Abstract
Arbuscular mycorrhiza constitute a heterogeneous group of diverse fungal taxa that have been reported to form mutualistic interaction with the roots of more than 90% of all plant species. Accomplishment of this symbiotic interaction requires a high degree of synchronization between the two partners and is based on a finely regulated molecular dialogue. Where plant roots exude strigolactones that stimulate fungal metabolism and branching, fungus releases signaling molecules—myc factors that trigger symbiotic responses in the host plant. Among the various benefits bestowed by this symbiotic association, transport of limiting soil nutrients including phosphorus (P), nitrogen (N), sulphur (S) in exchange for fixed carbon is considered as the key feature which occurs in arbuscule containing host cortical cells. In the last few years, novel transporters involved in this mutualistic interaction have been unravelled. This chapter briefly summarizes the signaling pathways and nutrient exchange involved in the establishment of an effective symbiosis between the host plant and fungus that could provide better insight into the role of mycorrhizal fungi in sustainable agriculture.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
2.1 Introduction
In the soil rhizosphere, plant roots interact with a number of beneficial micro-organisms, among which arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are recognized as one of the most significant group of soil biota in the context of ecosystem sustainability (Jeffries and Barea 2012, Barea et al. 2013). AM fungi, belonging to the phylum Glomeromycota have been documented to form symbiosis with more than 90% of plant species belonging to Angiosperms, Gymnosperms and Pteridophytes (Read et al. 2000; Shah 2014; Prasad et al. 2017). It is an ancient type of interaction that have been believed to facilitate colonization of land even more than 460 million years ago (Redeker et al. 2000; Smith and Read 2008). Due to their widespread occurrence, they are considered as ‘ecosystem engineers’ of plant communities (Cameron 2010; Bücking and Kafle 2015) as they affect the distribution and movement of nutrients within the soil ecosystem through the activities of the interlinked and extensive soil extra-radical mycelium (ERM) (Richardson et al. 2009; Barea et al. 2014). The major flux is the transfer of carbon (C) from the host plant to fungus (and thereby to the soil) and the reciprocal movement of phosphate and ammonium (NH4 +) from fungus to plant (Barea et al. 2014). This mutualistic interaction results in the formation of tree-shaped subcellular structures within cortical cells of plant roots called ‘arbuscules’ (derived from the Latin arbusculum, meaning bush or little tree), thus establishing main interface for symbiotic nutrient transfer (Parniske 2008; Gutjahr and Parniske 2013; López-Ráez and Pozo 2013). However, rather than developing on a leaf, AM interaction occurs beneath the soil surface, thus strongly hindering chances of understanding most of the early steps of their development including signal exchange that occurs between plant and the endophytic fungus (Genre 2012). Following sub sections briefly summarize the (1) events that lead to the establishment of AM symbiosis in plant rhizosphere and, (2) recent advancements in nutrient exchange and metabolite fluxes among the two symbionts.
2.1.1 AM Establishment: An Overview
AM symbiosis, which have been reviewed recently by various authors (Garg and Chandel 2010; Genre 2012; Aroca et al. 2013; Gutjahr and Parniske 2013; Barea et al. 2014; Bonfante and Desirò 2015; Mohanta and Bae 2015) is a complex and very dynamic interaction that requires a high degree of coordination between the two partners and is based on a finely regulated molecular dialogue (Hause et al. 2007; López-Ráez et al. 2010; Aroca et al. 2013; Barea et al. 2014; Pozo et al. 2015; López-Ráez 2016). The establishment of AM symbiosis can be divided into three different growth stages: (1) asymbiotic hyphal growth stage, where spores germinate and develop hyphae autonomously but for a limited period; (2) pre-symbiotic growth stage, where hyphal growth is stimulated by host signal perception; and (3) symbiotic stage, in which fungus penetrates plant root and develops both intraradical mycelium (IRM, to exchange nutrients) as well as extra-radical (ER) hyphae (to recruit nutrients in the soil and form new spores; Smith and Read 2008; López-Ráez and Pozo 2013).
Generally, it has been validated that AM fungi colonize plant roots from three main types of soil-based propagules: spores, fragments of mycorrhizal roots and ER hyphae, all of them producing more or less a well-developed mycelial network expanding in the soil (Barea et al. 2014). During the first phase, AM fungal colonization initiates with the formation of hyphae that arises from soil-borne propagules i.e. resting spores or mycorrhizal root fragments or from AM plants growing in the vicinity (Koltai and Kapulnik 2009). Following germination, fungus uses triacylglyceride (TAG) and glycogen reserves in the spore to support growth of such a short mycelium as it is unable to uptake C from the soil organic matter (Harrison 2005; Leigh et al. 2009). However, in the absence of host (i.e. during asymbiotic phase), these germinating hyphae can grow only for a few days. Due to their obligate biotrophic nature and short life span, growth of such asymbiotic hyphae ceases before the spore reserves are depleted; as a result, in view of new germination event, mycelium retract their cytoplasm into spore (Genre 2012) and thus, return to the dormant stage.
Such exploratory hyphal development pattern changes dramatically once the hyphae reach the vicinity of a host root (pre-symbiotic growth phase) and respond to their proximity (Balestrini and Lanfranco 2006; Nasim 2013). As a result, the growth of hyphal germ tube increases substantially and hyphae ramifies intensively through the soil towards the host root (López-Ráez et al. 2012) which suggests that they have perceived something exuded from the root (Harrison 2005). Plant roots release a wide range of compounds, among which strigolactones (SL) have been recognized as an important ‘rhizospheric plant signals’ involved in stimulating the pre-symbiotic growth of AM fungi at different stages, i.e. during spore germination stage and during hyphal growth and branching stage (Fig. 2.1b; Akiyama et al. 2005; Gómez-Roldán et al. 2008; López-Ráez et al. 2012) that enhance the chances of an encounter with the host (Kumar et al. 2015), thus causing successful root colonization by AM fungi. Various studies have validated the relevance of SL in the establishment of AM symbiosis where reduction in the process of mycorrhizal colonization of mutant plants have been observed due to the impairment in SL biosynthesis (Gómez-Roldán et al. 2008; Vogel et al. 2010; Kohlen et al. 2012; López-Ráez and Pozo 2013). SL are present in extremely low concentrations in the root exudates (Akiyama and Hayashi 2006) and their concentration tends to increase under the sub-optimal growth conditions such as limited nutrition, etc., that favour mycorrhizal colonization (Yoneyama et al. 2007; Koltai and Kapulnik 2009). Yoneyama et al. (2012) revealed that biosynthesis and exudation of SL gets boosted under phosphate starvation, a condition that promotes AM colonization. Various studies have authenticated that only the molecules released from the host plant are perceived by the fungus (through a so far uncharacterized receptor) that stimulate hyphal branching in AM fungi, indicating that discrimination between host and non-host occurs at this stage (Harrison 2005; Nasim 2013). These findings clearly signify that the fungus possesses mechanism to perceive active root molecules and to switch on specific transcriptional pathways which induces morphological changes in the fungus and activate its growth (Balestrini and Lanfranco 2006; Nasim 2013). Thus, extensive hyphal branching of AM fungi, as induced under the influence of SL maximizes the chance of contact with host root and that of establishing symbiosis (Akiyama et al. 2005; Aroca et al. 2013; López-Ráez and Pozo 2013). Conversely, when AM fungus starts to proliferate in the vicinity of the root, plants perceive diffusible fungal signals, called Myc factors at the plant plasma membrane, due to lysine-motif (LysM) receptor kinases (Antolın-Llovera et al. 2012; Oldroyd 2013) that actively prepares the intracellular environment and induce symbiosis-specific responses in the host root, even in the absence of any physical contact (Parniske 2008; Genre and Bonfante 2010). The chemical structure of these elusive Myc factors was identified as a mixture of sulphated and non-sulphated lipochito-oligosaccharides (Myc-LCO) that shares structural similarities with rhizobial Nod factors (Maillet et al. 2011). In addition to the up-regulation of genes involved in signal transduction, Myc factors are also known to activate a number of plant responses including stimulation of lateral root development, starch accumulation and repeated calcium oscillation in epidermal cells, in analogy with Rhizobium-legume symbiosis (Kosuta et al. 2008; Gutjahr et al. 2009; Maillet et al. 2011; Gutjahr and Parniske 2013; Bonfante and Desirò 2015).
Pre-symbiotic phase is trailed by direct plant–fungus contact i.e. symbiotic phase, which results in the setup of novel developmental and cellular modifications in both partners. Perception of Myc factor induces nuclear Ca2+-spiking that is decoded by a nuclear localized calcium-calmodulin kinase (CCaMK) and leads to phosphorylation of transcription factor—CYCLOPS which in turn cause transcriptional activation of symbiosis-related genes (Genre et al. 2013; Singh et al. 2014; Gutjahr 2014; Carbonnel and Gutjahr 2014). The hyphae of glomeromycetes adheres to atrichoblasts of the root epidermis by forming a highly branched, swollen and flattened characteristic fungal structure called appressorium (also called hyphopodium) (Fig. 2.1b; Smith and Read 2008; Genre 2012) which marks the initiation of symbiotic phase of the interaction. Accordingly, root epidermal cells respond to this appressorium formation by repositioning their nucleus and re-modelling their cytoplasm, thus preparing themselves for fungal penetration (Genre et al. 2005). A proline rich protein which is encoded by ENOD11 activates the epidermal cells before, during the formation of pre-penetration apparatus (PPA) and at the late stage of mycorrhizal development and even in the arbuscule-containing cells (Mohanta and Bae 2015). From the appressorium, a penetrating hypha is formed, which reaches the root cortex by following an intracellular route across epidermal cells (Barea et al. 2014). Host cell integrity is maintained by the invagination of its plasma membrane (i.e. peri-arbuscular membrane—PAM) which proliferates and engulfs the developing hypha, physically separating fungus from the plant cytoplasm (Bonfante and Desirò 2015), there by guiding intracellular fungal passage into deeper cortical layers. For this step to be successful, three ion channel genes of M. truncatula DMI1 (does not make infection 1), DMI2, and DMI3 are considered essential for the induction of PPA in plants (Siciliano et al. 2007; Genre and Bonfante 2010; Mohanta and Bae 2015). In the inner cortical cells, fungal hyphae ramify repeatedly in order to differentiate into arbuscules—the small characteristic tree like structures (Fig. 2.1c) which represents symbiotic interface where nutrient exchange between fungus and plant is thought to occur (Smith and Read 2008). The proteins encoded by common symbiosis (SYM) genes (CCaMK and CYCLOPS) are also involved in the intracellular fungal accommodation: mutants for SYM genes are not only defective in the signalling pathway (as testified by the lack of nuclear calcium spiking), but also in the assembly of the PPA, thus subsequent fungal colonization (Bonfante and Genre 2010; Genre 2012). In addition, VAPYRIN is another gene, which has been reported to be potentially involved in the structural reorganization of infected cells (Gutjahr and Parniske 2013). In case of vapyrin mutants of Medicago and Petunia, rhizodermal penetration is frequently aborted and in rare cases, where cortical colonization is achieved, no arbuscules or only small hyphal protrusions into cortical cells have been observed (Reddy et al. 2007; Pumplin et al. 2010; Gutjahr and Parniske 2013). Appearance of arbuscule inside the lumen of inner cortical cells hallmarks the establishment of symbiosis between the two partners (Genre 2012). On the basis of morphological attributes, two types of AM associations have been reported which include Arum type colonization and Paris type colonization (Garg and Chandel 2010). In the Arum type, which is particularly common in legumes, and in general in those plants whose root anatomy presents extensive apoplastic channels (Genre 2012), AM fungi form extensive intercellular hyphae in well-developed air spaces between cortical cells and invaginate cells as short side branches to form arbuscules (Shah 2014). Contrastingly, in the Paris type, colonization spreads directly from cell to cell in the root and is characterized by the absence of intercellular hyphae and the development of intracellular hyphal coils that frequently have intercalary arbuscules (Shah 2014). In addition to arbuscules, some fungi also form lipid containing storage structures known as vesicles in the root apoplast (Walker 1995; Rouphael et al. 2015).
As IRM grows, a dense net of ERM is formed simultaneously in the soil (Malbreil et al. 2014) which helps in the acquisition of mineral nutrients from the strata, particularly those nutrients whose ionic forms have poor mobility or are present in low concentration in the soil solution, such as phosphate and ammonia (Barea et al. 2005, 2014). In addition, ERM interacts with other soil micro-organisms and colonizes the root of adjacent plants belonging to the same or different species. Thus, plants and their AM fungi are interconnected through a web of roots and hyphae (Read 1998; Giovannetti et al. 2004) where exchange of water, nutrients as well as signals (Song et al. 2010) occur (Rouphael et al. 2015). Finally, ERM forms new chlamydospores and helps in the propagation of fungus, thus completing the lifecycle. Therefore, establishment of a functional AM symbiosis involves a high degree of coordination between plant and fungus, as characterized by progressive increase in the closeness of the interaction, from the exchange of long-range chemical signals in the rhizosphere to intimate intracellular association, where plant and fungus share a single cell volume (Genre 2012).
2.1.2 AM Fungi Improve Nutrient Dynamics in the Rhizosphere
Nutrient exchange is a key function that takes place at the symbiotic interface, formed in association between the roots of AM fungi and their host plants (Jakobsen and Hammer 2015) and is bidirectional in nature (Fig 2.1d). However, for many of these fungi, the specific mechanisms and gene products involved in nutrient transfer remain to be elucidated (Behie and Bidochka 2014). AM fungi are obligate biotrophs and are unable to absorb carbohydrates; as a result, they depend totally on their green host for organic C metabolism (Bonfante and Desirò 2015). In return, by acting as an extension of root system, thus increasing the plant surface area for absorption, ERM of the fungus provides host plant with access to nutrient resources such as phosphorus (P), nitrogen (N), sulphur (S) and various trace elements beyond the root depletion zone through the agency of IRM, where nutrients are exchanged at the fungus-plant interface for the fixed C (Fig. 2.1d; Marschner and Dell 1994; Smith et al. 2009; Fellbaum et al. 2014; Jakobsen and Hammer 2015). Studies have estimated that host plant transfers up to 20% of its photosynthetically fixed C to the AM fungus (Wright et al. 1998; Valentine et al. 2013; Fellbaum et al. 2014; Bücking and Kafle 2015) which is used to maintain and extend its hyphal network in the soil. However, maintenance of such cooperation has posed a paradox for evolutionary theory as it is hard to explain such kind of interaction where selfish individuals can exploit mutualisms, reaping benefits while paying no costs (Leigh 2010; Fellbaum et al. 2014). Recent studies have revealed that the flow of C to the fungus can be downregulated under sufficient nutrient regimes and that the fungus is also able to control transfer of nutrients to less than beneficial host (Kiers et al. 2011; Maillet et al. 2011; Valentine et al. 2013). Thus, it has been suggested that C to nutrient exchange in mycorrhizal symbiosis is controlled by biological market dynamics and that reciprocal reward mechanisms ensure a ‘fair trade’ between both the partners involved in AM symbiosis (Kiers et al. 2011; Bücking and Kafle 2015). AM fungi are able to absorb different macro-as well as -micronutrients; however, the likeliness for P uptake is higher when compared with the uptake of other nutrients which could be credited to the production of some enzymes such as phosphatase by the fungi, that enhances the solubility of insoluble P and hence it’s absorption by plant (Smith and Read 2008). However, when the concentration of nutrients is higher in the rhizosphere, symbiotic efficiency usually decreases which is due to the presence of nutrient receptors in plant cellular membrane that gets adversely affected (Miransari 2013). Thus, under low and medium nutrient concentrations, the dependency of the host on glomeromycotan fungi increases (Smith and Read 1997; Valentine et al. 2013).
2.1.2.1 Phosphorus Metabolism
P is an important macronutrient that is required for energy pathways and production in plant as well as for the structure of proteins and production of cellular membranes (Miransari 2013, Bakshi et al. 2017). It is preferentially taken up as orthophosphate (Pi) by plants, but unfortunately, this form occurs at low concentrations in soils, around 10 mM (Bieleski 1973) due to its low solubility and low mobility, leading to a rapid depletion zone around the roots (Malbreil et al. 2014). Improved uptake of P is the main benefit that plants obtain by associating with AM fungi which has been validated through the use of 32P/33P-based isotope dilution approaches (Barea 2010) and has led to the conclusion that the majority of P taken up by plants comes via the fungal partner (Smith et al. 2009; Smith and Smith 2011, 2012; Barea et al. 2014). In general, plant uses two different pathways to absorb P from the soil: the direct uptake by plant roots (i.e. plant uptake pathway, PP) and the indirect uptake by glomeromycotan fungi (i.e. mycorrhizal pathway, MP). Two different phosphate transporters (PTs) are activated during the uptake of P including the ones which are located in the epidermis and root hairs (i.e. PP) and the fungal hyphal transporters, which are localized with a few centimeters in distance from the plant roots (i.e. MP) (Bücking et al. 2012; Miransari 2013). Due to much smaller diameter than roots, the individual fungal hyphae allow access to narrower soil pores and hence enhance the soil volume explored (Drew et al. 2003; Smith and Read 2008; Smith et al. 2011). The active Pi are taken up into the ERM against a large electrochemical potential gradient, high-affinity PTs and energized by H+-ATPases (Harrison and van Buuren 1995; Ferrol et al. 2000; Bucher 2007; Javot et al. 2007ab; Smith and Read 2008; Smith and Smith 2011). P, thus absorbed by the fungal hyphae, is then translocated as polyphosphate (polyp, Fig. 2.1d) to the specialized AM fungal-plant interfaces i.e. arbuscules and hyphal coils (Smith et al. 2011) where it gets hydrolysed to free Pi that gets delivered in the apoplast, from where a specialized host plant transporter takes care of importation (Malbreil et al. 2014). Different studies have revealed that mycorrhizal pathway can deliver up to 100% of plant P uptake (Ravnskov and Jakobsen 1995; Smith et al. 2003) thus indicating that the uptake at the root epidermis is very low either due to down-regulation of direct plant PTs (Javot et al. 2007b; Yang et al. 2009; Grønlund et al. 2013) or due to the reduced Pi concentration in the rhizosphere soil solution (Jakobsen and Hammer 2015).
