Skip to main content

Conceptual Challenges of International Practice Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Practice Theory

Abstract

We consider how the main approaches of IPT relate to one another and how their relationship spurs exciting new questions for future research. To explore these relations, we focus on a set of conceptual challenges. These challenges present issues that are contentious, present dilemmas or paradoxes and over which IPT scholars take differing positions. These must be appreciated as creative tensions; rather than playing the approaches against each other, we argue that their tensions provide fruitful heuristics for advancing IPT. The challenges are major ontological puzzles. We begin with a discussion of the tension between an understanding of practice as a social regularity and as a fluid entity. This leads us to the question of how far IPT can make statements on the contingency and change of practical configurations. Next, we address the issue of how to conceptualise the scale and size of practice. This is largely a question of (ontological) prioritisation, which is fundamental given the interest of IPT in the international and the global. We proceed with a reflection on different standpoints towards the normativity of practice, how the material dimension of practices (bodies, technology, artefacts) is prioritised, and how to conceptualise power and critique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This includes the more detailed debates on visuality and the practice of seeing (e.g. Lisle 2017), cognition and the role of the brain in practice (e.g. Turner 2007; Lizardo 2009), knowledge and learning (e.g. Turner 2001; Alkemeyer and Buschmann 2017), or affectivity and feeling (e.g. Reckwitz 2012; Bially Mattern 2011).

  2. 2.

    In addition to those discussed below, metaphors recently introduced include the concept of ‘textures of practice’ proposed by Silvia Gherardi (2012), ‘practice architectures’ proposed by Stephen Kemmis (see Mahon et al. 2017), the concept of ‘complexes of practice’ developed by Elizabeth Shove (Shove et al. 2012), Karin Knorr Cetina’s concept of ‘global microstructures’ (Knorr Cetina 2005; Knorr Cetina and Bruegger 2002), as well as various recent understandings of discourse and discursive formations (see Schatzki 2017).

  3. 3.

    For an outline of these respective positions, see Gilpin 1981, and the contributions in Ikenberry 2014 for the realist position, for the constructivist discussion see Widmaier et al. (2007), the contributions in Avant et al. (2010), and the reviews in Flockhart (2016) and Hopf (2017).

  4. 4.

    Hopf distinguishes between meaningful difference or novelty, repeated exposures to I, exposures to social margins and liminars, weakly socialised and institutionalised environments, institutionalised differences and novelties, discursively resonant challenges to the status quo, intelligible and plausible alternatives to the status quo, and productive crises.

  5. 5.

    For the relation between multi-sited ethnography and practice theory, see Schmidt and Volbers (2011) and our discussion of the methodological relation between IPT and ethnography in Chap. 6.

  6. 6.

    See the reviews in Mayer et al. (2014) and McCarthy (2017).

  7. 7.

    See Srnicek (2017) as well as the special issue on ‘Materialism and World Politics’ of Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41(3).

