Skip to main content

Eurocentrism Awakened: The Arab Uprisings and the Search for a “Modern” Middle East

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Turkey’s Relations with the Middle East
  • 790 Accesses

Abstract

The 2011 Arab uprisings were initially hailed by many observers in the Western world as the harbinger of a “modern” Middle East. Finally, it was believed, the hegemony of corrupt autocrats and the prolonged “dark age” of the Arab world were coming to an end. In the context of this narrative that emerged in the wake of the Arab uprisings, the so-called Turkish model gained popularity as a potential guide for the modernization of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Accordingly, modernization has been defined as the inevitable path to a liberal democratic, free-market capitalist, and secular society within non-Western settings. This conceptualization is highly Eurocentric as the contents of modernization are solely limited to the contemporary characteristics of social, economic, and political life in Western Europe and Northern America. Moreover, the possibility that the complex transformation trajectories of non-Western societies may not produce the same outcomes as in the Western experience is completely overlooked.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, for example, Acharya and Buzan (2010), Shilliam (2011), and Voskressenski (2017).

  2. 2.

    For a detailed study of the Eurocentrism of Western governments and institutions, see Borg (2016), Salt (2012), Azeez (2014), and Hollis (2012). For a detailed study of the Eurocentrism of Western mainstream media outlets such as The Economist, Foreign Affairs, and The Guardian, see Salaita (2012), Shihade et al. (2012), and Malak and Salem (2015).

  3. 3.

    For more details, see Halliday (1993, pp. 148–160) and Lockman (2010).

  4. 4.

    For notable postcolonial works, see Fanon (1952, 1961), Foucault (1972), Said (1978), Spivak (1985, 1988), Chakrabarty (2000, 2002), and Bhambra (2007). For notable postcolonial works within the Middle East area studies in particular, see Amin (2009, 2016), Dabashi (2012), Ayubi (1995), Prashad (2012), and Lockman (2010).

  5. 5.

    The year the European colonization of the New World began after Christopher Columbus sailed across the Atlantic Ocean in search of a trade route to the East Indies.

  6. 6.

    Thought-provoking reflections on the social costs of the Industrial Revolution in the Western world can be found in fiction—see, for example, the works of literary giants such as Charles Dickens (1838), Jack London (1903), Upton Sinclair (1927), and George Orwell (1939).

  7. 7.

    For more details on the conceptualization of radical democracy, see Laclau and Mouffe’s (1985) classical text and the works of Tekdemir (2016, 2017).

  8. 8.

    See, for example, Jones (2013) for an archetypical Eurocentric narrative on Islamism in the MENA.

  9. 9.

    Persian mathematicians, Muhammad ibn al-Khwarizmi and Omer Khayyam, played key roles in the development of the contemporary understanding of algebra.

  10. 10.

    Nevertheless, in contrast to Western mainstream media and governments, the Western academia has long been dominated by vocal critics of Eurocentrism such as Gayatri Spivak, Noam Chomsky, Homi K. Bhabha, and Dipesh Chakrabarty.

  11. 11.

    For a comprehensive study of the role of neoliberalization process in triggering the 2011 uprisings in MENA, see Hanieh (2013). This is a point that is also made in the contribution of Cemal Burak Tansel in this volume.