A major breakthrough in mycorrhizal symbiosis was achieved when PT gene was characterized from the ER hyphae of Glomus versiforme (GvPT), involved in Pi uptake from soil (Harrison and van Buuren 1995; Smith and Smith 2011; Mohanta and Bae 2015). This Pi gene was induced at the transcriptional level in the presence of lower amount of Pi. Later on, another PT homolog (GmosPT) showing a similar role in Pi transport was reported from Funneliformis mosseae (formerly Glomus mosseae; Benedetto et al. 2005). Interestingly, a relatively high expression level of the transcript, independent of external Pi concentrations was observed in IR fungal structures (Benedetto et al. 2005) suggesting that the fungus may exert control over the amount of phosphate delivered to the plant inside the root cell (Balestrini and Lanfranco 2006). In addition to PTs, genes encoding alkaline phosphatases have been expressed in R. irregularis (formerly Glomus intraradices) and G. margarita (Tisserant et al. 1993; Aono et al. 2004). In such cases, levels of the corresponding transcripts were found to be higher in mycorrhizal roots than in germinating spores and external hyphae, thus advocating their role in nutrient exchange with host plants (Aono et al. 2004; Mohanta and Bae 2015). Conversely, on the plant side, PTs operating at the root–soil interface have been reported to be downregulated. As a result, host plant largely depends on the phosphate delivered by the fungal symbiont (Smith et al. 2003). Various studies have highlighted the presence of PTs which are exclusively expressed during symbiosis (Harrison et al. 2002; Paszkowski et al. 2002; Karandashov and Bucher 2005; Balestrini and Lanfranco 2006). In case of M. truncatula, plant PT—MtPT4 was found to be located at PAM, where it likely plays an essential role in phosphate transport into the cell (Harrison et al. 2002). However, loss of MtPT4 function led to the premature death of arbuscules in M. truncatula plant and fungus was unable to proliferate within the host root and consequently, resulted in the termination of symbiosis (Javot et al. 2007a; Mohanta and Bae 2015). Thus, it could be established that in addition to increase in plant Pi acquisition, mycorrhizal-induced PTs play an important role in maintaining symbiosis by regulating arbuscule morphogenesis (Javot et al. 2011; Yang et al. 2012; Xie et al., 2013; Berruti et al. 2016). At present, accumulating evidence confirms that AM symbiosis specifically induces the expression of plant PTs (Harrison et al. 2002; Paszkowski et al. 2002; Nagy et al. 2005; Xie et al. 2013; Walder et al. 2015; Berruti et al. 2016). These genes include OsPT11 (Orzya sativa phosphate transporter11), LePT4 (Lycopersicon esculentum PT4), PtPT8 (Populus trichocarpa PT8), PtPT10 (P. trichocarpa PT10), StPT4 (Solanum tuberosum PT4), StPT5 (S. tuberosum PT5), LePT4 (L. esculentum PT4), PhPT4 (Petunia hybrid PT4), PhPT5 (P. hybrid PT5), LjPT3 (Lotus japonicus PT3), GmPT7 (G. max PT7), GmPT11 (G. max PT11), GmPT10 (G. max PT10), ZmPT6 (Zea mays PT6) (as reviewed by Berruti et al. 2016). Recently, Volpe et al. (2016) studied the expression of AM-induced Pi transporters in M. truncatula (MtPT4) and L. japonicus (LjPT4) and found their expression in the root tips of even non-colonized plants, thereby postulating PT4 genes as novel component of Pi-sensing machinery in the root tips. However, it has been observed that the amount and availability of P in the soil greatly affects its uptake. Under higher P availability, AM fungi may not be able to efficiently colonize host plant roots (due to decreasing arbuscule development), because under such conditions, host plant may not be willing to spend energy for the development of symbiotic association (Miransari 2013). Conversely, under P deficit conditions, fungus is able to colonize the roots of host plant efficiently, thus significantly enhances P uptake by the host plant (Smith and Read 2008).
2.1.2.2 Nitrogen Metabolism
In addition to P, fungal partner also improves the performance of plant partner by providing N nutrient from both inorganic and organic N sources (Hodge et al. 2001; Leigh et al. 2009; Hodge and Fitter 2010; Matsumura et al. 2013; Kranabetter 2014; Corrêa et al. 2015; Mohanta and Bae 2015). In almost all ecosystems, availability of N limits primary productivity (Behie and Bidochka 2014). N bounded in the organic matter is typically present in the form of peptides, proteins and free amino acids (FAA). AM fungi release peptidases and proteases into the soil that cleave organically bound N and subsequently absorb nitrogenous monomers (Nygren et al. 2007; Behie and Bidochka 2014). According to McFarland et al. (2010), mycorrhizal fungi are able to cater 50% of plant N requirement. When compared with P, N is a more mobile nutrient, hence its uptake by mycorrhizal plant may be of less importance, as N can be supplied to the host plant through mechanisms such as diffusion and mass flow (Miransari 2013). The ability of mycorrhizal fungi to utilize mineral N from organic matter and amino acids has been indicated through different studies (St. John et al. 1983; Hodge et al. 2001; Hamel 2004). However, various factors such as volume of fungal network, amount of decomposing (hydrolytic) enzymes such as xyloglucanase, pectinase, interaction with other soil microbes may affect the ability of fungus to mineralize higher amounts of organic N (Miransari 2013). In addition, by providing P, mycorrhizal fungi also improve N2-fixation, thus representing a considerable contribution to N inputs in legume species (Azcón and Barea 2010; Barea et al. 2014).
AM fungi have been reported to directly take up and transfer N to their host plants (Bago et al. 1996; Johansen et al. 1993; He et al. 2003), thereby enhancing the utilization of different forms of N such as nitrate (NO3 ‾), ammonia (NH4 +) and urea to plants (Hodge et al. 2001). They easily translocate such different forms of N from ERM (incorporated into amino acids) to the IRM mainly as arginine via respective transporter molecule, where arginine (transported in association with polyP) would be broken down through urease cycle into NH4 + and thus, N is transferred to the plant without any C skeleton (Balestrini and Lanfranco 2006; Pérez-Tienda et al. 2011; Malbreil et al. 2014; Mohanta and Bae 2015). This hypothetical pathway was validated by the work of Tian et al. (2010) who demonstrated that during fungal association, arginine in roots of host plant increased threefold and was found to be the most abundant FAA owing to the presence of fungus inside the root. However, the molecular form in which N is transferred, as well as the involved mechanism is still under debate (Mohanta and Bae 2015). NO3 ‾ is the dominant form of N that is available to plants and fungi in most of the agricultural soils, while NH4 + predominates in many undisturbed or very acidic soils, where NO3 ‾ can be almost entirely absent (Bücking and Kafle 2015). The ERM of AM fungi can take up NH4 + (Frey and Schüepp, 1993) and NO3 ‾ (Hawkins et al. 2000), but NH4 + is generally preferred, because it is energetically more efficient than NO3 ‾. Moreover, NH4 + seems to be the preferred molecule (Guether et al. 2009) as upon root colonization with G. margarita, the transcript of LjAMT2 (NH4 + transporter) was found to be up-regulated in transcriptome analysis of L. japonicus. Moreover, this transcript was found to be extensively expressed in mycorrhizal root, but not in the nodule (Guether et al. 2009). Recently, various transcriptome studies have revealed the expression of several fungal NH4 + and NO3 – transporters in spores, ERM and IRM (Tisserant et al. 2012). Two high-affinity N transporters have been partially characterized in R. irregularis where the expression of GintAMT1, an NH4 + transporter was induced by low additions of NH4 + to the medium but was found to be suppressed under high NH4 + supply, thus suggesting that the expression of this transporter is substrate inducible and is regulated by NH4 + supply as well as by fungal NH4 + status (López-Pedrosa et al., 2006; Bücking and Kafle 2015). However, under N limiting conditions, NH4 + transporter GintAMT2 was found to be constitutively expressed in the ERM (Pérez-Tienda et al. 2011). Thus, such differential localization of high transcript levels of these transporters in colonized roots suggest that both transporters may differ in their role for N uptake and transport (Bücking and Kafle 2015). High expression levels of GintAMT1 in the ERM suggest that this transporter could be primarily involved in NH4 +acquisition of fungal hyphae from the soil, while, higher expression of GintAMT2 in the IRM signifies the role of this transporter in the re-uptake of NH4 + by the fungus from the symbiotic interface (Pérez-Tienda et al. 2011). The ability to transfer N has also been explored in other Glomus species, such as in F. mosseae, where AMT (GmAMT4.1) was identified during arbuscule development inside roots of G. max (López-Pedrosa et al. 2006; Behie and Bidochka 2014). Similarly, in case of Medicago mutants, it was demonstrated that in addition to PT, AMT symbiotic transporters (i.e., PT4 and AMT2; 3) did had an influence on the arbuscule lifespan (Javot et al. 2007b; Breuillin-Sessoms et al. 2015), thus speculating that the transport of Pi or NH4 + through these transporters not only deliver nutrients to the host root cells but also trigger signalling that enable the conditions for arbuscule maintenance (Breuillin-Sessoms et al. 2015; Berruti et al. 2016). To be further assimilated via glutamine synthetase/glutamate synthase (GS/GOGAT) cycle (Marzluf 1996), NO3 ‾ has to be converted into NH4 + by the sequential action of enzymes—nitrate reductase (NR) and nitrite reductase (NiR). One transcript for NR and two for NiR were identified in R. irregularis, all of which got expressed in ERM (Malbreil et al. 2014). Furthermore, transcripts coding for proteins that are involved in further steps to synthesize arginine were identified and were found to be highly expressed in germinating spores, ERM and IRM, thus confirming intense N cycling in this fungus (Tian et al. 2010; Tisserant et al. 2012).
In addition, plants that accommodate fungal translocation of N were found to upregulate N transporters. Plant NH4 + transporters were found to be upregulated in arbuscule-containing cells in case of sorghum (S. bicolor), where expression of plant NH4 + transporters—SbAMT3; 1 and SbAMT4 was induced only in arbuscule-containing cells (Koegel et al. 2013). Similarly, in case of M. truncatula, NO3 ‾ transporters were expressed in arbusculated cells (Gaude et al. 2012; Behie and Bidochka 2014). Such coordinated and specific expression of both plant and fungal NH4 +and NO3 ‾ transporters in mycorrhizal-colonized cortical cells intimate the crucial importance of fungal N transfer in plants (Behie and Bidochka 2014).
2.1.2.3 Sugar Metabolism
Carbon flux is mainly mediated from plant to the fungus as mycorrhizal fungi are incapable of breaking down complex organic compounds (Behie and Bidochka 2014) and thus, depends upon the host plant for C. Mycorrhizal fungi require C for extension of ERM, for active uptake or other energy consuming processes and for the development of new infection units (Bücking et al. 2012). Moreover, it has been validated that supply of C by the host plant stimulates P uptake and its transfer by AM fungi (Kiers et al. 2011; Hammer et al. 2011; Bücking et al. 2012). Earlier, it was shown that C is mainly delivered by the host plant in the form of hexoses, preferentially as glucose (Shachar-Hill et al. 1995; Solaiman and Saito 1997; Pfeffer et al. 1999; Malbreil et al. 2014) or in the form of sucrose into the apoplast, where it is converted into hexoses by acid invertase, secreted by host plant (Schaarschmidt et al. 2006) as fungus lacks the ability to secrete this enzyme (Tisserant et al. 2013). Hexoses are then transferred to the mycorrhizal fungi via fungal transporters that function at several symbiotic root locations (Schüβler et al. 2006; Helber et al. 2011; Mohanta and Bae 2015). In Glomus species, a high-affinity monosaccharide transporter (MST)—MST2 has been characterized by Bücking and Shachar-Hill (2005) whose expression pattern correlates with that of the mycorrhizal PT–PT4. Various studies have revealed that when expression of PT4 is reduced, symbiosis gets strongly impaired, resulting in malformed arbuscules, however, when incorporated, hexoses are then converted into trehalose, glycogen and lipids (Shachar-Hill et al. 1995; Pfeffer et al. 1999; Bago et al. 2000), thus signifying the fact that the amount of C received by the fungal symbiont is directly interrelated to the phosphate transfer efficiency. Moreover, many MST have been isolated and identified from different fungal species such as one MST from G. pyriformis (Schüβler et al. 2006), 3 MSTs as well as a sucrose transporter from R. irregularis (Helber et al. 2011). Triacylglycerol (TAG) is the main form of C stored by the mycobiont at all stages of its life cycle (Bago et al. 2003) which is mostly or exclusively made in IRM and gets transferred to ERM (Pfeffer et al. 1999). In vivo microscopic observations suggests that the rate of export is sufficient to account for the high levels of stored lipid in ERM (Bago et al. 2002, 2003) where glyoxylate cycle operates (Lammers et al. 2001) and converts exported TAG to carbohydrate. Trehalose and glycogen synthases were found to be present in the transcript collection of R. irregularis by the authors (Tisserant et al. 2012, 2013). C, thus formed in ERM, is finally used for the production of the chitinous cell wall (Lanfranco et al. 1999), for storing lipids and glycogen in the developing spores (Bonfante et al. 1994) and for long-lasting proteins like glomalin (Purin and Rillig 2007).
During the symbiotic phase, C metabolism of both the symbiotic partners get reformed at the level of gene expression (Balestrini and Lanfranco 2006). In AM-colonized roots, sucrose synthase gene was found to be up-regulated by Ravnskov et al. (2003) suggesting that the enzyme sucrose synthase plays a major role in generating sink strength (Mohanta and Bae 2015). In addition, mycorrhizal colonization has been reported to elevate the expression levels of plant sugar transporters. For instance, in the symbiotic interaction between M. truncatula and R. irregularis, increased expression of MtSucS1, a plant sucrose synthase gene, has been recorded in the surrounding internal hyphae and arbuscules (Behie et al. 2012). Besides, the expression of a family of M. truncatula sucrose transporters—MtSUTs increased in mycorrhizal-colonized roots. Currently, it is not possible to unravel which partner takes the first step to establish the mutualistic C–P exchange (Smith and Smith 2012; Jakobsen and Hammer 2015). However, it has been proposed that fungus might be able to use plant cell wall sugars (Helber et al. 2011), while P reserves in spore of AM fungi could serve as signals during early colonization (Hammer et al. 2011).
2.1.2.4 Sulphur Metabolism
Sulphur (S) is an essential macronutrient required for plant growth, development and response to various abiotic and biotic stresses as it plays as key role in the biosynthesis of many S-containing compounds. Sulphate represent a very small portion of soil S pull and is the only form that plant roots can uptake and mobilize through H+-dependent co-transport processes, thereby implying the role of sulphate transporters (Casieri et al. 2012; Miransari 2013). In contrast to the other organically bound forms of S, sulphate is commonly leached from soils due to its solubility in water, thus reducing its availability to plants (Eriksen and Askegaard 2000; Casieri et al. 2012). During mycorrhizal interactions, by altering the expression of plant sulphate transporters (Casieri et al. 2012; Giovannetti et al. 2014), fungal symbiont plays an important role in the uptake of S, thereby improving S nutritional status of the host plant (Allen and Shachar-Hill 2009; Casieri et al. 2012; Sieh et al. 2013; Berruti et al. 2016). In order to understand the beneficial role of mycorrhizal interaction on M. truncatula plants colonized with R. irregularis at different sulphate concentrations, Casieri et al. (2012) analyzed the expression of genes encoding putative Medicago sulphate transporters (MtSULTRs) and revealed that mycorrhizal symbiosis substantially increased the rate of plant S absorption. Moreover, in silico analyses they identified and recognized eight MtSULTRs, some of which were expressed in plant leaf and root at different S concentrations, thus demonstrated the role of AM fungi on S uptake by the host plant. Recently, a sulphate transporter (A group 1 sulfate transporter, LjSultr1; 2) specifically involved in the uptake of S from arbuscules has been identified in L. japonicus (Giovannetti et al. 2014). However, in contrast to PTs, a single gene LjSultr1; 2, seems to mediate both direct and symbiotic pathways of S uptake in L. japonicus. On the contrary, the efficiency of S uptake in plant roots was directly correlated with phosphate availability, as transfer of S increased only when the phosphate content of the soil was low (Sieh et al. 2013; Behie and Bidochka 2014). In addition, the effects of mycorrhizal colonization on the S uptake by the host plant could also be explained on the basis of higher production of root exudates, increased activity of other soil microbes such as Thiobacillus, formation of extensive hyphal network and production of different enzymes, which may acidify the rhizosphere and hence increase the availability of S to the host plant (Miransari 2013).
2.1.2.5 Other Macro-as Well as Micro-nutrient Metabolism
Apart from P, N and S, mycorrhizal fungi are able to increase the uptake of different macro-as well as-micro nutrients including potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu) and iron (Fe) under various environmental conditions. AM fungi develop an extensive network of hyphae that reaches into the even finest soil pores producing different enzymes such as phosphatases, which enhances the solubility of nutrients and hence their subsequent uptake by the host plant (Miransari 2013). In addition, enhanced uptake of water and plant growth, with a larger root medium, as observed under mycorrhization substantially increases the rate of nutrient uptake (Smith and Read 2008). In a split-plot experiment performed under field conditions, mycorrhizal fungi R. irregularis improved the uptake of different nutrients including K, Mg and Ca in tomato (L. esculentum; Cimen et al. 2010; Miransari 2013). Furthermore, several authors have reported up-regulation of a plant K+ transporter in mycorrhizal roots of L. japonicus (Guether et al. 2009; Berruti et al. 2016).
In case of micronutrients, AM fungi help plant in two ways: (1) they help in the uptake of these elements which are considered to be relatively immobile, and (2) take up these elements and store them so as to prevent their concentrations to reach toxic levels (Goltapeh et al. 2008). AM fungi mobilize such micronutrients either by producing different enzymes or by interacting positively with the other soil microbes or by modifying plant rhizosphere or by affecting the morphology (i.e. root growth) and physiology of the host plant, thus affecting the production of root exudates (Miransari 2013). In one of the studies, Zaefarian et al. (2011) demonstrated the beneficial effects of different fungal species including F. mosseae, G. etunicatum and R. irregularis (as single treatments) and the combined treatment of F. mosseae, Gigaspora hartiga and G. fasciculatum on the uptake of N, P, K, Fe, Zn and Cu. In addition, two meta-analysis studies have been published recently, focusing on the contribution of mycorrhizal symbiosis to different micro-nutrient concentrations in crops (Lehmann et al. 2014; Lehmann and Rillig 2015; as reviewed by Berruti et al. 2016). According to Lehmann et al. (2014), factors such as soil texture, pH and soil nutrient concentration (i.e., Zn and Pi deficiency) influence AM-mediated Zn content in different plant tissues.
2.1.2.6 Lipid Metabolism
Glomeromycetes can be certified as ‘oleogenic’ fungi as approximately 25% of their dry weight consists of lipids (Bago et al. 2002; Malbreil et al. 2014). Several experiments have revealed that lipid metabolism has an unexpected and specific regulation mechanism: C is obtained from plants as hexose but mainly stored as TAG (a compact form of C storage, allowing long-distance translocation) in hyphae and more particularly in spores (Malbreil et al. 2014) and is needed when required. Various labelling experiments have disclosed that synthesis of palmitic acid (the first produced in fatty acid synthesis and precursor to longer ones) takes place in only in IRM and is used in IRM, ERM or germinating spores (Pfeffer et al. 1999; Trépanier et al. 2005). Moreover, through their study, Tisserant et al. (2012) revealed that all the genes involved in the synthesis of fatty acids are present in R. irregularis and the fungus did not rely on the host plant to obtain them. However, it is not probable and might imply regulation at post-transcriptional level. Several genes related to fatty acid metabolism such as desaturase and lipase were found to be upregulated (five- and fourfold changes, respectively), out which, only 7% that belongs to lipid transport and metabolism were found to be upregulated in planta (Tisserant et al. 2013; Malbreil et al. 2014).
2.2 Conclusion and Future Prospects
From the above facts, it could be concluded that AM fungi are able to form effective symbiosis with host and act as an active bridge between the soil and the plant, thereby improving nutrient dynamics in the soil ecosystem. However, there is a paucity of information regarding the mechanisms that regulate the production of signal molecules under different environmental conditions. Moreover, the data regarding exchange of resources between the two symbionts, summarized in this chapter is largely based on trials with root organ cultures or with single plants that have been colonized by single AM species. Thus, in order to have a better insight about the dynamics of AM signalling as well as nutrient exchange between the symbionts, further research needs to be conducted under natural field conditions where multiple trading partners operate simultaneously. The information, thus generated could probably be used in developing new green technologies that might play an important role in sustainable agriculture.
References
Akiyama K, Hayashi H (2006) Strigolactones: chemical signals for fungal symbionts and parasitic weeds in plant roots. Ann Bot (Lond) 97:925–931
Akiyama K, Matsuzaki K, Hayashi H (2005) Plant sesquiterpenes induce hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature 435:824–827
Allen JW, Shachar-Hill Y (2009) Sulfur transfer through an arbuscular mycorrhiza. Plant Physiol 149:549–560
Antolın-Llovera M, Ried MK, Binder A, Parniske M (2012) Receptor kinase signaling pathways in plant-microbe interactions. Annu Rev Phytopathol 50:451–473
Aono T, Maldonado-Mendoza IE, Dewbre GR, Harrison MJ, Saito M (2004) Expression of alkaline phosphatase genes in arbuscular mycorrhizas. New Phytol 162:525–534
Aroca R, Ruiz-Lozano JM, Zamarreňo AM, Paz JA, García-Mina JM, Pozo MJ, López-Ráez JA (2013) Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis influences strigolactone production under salinity and alleviates salt stress in lettuce plants. J Plant Physiol 170:47–55
Azcón R, Barea JM (2010) Mycorrhizosphere interactions for legume improvement. In: Khan MS, Zaidi A, Musarrat J (eds) Microbes for legume improvement. Springer, Vienna, pp 237–271
Bago B, Vierheilig H, Piché Y, Azcón-Aguilar C (1996) Nitrate depletion and pH changes induced by the extraradical mycelium of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices grown in monoxenic culture. New Phytol 133:273–280
Bago B, Pfeffer P, Shachar-Hill Y (2000) Carbon metabolism and transport in arbuscular mycorrhizas. Plant Physiol 124:949–957
Bago B, Zipfel W, Williams RM, Jun J, Arreola R, Lammers PJ, Pfeffer PE, Shachar-Hill Y (2002) Translocation and utilization of fungal storage lipid in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant Physiol 128:108–124
Bago B, Pfeffer PE, Abubaker J, Allen JW, Brouillette J, Douds DD, Lammers PL, Shacher-Hill Y (2003) Carbon export from arbuscular mycorrhizal roots involves the translocation of carbohydrate as well as lipid. Am Soc Plant Biol 131:1496–1507
Bakshi M, Sherameti I, Meichsner D, Thürich J, Varma A, Johri AK, Yeh K-W, Oelmüller R (2017) Piriformospora indica reprograms gene expression in Arabidopsis phosphate metabolism mutants but does not compensate for phosphate limitation. Front Microbiol 8:1262. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01262
Balestrini R, Lanfranco L (2006) Fungal and plant gene expression in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Mycorrhiza 16:509–524
Barea JM (2010) Mycorrhizas and agricultural fertility. In: González-Fontes A, Gárate A, Bonilla I (eds) Agricultural Sciences: topics in modern agriculture. Studium, Houston, TX, pp 257–274
Barea JM, Azcón R, Azcón-Aguilar C (2005) Interactions between mycorrhizal fungi and bacteria to improve plant nutrient cycling and soil structure. In: Buscot F, Varma A (eds) Microorganisms in soils: roles in genesis and functions. Springer, Berlin, pp 195–212
Barea JM, Pozo MJ, Azcón R, Azcón-Aguilar C (2013) Microbial interactions in the rhizosphere. In: de Bruijn F (ed) Molecular microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, pp 29–44
Barea JM, Pozo MJ, López-Ráez JA, Aroca R, Ruíz-Lozano JM, Ferrol N, Azcón R, Azcón-Aguilar C (2014) Arbuscular mycorrhizas and their significance in promoting soil-plant system sustainability against environmental stresses. In: Rodelas MB, González-López J (eds) Beneficial plant-microbial interactions ecology and applications. CRC, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL, pp 353–387
Behie SW, Bidochka MJ (2014) Nutrient transfer in plant—fungal symbioses. Trends Plant Sci 19:734–740
Behie SW, Zelisko PM, Bidochka MJ (2012) Endophytic insect-parasitic fungi translocate nitrogen directly from insects to plants. Science 336:1576–1577
Benedetto A, Magurno F, Bonfante P, Lanfranco L (2005) Expression profiles of a phosphate transporter gene (GmosPT) from the endomycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae. Mycorrhiza 15:620–627
Berruti A, Lumini E, Balestrini R, Bianciotto V (2016) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as natural biofertilizers: let’s benefit from past successes. Front Microbiol 6:1559. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01559
Bieleski RL (1973) Phosphate pools, phosphate transport and phosphate. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 24:225–252
Bonfante P, Desirò A (2015) Arbuscular mycorrhizas: the lives of beneficial fungi and their plant host. In: Lugtenberg B (ed) Principles of plant-microbe interactions. Springer, Cham, pp 235–245
Bonfante P, Genre A (2010) Mechanisms underlying beneficial plant-fungus interactions in mycorrhizal symbiosis. Nat Comm 1:48. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1046
Bonfante P, Balestrini R, Mendgen K (1994) Storage and secretion processes in the spore of Gigaspora margarita Becker & Hall as revealed by high-pressure freezing and freeze substitution. New Phytol 128:93–101
Breuillin-Sessoms F, Floss DS, Gomez SK, Pumplin N, Ding Y, Levesque-Tremblay V, Noar RD, Daniels DA, Bravo A, Eaglesham JB, Benedito VA, Udvardi MK, Harrison MJ (2015) Suppression of arbuscule degeneration in Medicago truncatula phosphate transporter 4 mutants is dependent on the ammonium transporter 2 family protein AMT2;3. Plant Cell 27:352–1366
Bucher M (2007) Functional biology of plant phosphate uptake at root and mycorrhiza interfaces. New Phytol 173:11–26
Bücking H, Kafle A (2015) Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the nitrogen uptake of plants: current knowledge and research gaps. Agronomy 5:587–612
Bücking H, Shachar-Hill Y (2005) Phosphate uptake, transport and transfer by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices is stimulated by increased carbohydrate availability. New Phytol 165:899–912
Bücking H, Liepold E, Ambilwade P (2012) The role of the mycorrhizal symbiosis in nutrient uptake of plants and the regulatory mechanisms underlying these transport processes. In: Dhal NK, Sahu SC (eds) Plant science. Intech, Rijeka, pp 107–539
Cameron DD (2010) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as (agro) ecosystem engineers. Plant Soil 333:1–5
Carbonnel S, Gutjahr C (2014) Control of arbuscular mycorrhiza development by nutrient signals. Front Plant Sci 5(462). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00462
Casieri L, Gallardo K, Wipf D (2012) Transcriptional response of Medicago truncatula sulphate transporters to arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis with and without sulphur stress. Planta 235:1431–1447
Cimen I, Pirinc V, Doran I, Turgay B (2010) Effect of soil solarization and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (Glomus intraradices) on yield and blossom-end rot of tomato. Int J Agric Biol 12:551–555
Corrêa A, Cruz C, Ferrol N (2015) Nitrogen and carbon/nitrogen dynamics in arbuscular mycorrhiza: the great unknown. Mycorrhiza 25:499–515
Drew EA, Murray RS, Smith SE, Jakobsen I (2003) Beyond the rhizosphere: growth and function of arbuscular mycorrhizal external hyphae in sands of varying pore sizes. Plant Soil 251:105–114
Eriksen J, Askegaard M (2000) Sulphate leaching in an organic crop rotation on sandy soil in Denmark. Agric Ecosyst Environ 78:107–114
Fellbaum CR, Mensah JA, Cloos AJ, Strahan GE, Pfeffer PE, Kiers ET, Bucking H (2014) Fungal nutrient allocation in common mycorrhizal networks is regulated by the carbon source strength of individual host plants. New Phytol 203:646–656
Ferrol N, Barea JM, Azcón-Aguilar C (2000) The plasma membrane H+-ATPase gene family in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae. Curr Genet 37:112–118
Frey B, Schüepp H (1993) Acquisition of nitrogen by external hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with Zea mays L. New Phytol 124:221–230
Garg N, Chandel S (2010) Arbuscular mycorrhizal networks: process and functions. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30:581–599
Gaude N, Bortfeld S, Duensing N, Lohse M, Krajinski F (2012) Arbuscule-containing and non-colonized cortical cells of mycorrhizal roots undergo extensive and specific reprogramming during arbuscular mycorrhizal development. Plant J 69:510–528
Genre A (2012) Signalling and the re-structuring of plant cell architecture in am symbiosis. In: Perotto S, Baluška F (eds) Signaling and communication in plant symbiosis, Signaling and communication in plants, vol 11. Springer, Berlin, pp 51–71
Genre A, Bonfante P (2010) The making of symbiotic cells in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots. In: Koltai H, Kapulnik Y (eds) Arbuscular mycorrhizas: physiology and function. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 57–71
Genre A, Chabaud M, Timmers T, Bonfante P, Barker DG (2005) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi elicit a novel intracellular apparatus in Medicago truncatula root epidermal cells before infection. Plant Cell 17:3489–3499
Genre A, Chabaud M, Balzergue C, Puech-Pagès V, Novero M, Rey T, Fournier J, Rochange S, Bécard G, Bonfante P, Barker DG (2013) Short-chain chitin oligomers from arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi trigger nuclear Ca2+ spiking in Medicago truncatula roots and their production is enhanced by strigolactone. New Phytol 198:190–202
Giovannetti M, Sbrana C, Avio L, Strani P (2004) Patterns of below-ground plant interconnections established by means of arbuscular mycorrhizal networks. New Phytol 164:175–181
Giovannetti M, Tolosano M, Volpe V, Kopriva S, Bonfante P (2014) Identification and functional characterization of a sulfate transporter induced by both sulfur starvation and mycorrhiza formation in Lotus japonicus. New Phytol 204:609–619
Goltapeh EM, Danesh YR, Prasad R, Varma A (2008) Mycorrhizal fungi: what we know and what should we know? In: Varma A (ed) Mycorrhiza. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–27
Gómez-Roldán V, Fermas S, Brewer PB, Puech-Pages V, Dun EA, Pillot J-P, Letisse F, Matusova R, Danoun S, Portais J-C, Bouwmeester H, Becard G, Beveridge CA, Rameau C, Rochange SF (2008) Strigolactone inhibition of shoot branching. Nature 455:189–194
Grønlund M, Albrechtsen M, Johansen IE, Hammer E, Nielsen TH, Jakobsen I (2013) The interplay between P uptake pathways in mycorrhizal peas: a combined physiological and gene-silencing approach. Physiol Plant 149:234–248
Guether M, Neuhauser B, Balestrini R, Dynowski M, Ludewig U, Bonfante P (2009) A mycorrhizal-specific ammonium transporter from Lotus japonicus acquires nitrogen released by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Physiol 150:73–83
Gutjahr C (2014) Phytohormone signaling in arbuscular mycorrhiza development. Curr Opin Plant Biol 20:26–34
Gutjahr C, Parniske M (2013) Cell and developmental biology of the arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 29:593–617
Gutjahr C, Casieri L, Paszkowski U (2009) Glomus intraradices induces changes in root system architecture of rice independently of common symbiosis signaling. New Phytol 182:829–837
Hamel C (2004) Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on N and P cycling in the root zone. Can J Soil Sci 84:383–395
Hammer EC, Pallon J, Wallander H, Olsson PA (2011) Tit for Tat? A mycorrhizal fungus accumulates phosphorus under low plant carbon availability. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 76:236–244
Harrison MJ (2005) Signaling in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Annu Rev Microbiol 59:19–42
Harrison MJ, van Buuren ML (1995) A phosphate transporter from the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus versiforme. Nature 378:626–629
Harrison MJ, Dewbre GR, Liu J (2002) A phosphate transporter from Medicago truncatula involved in the acquisition of phosphate released by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Cell 14:2413–2429
Hause B, Mrosk C, Isayenkov S, Strack D (2007) Jasmonates in arbuscular mycorrhizal interactions. Phytochemistry 68:101–110
Hawkins HJ, Johansen A, George E (2000) Uptake and transport of organic and inorganic nitrogen by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Soil 226:275–285
He XH, Critchley C, Bledsoe C (2003) Nitrogen transfer within and between plants through common mycorrhizal networks (CMNs). Crit Rev Plant Sci 22:531–567
Helber N, Wippel K, Sauer N, Schaarschmidt S, Hause B, Requena N (2011) A versatile monosaccharide transporter that operates in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus sp. is crucial for the symbiotic relationship with plants. Plant Cell 23:3812–3823
Hodge A, Fitter AH (2010) Substantial nitrogen acquisition by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic material has implications for N cycling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:13754–13759
Hodge A, Campbell CD, Fitter AH (2001) An arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus accelerates decomposition and acquires nitrogen directly from organic material. Nature 413:297–299
Jakobsen I, Hammer EC (2015) Nutrient dynamics in arbuscular mycorrhizal networks. In: Horton TR (ed) Mycorrhizal networks, ecological studies, vol 224. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 91–131
Javot H, Penmetsa RV, Terzaghi N, Cook DR, Harrison MJ (2007a) A Medicago truncatula phosphate transporter indispensable for the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:1720–1725
Javot H, Pumplin N, Harrison M (2007b) Phosphate in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: transport properties and regulatory roles. Plant Cell Environ 30:310–322
Javot H, Penmetsa RV, Breuillin F, Bhattarai KK, Noar RD, Gomez SK, Zhang Q, Cook DR, Harrison MJ (2011) Medicago truncatula mtpt4 mutants reveal a role for nitrogen in the regulation of arbuscule degeneration in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant J 68:954–965
Jeffries P, Barea JM (2012) Arbuscular mycorrhiza—a key component of sustainable plant-soil ecosystems. In: Hock B (ed) The mycota. Springer, Berlin, pp 51–75
Johansen A, Jakobsen I, Jensen ES (1993) Hyphal transport by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus on N applied to the soil as ammonium or nitrate. Biol Fert Soils 16:66–70
Karandashov V, Bucher M (2005) Symbiotic phosphate transport in arbuscular mycorrhizas. Trends Plant Sci 10:22–29
Kiers ET, Duhamel M, Beesetty Y, Mensah JA, Franken O, Verbruggen E, Fellbaum CR, Kowalchuk GA, Hart MM, Bago A, Palmer TM, West SA, Vandenkoornhuyse P, Jansa J, Bücking H (2011) Reciprocal rewards stabilize cooperation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Science 333:880–882
Koegel S, Ait Lahmidi N, Arnould C, Chatagnier O, Walder F, Ineichen K, Boller T, Wipf D, Wiemken A, Courty PE (2013) The family of ammonium transporters (AMT) in Sorghum bicolor: two AMT members are induced locally, but not systemically in roots colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 198:853–865
Kohlen W, Charnikhova T, Lammers M, Pollina T, Tóth P, Haider I, Pozo MJ, de Maagd RA, Ruyter-Spira C, Bouwmeester HJ, López-Ráez JA (2012) The tomato CAROTENOID CLEAVAGE DIOXYGENASE 8 (SlCCD8) regulates rhizosphere signaling, plant architecture and affects reproductive development through strigolactone biosynthesis. New Phytol 196:535–547
Koltai H, Kapulnik Y (2009) Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis on enhancement of tolerance to abiotic stresses. In: White JF, Torres MS (eds) Defensive mutualism in microbial symbiosis. CRC, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL, pp 217–234
Kosuta S, Hazledine S, Sun J, Miwa H, Morris RJ, Downie JA, Oldroyd GE (2008) Differential and chaotic calcium signatures in the symbiosis signaling pathway of legumes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:9823–9828
Kranabetter JM (2014) Ectomycorrhizal fungi and the nitrogen economy of conifers—implications for genecology and climate change mitigation. Botany 92:417–423
Kumar A, Dames JF, Gupta A, Sharma S, Gilbert JA, Ahmad P (2015) Current developments in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi research and its role in salinity stress alleviation: a biotechnological perspective. Crit Crit Rev Biotechnol 35:461–474
Lammers PJ, Jun J, Abubaker J, Arreola R, Gopalan A, Bago B, Hernandez-Sebastia C, Allen JW, Douds DD, Pfeffer PE, Shachar-Hill Y (2001) The glyoxylate cycle in an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Carbon flux and gene expression. Plant Physiol 127:1287–1298
Lanfranco L, Vallino M, Bonfante P (1999) Expression of chitin synthase genes in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Gigaspora margarita. New Phytol 142:347–354
Lehmann A, Rillig MC (2015) Arbuscular mycorrhizal contribution to copper, manganese and iron nutrient concentrations in crops—a meta-analysis. Soil Biol Biochem 81:147–158
Lehmann A, Veresoglou SD, Leifheit EF, Rillig MC (2014) Arbuscular mycorrhizal influence on zinc nutrition in crop plants—a meta-analysis. Soil Biol Biochem 69:123–131
Leigh EG (2010) The evolution of mutualism. J Evol Biol 23:2507–2528
Leigh J, Hodge A, Fitter AH (2009) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can transfer substantial amounts of nitrogen to their host plant from organic material. New Phytol 181:199–207
López-Pedrosa A, González-Guerrero M, Valderas A, Azcón-Aguilar C, Ferrol N (2006) GintAmt1 encodes a functional high-affinity ammonium transporter that is expressed in the extraradical mycelium of Glomus intraradices. Fungal Genet Biol 43:102–110
López-Ráez JA (2016) How drought and salinity affect arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and strigolactone biosynthesis? Planta 243:1375–1385
López-Ráez JA, Pozo MJ (2013) Chemical signalling in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: biotechnological applications. In: Aroca R (ed) Symbiotic endophytes, Soil biology, vol 37. Springer, Berlin, pp 215–232
López-Ráez JA, Verhage A, Fernández I, García JM, Azcón-Aguilar C, Flors V, Pozo MJ (2010) Hormonal and transcriptional profiles highlight common and differential host responses to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and the regulation of the oxylipin pathway. J Exp Bot 61:2589–2601
López-Ráez JA, Bouwmeester H, Pozo MJ (2012) Communication in the rhizosphere, a target for pest management. In: Lichtfouse E (ed) Agroecology and strategies for climate change, Sustainable agriculture reviews, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 109–133
Maillet F, Poinsot V, André O, Puech-Pagès V, Haouy A, Gueunier M, Cromer L, Giraudet D, Formey D, Niebel A, Martinez EA, Driguez H, Bécard G, Dénarié J (2011) Fungal lipochitooligosaccharide symbiotic signals in arbuscular mycorrhiza. Nature 469:58–63
Malbreil M, Tisserant E, Martin F, Roux C (2014) Genomics of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Out of the shadows. Adv Bot Res 70:259–290
Marschner H, Dell B (1994) Nutrient uptake and mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant Soil 159:89–102
Marzluf GA (1996) Regulation of nitrogen metabolism in mycelial fungi. In: Brambl R, Marzluf GA (eds) Biochemistry and molecular biology, The mycota, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, pp 357–368
Matsumura A, Taniguchi S, Yamawaki K, Hattori R, Tarui A (2013) Nitrogen uptake from amino acids in maize through arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Am J Plant Sci 4:2290–2294
McFarland JW, Ruess RW, Kielland K, Pregitzer K, Hendrick R, Allen M (2010) Cross-ecosystem comparisons of in situ plant uptake of amino acid-N and NH4. Ecosystems 13:177–193
Miransari M (2013) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and uptake of nutrients. In: Aroca R (ed) Symbiotic endophytes, Soil biology, vol 37. Springer, Berlin, pp 253–270
Mohanta TK, Bae H (2015) Functional genomics and signaling events in mycorrhizal symbiosis. J Plant Interact 10(1):21–40
Nagy R, Karandashov V, Chague W, Kalinkevich K, Tamasloukht M, Xu G, Jakobsen I, Levy AA, Amrhein N, Bucher M (2005) The characterization of novel mycorrhiza-specific phosphate transporters from Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum tuberosum uncovers functional redundancy in symbiotic phosphate transport in solanaceous species. Plant J 42:236–250
Nasim G (2013) Host allelopathy and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. In: Cheema ZA, Farooq M, Wahid A (eds) Allelopathy. Springer, Berlin, pp 429–450
Nygren CMR, Edqvist J, Elfstrand M, Heller G, Taylor AF (2007) Detection of extracellular protease activity in different species and genera of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza 17:241–248
Oldroyd GED (2013) Speak, friend, and enter: signalling systems that promote beneficial symbiotic associations in plants. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:252–263
Parniske M (2008) Arbuscular mycorrhiza: the mother of plant root endosymbioses. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:763–775
Paszkowski U, Kroken S, Roux C, Briggs SP (2002) Rice phosphate transporters include an evolutionarily divergent gene specifically activated in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 99:13324–13329
Pérez-Tienda J, Testillano PS, Balestrini R, Fiorilli V, Azcón-Aguilar C, Ferrol N (2011) GintAMT2, a new member of the ammonium transporter family in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices. Fungal Genet Biol 48:1044–1055
Pfeffer P, Douds DD, Becard G, Shachar-Hill Y (1999) Carbon uptake and the metabolism and transport of lipids in an arbuscular mycorrhiza. Plant Physiol 120:587–598
Pozo MJ, López-Raéez JA, Azcón C, García-Garrido JM (2015) Phytohormones as integrators of environmental signals in the regulation of mycorrhizal symbioses. New Phytol 205:1431–1436
Prasad R, Bhola D, Akdi K, Cruz C, Sairam KVSS, Tuteja N, Varma A (2017) Introduction to mycorrhiza: historical development. In: Varma A, Prasad R, Tuteja N (eds) Mycorrhiza. Springer, Cham, pp 1–7
Pumplin N, Mondo SJ, Topp S, Starker CG, Gantt JS, Harrison MJ (2010) Medicago truncatula Vapyrin is a novel protein required for arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant J 61:482–494
Purin S, Rillig MC (2007) The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal protein glomalin: limitations, progress and a new hypothesis for its function. Pedobiologia 51:123–130
Ravnskov S, Jakobsen I (1995) Functional compatibility in arbuscular mycorrhizas measured as hyphal P transport to the plant. New Phytol 129:611–618
Ravnskov S, Wu Y, Graham JH (2003) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi differentially affect expression of genes coding for sucrose synthases in maize roots. New Phytol 157:539–545
Read D (1998) Biodiversity—plants on the web. Nature 396:22–23
Read DJ, Duckett JG, Francis R, Ligrone R, Russell A (2000) Symbiotic fungal associations in ‘lower’ land plants. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 355:815–831
Reddy S, Schorderet M, Feller U, Reinhardt D (2007) A petunia mutant affected in intracellular accommodation and morphogenesis of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant J 51:739–750
Redeker D, Kodner R, Graham L (2000) Glomalean fungi from the Ordovician. Science 289:1920–1921
Richardson AE, Barea JM, McNeill AM, Prigent-Combaret C (2009) Acquisition of phosphorus and nitrogen in the rhizosphere and plant growth promotion by microorganisms. Plant Soil 321:305–339
Rouphael Y, Franken P, Schneider C, Schwarz D, Giovannetti M, Agnolucci M, De Pascale S, Bonini P, Colla G (2015) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi act as biostimulants in horticultural crops. Sci Hortic 196:91–108
