Skip to main content

Media Logic and the Mediatization Approach: A Good Partnership, a Mésalliance, or a Misunderstanding?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Media Logic(s) Revisited

Abstract

The Mediatization approach is a general approach concerned with media change and the related transformations of everyday life, culture and society. It understands this as a long term meta process which is accompanying human development since ever. Mediatization studies thus describe and grasp theoretically the current upcoming of the computer and its consequences, but also historical developments, and it includes a critical perspective. The older concept of Media Logic came up in the 1970s and tried to understand how the relevant mass media television of that time contributed to a change of political thinking. Thus, Mediatization asks a broader question, but of course can learn from Media Logic, its research, and its results in specific cases. This is explained in more detail in this article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For results, compare Lundby (2014a, 2014b) and also www.mediatizedwolds.net for further references.

  2. 2.

    Here and in the whole paper we are concerned with the initial concept of Altheide and Snow, and not with the empirical and theoretical work that is based on it. A short overview of the papers in Lundby (2014a, 2014b), which refer to media logic , already shows rather broad and fundamental differences among those.

  3. 3.

    It should be mentioned here that in the early discussions of the relations between the media logic approach and mediatization approach, Hepp (2012) named two mechanisms of how mediatization works—a constructivist one which more generally can be called an action-related mechanism of how mediatization works, and a media logic approach, which more generally may be called institutional. Hepp’s description was subsequently broadened by Lundby (2014a) and Janson (2014) by the introduction of the above-mentioned material mechanism. As we have shown here with reference to the underlying fourfold media concept, there is a fourth mechanism, based on content and aesthetic factors.

