Keywords

Introduction

Gross anatomical contours of the heart have been depicted already by prehistoric hunters more than 17,000 years ago (the Upper Paleolithic period ). Examples of such primitive art have been found in the caves of Lascaux, Southern France. One view holds that these instructional paintings facilitated the work of hunt; another refers to an expiatory ritual [4]. Until the late Middle Ages, most anatomical illustrations concern the complete body, without attention for individual organs [45]. The first illustrated anatomical textbook that includes a detailed description of the structure of the heart was written by Jacopo Berengario (Barigazzi) of Carpi [23, 47]. His insights were based on the many dissections performed when he was professor of surgery at Bologna between 1502 and 1527 [53]. The transition from anatomy (i.e. form) to physiology (viz. pump function) took several centuries. It must be emphasized that determination of the phasic size of the beating heart was not relevant until relatively recently (i.e., around 1900), when physiologists started studying pump function, e.g., by relating output to input (see Frank & Starling). Even William Harvey [14] was not primarily interested in ventricular size as such. He just mentioned an estimate of the amount of circulating blood by stating that everyone who crosses streets in the butchers’ quarter knows that only a few liters of blood leave the animal once the major neck vessels are severed. It was more than a century later that interest developed in quantifying the size of the (non-beating) heart. Investigations regarding left ventricular (LV) size and shape were carried out by the Reverend Stephen Hales (1677–1761) from Middlesex, who made casts of the lumen of animal heart chambers using the beeswax cast technique [13]. A recently created example based on the same technique is shown in a photographic illustration elsewhere [26].

Cardiac function has often been analyzed by evaluating cardiac output (CO) , as well as by considering metrics that directly employ information on end-systolic volume (ESV ) and end-diastolic volume (EDV ). An indication about the magnitude of CO in animals was noted by Harvey, as mentioned. Following experiments on skeletal muscle, cardiac physiologists commenced investigating the isolated animal heart, while manipulating filling characteristics as in the experiments by O. Frank, E. Starling, and M. Blix [15, 49]. Around the beginning of the twentieth century, physiologists analyzed the relationship between filling (preload) and output, resulting in the famous Starling curve. The Italian scientist Dario Maestrini (Corciano 1886–1975 Arezzo) is said to have arrived at similar statements [36, 38]. It took somewhat longer to devise methods that can actually estimate LV chamber volume in the beating intact (innervated) heart. The introduction of indicator dilution techniques permitted calculation of ejection fraction (EF), being the rate of washout during successive heart beats, i.e., ejected stroke volume (SV) relative to filling volume. With the advent of x-ray imaging, biplane angiography, and radionuclide tracers, besides noninvasive methods such as advanced 3D echocardiography, MRI, and CT scan, accurate estimations of ESV and EDV became within reach [31]. Thus, EF became “redefined” as (1-ESV/EDV). The distinction between ventricular size in men and women was established 35 years ago [7, 8] and is increasingly being appreciated.

Cardiomyocyte and Contraction Process

The fundamental building block of cardiac muscle contraction refers to the cardiomyocyte which contains myofibrils consisting of contractile proteins arranged in units which are called sarcomeres. Activation takes place via an electrical stimulus which in the healthy heart spreads from the sinus node via the AV node and the ventricular septum in the direction of the apex, to continue along the free wall in the direction of the base of the heart [24]. The electrical trigger initiates contraction, and the complete sequence can be recorded as the typical electrocardiogram (ECG ). The precise mechanisms of contraction at the cellular level are complex and still an area of intense investigation. The contractile machinery is summarized in Fig. 8.1 [39]. The intrinsic capability to contract and generate force is referred to as contractility (or inotropy). Similarly the property describing the ease of relaxation during diastole is referred to as lusitropy. Both processes are modulated by β-adrenergic stimulation (β-AS), which increases (the rate of) peak force development, in addition to enhancing lusitropy [44]. Notably, β-AS raises intracellular cAMP levels, activating protein kinase A (PKA), which in turn phosphorylates key proteins involved in excitation–contraction (EC) coupling. These include the L-type Ca2+ channel and phospholamban (PLB ), respectively, increasing Ca2+ entry into the cytoplasm and sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+ reuptake by the SR Ca2+-ATPase2a (SERCA2a). These effects contribute to increased SR Ca2+ content , inotropy, and lusitropy. High SR Ca2+ load also enhances Ca2+ leak and fractional Ca2+ release during EC coupling. Interestingly, ß-AS has been shown to increase the gain of cardiac EC coupling. Mechanisms of cardiac EC coupling have been found to differ between the sexes [10]. Contractions and Ca2+ transients in rats are significantly smaller in myocytes from females when compared to males. Ca2+ spark frequency does not differ between the sexes, but amplitudes are smaller in cells from females when compared to males. Thus, the gain of EC coupling (i.e., SR Ca2+ release per unit Ca2+ current) is much lower in cells from females [10]. As the amount of Ca2+ released during a spark is regulated by the intrinsic gating of the RyR2 (type 2 release) channels, sex differences in the opening of individual channels could be responsible. Alternatively, as RyR2 levels are actually higher in females, it is possible that there are posttranslational modifications in males that could contribute to increased SR Ca2+ release by increasing channel opening [40]. Additionally, estrogen receptor activation was found to influence cardiac myofilament function [33]. At the myofilaments, PKA phosphorylates troponin I (TnI) and myosin binding protein-C (MyBP-C ). Cross-bridge (XB) cycling rate (XBcy) is still debated in the literature. Most studies on ion channels and Ca2+ transport have been limited to myocyte ion handling and electrophysiological descriptions. However, an advanced approach by Negroni et al. [39] clarifies how altered Ca2+ sensitivity and XBcy interact during β-AS in ventricular myocytes. Thus, they provide a quantitative framework to study β-AS dynamic effects on Ca2+ transients, action potential, and contractile properties while incorporating an updated Soltis–Saucerman model [54]. The latter integrates the Shannon–Bers Ca2+ electrophysiological myocyte model [50] with dynamic descriptions of CaMKII and PKA signaling pathways. The half-sarcomere is composed of inextensible thick and thin filaments in parallel with an internal elastic load (Fig. 8.1a). The thick (ThF) and thin filaments (Tf) can slide past each other defining a zone of overlap where XBs can attach to the thin filament. Attached XBs act as independent force generators, occupying different states in the XB cycle [19]. It was demonstrated [15] that as the sarcomere shortens below slack length, titin-based restoring forces act to desensitize the myofilaments. That study showed for the first time the importance of titin-based restoring force in length-dependent deactivation during the early phase of diastole. Titin is synthesized as either the more compliant (fetal) N2BA or stiffer (adult) N2B form. Signaling by thyroid hormone, insulin, and Gq-protein-coupled receptors to the phosphoinositol 3 kinase–Akt–mammalian target of rapamycin pathway enhances N2B expression . The N2BA:N2B ratio generally increases in humans with heart failure (HF) and reduced EF, but changes in patients with preserved EF remain less certain [51]. Recently, a validation was realized of an LV finite element model driven by a cell-based cross-bridge cycling descriptor and coupled to a closed-loop lumped parameter circulatory model to simulate different ventricular loading conditions (preload and afterload) and contractility levels. This approach permitted reproduction of a linear end-systolic pressure–volume relationship, a curvilinear end-diastolic pressure–volume relationship, and a linear relationship between myocardial oxygen consumption and pressure–volume area [52].

Fig. 8.1
figure 1

Model summarizing major components and processes involved in cardiac contraction at the cellular level

(A) Constitutive muscle unit, consisting of half-sarcomere length (L) composed of thick (ThF) and thin (Tf) filaments in parallel with an elastic element. The equivalent cross-bridge (XB) representing all attached cross-bridges is part of the ThF. It attaches to the Tf by the mobile end of its elastic structure, with h elongation, defining an inextensible half-sarcomere length X = L-h. A series elastic element with length Ls accounts for compliant muscle ends and together with L make up total muscle length (Lm). (B) Cross-bridge dynamics showing steady-state XB elongation (hr), its decrease due to ΔL, and later return to hr at shorter half-sarcomere length (L-ΔL). (C) Four-compartment myocyte model: bulk cytosol, cleft, sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR), and subsarcolemmal space (Sub-SL) [50, 54] with ion currents as described by various authors. This model is coupled to the myofilament force development model consisting of 5-state troponin systems (TS) with Ca2+ binding. Each TS is composed of three adjacent troponin–tropomyosin regulatory units able to act cooperatively to bind Ca2+ in three successive steps. Troponin systems are free TS, Ca2+ bound to TS without attached XBs (TSCa3), Ca2+ bound to TS with attached XBs in the weak state (TSCa3∼), Ca2+ bound to TS with attached XBs in the power state (TSCa3*), and TS without Ca2+ with attached XBs in the power state (TS*). Baseline mechanical parameters and all changes used for ISO are in Table 8.1 of the original publication. Reproduced from Negroni et al. [39], with permission. Other abbreviations: AP(D) action potential (duration), CaMKII Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II, CFTR cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator, EC excitation–contraction, Fm muscle force, ICaL L-type Ca2+ channel current, ICFTR CFTR-mediated Cl current, ICl(Ca) Ca2+-dependent Cl current, IKr rapid delayed rectifier K+ current, IKs slow delayed rectifier K+ current, INa fast Na+ current, INCX Na+–Ca2+ exchanger current, INKA Na+–K+-ATPase current, ISO isoproterenol, ISO-Cytofl ISO effect without β-AS on parameters involved in cytosolic fluxes, ISO-titin ISO effect without β-AS on parameters involved in titin, ISO-XBCa ISO effect without β-AS on parameters involved in XBCa, ISO-XBCa–XBcy ISO effect without β-AS on parameters in XBCa and XBcy, ISO-XBcy ISO effect without β-AS on parameters involved in XBcy, kdf rate of force redevelopment (as response to a length step), krel rate of force decay, ktr rate of force redevelopment (response to a length pulse), Lm muscle length, MyBP-C myosin binding protein-C, NCX Na+–Ca2+ exchanger, NKA Na+–K+-ATPase, PKA protein kinase A, PLB phospholamban, PLM phospholemman, PMCA plasma membrane Ca2+ ATPase, a transport protein in the plasma membrane, RyR ryanodine receptor, SERCA sarcoendoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase, SR sarcoplasmic reticulum, TnC troponin C, TnI troponin I, TSCa3 Ca2+ bound to troponin system without attached XBs, TSCa3 ∼ Ca2+ bound to troponin system with attached XBs in the weak state, TSCa3* troponin system without Ca2+ with attached XBs in the power state, XB (myofilament) cross-bridge, XBCa XB Ca2+ sensitivity, XBcy cross-bridge cycling rate, WT wild type, β-AS β-adrenergic stimulation

Sex-Specific Differences in Cardiomyocytes

The observation that receptors for all major sex steroid hormones, including testosterone, are present on individual cardiomyocytes suggests that these hormones may influence the heart at the cellular level. Male/female differences in intracellular Ca2+ release and contraction in isolated ventricular myocytes have already been mentioned. Growing evidence suggests that these differences arise from effects of sex steroid hormones on processes involved in intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis [2]. Also in adult mammals, sex-based differences in cardiac structure and function have been reported, based on main molecular mechanisms involved in the response of the heart to pathological situations. These differences should be dealt with, not only in basic science or clinical research but also with regard to therapeutic approaches [11]. Recently, in rats contractility in the whole heart, adult ventricular myocytes, as well as myofibrils from both sexes were analyzed. Functional sex differences were observed at all levels. Hearts and cardiomyocytes from female rats displayed greater fractional shortening (FS) than males, and female cells and myofibrils took longer to relax. RNA sequencing experiments on these cardiomyocytes were performed, resulting in the identification of around 600 genes which were expressed in a sexually dimorphic manner. Further analysis revealed sex-specific enrichment of signaling pathways and key regulators. At the protein level, female cardiomyocytes exhibited higher PKA activity, consistent with pathway enrichment identified through RNA sequencing [56]. In contrast, Farrell et al. [10] found FS to be significantly smaller in female rats, and a similar finding for EF was attributed to the load dependence of the metric. However, one would rather expect an increased EF level [32] in women in view of the lower arterial blood pressure levels seen in both healthy humans (Table 8.1) and animals [57].  Additionally, it is important to point out that sex differences in genes and gene families often reverse by sex in diseased versus control, healthy tissues [9].

Table 8.1 Hemodynamic variables in healthy adults (N = 410) based on Kuznetsova et al. [34]

It remains unclear how these differences as observed in rodents translate to macroscopic distinctions in humans. Reportedly, EF is higher in women ([8], and also this study), but the observation is likely associated with their smaller ESV values [30]. Differences also occur during aging. A progressive loss of telomeric DNA in human cardiac stem cells (hCSCs ) occurs with aging, and the newly formed cardiomyocytes inherit short telomeres and rapidly reach the senescent phenotype. One study including female (N = 32) and male (N = 42) hearts from individuals without cardiovascular disease (age range 19–104 years) demonstrated that at all ages, the female heart is equipped with a larger pool of functionally competent hCSCs and younger myocytes than the male myocardium. The replicative potential is higher, and telomeres are longer in female hCSCs than in male hCSCs. In the female heart, myocyte turnover occurs at a rate of 10%, 14%, and 40% per year at 20, 60, and 100 years of age, respectively. Corresponding values in the male heart are 7%, 12%, and 32% per year, documenting that cardiomyogenesis involves a large and progressively increasing number of parenchymal cells with aging. From 20 to 100 years of age, the myocyte compartment is replaced 15 times in women and 11 times in men [20].

Ventricular Pressure and Volume in Males and Females

So much for the difficult part. All those ion currents and sliding filament activities serve to get something like a compression pump fully operational on a 24-h basis. Now the more straightforward pump function description deserves attention, referring to a macroscopic view. Stroke volume (SV) and heart rate (HR) are important determinants of ventricular pumping capacity. SV is the difference between EDV and ESV . Cardiac output (CO) is obtained by multiplying SV and HR. Figure 8.2 illustrates positions of SV and HR combinations as measured in a population consisting of 410 healthy individuals. Iso-CO curves (i.e., trajectories with fixed CO levels) are inscribed. Obviously, similar values for SV can be generated by various suitable combinations of EDV and ESV. Therefore, we need a framework in which we can depict not just the difference between EDV and ESV (as shown on the ordinate of Fig. 8.2), but rather the particular volumes that actually generate a certain SV, either in a healthy individual or in a cardiac disease patient. In other words, it is required to define a so-called working point, which exactly characterizes the conditions which are responsible for a particular SV. This concept has been presented in detail elsewhere [32].

Fig. 8.2
figure 2

Diagram showing combinations of stroke volume index and heart rate as measured in 410 healthy adults. Multiplication of both components yields cardiac output index (COi), as reflected by the relative bubble size. Two levels of constant COi are indicated by the dotted curves, namely 3 (upper tracing) and 2 L/min.m2. Average values are different for males and females (see Table 8.1). Abbreviation: bpm, beats per minute

The Pressure–Volume Loop in Healthy Males and Females

Table 8.1 shows a comparison of various hemodynamically relevant variables routinely explored in clinical investigations. Apart from the slight disparity of systolic pressure, it is remarkable to observe the significant differences regarding LV volumes when comparing men and women. This notable fact was first published by Buonanno et al. [8] and unfortunately had not received the attention which it deserves. Figure 8.3

Fig. 8.3
figure 3

Schematic sketch of the left ventricular pressure–volume loop, reflecting the dynamic behavior during a single cardiac cycle. Although not emphasized in most textbooks, there are considerable differences between the healthy adult male and female. The loops refer to a single cardiac cycle. Filling is complete when reaching end-diastolic volume (EDV ). Then pressure builds up, which eventually opens the aortic valve, while starting ejection until end-systolic volume (ESV ) with end-systolic pressure (ESP ) is reached. Subsequently pressure falls and filling resumes. Essentially the diagram is similar for men and women, except for the fact that ESV and EDV are significantly smaller in healthy adult women, while ESP is slightly lower. End-systolic elastance Emax is defined as ESP / (ESV-Vo), where Vo is an extrapolated value, here based on a reasonable estimate. The effective arterial elastance (Ea) is given by ESP/(EDV–ESV). The ratio of Emax and Ea is called ventriculo-arterial coupling. Based on average data from [34] see Table 8.1

combines LV pressure and volume data to construct average PV loops, typical for healthy males and females. Again, the contours of the loops depict remarkable sex-specific differences which generally are not discussed in standard textbooks. The LV peak systolic pressure (PSP) vs ESV relationship was first described by Holt [17]. Nowadays, end-systolic pressure (ESP ) is often approximated as 0.9* PSP, yielding the familiar maximal systolic elastance (Emax), shown in Fig. 8.3.

It is well-known that the size of the healthy heart varies, depending on age and size of the animal or human under consideration. In contrast, in the healthy organism, it is found that arterial blood pressure at resting conditions is nearly constant across all species, although being slightly lower in adult healthy females [48, 57]. A popular index to indicate systolic function (i.e., pump performance) is EF, being the ratio of SV and EDV and often expressed as a percentage. Since average ESV is significantly smaller in healthy adult women, it follows that EF tends to be higher in females [30], and this is confirmed (Table 8.1) based on data described elsewhere [34]. Although EF depends on both ESV and EDV, it appears that ESV is the dominant component [30]. Indeed, the relationship between EF and ESV is based on the boundary conditions of ventricular function, where ESV cannot be greater than EDV, while values for SV occur within a certain range. When these restrictions are applied to a Monte Carlo model, we find a distribution of theoretical working points similar to what we encounter in the actual VRG [27]. In Fig. 8.3 the SV can be identified as the width of the loop, since this is the difference between EDV and ESV. The latter two variables determine the working point as illustrated in Fig. 8.4 which is based on the pioneering work by Holt on obtaining LV and right ventricular (RV) volume in dogs [16,17,18]. The electric conductivity method employed by those authors to measure volumes was refined [3] and adapted for use in humans, horses [22], and small animals (survey in [31]).

Fig. 8.4
figure 4

Volume regulation graph, constructed on the basis of right ventricular (RV) volume data (normalized by body weight) for seven anesthetized dogs as reported by Holt [18], using an electrical conductance method and saline injection to obtain indicator dilution curves. Bubble size refers to heart rate (range 70–108 beats per minute)

The Volume Regulation Graph for the Right Ventricle

Similar to that for the LV, the VRG can be derived for the RV. Figure 8.4 shows the results based on a study by Holt [18], where heart rate (range 70–108 beats per minute) is reflected by “bubble” size. Average fractional emptying (an expression coined by Holt, nowadays called EF) amounted to 39% for the RV in seven anesthetized dogs, while in a preceding study [16], 46% was found for the LV. Although the authors recognized the fractional behavior of the dilution curves, their primary interest was not EF or any equivalent thereof but rather the estimation of residual volume, i.e., ESV . The findings for the RV VRG shown in Fig. 8.4 have been confirmed in numerous other studies, including, e.g., those reporting on post-Fallot repair studies [28].

The Case of Sharing a Pizza

Imagine that someone offers you a slice of pizza. She or he cuts a piece that is 3/5 (60%) of the total size. Now, how many bites do you get? Is this going to be a complete meal or just a snack? Well, apart from the toppings, it all depends on whether we are talking about a mini-pizza or a supersized one. So, given the fraction offered, you need to know the circumference (or diameter), because traditional pizzas, homemade or not, are reported to be round. A similar unspecified attribute is involved when discussing EF, which is often magically endowed with the prestigious title: indicator of systolic function.

The metric EF is also often referred to as an index. Wheelan [58] has nicely described how to view such an indicator: “The advantage of any index is that it consolidates lots of complex information into a single number. We can then rank things that otherwise defy simple comparison – anything from quarterbacks to colleges to beauty pageant contestants. In the Miss America pageant, the overall winner is a combination of five separate competitions: personal interview, swimsuit, evening wear, talent, and onstage question.” He continues providing a similar example on ranking sports cars, emphasizing that each classification system has the potential to produce a different outcome. The same line of reasoning applies to the heart when we consider EF. Robotham et al. [46] concluded: “Thus, EF, although a relatively simple measure that is intuitively easily comprehended, is an extremely complex parameter describing the entire cardiovascular system and requires additional study.” Strictly speaking, the outcome for EF only depends on ESV and EDV when employing the more insightful variant of the definition formula:

$$ \mathrm{EF}={100}^{\ast}\;\left(1-\mathrm{ESV}/\mathrm{EDV}\right) $$
(8.1)

However, both ESV and EDV themselves depend on many underlying factors. Ventricular function can be described via the volume regulation graph (VRG) approach or based on the elastance concept [27]. ESV and EDV can be related [21] to each other via

$$ \mathrm{ESV}=\alpha +\beta \kern0.32em \mathrm{EDV} $$
(8.2)

and graphically represented in the VRG; see Fig. 8.4. In the past, we derived an analytical expression by combining Eq. (8.1) with the definition formula for EF:

$$ \mathrm{EF}=1+{\mathrm{C}}_1\kern0.28em \left\{\mathrm{ESV}/\left({\mathrm{C}}_2-\mathrm{ESV}\right)\right\}\kern0.5em $$
(8.3)

with constants C1 and C2 calculated for the population under consideration (Kerkhof 1984) [21]. This expression underscores the importance of measuring ESV [2930]. From the PV loop (Fig. 8.3), we can define (assuming linearity when considering a sufficiently small ESV range) the Emax using ESP , end-systolic volume (ESV), and the intercept Vo [6]:

$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}\mathrm{Emax}=\mathrm{ESP}/\left(\mathrm{ESV}-\mathrm{Vo}\right)\kern0.15em \mathrm{or},\\ {}\mathrm{ESV}=\mathrm{ESP}/\mathrm{Emax}+\mathrm{Vo}.\end{array}} $$

The ventricular diastolic stiffness is traditionally defined as an exponential curve [27], by relating end-diastolic pressure (EDP) to two constants (i.e., Po and m), EDP = Po e(m*EDV), where Po is a constant and m is the modulus referring to LV distensibility. Thus, EDV can be expressed as EDV = (log EDP − log Po)/m. As a consequence, EF can be described either as a function of {ESV, ESP, Vo, EDP, Po, and m} or as dependent on {ESV, α, β, R2, EDVave}.

Importantly, the VRG can be used as a starting point to derive various connections with clinically relevant metrics, such as EF and Emax. This view is summarized in Fig. 8.5, where (1-EF) is shown by the line connecting the origin with any particular operating point of {EDV , ESV }, for example, for the average values in males and females. In dogs of various breeds, admitted to the clinic because of heart disease, age seems to affect ventricular volume regulation (as reflected by the slope difference in the VRG), but this effect is only discernible in female dogs [42].

Fig. 8.5
figure 5

Volume regulation graph, showing relationship between end-systolic volume index (ESVi ) and end-diastolic volume index (EDVi ) in healthy adult individuals (N = 410), stratified for sex (215 women). The broken lines refer to linear regression analysis. These lines should be distinguished from the solid lines with arrow heads that connect the origin with each group average, illustrating that average ejection fraction (EF) is higher in women (see Table 8.1). A steeper slope indicates a lower EF. Data from Kuznetsova et al. [34], measured by 2D echocardiography

Another application of the VRG concept refers to EF versus ESVi (Fig. 8.6). The male/female regression curves based on Eq. (8.3) show overlap, but average values for males and females are significantly different (Table 8.1).

Fig. 8.6
figure 6

Ejection fraction (EF) versus end-systolic volume index (ESVi ) for healthy individuals, stratified for sex, as also shown in Fig. 8.1. The yellow triangle refers to the average value for males, while the yellow star reflects average value for females. Both EF and ESVi are significantly different (see Table 8.1). The regression curve is based on Eq. (8.3)

These findings can be summarized as shown in Fig. 8.7 where EF is presented in the VRG as a box which contains several surprises when we look at the true contents. The example is based on data (N = 12) obtained in healthy individuals [1], illustrating that EF is inversely associated with both ESVi , and with the VAC index, the latter only when assuming that Vo = 0. It is important to note that EF and VAC are “uncoupled” when the true Vo is taken into account. Otherwise, the relation between EF and VAC is trivial, and one metric does not offer any additional information to that of the other.

Fig. 8.7
figure 7

Volume regulation graph illustrating the derivation of ejection fraction (EF) by considering the slope of the line which connects the origin with the pertaining working point defined by {EDV ,ESV }. The inset (upper panel) shows that EF is nonlinearly related to ESVi , while an exponential relationship describes ventriculo-arterial coupling versus EF (lower right inset). For explanation see text. Data (N = 12) based on healthy individuals described by Asanoi et al. [1]

Associations Between Clinically Relevant Variables

The insightful and telling Fig. 8.8 obtained from Ky et al. [35] nicely summarizes the associations between major variables of relevance in cardiovascular studies. These authors did not stratify for sex but report that their analysis is based on 466 patients (37% females) with systolic HF with an average EF of 27%. In an earlier study concerning HF patients, we found that both average EF and VAC are significantly higher in women [26]. Table 8.1 documents that this is also the case in healthy adults. Not all variables listed in Fig. 8.8 were discussed in the present survey, but clearly the correlation reported between ESV and EDV is the highest found among all combinations. This outcome supports our starting point reflected by the VRG (Figs. 8.4 and 8.5), which has also been discussed elsewhere [5, 25].