Literature

  • Acuto, Michele, and Simon Curtis, eds. 2013. Reassembling International Theory: Assemblage Thinking and International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, Emanuel, and Vincent Pouliot. 2011a. International Practices. International Theory 3 (1): 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011c. International Practices: Introduction and Framework. In International Practices, ed. Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot, 3–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Symbolic Power in European Diplomacy: The Struggle Between National Foreign Service and the EU’s External Action Service. Review of International Studies 40 (4): 657–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, and Vincent Pouliot. 2014. Power in Practice: Negotiating the International Intervention in Libya. European Journal of International Relations 20 (4): 889–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkemeyer, Thomas, and Nikolaus Buschmann. 2017. Learning in and Across Practices: Enablement as Subjectivation. In The Nexus of Practices. Connections, Constellations, Practitioners, ed. Allison Hui, Theodore R. Schatzki, and Elizabeth Shove, 8–23. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amicelle, Anthony, Clauda Aradau, and Julien Jeandesboz. 2015. Questioning Security Devices: Performativity, Resistance, Politics. Security Dialogue 46 (4): 293–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avant, Deborah, Martha Finnemore, and Susan K. Sell. 2010. Who Governs the Globe? In Who Governs the Globe? ed. Deborah Avant, Martha Finnemore, and Susan K. Sell, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Barry. 2001. Practice as Collective Action. In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, ed. Theodore Schatzki et al., 17–28. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Michael, and Raymond Duvall. 2005. Power in Global Governance. In Power in Global Governance, ed. Michael Barnett and Raymond Duvall, 1–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellanova, Rocco, and Gloria Gonzáles Fuster. 2013. Politics of Disappearance: Scanners and (Unobserved) Bodies as Mediators of Security Practices. International Political Sociology 7 (2): 188–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Tobias, and Alejandro Esguerra. 2017. Conclusion: Power, Relationality and Difference. In World Politics in Translation, ed. Tobias Berger and Alejandro Esguerra, 216–231. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Bourdieu, International Relations, and European Security. Theory and Society 41 (5): 451–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best, Jacqueline, and William Walters. 2013. ‘Actor-Network Theory’ and International Relationality: Lost (and Found) in Translation. Introduction. International Political Sociology 3 (7): 332–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bially Mattern, Janice. 2011. A Practice Theory of Emotion for International Relations. In International Practices, 63–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bogusz, Tanja. 2014. Why (not) Pragmatism? In The Spirit of Luc Boltanski. Essays on the Pragmatic Sociology of Critique, ed. Simon Susen and Bryan S. Turner, 129–152. London: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, Luc. 2011. On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, Luc, and Ève Chiapello. 2007. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. On Justification. Economies of Worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Gender Troubles: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, David, and Julian Reid. 2016. The Neoliberal Subject. London/New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittmer, Jason. 2016. Theorizing a More-Than-Human Diplomacy: Assembling the British Foreign Office, 1839–1874. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 11 (1): 78–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Charlotte. 2012. Stop Telling Us How to Behave. Socialization or Infantilization? International Studies Perspectives 13 (2): 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faizullaev, Alisher, and Jerémie Cornut. 2017. Narrative Practice in International Politics and Diplomacy: The Case of the Crimean Crisis. Journal of International Relations and Development 20 (3): 578–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flockhart, Trine. 2016. The Problem of Change in Constructivist Theory: Ontological Security Seeking and Agent Motivation. Review of International Studies 42 (5): 799–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frega, Robert. 2014. The Normative Creature: Toward a Practice-Based Account of Normativity. Social Theory and Practice 40 (1): 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, Mervyn, and Silviya Lechner. 2016a. Two Conceptions of International Practice: Aristotelian Praxis and Wittgensteinian Language-Games? Review of International Studies 42 (2): 334–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadinger, Frank. 2016. On Justification and Critique. Luc Boltanski’s Pragmatic Sociology and International Relations. International Political Sociology 10 (3): 187–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, Silvia. 2012. How to Conduct a Practice-Based Study: Problems and Methods. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, Silvia, and Manuela Perrotta. 2010. Egg Dates Sperm: A Tale of a Practice Change and Its Stabilization. Organization 18 (5): 595–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gross Stein, Janice. 2011. Background Knowledge in the Foreground: Conversations About Competent Practice in ‘Sacred Space’. In International Practices, ed. Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot, 87–107. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzini, Stefano. 1993. Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis. International Organization 47 (3): 443–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. The Ambivalent ‘Diffusion of Power’ in Global Governance. In The Diffusion of Power in Global Governance. International Political Economy Meets Foucault, ed. Stefano Guzzini and Iver B. Neumann, 1–37. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Power. Bourdieu’s Field Analysis of Relational Capital, Misrecognition and Domination. In Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR, ed. Rebecca Adler-Nissen, 78–92. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, Axel, and Gabi Schlag. 2013. Securitizing Images: The Female Body and the War in Afghanistan. European Journal of International Relations 19 (4): 891–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschauer, Stefan. 2004. Praktiken und ihre Körper: Über Materielle Partzipanden des Tuns. In Doing Culture. Neue Positionen zum Verhältnis von Kultur und Sozialer Praxis, ed. Karl Hörning and Julia Reuter, 73–91. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofius, Maren. 2016. Community at the Border or the Boundaries of Community? The Case of EU Field Diplomats. Review of International Studies 42 (5): 939–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmqvist, Caroline. 2013. Undoing War: War Ontologies and the Materiality of Drone Warfare. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41 (3): 535–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopf, Ted. 2002. Social Construction of International Politics. Identities & Foreign Policies, Moscow 1955 & 1999. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Change in International Practices. European Journal of International Relations. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1354066117718041.

  • Ikenberry, G. John, ed. 2014. Power, Order, and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, Jonathan. 2016. Governing Through Failure and Denial: The New Resilience Agenda. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 44 (3): 370–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Complex Global Microstructures. The New Terrorist Societies. Theory, Culture & Society 31 (4): 213–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, Karin, and Urs Bruegger. 2002. Global Microstructures: The Virtual Societies of Financial Markets. American Journal of Sociology 107 (4): 905–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1989. Rules, Norms, and Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisle, Debbie. 2017. Learning How to See. In Routledge Handbook of International Political Sociology, ed. Xavier Guillaume and Pinar Bilgin, 295–304. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizardo, Omar. 2009. Is a ‘Special Psychology’ of Practice Possible?: From Values and Attitudes to Embodied Dispositions. Theory & Psychology 19 (6): 713–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lok, Jaco, and Mark De Rond. 2013. On the Plasticity of Institutions: Containing and Restoring Practice Breakdowns at the Cambridge University Boat Club. Academy of Management Journal 56 (1): 185–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Examining the State: A Foucauldian Perspective on International ‘Governance Indicators’. Third World Quarterly 29 (2): 255–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Michael. 2001. Ethnomethodology and the Logic of Practice. In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, ed. Theodore R. Schatzki, Karin Knorr Cetina, and Eike von Savigny, 131–148. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1984. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, Kathleen, Susanne Kemmis, Stephen Francisco, and Annemaree Lloyd. 2017. Introduction: Practice Theory and the Theory of Practice Architectures. In Exploring Education and Professional Practice – Through the Lens of Practice Architectures, ed. Kathleen Mahon, Susanne Francisco, and Stephen Kemmis, 1–30. Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, George E. 1995. Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24 (October): 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, George E., and Erkan Saka. 2006. Assemblage. Theory, Culture & Society 23 (2/3): 101–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Mazé, Médéric. 2017. Returning Struggles to the Practice Turn: How Were Bourdieu and Boltanski Lost in (Some) Translations and What to Do About It? International Political Sociology 11 (2): 203–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Maximilian, Mariana Carpes, and Ruth Knoblich, eds. 2014. International Relations and the Global Politics of Science and Technology. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, Daniel R., ed. 2017. Technology and World Politics: An Introduction. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen, Reijo, Dalvir Samra-Fredericks, and Dvora Yanow. 2009. Re-Turn to Practice: An Introductory Essay. Organization Studies 30 (12): 1309–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, Annemarie. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nachi, Mohamed. 2014. Beyond Pragmatic Sociology: A Theoretical Compromise Between ‘Critical Sociology’ and the ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique’. In The Spirit of Luc Boltanski. Essays on the Pragmatic Sociology of Critique, ed. Simon Susen and Bryan Turner, 293–312. London: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Iver B. 2002. Returning Practice to the Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31 (3): 627–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. At Home with the Diplomats: Inside a European Foreign Ministry. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Iver B., and Ole Jacob Sending. 2010. Governing the Global Polity: Practice, Mentality and Rationality. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Practice Theory, Work, & Organization: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017a. Is Small the Only Beautiful? Making Sense of ‘Large Phenomena’ from a Practice-Based Perspective. In The Nexus of Practices. Connections, Constellations, Practitioners, ed. Allison Hui, Theodore Schatzki, and Elizabeth Shove, 98–113. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemann, Holger, and Henrik Schillinger. 2016. Contestation ‘All the Way Down’? The Grammar of Contestation in Norm Research. Review of International Studies 43 (1): 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nullmeier, Frank, and Tanja Pritzlaff. 2009. Zu einer Theorie politischer Praktiken. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 38 (1): 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. The Mangle of Practice. Time, Agency & Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010a. The Materials of Practice: Nuclear Warheads, Rhetorical Commonplaces and Committee Meetings in Russian–Atlantic Relations. Cooperation and Conflict 45 (3): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010b. International Security in Practice. The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. International Pecking Orders. The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prügl, Elisabeth. 2012. ‘If Lehman Brothers Had Been Lehman Sisters…’: Gender and Myth in the Aftermath of the Financial Crisis. International Political Sociology 6 (1): 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralph, Jason, and Jess Gifkins. 2017. The Purpose of the United Nations Security Council Practice: Contesting Competence Claims in the Normative Context Created by the Responsibility to Protect. European Journal of International Relations 23 (3): 630–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, Andreas. 2002. Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004b. Die Reproduktion und die Subversion sozialer Praktiken. Zugleich ein Kommentar zu Pierre Bourdieu und Judith Butler. In Doing Culture. Neue Positionen zum Verhältnis von Kultur und sozialer Praxis, ed. Karl Hörning and Julia Reuter, 40–54. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Affective Spaces: A Praxeological Outlook. Rethinking History 16 (2): 241–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Practice Theory. In Philosophy of Anthropology and Sociology, ed. Stephen Turner and Mark Risjord, vol. 15 of Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, ed. Dov M. Gabbay, Paul Thagard and John Woods, 499–540. Amsterdam: Elsevier BV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, Hilmar. 2013. Die Instabilität der Praxis. Reproduktion und Transformation des Sozialen in der Praxistheorie. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Practice Theory. In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, ed. Theodore R. Schatzki, Karin Knorr Cetina, and Eike von Savigny, 1–14. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. The Site of the Social. A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Peripheral Vision: The Sites of Organizations. Organization Studies 26 (3): 465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Sayings, Texts and Discursive Formations. In The Nexus of Practices. Connections, Constellations, Practitioners, ed. Allison Hui, Theodore R. Schatzki, and Elizabeth Shove, 126–140. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Two Ways of Criticizing International Practices. Paper Presented at the Pan-European Conference of the European International Studies Association, Barcelona, September 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Robert. 2012. Soziologie der Praktiken. Konzeptionelle Studien und empirische Analysen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Robert, and Jörg Volbers. 2011. Siting Praxeology. The Methodological Significance of ‘Public’ in Theories of Social Practices. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41 (4): 419–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Beyond the ‘Here and Now’ of Practice Theory. International Studies Quarterly Online. http://www.isanet.org/Publications/ISQ/Posts/ID/4960/Beyond-the-Here-and-Now-of-Practice-Theory.