References

  • Altheide, D. L. (1985). Media power. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altheide, D. L. (2013). Media logic and social power. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 3(2), 119–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altheide, D. L., & Snow, R. P. (1979). Media logic. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altheide, D. L., & Snow, R. P. (1992). Media logic and culture: Reply to Oakes. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 5(3), 465–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang, I. (1989). Wanted: Audiences. In E. Seiter, H. Borchers, G. Kreutzner, & E. Warth (Eds.), Remote control (pp. 96–115). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Averbeck-Lietz, S. (2014). Understanding mediatization in ‘first modernity’. In K. Lundy (Ed.), Handbook mediatization of communication (pp. 109–130). Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakardjieva, M. (2005). Internet society: The internet in everyday life. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1980). Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bösch, F. (2011). Mediengeschichte. Frankfurt am Main/New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degele, N. (2002). Einführung in die Techniksoziologie. München: Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göttlich, U., Heinz, L. & Herbers, M. R. (2017). Mediatisierte Medienrezeption: Neue Integrationswege der Ko-Orientierung? In F. Krotz, C. Despotovic, & M. Krause (Eds.), Mediatisierung als Metaprozess (pp. 163–186). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenz, T. & Pfadenhauer, M. (2017). Kulturen im Wandel: Zur nonlinearen Brüchigkeit von Mediatisierungsprozessen. In F. Krotz, C. Despotovic, & M. Krause (Eds.), Mediatisierung als Metaprozess (pp. 187–210). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1990). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1989). Ausgewählte Schriften: Ideologie, Kultur, Medien, neue Rechte, Rassismus. Hamburg: Argument Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepp, A. (2012). Cultures of mediatization. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepp, A., & Krotz, F. (Eds.). (2014). Mediatized worlds. Houndsmills: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjavard, S. (2008). The mediatization of society. A theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 105–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjavard, S. (2013). The mediatization of culture and society. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hörisch, J. (2004). Eine Geschichte der Medien. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illich, I. (2010). Im Weinberg des Textes. München: C.H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, H. A. (1951). The bias of communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, H. A. (2007). Empire and communications. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson. A. (2014). Indispensable things: On mediatisation, materiality, and space. In: K. Lundby, (Ed.), Mediatization of communication. Handbooks of communication science, 21 (pp. 273–296). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinsteuber, H. (2005). Mediensysteme. In S. Weischenberg, H. Kleinsteuber, & B. Pörksen (Eds.), Handbuch Journalismus und Medien (pp. 275–280). UVK: Konstanz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K., Reichmann, W. & Woermann, N. (2017). Dimensionen und Dynamiken synthetischer Gesellschaften. In: F. Krotz, C. Despotovic, & M. Kruse (Eds.), Mediatisierung als Metaprozess (pp. 35–57). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krotz, F. (1995). Elektronisch mediatisierte Kommunikation. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 43(4), 445–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krotz, F. (2001). Die Mediatisierung kommunikativen Handelns. Wie sich Alltag und soziale Beziehungen, Kultur und Gesellschaft durch die Medien wandeln. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krotz, F. (2007). Mediatisierung. Fallstudien zum Wandel von Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krotz, F. (2011). Mediatisierung als Metaprozess. In J. Hagenah & H. Meuiemann (Eds.), Mediatisierung der Gesellschaft? (pp. 19–41). Lit: Münster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krotz, F. (2012). Von der Entdeckung der Zentralperspektive zur Augmented Reality. In F. Krotz & A. Hepp (Eds.), Mediatisierte Welten (pp. 27–58). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krotz, F. (2014a). Media related actions and the meta process Mediatization. In A. Hepp & F. Krotz (Eds.), Mediatized worlds (pp. 72–78). Palgrave: Houndsmills.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krotz, F. (2014b). Einleitung: Projektübergreifende Konzepte und theoretische Bezüge der Untersuchung mediatisierter Welten. In F. Krotz, C. Despotovic, & M. Kruse (Eds.), Die Mediatisierung sozialer Welten: Synergien empirischer Forschung (pp. 7–32). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krotz, F. (2014c). Mediatization as a mover in modernity: Social and cultural change in the context of media change. In: K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization of communication. Handbooks of communication science 21. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter, 131–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krotz, F. (2017a). Explaining the mediatisation approach. Javnost—The Public, 24(2), 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krotz, F. (2017b). Mediatisierung: Ein Forschungskonzept. In F. Krotz, C. Despotovic, & M. Kruse (Eds.), Mediatisierung als Metaprozess: Transformationen, Formen der Entwicklung und die Generierung von Neuem (pp. 13–34). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krotz, F. (2017c). Pfade der Mediatisierung: Bedingungsgeflechte für die Transformationen von Medien, Alltag, Kultur und Gesellschaft. In F. Krotz, C. Despotovic, & M. Kruse (Eds.), Mediatisierung als Metaprozess: Transformationen, Formen der Entwicklung und die Generierung von Neuem (pp. 347–364). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krotz, F., Despotovic, C., & Kruse, M. (Eds.). (2014). Die Mediatisierung sozialer Welten: Synergien empirischer Forschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krotz, F., Despotovic, C., & Kruse, M. (Eds.) (2017). Mediatisierung als Metaprozess: Transformationen, Formen der Entwicklung und die Generierung von Neuem. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krotz, F., & Hepp, A. (Eds.). (2012). Mediatisierte Welten. Wiesbaden: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krotz, F., & Hepp, A. (2013). A concretization of mediatization: How mediatization works and why ‘mediatized worlds’ are a helpful concept for empirical mediatization research. Empedokles. The European Journal of Philosophy of Communication, 3(2), 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundby, K. (2009a). Media logic: Looking for social interaction. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization: Concept, changes, consequences (pp. 101–191). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundby, K. (2009b). Media logic: Looking for social interaction. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization: Concept, changes, consequences (pp. 85–100). New York: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundby, K. (Ed.). (2014a). Handbook mediatization of communication. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundby, K. (2014b). Mediatization of communication. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Handbook mediatization of communication (pp. 3–35). de Gruyter: Berlin/Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoleni, G., & Schulz, W. (1999). Mediatization of politics: A challenge for democracy? Political Communication, 16, 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, I. F., & Wolverton, L. (2008). Reinventing knowledge. From Alexandria to the internet. New York: Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuail, D. (1996). Mass communication theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyrowitz, J. (1990). Die Fernsehgesellschaft, 2 Vol. Weinheim and Basel: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möll, G. & Hitzler, R. (2017). Zwischen spekulativen Strategien und strategischen Spekulationen. Zur reflexiven Mediatisierung riskanter Geldverausgabung. In F. Krotz, C. Despotovic, & M. Kruse (Eds.), Mediatisierung als Metaprozess: Transformationen, Formen der Entwicklung und die Generierung von Neuem (pp. 211–232). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterhammel, J. (2011). Die Verwandlung der Welt. Eine Geschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts (Special ed.). München: C.H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pürer, H. (2003). Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft. Ein Handbuch. Konstanz: UTB/UVK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F. de. (1998). Grundfragen der allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft. In: D. Mersch (Ed.), Zeichen über Zeichen: Texte zur Semiotik von Peirce bis Eco und Derrida (pp. 193–215). München: DTV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, H. I. (1989). Culture Inc: The corporate takeover of public expression. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, W. (2008). Politische Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, P. (2010). Schriftkultur. Eine Geschichte des Schreibens und Lesens. Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterne, J. (2003). The audible past. Cultural origins of sound reproduction. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J., & Esser, F. (2014). Mediatization of politics: Towards a theoretical framework. In F. Esser & J. Strömbäck (Eds.), Mediatizations of politics: Understanding the transformation of western democracies (pp. 3–28). Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, B. (Ed.). (2007). Mediensysteme im internationalen Vergleich. Konstanz: UTB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1990). Television: Technology and cultural form. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Friedrich Krotz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Krotz, F. (2018). Media Logic and the Mediatization Approach: A Good Partnership, a Mésalliance, or a Misunderstanding?. In: Thimm, C., Anastasiadis, M., Einspänner-Pflock, J. (eds) Media Logic(s) Revisited. Transforming Communications – Studies in Cross-Media Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65756-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics