Skip to main content

How to Ground Animal Rights on African Values: A Constructive Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Method, Substance, and the Future of African Philosophy

Abstract

In this chapter I expound “African Modal Relationalism,” Kai Horsthemke’s label for my theory of animal rights with a sub-Saharan pedigree, and I defend it from several criticisms he has recently made of it in his book Animals and African Ethics. Central to my theory, developed in the light of some values salient in indigenous African thought, is the claim that a being has a greater moral status, the more it is in principle capable of relating communally with characteristic human beings. Horsthemke maintains that this principle is anthropocentric and speciesist, is poorly motivated relative to his egalitarian-individualist approach, and does not have the implications that I contend. I aim to rebut these and related objections, contending that African Modal Relationalism is in fact a promising way to philosophically ground animal rights.

This work has benefited from the input of Kai Horsthemke and other participants at the “Conference on African Philosophy: Past, Present and Future” held at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in 2015. It was first published in the Journal of Animal Ethics 7, no. 2 (2017): 163–174, and is reprinted here (with some minor modifications) with the permission of the University of Illinois.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Horsthemke (2015).

  2. 2.

    For example, Callicott (1994: 158).

  3. 3.

    Metz (2010a, b, 2012). See also LenkaBula (2008), Behrens (2010, 2014), Molefe (2015), Chemhuru (2016a, b).

  4. 4.

    Horsthemke (2015: 85–92, 99, 123, 144).

  5. 5.

    Horsthemke (2015: 2–3).

  6. 6.

    Behrens (2011), Kelbessa (2011), Chemhuru (2016b).

  7. 7.

    Olupona (1991), Teffo and Roux (1998: 196, 198–201), Chitando et al. (2012).

  8. 8.

    For example, Teffo and Roux (1998: 204), Christians (2004: 244–245), Murove (2007), Metz (2013).

  9. 9.

    For overviews, see Kasenene (2000: 349, 354–355), Christians (2004), Odimegwu (2007), Wiredu (2008).

  10. 10.

    There are additional, and in some ways even more controversial, implications of my theory of moral status , not central to the debate with Horsthemke . For instance, certain animals are probably much more able to be communed with by characteristic human beings than others, for example, cats versus fish, meaning the former have a greater moral status. In addition, “marginal” cases of human beings are, I maintain, noticeably more able to be communed with by characteristic human beings than animals, meaning the former have a greater moral status. For discussion of these points, see Metz (2012).

  11. 11.

    For discussion in the context of several sub-Saharan peoples, see Nkulu-N’Sengha (2009).

  12. 12.

    Metz (2011), Metz and Gaie (2010).

  13. 13.

    Horsthemke (2015: 11; see also 82–83, 93).

  14. 14.

    Horsthemke sometimes has a broader, and vaguer, notion of anthropocentrism, according to which it means “human-centred” or involves assigning “special value or worth to human beings” (2015: 5).

  15. 15.

    See Nkulu-N’Sengha (2009).

  16. 16.

    Horsthemke (2015: 85).

  17. 17.

    Gyekye (2010).

  18. 18.

    Horsthemke (2015: 91).

  19. 19.

    Horsthemke (2015: 5).

  20. 20.

    Metz (2010c: 309); see also Metz (2012: 389, 399–400).

  21. 21.

    Horsthemke (2015: 91).

  22. 22.

    Horsthemke (2015: 92).

  23. 23.

    Horsthemke (2015: 89, 99).

  24. 24.

    See Metz (2010b).

  25. 25.

    Horsthemke (2015: 89).

  26. 26.

    Compare this account of dignity with the discussion of “non-intrinsic final goodness” common in the value-theoretic literature, e.g., Korsgaard (1983), Kagan (1998), Rabinowicz and Rønnow-Rasmussen (2000).

  27. 27.

    Horsthemke (2015: 89).

  28. 28.

    Metz (2012: 394–395, 397).

  29. 29.

    Horsthemke (2015: 91).

  30. 30.

    Horsthemke (2015: 90).

