Abstract
One approach that can be taken to the study of common sense is to consider a model of common-sense knowledge-generation. This approach is useful because it offers the possibility of therapeutic interventions for individuals who appear to engage in highly unreliable knowledge-generation practices. The proposed model elaborates on this idea using the concept of ‘personal epistemologies’ that vary in the population leading away from, or to, common-sense knowledge and praxis. I argue that by providing a normative standard for knowledge-generation praxis, education theory and science can inform and fulfil the broad conceptual requirements of such an approach. Interesting and significant parallels are found with phenomenological theories of schizophrenia which investigate the loss of common sense and the educational theory and science based on Piaget’s constructivism, Vygotsky’s social constructivism and ‘rational constructivism’. These parallels emphasise common ground between these different domains of research. By outlining the main parallels between these different domains the approach taken can be used to augment and enrich the research scope and conceptual framework of existing therapeutic models. I argue that for certain identifiable groups this research approach could be incorporated into existing therapeutic interventions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1994). Losing control: How and why people fail at self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Academic.
Baviskar, S., Hartle, R. T., & Whitney, T. (2009). Essential criteria to characterize constructivist teaching: Derived from a review of the literature and applied to five constructivist-teaching method articles. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 541–550.
Cobb, P. (1991). Reconstructing elementary school mathematics. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 13(2), 3–32.
Cobb, P. (2005). Where is the mind? A coordination of sociocultural and cognitive constructivist perspectives. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Kindle. New York: Teachers College Press.
Davis, E. (2014). Representations of commonsense knowledge. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507.
Di Paolo, E., Rohde, M., & De Jaegher, H. (2010). Horizons for the enactive mind: values, social interaction, and play. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Towards a new paradigm for cognitive science (pp. 33–87). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Doss, B. (2004). Changing the way we study change in psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(4), 368–386. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy/bph094
Forman, G., & Pufall, P. B. (2013). Constructivism in the computer age. New York: Psychology Press.
Fosnot, C. T., & Perry, R. S. (2005). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Kindle. New York: Teachers College Press.
Fuchs, T., & Jaegher, H. D. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 465–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-009-9136-4
Hanssen, M., Bak, M., Bijl, R., Vollebergh, W., & van Os, J. (2005). The incidence and outcome of subclinical psychotic experiences in the general population. The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44(Pt 2), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466505X29611
Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1994). Constructivism: Principles, paradigms, and integration. The Journal of Special Education, 28(3), 233–247.
Higgins, E. T. (1996). The “self digest”: Self-knowledge serving self-regulatory functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1062.
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (Eds.). (2004). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. New York: Psychology Press.
Kazdin, A. E. (2006). Mechanisms of change in psychotherapy: Advances, breakthroughs, and cutting-edge research (do not yet exist). In R. R. Bootzin & P. E. McKnight (Eds.), Strengthening research methodology: Psychological measurement and evaluation (pp. 77–101). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Kazdin, A. E. (2007). Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091432
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., Swanson, R. A. (2015). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. Kindle. New York: Routledge.
Kushnir, T., & Xu, F. (2012). What is rational constructivism? In T. Kushnir, & F. Xu (Eds.), Rational constructivism in cognitive development. Kindle. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Lutz, S., & Huitt, W. (2004). Connecting cognitive development and constructivism: Implications from theory for instruction and assessment. Constructivism in the Human Sciences, 9(1), 67–90.
Lyddon, W. J. (1989). Personal epistemology and preference for counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(4), 423.
Minkowski, E. (1997). La Schizophrenie. Psychopathologie des schizoïdes et des schizophrènes. Paris: Payot.
Mitchell, J., & Vierkant, A. D. (1989). Delusions and hallucinations as a reflection of the subcultural milieu among psychotic patients of the 1930s and 1980s. The Journal of Psychology, 123(3), 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1989.10542981
Moran, D. (2001). Introduction to phenomenology, Robert Sokolowski. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 32(1), 109–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2001.11007322
Norman, R. M., & Malla, A. K. (1993). Stressful life events and schizophrenia. I: A review of the research. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 162(2), 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.162.2.161
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.
Rhodes, M. (2012). When children ignore evidence in category-based induction: Irrational inferences? In T. Kushnir, & F. Xu (Eds.), Rational constructivism in cognitive development. Kindle. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Rieber, R. W., & Robinson, D. K. (2004). The essential Vygotsky. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Ross, R. M., McKay, R., Coltheart, M., & Langdon, R. (2015). Jumping to conclusions about the beads task? A meta-analysis of delusional ideation and data-gathering. Schizophrenia Bulletin, sbu187. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbu187.
Sass, L. A. (2014). Self-disturbance and schizophrenia: structure, specificity, pathogenesis (current issues, new directions). Schizophrenia Research, 152(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2013.05.017
Schilbach, L. (2016). Towards a second-person neuropsychiatry. Philosophy Transactions Royal Social B, 371(1686), 20150081. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0081
Stanghellini, G. (2000). Vulnerability to schizophrenia and lack of common sense. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 26(4), 775–787. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033493
Von Glaserfeld, E. (2005). Introduction: Aspects of constructivism. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Kindle. New York: Teachers College Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1962)
Waller, H., Freeman, D., Jolley, S., Dunn, G., & Garety, P. (2011). Targeting reasoning biases in delusions: A pilot study of the Maudsley Review Training Programme for individuals with persistent, high conviction delusions. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42(3), 414–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.03.001
Westbrook, D., Kennerley, H., & Kirk, J. (2011). An introduction to cognitive behaviour therapy: Skills and applications. New York: Sage publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
D. Timlett, A. (2018). Is a Therapy for Fostering Common Sense Possible?. In: Hipólito, I., Gonçalves, J., Pereira, J. (eds) Schizophrenia and Common Sense. Studies in Brain and Mind, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73993-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73993-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73992-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73993-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)