Schaarschmidt S, Roitsch T, Hause B (2006) Arbuscular mycorrhiza induces gene expression of the apoplastic invertase LIN6 in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) roots. J Exp Bot 57:4015–4023
Schüβler A, Martin H, Cohen D, Fitz M, Wipf D (2006) Characterization of a carbohydrate transporter from symbiotic glomeromycotan fungi. Nature 444:933–936
Shachar-Hill Y, Pfeffer PE, Douds D, Osman SF, Doner LW, Ratcliffe RG (1995) Partitioning of intermediary carbon metabolism in vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal leek. Plant Physiol 108:7–15
Shah MA (2014) Mycorrhizas: novel dimensions in the changing world. Springer, New Delhi, p 5
Siciliano V, Genre A, Balestrini R, Cappellazzo G, DeWit PJGM, Bonfante P (2007) Transcriptome analysis of arbuscular mycorrhizal roots during development of the prepenetration apparatus. Plant Physiol 144:1455–1466
Sieh D, Watanabe M, Devers EA, Brueckner F, Hoefgen R, Krajinski F (2013) The arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis influences sulfur starvation responses of Medicago truncatula. New Phytol 197:606–616
Singh S, Katzer K, Lambert J, Cerri M, Parniske M (2014) CYCLOPS, a DNA-binding transcriptional activator, orchestrates symbiotic root nodule development. Cell Host Microbe 15:139–152
Smith SE, Read DJ (1997) Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic, London
Smith SE, Read DJ (2008) Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 3rd edn. Academic, New York, p 800
Smith SE, Smith FA (2011) Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in plant nutrition and growth: new paradigms from cellular to ecosystem scales. Annu Rev Plant Biol 62:227–250
Smith SE, Smith FA (2012) Fresh perspectives on the roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant nutrition and growth. Mycologia 104:1–13
Smith SE, Smith FA, Jakobsen I (2003) Mycorrhizal fungi can dominate phosphate supply to plants irrespective of growth responses. Plant Physiol 133:16–20
Smith FA, Grace EJ, Smith SE (2009) More than a carbon economy: nutrient trade and ecological sustainability in facultative arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses. New Phytol 182:347–358
Smith SE, Jakobsen I, Gronlund M, Smith FA (2011) Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in plant phosphorus nutrition: interactions between pathways of phosphorus uptake in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots have important implications for understanding and manipulating plant phosphorus acquisition. Plant Physiol 156:1050–1057
Solaiman MZ, Saito M (1997) Use of sugars by intraradical hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi revealed by radiorespirometry. New Phytol 136:533–538
Song YY, Zeng RS, Xu JF, Li J, Shen X, Yihdego WG (2010) Inter plant communication of tomato plants through underground common mycorrhizal networks. PLoS One 5(10):e13324
St. John TV, Coleman DC, Reid CPP (1983) Association of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae with soil organic particles. Ecology 64:957–959
Tian C, Kasiborski B, Koul R, Lammers PJ, Bücking H, Shachar-Hill Y (2010) Regulation of the nitrogen transfer pathway in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: gene characterization and the coordination of expression with nitrogen flux. Plant Physiol 153:1175–1187
Tisserant B, Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Gianinazzi S, Gollotte A (1993) In planta histochemical staining of fungal alkaline phosphatase activity for analysis of efficient arbuscular mycorrhizal infections. Mycol Res 97:245–250
Tisserant E, Kohler A, Dozolme-Seddas P, Balestrini R, Benabdellah K, Colard A, Croll D, da Silva C, Gomez SK, Koul R, Ferrol N, Fiorilli V, Formey D, Franken P, Helber N, Hijri M, Lanfranco L, Lindquist E, Liu Y, Malbreil M, Morin E, Poulain J, Shapiro H, van Tuinen D, Waschke A, Azcón-Aguilar C, Bécard G, Bonfante P, Harrison MJ, Küster H, Lammers P, Paszkowski U, Requena N, Rensing SA, Roux C, Sanders IR, Shachar-Hill Y, Tuskan G, Young JP, Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Martin F (2012) The transcriptome of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices (DAOM 197198) reveals functional tradeoffs in an obligate symbiont. New Phytol 193:755–769
Tisserant E, Malbreil M, Kuoc A, Kohlera A, Symeonidid A, Balestrini R, Charron P, Duensing N, dit Frey NF, Gianinazzi-Pearsoni V, Gilbert LB, Handa Y, Herr JR, Hijri M, Koul R, Kawaguchi M, Krajinski F, Lammers PJ, Masclaux FG, Murat C, Morin E, Ndikumana S, Pagni M, Petitpierre D, Requena N, Rosikiewicz P, Riley R, Saito K, Clemente HS, Shapiro H, van Tuinen D, Bécard G, Bonfante P, Paszkowski U, Shachar-Hill Y, Tuskans GA, Young JPW, Sanders IR, Henrissat B, Rensing SA, Grigorievc IV, Corradi N, Roux C, Martin F (2013) Genome of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus provides insight into the oldest plant symbiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:20117–20122
Trépanier M, Bécard G, Moutoglis P, Willemot C, Gagné S, Avis TJ, Rioux JA (2005) Dependence of arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi on their plant host for palmitic acid synthesis. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:5341–5347
Valentine AJ, Mortimer PE, Kleinert A, Kang Y, Benedito VA (2013) Carbon metabolism and costs of arbuscular mycorrhizal associations to host roots. In: Aroca R (ed) Symbiotic endophytes, Soil biology, vol 37. Springer, Berlin, pp 233–252
Vogel JT, Walter MH, Giavalisco P, Lytovchenko A, Kohlen W, Charnikhova T, Simkin AJ, Goulet C, Strack D, Bouwmeester HJ, Fernie AR, Klee HJ (2010) SlCCD7 controls strigolactone biosynthesis, shoot branching and mycorrhiza-induced apocarotenoid formation in tomato. Plant J 61:300–311
Volpe V, Giovannetti M, Sun X-G, Fiorilli V, Bonfante P (2016) The phosphate transporters LjPT4 and MtPT4 mediate early root responses to phosphate status in non-mycorrhizal roots. Plant Cell Environ 39:660–671
Walder F, Brulé D, Koegel S, Wiemken A, Boller T, Courty P-E (2015) Plant phosphorus acquisition in a common mycorrhizal network: regulation of phosphate transporter genes of the Pht1 family in sorghum and flax. New Phytol 205:1632–1645
Walker C (1995) AM or VAM: what’s in a word? In: Varma A, Hock B (eds) Mycorrhiza: structure, function, molecular biology and biotechnology. Springer, Berlin, pp 25–26
Wright DP, Read DJ, Scholes JD (1998) Mycorrhizal sink strength influences whole plant carbon balance of Trifolium repens L. Plant Cell Environ 21:881–891
Xie X, Huang W, Liu F, Tang N, Liu Y, Lin H, Zhao B (2013) Functional analysis of the novel mycorrhiza-specific phosphate transporter AsPT1 and PHT1 family from Astragalus sinicus during the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytol 198:836–852
Yang Q, Chen ZZ, Zhou XF, Yin HB, Li X, Xin XF, Hong XH, Zhu JK, Gong Z (2009) Overexpression of SOS (salt overly sensitive) genes increases salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Mol Plant 2:22–31
Yang S-Y, Grønlund M, Jakobsen I, Suter Grotemeyer M, Rentsch D, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Kumar CS, Sundaresan V, Salamin N, Catausan S, Mattes N, Heuer S, Paszkowski U (2012) Non redundant regulation of rice arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis by two members of the PHOSPHATE TRANSPORTER1 gene family. Plant Cell 24:4236–4251
Yoneyama K, Xie X, Kusumoto D, Sekimoto H, Sugimoto Y, Takeuchi Y, Yoneyama K (2007) Nitrogen deficiency as well as phosphorus deficiency in sorghum promotes the production and exudation of 5-deoxystrigol, the host recognition signal for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and root parasites. Planta 227:125–132
Yoneyama K, Xie X, Kim H, Kisugi T, Nomura T, Sekimoto H, Yokota T, Yoneyama K (2012) How do nitrogen and phosphorus deficiencies affect strigolactone production and exudation? Planta 235:1197–1207
Zaefarian F, Rezvani M, Rejali F, Ardakani MR, Noormohammadi G (2011) Effect of heavy metals and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal on growth and nutrients (N, P, K, Zn, Cu and Fe) accumulation of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 11:346–352
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Department of science and technology (DST—under PURSE GRANT) and Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India for providing financial assistance for undertaking the research in the above context.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bhandari, P., Garg, N. (2017). Dynamics of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis and Its Role in Nutrient Acquisition: An Overview. In: Varma, A., Prasad, R., Tuteja, N. (eds) Mycorrhiza - Nutrient Uptake, Biocontrol, Ecorestoration. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68867-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68867-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68866-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68867-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)