Abstract
With the increased demand to facilitate the archaeological work either in well-known archaeological sites or the crude sites, geophysical methods plays an important role. The Geophysical methods have been used since 1946 with increasing frequency for archaeological investigations and currently the branch of archaeogeophysics is widely applied. The wide varieties of geophysical methods applied in archaeological work relies principally upon existing reasonable contrast in physical properties between the buried archaeological feature and the surrounding subsoil. Understanding the archaeological properties of the physical contrasts, in terms of density, thermal conductivity, electrical resistance, magnetic or dielectric properties, remains fundamental issues of choosing and applying the discipline geophysical techniques. In this regard, we tried to introduce a brief outline for the common and applicable techniques in archaeological investigations. The physical principles and field instrumentation involved for the acquisition of data with each method are considered, as well as some common results from the worldwide case studies. Generally, the archeogeophysical survey results can be used to guide excavation and to give archaeologists insight into the patterning of non-excavated parts of the site as well as it is often used where preservation of the sensitive sites is the aim rather than excavation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arato A, Piro S, Sambuelli L (2015) 3D inversion of ERT data on an archaeological site using GPR reflection and 3D inverted magnetic data as a priori information. Near Surf Geophys 13:545–556
Baranwal VC, Franke A, Börner RU, Spitzer K (2011) Unstructured grid based 2-D inversion of VLF data for models including topography. J Appl Geophys 75:363–372
Cardarelli E, Di Filippo G (2004) Integrated geophysical surveys on waste dumps: evaluation of physical parameters to characterize an urban waste dump (four case studies in Italy). Waste Manag Res 22:390–402
Cardarelli E, Di Filippo G (2009) Integrated geophysical methods for the characterisation of an archaeological site (Massenzio Basilica–Roman forum, Rome, Italy). J Appl Geophys 68:508–521
Claerbout JF, Muir F (1973) Robust modeling with erratic data. Geophysics 38:826–844
Dabas M, Hesse A, Tabbagh J (2000) Experimental resistivity survey at Wroxeter archaeological site with a fast and light recording device. Archaeol Prospect 7:107–118
De Domenico D, Giannino F, Leucci G, Bottari C (2006) Integrated geophysical surveys at the archaeological site of Tindari (Sicily, Italy). J Archaeol Sci 33:961–970
Diamanti N, Tsokas G, Tsourlos P, Vafidis A (2005) Integrated interpretation of geophysical data in the archaeological site of Europos (northern Greece). Archaeol Prospect 12:79–91
Drahor MG (2004) Application of the self-potential method to archaeological prospection: some case studies. Archaeol Prospect 11:77–105
Drahor MG (2006) Integrated geophysical studies in the upper part of Sardis archaeological site, Turkey. J Appl Geophys 59:205–223
Drahor MG (2011) A review of integrated geophysical investigations from archaeological and cultural sites under encroaching urbanisation in Izmir, Turkey. Phys Chem Earth 36:1294–1309
Drahor MG, Akyol AL, Dilaver N (1996) An application of the self-potential (SP) method in archaeogeophysical prospection. Archaeol Prospect 3:141–158
Drahor MG, Göktürkler G, Berge MA, Kurtulmuş TÖ, Tuna N (2007) 3D resistivity imaging from an archaeological site in south-western Anatolia, Turkey: a case study. Near Surf Geophys 5:195–201
Drahor MG, Berge MA, Kurtulmuş TÖ, Hartmann M, Speidel MA (2008a) Magnetic and electrical resistivity tomography investigations in a Roman Legionary camp site (Legio IV Scythica) in Zeugma, southeastern Anatolia, Turkey. Archaeol Prospect 15:159–186
Drahor MG, Kurtulmuş TO, Berge MA, Hartmann M, Speidel MA (2008b) Magnetic imaging and electrical resistivity tomography studies in a Roman Military installation found in Satala archaeological site from northeastern of Anatolia, Turkey. J Archaeol Sci 35:259–271
Drahor MG, Berge MA, Öztürk C, Alpaslan N, Ergene G (2009) Integrated usage of geophysical prospection techniques in Höyük (tepe, tell)-type archaeological settlements. ArcheoSciences, revue d’archéométrie 33(suppl):291–293
Drahor MG, Berge MA, Öztürk C (2011) Integrated geophysical surveys in the Agios Voukolos church, Izmir, Turkey. J Archaeol Sci 38:2231–2242
Drahor MG, Berge MA, Öztürk C, Ortan B (2015a) Integrated geophysical investigations at a sacred Hittite Area in Central Anatolia, Turkey. Near Surf Geophys 13:523–543
Drahor MG, Öztürk C, Ortan B, Berge MA, Ongar A (2015b) A report on integrated geophysical investigation in the Šapinuva archaeological site in Central Anatolia of Turkey. Geoim LTD. 2015ARKEO1-05, 90 p (in Turkish)
Emre Ö, Duman TY, Özalp S, Elmacı H, Olgun Ş (2011) 1/250,000 Scale active fault map series of Turkey, Çorum (NK 36-16) quadrangle. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Ankara, Turkey
Gaffney CF, Gater JA, Linford P, Gaffney VL, White R (2000) Large-scale systematic fluxgate gradiometry at the Roman city of Wroxeter. Archaeol Prospect 7:81–99
Gaffney V, Patterson H, Piro S, Goodman D, Nishimura Y (2004) Multimethodological approach to study and characterize Forum Novum (Vescovio, Central Italy). Archaeol Prospect 11:201–212
Gaffney C, Harris C, Pope-Carter F, Bonsall J, Fry R, Parkyn A (2015) Still searching for graves: an analytical strategy for interpreting geophysical data used in the search for “unmarked” graves. Near Surf Geophys 13:557–569
Greenewalt CH (2003) Archaeological exploration of Sardis, 2002 field season. Report to the General Directorate of Monuments and Museums, Ministry of Culture, Republic of Turkey
Hartmann M, Speidel MA (2003) The Roman army at Zeugma: recent research results. In: R. Early et al., Zeugma: Interim Reports. J Roman Archaeol 51(suppl):101–126
Kvamme KL (2006) Integrating multidimensional archaeological data. Archaeol Prospect 13:57–72
Leucci G, Negri S (2006) Use of ground penetrating radar to map subsurface archaeological features in an urban area. J Archaeol Sci 33:502–512
Leucci G, Greco F, De Giorgi L, Mauceri R (2007) Three-dimensional image of seismic refraction tomography and electrical resistivity tomography survey in the castle of Occhiolà (Sicily, Italy). J Archaeol Sci 34:233–242
Lightfoot CS (1991) Archaeological surveys at Satala in 1989. In: The proceeding of VIIIth meeting of research results of symposium of excavation, survey and archaeometry, Ankara, Turkey, May 28 and June 1, 1990, pp 299–309 (In Turkish)
Lightfoot CS (1997) Excavations at Amorium in 1996. Bull Br Byzantine Stud 23:39–49
Lightfoot CS, Arbel Y (2003) Amorium excavation 2001. In: XXIVth symposium on excavation results proceedings, pp 521–532 (In Turkish)
Linford N, Linford P, Payne A (2015) Chasing aeroplanes: developing a vehicle-towed caesium magnetometer array to complement aerial photography over three recently surveyed sites in the UK. Near Surf Geophys 13:623–631
Matera L, Noviello M, Ciminale M, Persico R (2015) Integration of multisensor data: an experiment in the archaeological park of Egnazia (Apulia, Southern Italy). Near Surf Geophys 13:613–621
Monteiro Santos FA, Mateus A, Figueiras J, Gonçalves MA (2006) Mapping groundwater contamination around a landfill facility using the VLF-EM method—a case study. J Appl Geophys 60:115–125
MTA (2002) 1/500.000 Scale Geological Maps of Turkey, 7, General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration (MTA), Ankara, Turkey
Neubauer W, Eder-Hinterleitner A (1997) Resistivity and magnetic of the Roman town Carnuntum, Austria: an example of combined interpretation of prospection data. Archaeol Prospect 4:179–189
Papadopoulos N, Sarris A, Yil MJ, Kim JH (2009) Urban archaeological investigations using surface 3D ground penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography methods. Explor Geophys 40:56–68
Papadopoulos NG, Sarris A, Salvi MC, Dederix S, Soupios P, Dikmen U (2012) Rediscovering the small theatre and amphitheatre of ancient Ierapytna (SE Crete) by integrated geophysical methods. J Archaeol Sci 39:1960–1973
Piro S, Mauriello P, Cammarano F (2000) Quantitative integration of geophysical methods for archaeological prospection. Archaeol Prospect 7:203–213
Pullammanappallil SK, Louie JN (1994) A generalized simulated annealing optimization for inversion of first arrival times. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(5):1397–1409
Sarris A, Papadopoulos NG, Agapiou A, Salvi MC, Hadjimitsis DG, Parkinson WA et al (2013) Integration of geophysical surveys, ground hyperspectral measurements, aerial and satellite imagery for archaeological prospection of prehistoric sites: the case study of Vésztő-Mágor Tell, Hungary. J Archaeol Sci 40:1454–1470
Seren S, Eder-Hinterleitner A, Neubauer W, Groh S (2004) Combined high resolution magnetics and GPR surveys of the roman town of Flavia Solva. Near Surf Geophys 2:63–68
Sharma SP, Kaikkonen P (1998) Two-dimensional non-linear inversion of VLF-R data using simulated annealing. Geophys J Int 133:649–668
Simon F-X, Kalayci T, Donati JC, Cuenca Garcia C, Manataki M, Sarris A (2015) How efficient is an integrative approach in archaeological geophysics? Comparative case studies from Neolithic settlements in Thessaly (Central Greece). Near Surf Geophys 13:601–611
Simyrdanis K, Papadopoulos N, Kim JH, Tsourlos PI, Moffat I (2015) Archaeological investigations in the shallow seawater environment with electrical resistivity tomography. Near Surf Geophys 13:601–611
Speidel MA (1998) Legio IV Scythica: its movements and men. In The Twin Towns of Zeugma on the Euphrates. Rescue work and historical studies, Kennedy D (ed.). J Roman Archaeol 27(suppl):163–204
Tsokas GN, Giannopoulos A, Tsourlos P, Vargemezis G, Tealby JM, Sarris A, Papazachos CB, Savopoulou T (1994) A large scale geophysical survey in the archaeological site of Europos (N. Greece). J Appl Geophys 32:85–98
Tsokas GN, Tsourlos PI, Vargemezis G, Novack M (2008) Non-destructive electrical resistivity tomography for indoor investigation: the case of Kapnikarea church in Athens. Archaeol Prospect 15:47–61
Tsokas GN, Kim JH, Tsourlos PI, Angistalis G, Vargemezis G, Stampolidis A, Diamanti N (2015) Investigating behind the lining of the Tunnel of Eupalinus in Samos (Greece) using ERT and GPR. Near Surf Geophys 13:571–583
Vafidis A, Economou N, Ganiatsos Y, Manakou M, Poulioudis G, Sourlas G et al (2005) Integrated geophysical studies at ancient Itanos (Greece). J Archaeol Sci 32:1023–1036
Wagner J (1976) Seleukeia am Euphrat/Zeugma. Karte II
Wessel P, Smith WHF (1995) New version of the generic mapping tools released. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 76:329
Wilken D, Wunderlich T, Stümpel H, Rabbel W, Pašteka R, Erkul E, Papčo J, Putiška R, Krajňák M, Kušnirák D (2015) Case history: integrated geophysical survey at Katarínka Monastery (Slovakia). Near Surf Geophys 13:585–599
Acknowledgements
The author acknowledges the GEOIM LTD Company for supporting of some data and results. Also I am grateful to Atilla Ongar, who is a research assistant in Dokuz Eylül University in Department of Geophysics, assisted during preparing of overall figures.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Drahor, M.G. (2019). Integrated Geophysical Investigations in Archaeological Sites: Case Studies from Turkey. In: El-Qady, G., Metwaly, M. (eds) Archaeogeophysics. Natural Science in Archaeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78861-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78861-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78860-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78861-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)