Skip to main content

Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
An Ontology for Unconventional Conflict

Part of the book series: Understanding Complex Systems ((UCS))

  • 403 Accesses

Abstract

This book is not the final word on what we can know about unconventional conflict and its complexities. However, it is a distillation of what is currently known and what has been done with regard to creating an ontology of unconventional conflict at the theater level. It captures many, if not all, of the emergent properties that result in unconventional conflict. There is much that remains to be learned, particularly regarding the social theories that drive the estimates of outcomes of unconventional conflict activities. This chapter includes a review of the ontology’s contents and how they fit together, a discussion of the uses of the ontology, and concluding thoughts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Arp, R., Smith, B., & Spear, A. D. (2015). Building ontologies with basic formal ontology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, E. L., Hughes, W. P., Jr., & Low, L. J. (1997). A concise theory of combat, NPS-IJWA-97-001. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, D. S. (2006a). Interim semi-static stability model. Retrieved May 4, 2016, from Hartley Consulting: http://drdeanhartley.com/HartleyConsulting/TOOLBOX/issm.htm

  • Hartley, D. S. (2008). DIME/PMESII VV&A tool. Retrieved May 4, 2016, from Hartley Consulting: http://drdeanhartley.com/HartleyConsulting/VVATool/VVA.htm

  • Hartley, D. S. (2009). I2WD HSCB testbed: 2009 V&V strategy & plan. Ft Monmouth, NJ: US Army RDECOM CERDEC I2WD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, D. S. (2012). Validation process for the DEXES II conceptual model. Oak Ridge, TN: Hartley Consulting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, D. S. (2017). Unconventional conflict: A modeling perspective. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, D. S., & Lacy, L. W. (2011). Irregular Warfare (IW) metrics ontology final Report, TRAC-H-TR-13-020. Ft Leavenworth, KS: US Army TRAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, D. S., & Lacy, L. W. (2013a). Creating the foundations for modeling irregular warfare. In D. M. Nicholson & D. D. Schmorrow (Eds.), Advances in design for cross-cultural activities, part II (pp. 13–23). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, D. S., & Lacy, L. W. (2013b). IW ontology final report. Ft Leavenworth, KS: US Army TRAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, B. C., & Sands, J. I. (1997). Doing windows: Non-traditional military responses to complex emergencies. Washington, DC: CCRP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • HQ Department of the Army. (2009). Army field manual on tactics in counterinsurgency, FM 3-24.2. Washington, DC: Department of the Army.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hartley, D.S. (2018). Conclusion. In: An Ontology for Unconventional Conflict. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75337-9_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics