Skip to main content

Mind and Madness: Louis Sass and the Horizonal Conception of Experience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Schizophrenia and Common Sense

Part of the book series: Studies in Brain and Mind ((SIBM,volume 12))

  • 657 Accesses

Abstract

The philosophy of psychiatry has recently begun to pay attention to the school of phenomenology initiated by Husserl and the ‘therapeutic’ philosophy of Wittgenstein in order to make sense of madness; Louis Sass is exemplary of this trend. J.J. Valberg argues that experience, as characterized by phenomenology, cannot be reconciled with the scientific worldview, due its all-encompassing character whereby everything that exists refers back to a central subject. He calls this the horizonal conception of experience (Sect. 8.2.2). Nevertheless, in line with natural science he also thinks that experience is dependent upon the proper functioning of the brain and nervous system. Experience is thus paradoxically a small, contingent part of the world, and the necessary condition of there being a world at all (Sect. 8.3). Valberg argues that this combination generates insoluble “puzzles” for philosophy. Louis Sass finds strikingly similar paradoxes in the experiences of schizophrenic patients, who suffer from an ‘impossible’ lived situation, which they experience as a change to the nature of the world, rather than to their minds (Sect. 8.4). He argues that their illness is the result of a quasi-voluntary process of bringing pre-reflective backgrounds to consciousness into explicit awareness. In this paper, I shall investigate the parallels between what Valberg thinks is our natural human condition, and what Sass regards as psychopathology. I will conclude (Sect. 8.5) that Valberg’s characterization of ordinary (non-pathological) consciousness as paradoxical indicates a limit to Sass’s phenomenological psychiatry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sass, in a recent paper co-authored with Josef Parnas and Dan Zahavi, clarifies that schizophrenia “is not, at its core, an intellectual, volitional, or “reflective” kind of self-consciousness” (Sass, Parnas, & Zahavi, 2011, p. 7). The authors observe that “[m]ost basic to schizophrenia is a kind of “operative” hyperreflexivity that occurs in an automatic fashion” (ibid). However, this habitual form of self-objectification could still be thought of as applying the same norms of rationality as mechanistic explanation, embodying the same epistemic excellence that scientists assign to the objectifying observation of external phenomena. Sass speculates in this vein in the epilogue of Madness and Modernism (pp. 355–373), suggesting that modern culture, insofar as it models knowledge on objectification, may play a role in motivating the mental habits that can lead to schizophrenia in some individuals.

References

  • Bechtel, W. (2008). Mental mechanisms: Philosophical perspectives on cognitive neuroscience. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. (1999). The paradox of subjectivity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, T. (2003). The mechanical mind: A philosophical introduction to minds, machines and mental representation (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1996). Meditations on first philosophy, with selections from the objections and replies (J. Cottingham, Trans.; Introduction: B. Williams.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. (2015). Merleau-Ponty’s transcendental theory of perception. In S. Gardner & M. Grist (Eds.), The transcendental turn (pp. 294–323). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, M. A., Howarth, J. M., & Keat, R. N. (1991). Understanding phenomenology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, B. (1991). Wittgenstein and scepticism. In K. Puhl (Ed.), Meaning scepticism (pp. 34–69). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1982). Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology (seventh impression) (D. Cairns, Trans.). The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutto, D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (2007). Critique of pure reason (Revised second ed.) (N. Kemp Smith, Trans.; Introduction: H. Caygill; Bibliography: G. Banham.). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lysaker, P. H., Buck, K. D., Leonhardt, B. L., Buck, B., Hamm, J., Hasson-Ohayon, I., et al. (2014). Metacognitively focused psychotherapy for people with schizophrenia: Eight core elements that define practice. In P. H. Lysaker, G. Dimaggio, & M. Brüne (Eds.), Social cognition and metacognition in schizophrenia: Psychopathology and treatment approaches (pp. 196–215). Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, M. (2003). Externalism: Putting mind and world back together again. Chesham, UK: Acumen Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J. P. (1956). Being and nothingness: A phenomenological essay on ontology (H. E. Barnes, Trans.). New York: Washington Square Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sass, L. A. (1992). Madness and modernism: Insanity in the light of modern art, literature, and thought. New York: BasicBooks, HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sass, L. A., Parnas, J., & Zahavi, D. (2011). Phenomenological psychopathology and schizophrenia: Contemporary approaches and misunderstandings. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 18(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2011.0008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valberg, J. J. (1992). The puzzle of experience. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Valberg, J. J. (2007). Dream, death and the self. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On certainty (G. E. M. Anscombe, & G. H. Von Wright (Eds.); G. E. M. Anscombe, & D. Paul, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Carpenter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Carpenter, G. (2018). Mind and Madness: Louis Sass and the Horizonal Conception of Experience. In: Hipólito, I., Gonçalves, J., Pereira, J. (eds) Schizophrenia and Common Sense. Studies in Brain and Mind, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73993-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics