Abstract
Kwasi Wiredu’s proposal of democracy by consensus in place of majoritarian democracy on the African continent has captured the attention of a number of scholars in African philosophy such as Emmanuel Chukwudi Eze, Bernard Matolino, Helen Lauer, Ademola Kazeem Fayemi, Martin Odei Ajei, and myself. In this chapter, I continue the debate by focusing on Matolino’s defense of Wiredu and his criticism of me. In engaging with Matolino, I seek to show how he has mischaracterized my position and arguments as part of his continued defense of Wiredu’s notion of deliberation as a purely rational activity. Part of my aim is to show that he runs into a series of contradictions, logical fallacies, and quite bizarre conclusions. I demonstrate that instead of approaching debates by interpreting participants as belonging to “camps” as Matolino does, we should approach debates by assuming that deliberation has the capacity to transform the views of participants, or at least to occasion a gradual evolution of views. According to this reading of deliberation, participants should avoid doubling down on their positions even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Wiredu (1996: 182–190).
- 2.
Wiredu (2011: 1065).
- 3.
Ani (2014b: 345).
- 4.
Wiredu (2011: 1056–1058).
- 5.
Wiredu (1996: 185).
- 6.
Eze (2000: 4–5).
- 7.
As alleged by Wiredu (1996: 185).
- 8.
- 9.
Eze (2000: 6).
- 10.
Matolino (2009: 38).
- 11.
Ibid: 37.
- 12.
Eze (2000: 5).
- 13.
Ibid: 6.
- 14.
Ibid.
- 15.
Ani (2014b: 349).
- 16.
Ibid.
- 17.
Matolino (2013: 37).
- 18.
Matolino (2016: 45).
- 19.
- 20.
Matolino (2016: 45).
- 21.
Corman et al. (2006: 1).
- 22.
Matolino (2016: 36).
- 23.
Ibid.
- 24.
Eze (1997: 317).
- 25.
Ibid.
- 26.
Matolino (2016: 38).
- 27.
Ibid: 39.
- 28.
Ibid.
- 29.
Matolino (2016: 43).
- 30.
Ani (2014b: 348).
- 31.
Ibid: 351.
- 32.
Eze (2000: 6)
- 33.
Matolino (2016: 44).
- 34.
Ibid.
- 35.
Ibid: 46.
- 36.
Ibid.
- 37.
Ibid.
- 38.
Eze (2000: 6).
- 39.
Matolino (2013: 150).
- 40.
Matolino (2016: 44).
- 41.
Ibid.
- 42.
Ibid: 45.
- 43.
Ani (2014b: 351).
- 44.
Wiredu (1996: 183).
- 45.
Matolino (2016: 45).
- 46.
As seen in Matolino (2016: 44–45).
- 47.
Matolino (2016: 36).
- 48.
Ibid: 47–50.
- 49.
Ibid: 45.
- 50.
Ibid.
- 51.
Matolino (2016: 45).
- 52.
Ibid.
- 53.
Matolino (2013: 150).
- 54.
Ibid.
- 55.
Matolino (2016: 45).
- 56.
Ibid.
- 57.
Ibid: 54.
- 58.
Matolino (2016: 46).
- 59.
Matolino (2016: 46).
- 60.
Ibid.
- 61.
Ibid.
- 62.
Ibid.
- 63.
Matolino (2013: 151).
- 64.
Ibid.
- 65.
Matolino (2016: 53).
- 66.
Ani (2014a).
- 67.
Matolino (2013: 147).
- 68.
Janz (2008: 296).
- 69.
Matolino (2016: 54).
- 70.
- 71.
Oxford Dictionary (2017).
- 72.
Cambridge Dictionary (2017).
- 73.
Merriam-Webster (2017).
- 74.
Matolino (2016: 36).
- 75.
Ibid.
References
Ani, Emmanuel Ifeanyi. 2014a. On Agreed Actions Without Agreed Notions. South African Journal of Philosophy 33 (3): 311–320.
———. 2014b. On Traditional African Consensual Rationality. Journal of Political Philosophy 22 (3): 342–365.
Cambridge Dictionary. 2017. Rational. Available at: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/rational. Accessed 24 Aug 2017.
Corman, Steven R., Aaron Hess, and Z.S. Justus. 2006. Credibility in the Global War on Terrorism: Strategic Principles and Research Agenda. Consortium for Strategic Communication. Available at: http://csc.asu.edu/wp-content/uploads/pdf/117.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2017.
Eisend, Martin. 2006. Source Credibility: Dimensions in Marketing Communication: A Generalized Solution. Journal of Empirical Generalizations in Marketing Science 10: 1–33.
Eze, Emmanuel Chukwudi. 1997. Democracy or Consensus: A Response to Wiredu. In Postcolonial African Philosophy: A Critical Reader, ed. Emmanuel Chukwudi Eze, 313–323. Oxford: Blackwell.
———. 2000. Democracy or Consensus? Response to Wiredu. Polylog. Available at: http://them.polylog.org/2/fee-en.htm
Hovland, Carl, et al. 1953. Communication and Persuasion. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Janz, Bruce B. 2008. Reason and Rationality in Eze’s on Reason. South African Journal of Philosophy 27 (4): 296–309.
Matolino, Bernard. 2009. A Response to Eze’s Critique of Wiredu’s Consensual Democracy. South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (1): 34–42.
———. 2013. The Nature of Opposition in Kwasi Wiredu’s Democracy by Consensus. African Studies 72 (1): 138–152.
———. 2016. Rationality and Consensus in Kwasi Wiredu’s Traditional African Polities. Theoria (146): 36–55.
Merriam-Webster. 2017. Rational. Available at: https://www.merriam- webster.com/dictionary/rational. Accessed 24 Aug 2017.
Oxford Dictionary. 2017. Rational. Available at: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/rational. Accessed 24 Aug 2017.
Thesaurus. 2017. Rational. Available at: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/rational. Accessed 24 Aug 2017.
Wiredu, Kwasi. 1996. Cultural Universals and Particulars. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
———. 2011. The State and Civil Society in Africa. In Reclaiming the Human Sciences, ed. Helen Lauer and K. Ayidoho, vol. 2, 1055–1066. Legon-Accra: Sub-Saharan Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ani, E.I. (2018). The Question of Rationality in Kwasi Wiredu’s Consensual Democracy. In: Etieyibo, E. (eds) Method, Substance, and the Future of African Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70226-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70226-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70225-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70226-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)