Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cultural Intermediaries
  • 3209 Accesses

Abstract

Cultural intermediation is a central aspect of contemporary convergence culture, which enables audience participation with media organizations. This chapter will primarily serve to introduce the book’s conceptual parameters and provide an overall reflection on new trends for the scholarly study of convergence culture, participation, and online communities. The field has tended to move beyond the ubiquitous manifestation of convergence that sees users interacting through media on a variety of devices in numerous innovative and challenging ways, evolving new media careers, and impacting on democratic involvement from publics within a networked society. Indeed, the loudest critique on convergence, and the creative industries as a discipline that houses it, suggests that the convergence rhetoric is futuristic in its approach, is primarily constructed on speculation, reduces academic enquiry to mere market-driven activities and provides little contribution to knowledge. However, online communities and user participation continue to steadily grow through social network sites and online community platforms specifically built for the purpose of media convergence. This chapter introduces why the role of cultural intermediation is significant and how it can be employed as a framework that incorporates the theoretical debates within the media organization setting. The chapter also seeks to introduce why media organizations persist in engaging with user-created content and participatory culture. This chapter locates this scholarly debate of convergence culture alongside the empirical processes that occur between organizational hierarchy and culture to demonstrate the tension of institutional co-creative production methodologies, beyond the abstract and scholarly interpretation of convergence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abidin, C. 2015. ‘Commerce on instagram’. Retrieved 24 April 2017 from http://wishcrys.com/2015/01/03/commerce-on-instagram.

  • Banks, J. 2009. ‘Co-creative expertise: Auran games and fury—a case study’. Media International Australia 130: 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y. 2006. The wealth of networks. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D.M. 2011. ‘The computational turn: Thinking about the digital humanities’. Culture Machine 12: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Born, G., and T. Prosser. 2001. ‘Culture and consumerism: Citizenship, public service broadcasting and the GGC’s fair trading obligations’. The Modern Law Review 64 (5): 277–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1984. A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadcasting Research Unit. 1985. The public service idea in British broadcasting: Main principles. Luton: John Libbey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, A. and J. Burgess. 2012. ‘Local and global responses to disaster: #eqnz and the Christchurch earthquake.’ Paper presented at the Australian & New Zealand Disaster and Emergency Management Conference, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J., and J. Banks. 2010. ‘User-created content and online social networks’. In The media and communications in Australia, 3rd ed, ed. S. Cunningham, and G. Turner. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J., A. Bruns, and L. Hjorth. 2013. ‘Emerging methods for digital media research: An introduction’. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 57 (1): 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpentier, N. 2009. ‘Participation is not enough: The conditions of possibility of mediated participatory practices’. European Journal of Communication 24 (4): 407–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Media and participation: A site of ideological-democratic struggle. Bristol: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Souza e Silva, A. 2006. ‘Mobile technologies as interfaces of hybrid spaces’. Space and Culture 9 (3): 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, T. 2010. ‘Net worth: Popular social networks as colossal marketing machines’. In Propaganda society: Promotional culture and politics in global context, ed. G. Sussman. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R.M., R.I. Fretz, and L.L. Shaw. 1995. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flew, T. 2011. ‘Rethinking public service media and citizenship: Digital strategies for news and current affairs at Australia’s Special Broadcasting Service (SBS)’. International Journal of Communication 5: 215–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. 2002. The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1977–1978. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, T. 2010. ‘The politics of platforms’. New Media and Society 12 (3): 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin Collaboration. 2013. ‘Making social and behaviour change good’. Retrieved 24 April 2017 from https://goodwincollaboration.wordpress.com/?s=opinion+leaders%2C+peer+educators%2C+community+facilitators%2C+counselors%2C+and+outreach+workers.

  • Green, J., and H. Jenkins. 2009. ‘The Moral Economy of Web 2.0’. In Media Industries: History theory and method, ed. J. Holt and A. Perren, (pp. 213–225 & 231–244). Maiden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson. 1995. Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, J., and N. Couldry. 2011. ‘Rethinking convergence/culture: An introduction’. Cultural Studies 25 (4–5): 473–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermida, A. 2012. ‘Tweets and truth’. Journalism Practice 6 (5–6): 659–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesmondhalgh, D. 2007. The cultural industries. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, M. 2015. ‘Designing desire’. In Communication, digital media and everyday life, 2nd ed, ed. T. Chalkley, M. Hobbs, A. Brown, T. Cinque, B. Warren, and M. Finn. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst, H., L. Hjorth, and J. Tacchi. 2012. ‘Rethinking ethnography: An introduction’. Media International Australia 145: 86–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J. 2013. ‘Collaboration, connections and consequences: A study of cultural intermediation within the ABC Pool institutional online community’. Unpublished PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. 2006. Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H., R. Purushotma, M. Weigel, K. Clinton, and A.J. Robison. 2009. Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H., S. Ford, and J. Green. 2013. Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiss, D., M. Finn, and F. Turner. 2010. The limits of peer production: Some reminders from Max Weber for the network society. New Media & Society 13 (2): 243–259. doi:10.1177/1461444810370951.

  • Layar. 2014. ‘About.’ Retrieved 24 April 2014 from https://www.layar.com/about.

  • Lessig, L. 2004. Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, T., and L. Humphreys. 2014. Layar-ed places: Using mobile augmented reality to tactically reengage, reproduce, and reappropriate public space. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444814527734. Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marres, N., and C. Gerlitz. 2015. ‘Interface methods: Renegotiating relations between digital social research, STS and sociology’. The Sociological Review 64 (1): 21–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negus, K. 2002. ‘The work of cultural intermediaries and the enduring distance between production and consumption’. Cultural Studies 16 (4): 501–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, B., K. Smith, and S. Warren. 2015. ‘Revealing and revaluing cultural intermediaries in the “real” creative city: Insights from a diary-keeping exercise’. European Journal of Cultural Studies 18 (6): 724–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S., H. Horst, J. Postill, L. Hjorth, T. Lewis, and J. Tacchi. 2015. Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, N. 2014. ‘Jamie Oliver and cultural intermediation’. Food, Culture & Society 18 (2): 245–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. 2015. ‘Digital methods for web research’. In Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences, ed. R. Scott, and S. Kosslyn. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushkoff, D. 2006. ‘Merchants of cool’. In Frontline, ed. D. Rushkoff. New York: PBS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirky, C. 2008. ‘Here comes everybody’: The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith Maguire, J., and J. Matthews. 2014. The cultural intermediaries reader. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spurgeon, C., J. Burgess, H. Klaebe, K. McWilliam, J. Tacchi, and M. Tsai. 2009. ‘Co-creative media: Theorising digital storytelling as a platform for researching and developing participatory culture’. Paper presented at the Australia and New Zealand Communication Association (ANZCA) conference, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tacchi, J., D. Slater, and G. Hearn. 2003. Ethnographic action research: A user’s handbook developed to innovate and research ICT applications for poverty eradication. New Delhi: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, G. 2011. ‘Surrendering the space: Convergence culture, cultural studies, and the curriculum’. Cultural Studies 25 (4–5): 685–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. What’s become of cultural studies? London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J.G., and T.B. Ksiazek. 2012. ‘The dynamics of audience fragmentation: Public attention in an age of digital media’. Journal of Communication 62 (1): 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, D. 2005. ‘Mediating production and consumption: Cultural capital and “cultural workers”’. The British Journal of Sociology 56 (1): 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathon Hutchinson .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hutchinson, J. (2017). Introduction. In: Cultural Intermediaries. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66287-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics