further protocol refinements.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
12.1 Introduction
Somatic embryogenesis , i.e. the initiation of embryos from plant somatic tissues, is employed as a multiplication method for several plant species. Conversely, with regard to grapevine somatic embryogenesis is mostly used in breeding programs, embryo tissues being the best sources for regeneration of genetically modified plants (Franks et al. 1998; Reustle and Buchholz 2009; Gambino and Gribaudo 2012; Gray et al. 2014). In addition, somatic embryogenesis has been proposed as a strategy aimed at inducing somaclonal variation (Kuksova et al. 1997) and as a tool for additional aims such as the separation of periclinal chimeras (Franks et al. 2002), while improvements in setting up grapevine cryopreservation protocols have been obtained (González-Benito et al. 2009; Vasanth and Vivier 2011). Its interest as a tool in functional genomics studies has recently increased (Gambino et al. 2014) thanks to the availability of the reference genome in grapevine (Jaillon et al. 2007) and the consequent need of characterization of the putative genes identified in silico. Somatic embryogenesis is also a precious tool for studying embryo development as somatic embryos follow a developmental pathway very similar to that of their zygotic counterparts (Dodeman et al. 1997).
In this context, a reliable technique for the production of somatic embryos and regenerated plantlets from an ample number of Vitis genotypes is an essential pre-requisite for any application of somatic embryogenesis. The large genetic variability occurring in the genus Vitis may strongly influence the results. During the years, a broad number of protocols and media composition has been proposed. Details can be found in reviews such as those of Martinelli and Gribaudo (2009), and more recently Dhekney et al. (2016). From the available literature some common, main developmental phases can be identified: (a) Induction of callogenesis and embryogenic competence in cultured explants; (b) Culture of embryogenic calli and expression of the embryogenic program; (c) Long term culture of embryogenic callus and preservation of the embryogenic ability of the cultures or re-initiation of embryogenic calli from somatic embryos ; (d) Development of somatic embryos into plantlets .
12.2 Materials
-
a.
Grapevine inflorescences
-
b.
Laminar-flow hood, forceps, scalpels, glass bead sterilizer, sterile cutting pads
-
c.
Autoclave, pH meter, balances
-
d.
Tissue culture chambers
-
e.
Stereomicroscope
-
f.
Sodium hypochlorite, wetting agent, sterile distilled or deionized water
-
g.
Culture media (see Table 12.1), also available on the market as products for micropropagation
-
h.
Plant growth regulators (PGRs): 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), 6-benzyladenine (BA), naphtoxy acetic acid (NOA), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), naphthalene acetic acid (NAA )
-
i.
Tissue culture agar, gellan gum (Gelrite™, Phytagel™, etc.), sucrose
-
j.
Generic laboratory glassware and plasticware (beakers, Erlenmeyer flasks, cylinders, glass autoclavable bottles)
-
k.
Sterile Petri dishes (for media A, B, C and G: see below), Parafilm®
-
l.
Single-use or re-usable containers for plant tissue cultures (for media D, E and F: see below)
-
m.
Peat pellets (Jiffy7®)
Basic media composition is listed in Table 12.1. Required composition and modifications for different culture stages are listed in Table 12.2.
12.3 Method
The regeneration procedure includes:
-
(a)
Embryogenic culture initiation (acquisition of embryogenic competence ): culture of initial explants and induction of callogenesis
-
(b)
Embryo differentiation (expression of the embryogenic program)
-
(c)
Embryo germination and development into plantlets
-
(d)
Long term culture of embryogenic callus and preservation of the embryogenic ability
-
(e)
Micropropagation and acclimatization of the resulting plantlets .
12.3.1 Embryogenic Culture Initiation
Stamens (anthers plus filaments) have been the most widely used starting material for culture, and successful initiation of regenerable embryogenic calli has been obtained from stamens of a considerable number of grapes. Immature pistils (ovaries plus styles, stigmas and receptacles) also represent a good starting explant , with the advantage of being collectible easily and simultaneously with anther excision. Below we refer to the described explants simply as anthers and ovaries. In some cultivars the efficiencies obtained from ovaries can be notably higher than compared to anthers, ovaries being more responsive to embryogenic induction (Nakano et al. 1997; Martinelli et al. 2001; Kikkert et al. 2005; Vidal et al. 2009).
Even whole flowers proved to be suitable material for initiating embryogenic cultures for some cultivars: their collection from the inflorescence is easier and faster than excision of anthers and ovaries from the flower itself; it can be done without the use of a stereomicroscope and damage to the explant is unlikely. No morphological difference was noted among embryogenic cultures originated from ovaries, flowers, or anthers (Gambino et al. 2007).
As for the best developmental stage to initiate anther culture , here we describe the stage that is most often reported best for Vitis vinifera (Faure et al. 1996; Gribaudo et al. 2004; Vidal et al. 2009), although in the case of some cultivar or species of the genus Vitis somatic embryogenesis occurred more frequently if explants were collected at later developmental stages (Gribaudo et al. 2004; Bouamama et al. 2007; Prado et al. 2010).
-
(i)
Use immature inflorescences for embryogenic culture initiation. Collect flower in the vineyard 10–14 days before full bloom, when: inflorescence are still compact but flowers gradually separate from each other (Fig. 12.1a), calyptra is dark green and gradually lengthens, anthers are green and translucent (Fig. 12.1b), the pollen mother cells are in late pre-meiotic phase (corresponding to the active synthesis of DNA and proteins needed for meiosis)
-
(ii)
Surface-sterilize the inflorescences for 15 min with a solution of sodium hypochlorite (1.5% available chlorine) containing a few drops of a wetting agent (for instance Tween 20®), and rinse several times with sterile distilled or deionized water.
-
(iii)
Store inflorescences in sterile Petri dishes or other closed container at 4 °C for 2 up to a maximum of 5 days.
-
(iv)
Perform a second surface sterilization before use as described in (ii)
-
(v)
Using a stereomicroscope and under a laminar-flow hood carefully open the flowers, excise intact stamens (anthers plus filaments) and pistils (ovaries plus styles, stigmas and receptacles) by separating them from the calyptra. Place stamens and pistils in Petri dishes containing the medium A.
-
(vi)
Seal Petri dishes with Parafilm® and place in the dark at 26 °C.
12.3.2 Embryo Differentiation
After three months of culture on medium A, most explants have produced callus. However, callus type is seldom homogeneous and can be classified in embryogenic (generally granular white or slightly yellow callus, sometimes associated to dark callus) (Fig. 12.1c) or non-embryogenic (dry and compact or watery and soft callus; colours can vary from yellow to brown) (Fig. 12.1d) (Gambino et al. 2006; Vidal et al. 2009; Prado et al. 2010). Initial embryogenic cultures are generally asynchronous. Transfer the cultures onto medium B is needed to allow embryo differentiation and development (Fig. 12.1e).
-
(i)
Transfer the explants that have produced embryogenic callus onto medium B.
-
(ii)
Seal Petri dishes with Parafilm® and place in the dark at 26 °C.
-
(iii)
Every 4 weeks transfer the cultures onto fresh B medium.
12.3.3 Embryo Germination and Development into Plantlets
From about 5 months after culture initiation onwards, single large embryos can be isolated from the embryogenic callus (Fig. 12.1e) and transferred to medium C, at 24 °C under light (photoperiod 16 h). Conversion of somatic embryos into plants is accompanied by development of the primary root, greening of hypocotyls and cotyledons and formation of the shoot apex with one or two foliar primordia (Redenbaugh et al. 1986) (Fig. 12.1f).
However, as germination and plant recovery can vary considerably depending on the genotype and the embryo morphological and physiological state, various dormancy-breaking treatments have been proposed (Martinelli and Gribaudo 2009; Larrouy et al. 2017) and can be applied in case of germination failure. The following simple strategy is based on the one proposed by Franks et al. (1998):
-
(i)
Remove the basal part of the germinating embryo cutting it at the hypocotyl
-
(ii)
Subculture the cut upper part of the embryo on medium D for shoot growth
-
(iii)
Culture the resulting shoot for 2 weeks on medium E for root induction
-
(iv)
Transfer to medium F for further growth.
All the steps are at 24 °C under light (photoperiod 16 h).
12.3.4 Long-Term Culture of Embryogenic Callus and Preservation of the Embryogenic Ability
During the subsequent subcultures, the embryogenic competence of the callus can be maintained through subcultures performed monthly, alternating every two months medium A and medium B (Franks et al. 1998; Gambino et al. 2005).
However, this strategy is not always advisable for a long-term culture as several grapevine cultivars tend to reduce their embryogenic ability if subjected to many cycles of callogenesis /differentiation . In addition, in some cultivars those culture conditions may impair the successive germination of developed embryos . In these cases, the embryogenic callus obtained from floral explant cultured on medium A can be transferred onto medium G and subcultured every month on the same medium. It is important to subculture only the pro-embryogenic masses , carefully selecting the finely granular, friable callus and discarding the black parts and the developed embryos that can be present.
12.3.5 Micropropagation and Acclimatization
-
(i)
Micropropagate plantlets derived either from direct embryo germination or from the embryo germination protocol above described by periodically culturing apical cuttings (3–4 cm long) on the PGRs-free medium F (Fig. 12.1g) in suitable plant tissue culture containers
-
(ii)
When transfer to ex-vitro conditions is required, collect apical cuttings (4–5 cm long) from the micropropagated plants and place them in soaked, autoclaved peat pellets (Jiffy7®) for 2–4 weeks
-
(iii)
For acclimatization , replace the container lid with plastic film and gradually remove the film within the space of 8–10 days
All the previous steps are at 24 °C under light (photoperiod 16 h).
-
(iv)
Transfer the acclimatized plantlets to greenhouse and, after a suitable period of growth, to soil in the field.
12.4 Steps Requiring Further Protocol Refinements
The protocol for plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis in grapevine described in this chapter proved efficient for many cultivars during a twenty-year experience in our laboratory (Gribaudo et al. 2017). However, further protocol refinements or modifications will be useful, particularly concerning the embryo conversion into plant and the extension of the range of regenerating genotypes.
Germination step is particularly troublesome, as it can impair the success of the whole procedure. In principle, germination may occur in white, well-shaped, well-polarized embryos with root and shoot axes, a hypocotyl and two cotyledons. Germination is hindered by physiological anomalies such as endodormancy, and/or by morphological abnormalities. Abnormal, missing or non-functional apexes have been observed as well as other embryo teratologies (Goebel-Tourand et al. 1993; Faure et al. 1998; Larrouy et al. 2017). The pronounced anomalous behavior where the embryo exhibits continuous growth leading to abnormal structure and function of the shoot meristem has been connected with the ‘precocious germination’, an event already described for zygotic embryos during in vitro culture (Finkelstein and Crouch 1984). Indeed the morphological and physiological state of embryos and the culture conditions are crucial aspects in promoting embryo conversion and ensuring the success of the culture. A number of strategies and protocols have been proposed (Martinelli and Gribaudo 2009) but their efficiency must be tested in specific culture conditions.
The strong genotype influence on the performance of in vitro cultures in general, and of grapevine embryogenic culture in particular, makes difficult to set up a unique protocol optimal or even efficient for all cultivars and species of the genus Vitis (Oláh et al. 2009; Vidal et al. 2009; Gribaudo et al. 2017). Undeniably the embryogenic response in a grapevine cultivar involves a complex interaction of the genotype with explants, culture medium and culture conditions (Dhekney et al. 2016). Therefore, cultivar or species not yet tested for their embryogenic capacity or having a low response to the described protocol may be evaluated on alternative induction media , gleaning suggestions from the substantial available literature.
References
Bouamama B, Ben Salem-Fnayou A, Ben Jouira H, Ghorbel A, Mliki A (2007) Influence of the flower stage and culture medium on the induction of somatic embryogenesis from anther culture in Tunisian grapevine cultivars. J Int Sci Vigne Vin 41:185–192
Dhekney SA, Li ZT, Grant TNL, Gray DJ (2016) Somatic embryogenesis and genetic modification of Vitis. In: Germanà MA, Lambardi M (eds) In vitro embryogenesis in higher plants, methods in molecular biology, Springer Science + Business Media, USA, pp 263–277
Dodeman VL, Ducreux G, Kreis M (1997) Zygotic embryogenesis versus somatic embryo-genesis. J Exp Bot 48:1493–1509
Faure O, Aarrouf J, Nougarède A (1996) Ontogenesis, differentiation and precocious germination in anther-derived somatic embryos of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): proembryogenesis. Ann Bot 78:23–28
Faure O, Dewitte W, Nougarède A, VanOnckelen H (1998) Precociously germinating somatic embryos of Vitis vinifera have lower ABA and IAA levels than their germinating zygotic counterparts. Physiol Plant 102:591–595
Finkelstein RR, Crouch ML (1984) Precociously germinating rapeseed embryos retain characteristics of embryogeny. Planta 162:125–131
Franks T, He DG, Thomas M (1998) Regeneration of transgenic Vitis vinifera L. Sultana plants: genotypic and phenotypic analysis. Mol Breed 4:321–333
Franks T, Botta R, Thomas M, Franks J (2002) Chimerism in grapevines: implications for cultivar identity, ancestry and genetic improvement. Theor Appl Genet 104:192–199
Gambino G, Gribaudo I (2012) Genetic transformation of fruit trees: current status and remaining challenges. Transgenic Res 21:1163–1181
Gambino G, Gribaudo I, Leopold S, Schartl A, Laimer M (2005) Molecular characterization of grapevine plants transformed with GFLV resistance genes: I. Plant Cell Rep 24:655–662
Gambino G, Bondaz J, Gribaudo I (2006) Detection and elimination of viruses in callus, somatic embryos and regenerated plantlets of grapevine. Eur J Plant Pathol 114:397–404
Gambino G, Ruffa P, Vallania R, Gribaudo I (2007) Somatic embryogenesis from whole flowers, anthers and ovaries of grapevine (Vitis spp.). Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 90:79–83
Gambino G, Pagliarani C, Gribaudo I (2014) Functional genomics in fruit trees. In: Ramawat KG, Mérillon JM, Ahuja MR (eds) Tree Biotechnology. CRC Press, USA, pp 583–613
Goebel-Tourand I, Mauro MC, Sossountazov L, Miginiac E, Deloire A (1993) Arrest of somatic embryo development in grapevine: histological characterization and the effect of ABA, BAP and zeatin in stimulating plantlet development. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 33:91–103
González-Benito ME, Martín C, Vidal JR (2009) Cryopreservation of embryogenic cell suspensions of the Spanish grapevine cultivars ‘Albariño’ and ‘Tempranillo’. Vitis 48:131–136
Gray DJ, Li ZT, Dhekney SA (2014) Precision breeding of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) for improved traits. Plant Sci 228:3–10
Gribaudo I, Gambino G, Vallania R (2004) Somatic embryogenesis from grapevine anthers: the optimal developmental stage for collecting explant. Am J Enol Vitic 55:427–430
Gribaudo I, Gambino G, Boccacci P, Perrone I, Cuozzo D (2017) A multi-year study on the regenerative potential of several Vitis genotypes. Acta Hortic 1155:45–50
Jaillon O et al (2007) The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature 449:463–468
Kikkert JR, Striem MJ, Vidal JR, Wallace PG, Barnard JB, Reisch BI (2005) Long-term study of somatic embryogenesis from anthers and ovaries of 12 grapevine (Vitis sp) genotypes. In vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 41:232–239
Kuksova VB, Piven NM, Gleba YY (1997) Somaclonal variation and in vitro induced mutagenesis in grapevine. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 49:17–27
Larrouy J, Jaksons P, Bicknell R (2017) Response interactions in grape somatic embryogenic cultures to cold and gibberellic acid treatments to overcome embryo dormancy. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 129:45–52
Martinelli L, Gribaudo I (2009) Strategies for effective somatic embryogenesis in grapevine (Vitis spp.). An appraisal. In: Roubelakis-Angelakis KA (ed) Grapevine molecular physiology & biotechnology, Springer Science + Business Media, NL, pp 461–493
Martinelli L, Gribaudo I, Bertoldi I, Candioli E, Poletti V (2001) High efficiency somatic embryogenesis and plant germination in grapevine cultivars Chardonnay and Brachetto a grappolo lungo. Vitis 40:111–115
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497
Nakano M, Sakakibara T, Watanabe Y, Mii M (1997) Establishment of embryogenesis cultures in several cultivars of Vitis vinifera and V. labruscana. Vitis 36:141–145
Nitsch JP, Nitsch C (1969) Haploid plants from pollen grains. Science 163:85–87
Oláh R, Zok A, Pedryc A, Howard S, Kovács LG (2009) Somatic embryogenesis in a broad spectrum of grape genotyes. Sci Hortic 120:134–137
Prado MJ, Grueiro MP, González V, Testillano PS, Domínguez C, López M, Rey M (2010) Efficient plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis from anthers and ovaries of six autochthonous grapevine cultivars from Galicia (Spain). Sci Hortic 125:342–352
Redenbaugh K, Paasch BD, Nichol JW, Kossler ME, Viss PR, Walker KA (1986) Somatic seeds: encapsulation of asexual plant embryos. Bio/Technol 4:797–801
Reustle GM, Buchholz G (2009) Recent trends in grapevine genetic engineering. In: Roubelakis-Angelakis KA (ed) Grapevine molecular physiology & biotechnology. Springer Publisher, The Netherlands, pp 495–508
Vasanth K, Vivier MA (2011) Improved cryopreservation procedure for long term storage of synchronised culture of grapevine. Biol Plant 55:365
Vidal JR, Rama J, Taboada L, Martin C, Ibañez M, Segura A, González-Benito ME (2009) Improved somatic embryogenesis of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) with focus on induction parameters and efficient plant regeneration. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 96:85–94
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gribaudo, I., Gambino, G. (2018). Grapevine (Vitis spp.). In: Jain, S., Gupta, P. (eds) Step Wise Protocols for Somatic Embryogenesis of Important Woody Plants. Forestry Sciences, vol 85. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79087-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79087-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-79086-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-79087-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)