References

  • Behrens, Kevin. 2010. Exploring African Holism with Respect to the Environment. Environmental Values 19 (4): 465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. African Philosophy, Thought and Practice and Their Contribution to Environmental Ethics. University of Johannesburg. Unpublished doctoral thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. An African Relational Environmentalism and Moral Considerability. Environmental Ethics 36 (1): 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callicott, J. Baird. 1994. Earth’s Insights. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemhuru, Munamato. 2016a. Using the African Teleological View of Existence to Interpret Environmental Ethics. Philosophia Africana 18 (1): 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016b. The Import of African Ontology for Environmental Ethics. University of Johannesburg. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chitando, Ezra, Afe Adogame, and Bolaji Bateye, eds. 2012. African Traditions in the Study of Religion in Africa. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christians, Clifford G. 2004. Ubuntu and Communitarianism in Media Ethics. Ecquid Novi 25 (2): 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyekye, Kwame. 2010. African Ethics. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Ethics, ed. Edward Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/african-ethics/.

  • Horsthemke, Kai. 2015. Animals and African Ethics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, Shelly. 1998. Rethinking Intrinsic Value. The Journal of Ethics 2 (4): 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasenene, Peter. 2000. African Ethical Theory and the Four Principles. In Cross-Cultural Perspectives in Medical Ethics, ed. Robert Veatch, 347–357. Sudbury: Jones & Bartlett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelbessa, Workineh. 2011. Indigenous and Modern Environmental Ethics. Washington, DC: The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, Christine. 1983. Two Distinctions in Goodness. The Philosophical Review 92 (2): 169–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LenkaBula, Puleng. 2008. Beyond Anthropocentricity–Botho/Ubuntu and the Quest for Economic and Ecological Justice in Africa. Religion and Theology 15 (3/4): 375–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, Thaddeus. 2010a. African and Western Moral Theories in a Bioethical Context. Developing World Bioethics 10 (1): 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010b. For the Sake of the Friendship: Relationality and Relationship as Grounds of Beneficence. Theoria 57 (4): 54–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010c. Animal Rights and the Interpretation of the South African Constitution. Southern African Public Law 25 (2): 301–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Ubuntu as a Moral Theory and Human Rights in South Africa. African Human Rights Law Journal 11 (2): 532–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. An African Theory of Moral Status: A Relational Alternative to Individualism and Holism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (3): 387–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. The Western Ethic of Care or an Afro-communitarian Ethic? Finding the Right Relational Morality. Journal of Global Ethics 9 (1): 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, Thaddeus, and Joseph Gaie. 2010. The African Ethic of Ubuntu/Botho: Implications for Research on Morality. Journal of Moral Education 39 (3): 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molefe, Motsamai. 2015. A Rejection of Humanism in African Moral Tradition. Theoria 62 (2): 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murove, Munyaradzi. 2007. The Shona Ethic of Ukama with Reference to the Immortality of Values. Mankind Quarterly 48 (2): 179–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nkulu-N’Sengha, Mutombo. 2009. Bumuntu. In Encyclopedia of African Religion, ed. Molefi Asante and Ama Mazama, 142–147. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odimegwu, Ike, ed. 2007. Perspectives on African Communalism. Victoria: Trafford Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olupona, Jacob, ed. 1991. African Traditional Religions in Contemporary Society. New York: Paragon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowicz, Wlodek, and Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen. 2000. A Distinction in Value: Intrinsic and for Its Own Sake. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (1): 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teffo, Lesiba, and Abraham Roux. 1998. Themes in African Metaphysics. In The African Philosophy Reader, ed. Pieter Coetzee and Abraham Roux, 2nd ed., 192–208. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiredu, Kwasi. 2008. Social Philosophy in Postcolonial Africa: Some Preliminaries Concerning Communalism and Communitarianism. South African Journal of Philosophy 27 (4): 332–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Metz, T. (2018). How to Ground Animal Rights on African Values: A Constructive Approach. In: Etieyibo, E. (eds) Method, Substance, and the Future of African Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70226-1_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics