Abstract
The political advantages of policy learning are becoming apparent to public officials, who increasingly recognise the instrumental utility of using overseas policy experiences in mobilising domestic support, overcoming political or industry opposition and marshalling transnational coalitions, especially where policy challenges are transnational in nature. Yet, analysis of these phenomena poses particular conceptual problems since most prominent approaches privilege either agential learning or structural diffusion accounts of how and why policies transfer across borders. These can produce partial or sometimes contradictory accounts of why policies transfer between states occur. This chapter engages with this problem by appealing to political sociology insights around structure/agency metatheory and applying these to a case study concerning the diffusion of multinational corporations taxation policies between OECD and G20 states, and the transfer of Diverted Profits Tax between the U.K. and Australia. Developing the work of Margaret Archer, the chapter proposes an institutional morphogenesis of policy transfer, which circumscribes the scope of policy learning with respect to the structure/agency debate. Here it is found that policy transfer, especially in the context of transnational challenges, must be understood as a product of structural imperatives, institutional paradigms and policy learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archer, M. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Bennett, C. J. (1991). What is policy convergence and what causes it. British Journal of Political Science, 21(2), 215–233.
Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84(2), 395–415.
Bhaskar, R. (2010). Reclaiming reality. London: Taylor & Francis.
Carson, E., & Kerr, L. (2010). Contractualism and social inclusion: Strands of policy emulation in UK and Australian local employment services. Policy & Politics, 38(1), 41–55.
Cerny, P. G. (2000). Political agency in a globalizing world: Toward a structurational approach. European Journal of International Relations, 6(4), 435–463.
Chan, C. W. (2000). Taxation of global e-commerce on the internet: The underlying issues and proposed plans. Minnesota Journal of Global Trade, 9(1), 233–268.
Chirinko, R. S., & Wilson, D. J. (2017). Tax competition among US states: Racing to the bottom or riding on a seesaw? (Working Paper Series, No. 2008-03). San Francisco, CA: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
Department of the Treasury (Australia). (2016, May). Implementing a diverted profits tax. Discussion paper. https://static.treasury.gov.au/uploads/sites/1/2017/06/C2016-018_Diverted-profits-tax_discussion-paper.pdf.
Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance, 13(1), 5–23.
Dunlop, C. A. (2009). Policy transfer as learning: Capturing variation in what decision-makers learn from epistemic communities. Policy Studies, 30(3), 289–311.
Dunlop, C. A. (2017). Policy learning and policy failure: Definitions, dimensions and intersections. Policy and Politics, 45(1), 3–18.
Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2013). Systematising policy learning: From monolith to dimensions. Political Studies, 61(3), 599–619.
Evans, M., & Davies, J. (1999). Understanding policy transfer: A multi-level, multi-disciplinary perspective. Public Administration, 77(2), 361–385.
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Gilardi, F., & Wasserfallen, F. (2016). How socialization attenuates tax competition. British Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 45–65.
Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state. The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 3(25), 275–296.
Hay, C. (2002). Political analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hay, C., & Jessop, B. (1995). Introduction: Local political economy: Regulation and governance. Economy and Society, 24(3), 303–306.
Heywood, A. (1999). Political theory: An introduction (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Higgott, R. (1996). Beyond embedded liberalism: Governing the international trade regime in an era of economic nationalism. In P. Gummett (Ed.), Globalisation and public policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Janeba, E. (1995). Corporate income tax competition, double taxation treaties, and foreign direct investment. Journal of Public Economics, 56(2), 311–325.
Legrand, T. (2015). Transgovernmental policy networks in the Anglosphere. Public Administration, 93(4), 973–991.
Legrand, T. (2016). Elite, exclusive and elusive: Transgovernmental policy networks and iterative policy transfer in the Anglosphere. Policy Studies, 37(5), 440–455.
Legrand, T., & Vas, C. (2014). Framing the policy analysis of OECD and Australian VET interaction: Two heuristics of policy transfer. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(3), 230–248.
Manwaring, R. (Ed.) (2016). From new labour to Rudd/Gillard: Dilemmas, lesson-drawing and policy transfer [Special issue]. Policy Studies, 37(5).
Marmor, T. (1997). Global health policy reform: Misleading mythology or learning opportunity. In C. Altenstetter & J. W. Björkman (Eds.), Health policy reform, national variations and globalisation. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Marsh, D., & Sharman, J. C. (2009). Policy diffusion and policy transfer. Policy Studies, 30(3), 269–288.
McAnulla, S. (2002). Structure and agency. In D. Marsh & G. Stoker (Eds.), Theory and methods in political science. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
OECD. (2014). Addressing the tax challenges of the digital economy, OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pal, L. (2012). Frontiers of governance: The OECD and global public management reform. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum, 41(2), 169–174.
Rawlings, G. (2007). Taxes and transnational treaties: Responsive regulation and the reassertion of offshore sovereignty. Law and Policy, 29(1), 51–66.
Razin, A., & Sadka, E. (2011). Tax competition and migration: The race-to-the-bottom hypothesis revisited. CESifo Economic Studies, 58(1), 164–180.
Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
Rose, R. (1993). Lesson-drawing in public policy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Rose, R. (2005). Learning from comparative public policy: A practical guide. London: Routledge.
Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting mothers and soldiers. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Harvard.
Stewart, M. (2012). Transnational tax information exchange networks: Steps towards a globalized, legitimate tax administration. World Tax Journal, 4(2), 152–179.
Stone, D. (2012). Transfer and translation of policy. Policy Studies, 33(6), 483–499.
Stone, D. (2017). Understanding the transfer of policy failure: Bricolage, experimentalism and translation. Policy and Politics, 45(1), 55–70.
Wendt, A. (1994). Collective identity formation and the international state. American Political Science Review, 88(2), 384–396.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the editors for invaluable comments on an earlier version of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Legrand, T. (2018). Structure, Agency and Policy Learning: Australia’s Multinational Corporations Dilemma. In: Dunlop, C., Radaelli, C., Trein, P. (eds) Learning in Public Policy. International Series on Public Policy . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76210-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76210-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76209-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76210-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)