  • Sending, Ole Jacob, and Iver B. Neumann. 2006. Governance to Governmentality: Analyzing NGOs, States, and Power. International Studies Quarterly 50 (3): 651–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Banking on Power. How Some Practices in an International Organization Anchor Others. In International Practices, ed. Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot, 231–254. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shove, Elizabeth, Mika Pantzar, and Matt Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, Ty, and Brent J. Steele. 2017. Micro-Moves in International Relations Theory. European Journal of International Relations 23 (2): 267–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, Gabrielle M., ed. 2005a. Practicing History. New Directions in Historical Writing After the Linguistic Turn. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005b. Introduction. In Practicing History. New Directions in Historical Writing After the Linguistic Turn, ed. Gabrielle M. Spiegel, 1–33. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srnicek, Nick. 2017. New Materialisms and International Relations: Bodies, Brains and Complex Causality. In Technology and World Politics: An Introduction, ed. Daniel R. McCarthy, 84–99. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, Anna L. 2005. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Stephen P. 1994. The Social Theory of Practice. Tradition, Tacit Knowledge and Presuppositions. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Throwing Out the Tacit Rule Book. Learning and Practices. In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, ed. Theodore R. Schatzki, Karin Knorr Cetina, and Eike von Savigny, 120–130. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Mirror Neurons and Practices: A Response to Lizardo. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37 (3): 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderveen, Zach. 2010. Bearing the Lightning of Possible Storms: Foucault’s Experimental Social Criticism. Continental Philosophy Review 43 (4): 467–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, William. 2002. The Power of Inscription: Beyond Social Construction and Deconstruction in European Integration Studies. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31 (1): 83–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Drone Strikes, Dingpolitik and Beyond: Furthering the Debate on Materiality and Security. Security Dialogue 45 (2): 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Matt. 2017. Placing Power in Practice Theory. In The Nexus of Practices. Connections, Constellations, Practitioners, ed. Allison Hui, Theodore R. Schatzki, and Elizabeth Shove, 169–182. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widmaier, Wesley W., Mark Blyth, and Leonard Seabrooke. 2007. Exogenous Shocks or Endogenous Constructions? The Meanings of Wars and Crises. International Studies Quarterly 51 (4): 747–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, Antje. 2008. The Invisible Constitution of Politics. Contested Norms and International Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. A Theory of Contestation. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Michael. 2012. The New Economy of Security. Global Crime 13 (4): 312–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winch, Peter. 1958. The Idea of Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, John, and Michel Callon. 1992. The Life and Death of an Aircraft: A Network Analysis of Technical Change. In Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, ed. Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law, 21–52. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, Dvora, and Haridimos Tsoukas. 2009. What Is Reflection-in-Action? A Phenomenological Account. Journal of Management Studies 46 (8): 1339–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bueger, C., Gadinger, F. (2018). Conceptual Challenges of International Practice Theory. In: International Practice Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73350-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics