Abstract
Using census’ data from 1960 to 2010, the study focuses on the horizontal stratification in Brazil’s higher education – i.e., inequalities among sex and race groups which completed the superior level of schooling. Three major trends, not in the same direction, were detected. First, university access has been democratized, with an increase in the relative share of women, blacks, browns, and indigenous people. In the general population, 9.4% of the women and 7.2% of the men had a college degree in 2010. Whites were 95% of the college graduates in 1960; in 2010, they represent three out of four graduates – although whites are less than half the Brazilian population. Second, this inclusion does not imply equal access to all university careers; it took place more intensely in fields less valued by the labor market. Brazil has a stratification pattern similar to that of the United States: education, humanities, and health – with Medicine as an outlier – are fields with a larger concentration of women, while careers related to business, engineering, and technology attract more men. In terms of race, there is a higher concentration of brown and black people in careers in applied social sciences and humanities and especially in the field of Religion. Finally, inferential analysis revealed persistent wage inequalities. Women with university degrees still earn less than her male counterparts in the same career, despite the decrease in the wage gap. More dramatically, disadvantages related to race fluctuated but did not undergo significant changes throughout these decades.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
These are the predominant paths; as stated by Lucas himself (2001, p. 1652), there is nothing that would prevent qualitative differences from being pursued even when universalization is not present.
- 2.
The gender difference in mathematical skills is lower in countries where there are more equal opportunities for men and women. By conducting a review of the research in this field, Gerber and Cheung (2008, p. 312) concluded that there is no clarity as to which decisive mechanisms are responsible for these differences to emerge so early in the life of college students. So, more research is needed on this front.
References
Ayalon, H. (2003). Women and men go to university: Gender differences in choice of field in higher education. Sex Roles, 48, 277–290.
Baker, D. P., & Jones, D. P. (1993). Creating gender equality: Cross-national gender stratification and mathematical performance. Sociology of Education, 66(2), 91–103.
Beltrão, K. I., & Teixeira, M. de P. (2004). O vermelho e o negro: gênero na universidade brasileira – uma análise da seletividade das carreiras a partir dos Demographic Censuses de 1960 a 2000. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA (Texto para discussão, no. 1052).
Bourdieu, P. (1999). Escritos de educação (2ª ed). Petrópolis: Vozes.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. 1992. A reprodução: elementos para uma teoria do sistema de ensino (3ª ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Francisco Alves.
Bradley, K. (2000). The incorporation of women into higher education: Paradoxical outcomes? Sociology of Education, 73(1), 1–18.
Brasil. (2011). Censo da Educação Superior (CES) de 2010. Resumo técnico.
Brasil. Bolsas ofertadas por ano. Disponível em: http://prouniportal.mec.gov.br/images/arquivos/pdf/Representacoes_graficas/bolsas_ofertadas_ano.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2013.
Brasil. Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira (INEP). (2009, September). Avaliando o desempenho no ENADE de bolsistas do ProUni. Na Medida, 1(3).
Campante, F. R., Crespo, A. R. V., & Leite, P. G. (2004, June). Desigualdade salarial entre raças no mercado de trabalho urbano brasileiro: aspectos regionais. Revista Brasileira de Economia, Rio de Janeiro, 58(2). Available at: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71402004000200003&lng=en&nrm=iso. Accessed 27 Mar 2014. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-71402004000200003.
Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2002). Equal but separate? A cross-national study of sex segregation in higher education. American Sociological Review, 67(4), 573–599.
Daymont, T. N., & Andrisani, P. J. (1984). Job preferences, college major, and the gender gap in earnings. Journal of Human Resources, 19, 408–428.
Fiorentine, R. (1987). Men, women, and the premed persistence gap: A normative alternatives approach. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1118–1139.
Gerber, T. P., & Cheung, S. Y. C. (2008). Horizontal stratification in postsecondary education: Forms, explanations, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 299–318.
Grogger, J., & Eide, E. (1995). Changes in college skills and the rise in the college wage premium. Journal of Human Resources, 30, 280–310.
Gunderson, M. (1989). Male-female wage differentials and policy responses. Journal of Economic Literature, 27, 46–72.
Hasenbalg, C. (1979). Discriminação e desigualdades raciais no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Graal.
Jonsson, J. (1999). Explaining sex differences in educational choice: An empirical assessment of a rational choice model. European Sociological Review, 15, 391–404.
Karen, D. (1991). The politics of class, race and gender access to higher education in the United States, 1960–1986. American Journal of Education, 99, 208–237.
Karen, D. (2001). Changes in access to higher education in the United States: 1980–1992. Sociology of Education, 75(3), 191–210.
Lucas, S. (2001). Effectively maintained inequality: Education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1642–1690.
Marini, M. M., Fan, P., Finley, E., & Beutel, A. M. (1996). Gender and job values. Sociology of Education, 69(1), 49–65.
Menezes-Filho, N. (2012, December). Apagão de mão de obra qualificada? As profissões e o mercado de trabalho brasileiro entre 2000 e 2010 (Policy Paper no. 4). São Paulo: Insper.
Paglin, M., & Rufolo, A. (1990). Heterogeneous human capital, occupational choice, and male-female earnings differences. Journal of Labor Economics, 8, 123–144.
Ramirez, F., & Wotipka, C. M. (2001). Slowly but surely? The global expansion of women’s participation in Science and Engineering Fields of study, 1972–92. Sociology of Education, 74, 231–251.
Reis, M. R., & Crespo, A. R. V. (2005). Race discrimination in Brazil: An analysis of the age, period and cohort effects (Texto para Discussão IPEA, no. 1.114). Rio de Janeiro: IPEA.
Soares, S. S. D. (2000). O perfil da discriminação no mercado de trabalho: homens negros, mulheres brancas e mulheres negras (Texto para Discussão IPEA, no. 769). Brasília: IPEA.
Van de Werfhorst, H. G., & Kraykamp, G. (2001). Four field-related educational resources and their impact on labor, consumption and sociopolitical orientation. Sociology of Education, 74(4), 296–317.
Van der Werfhorst, H. G. (2002). Fields of study, acquired skills, and the wage benefit from a matching job. Acta Sociol., 45(4), 287–303.
Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (2003). Women in Science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Costa Ribeiro, C.A., Schlegel, R. (2019). Horizontal Stratification in Brazil’s Higher Education (1960–2010). In: Arretche, M. (eds) Paths of Inequality in Brazil. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78184-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78184-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78183-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78184-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)