Fig. 8.8
figure 8

Cross table of volume-related variables of the left ventricle, measured by echocardiography in 466 patients with chronic systolic heart failure, showing correlation coefficients for all combinations of two components. Ees is obtained by the single beat (sb) method and more or less comparable to Emax in our text. Note that the coupling index is here defined as our (k−1). The blue ellipse signifies a positive correlation, while a red contour refers to negative correlation. The intensity of the color reflects the strength of the association. Interestingly, the two variables which we employ for depicting the volume regulation graph, namely, ESV and EDV , yield the highest correlation. V100 is the volume which corresponds with a pressure level of 100 mmHg on the linearized Emax curve. Abbreviations as in our text. Reproduced from Ky et al. [35], with permission

Discussion

Strictly speaking, any sex-specific analysis is of limited meaning if not interpreted against the context of the potential role which age plays. The data we discussed here refer to healthy adults, with age ranging from 15 to 90 years. From our observations on healthy adults, we conclude that there are significant sex differences regarding average LV size when considering the nearly complete adult lifespan. These findings fully support earlier findings reported in the literature [8], which unfortunately did not receive the attention it deserves within the clinical discipline. The results on the LV have been extended to the RV, e.g., by [37].

Using gated myocardial perfusion SPECT for the LV, Peace et al. [41] studied the effect of sex, age (range), and weight (range) on LV EF and ESV reference limits in adults. These authors fully confirm the findings obtained by Buonanno et al. [8]. Using coronary CT angiography, Gebhard et al. [12] analyzed 1155 individuals (54.5% males) free from overt heart disease and found that average EF was 2.0% points higher in females (p < 0.001). This male/female difference increased with advancing age (range 18–92 years). Slight age-dependent variation has been observed in some studies, and this potential modifying effect requires further study, because conflicting results have been reported, e.g., no correlation between EF and age [41].

Why ventricular size is generally smaller in healthy females compared to males is not entirely clear. Various factors have been implicated, including differences in neurohumoral signaling, age-dependent changes in estrogen/progesterone status, gender-related life style factors, and progressive cardiomyocyte loss with age in males (but not observed in women).

The embryologic origins of the RV and the LV differ. The RV exhibits dominant pump function during fetal development. At birth, separation of the pulmonary and the systemic circulation causes that the LV assumes primary pump function generating much higher needed pressures. Concomitant with morphological and functional modifications in both the LV and RV, the neonatal cardiomyocytes undergo changes in morphology, respiration, metabolism, and contractile function. Distinct key transcription factors drive the chamber-specific gene networks during development. Existing evidence reveals a critical role of noncanonical Wnt11 in orchestrating early development. Expression of Wnt11 is dynamically regulated in a temporal–spatial manner, playing important roles in myocardial development [55]. However, these researchers only looked at male mice, and further investigations are needed. Another intriguing approach for elucidating male/female phenotypic differences in cardiac size follows the pattern of ventricular volume adaptation for sex-mismatch cases in heart transplant patients, both in children and adults [43].

Conclusions

In healthy adults we observe striking (significant) differences when blood pressure and left ventricular volumes are compared in males and females . These disparities have serious consequences for particular metrics commonly used to evaluate cardiovascular function. Pulse pressure (which is related to vascular stiffness) is higher in males. In contrast EF (often used to assess systolic function), Emax (reflecting contractility), and VAC are higher in women (assuming that the intercept Vo can be neglected). However, mean blood pressure (an indicator of afterload) is lower in women. As illustrated, ESV and EDV are linearly correlated, clarifying why EF is slightly higher in women (Figs. 8.4 and 8.9), and permitting the robust description of various relationships, including EF vs ESV (i). It is often emphasized that sex matters when studying cardiovascular properties, and this notion has been confirmed in the present analysis based on healthy individuals. Further studies in cardiac disease patients are required to investigate if these differences persist in selected diagnostic cohort categories and what ultimately will be the implications for more precise diagnosis and treatment.

Fig. 8.9
figure 9

Summary of dimensional findings regarding left ventricular size in healthy adult women and men. Ejection fraction (EF) is generally higher in smaller hearts (as in women), because end-systolic volume index (ESVi ) tends to be smaller, while end-diastolic volume index “follows” ESVi. Schematic dimensions of the symbolic heart are somewhat exaggerated to make this point clearly visible