References

  • Abourahme, N., & Jayyusi, M. (2011). The will to revolt and the spectre of the real: Reflections on the Arab movement. City, 16(5), 625–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2010). Non-Western international relations theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajami, F. (2012, March 1). The Arab Spring at once: A year of living dangerously. Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akyol, M. (2012). The Turkish model: Marching to Islamic liberalism. Cairo Review, 4, 68–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Azm, S. (2011). The Turkish model: A view from Damascus. Turkish Studies, 12(4), 633–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin, S. (2009). Eurocentrism (2nd ed.). New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, S. (2016). The reawakening of the Arab world: Challenge and change in the aftermath of the Arab Spring. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aras, B., & Akarçeşme, S. (2012). Turkey and the Arab Spring. International Journal, Winter, 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atasoy, S. (2011). The Turkish example: A model for change in the Middle East. Middle East Policy, XVIII(3), 86–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayubi, N. (1995). Over-stating the Arab state: Politics and society in the Middle East. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azeez, G. (2014). Western notions of Middle Eastern revolutions: Counter-revolutionary discourse from Mahdi to the Arab Spring. In B. Clark, A. Ghafar, & J. Mortiz (Eds.), The contemporary Middle East: Revolution or reform (pp. 64–86). Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengio, O. (2012). Are Iraq and Turkey models for democratization? Middle East Quarterly, 19(3), 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhambra, G. K. (2007). Rethinking modernity: Postcolonialism and the sociological imagination. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bilgin, P. (2016). Thinking postcolonially about the Middle East: Two moments of anti-Eurocentric critique. Odense: Center for Mellemostudier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaut, J. M. (1993). The colonizer’s model of the world: Geographical diffusionism and Eurocentric history. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, S. (2016). The Arab uprisings, the liberal civilizing narrative and the problem of orientalism. Middle East Critique, 25(3), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee, B. J., & Ghiabi, M. (2016). Passive, silent and revolutionary: The “Arab Spring” revisited. Middle East Critique, 25(3), 299–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, D. (2002). Habitations of modernity: Essays in the wake of subaltern studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabashi, H. (2012). The Arab Spring: The end of postcolonialism. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadush, U., & Dunne, M. (2011). American and European responses to the Arab Spring: What’s the big idea. The Washington Quarterly, 34(4), 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dede, A. Y. (2011). The Arab uprisings: Debating the “Turkish Model”. Insight Turkey, 13(2), 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, C. (1838). Oliver Twist. London: Richard Bentley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. (1952). Black skin, white masks. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. (1961). The wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. G. (1968). Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göksel, O. (2012). Assessing the Turkish model as a guide to the emerging democracies in the Middle East. Ortadoğu Etütleri, 4(1), 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göksel, O. (2013). Deconstructing the discourse of models: The “Battle of Ideas” over the post-revolutionary Middle East. Insight Turkey, 15(3), 157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göksel, O. (2014). Perceptions of the Turkish model in post-revolutionary Tunisia. Turkish Studies, 15(3), 476–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, F. (1993). Orientalism and its critics. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 20(2), 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanieh, A. (2013). Lineages of revolt: Issues of contemporary capitalism in the Middle East. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J. M. (2009). What have the Muslims ever done for us? Islamic origins of Western civilization. In R. K. Kanth (Ed.), The challenge of Eurocentrism: Global perspectives, policy, and prospects (pp. 217–235). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J. M. (2012). The Eurocentric conception of world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, R. (2012). No friend of democratization: Europe’s role in the genesis of the Arab Spring. International Affairs, 88(1), 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. G. (2013). The mirage of the Arab Spring: Deal with the region you have, not the region you want. Foreign Affairs, 92(1), 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayadibi, S., & Birekul, M. (2011). Turkish democracy: A model for the Arab world. Journal of Islam in Asia, 8(3), 255–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirişçi, K. (2011). Turkey’s “Demonstrative Effect” and the transformation of the Middle East. Insight Turkey, 13(2), 33–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubicek, P. (2013). Debating the merits of the “Turkish Model” for democratization in the Middle East. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, 12(3), 166–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambropoulos, V. (1993). The rise of Eurocentrism: Anatomy of interpretation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, B. (1982, June 24). The question of orientalism. New York Review of Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockman, Z. (2010). Contending visions of the Middle East: The history and politics of orientalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • London, J. (1903). The people of the Abyss. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (2011, November 28). The big think behind the Arab Spring. Foreign Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malak, K., & Salem, S. (2015). Re-orientalizing the Middle East: The power agenda setting post-Arab uprisings. Middle East – Topics & Arguments (META), 4, 93–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matin, K. (2013). Recasting Iranian modernity: International relations and social change. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullin, C., & Pallister-Wilkins, P. (2015). Introduction: The West Asian and North African uprisings and the limits of liberal governance. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 9(2), 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nafaa, H. (2011). The “Turkish Model” in the mirror of the Arab Spring. In Turkey and the Arab Spring: Implications for Turkish foreign policy from a transatlantic perspective (pp. 37–44). Washington, DC: German Marshall Fund of the United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwell, G. (1939). Coming up for air. London: Victor Gollancz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, M., & Cavatorta, F. (2012). The Arab uprisings in theoretical perspective: An introduction. Mediterranean Politics, 17(2), 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prashad, V. (2012). Arab Spring, Libyan Winter. Edinburgh: AK Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodinson, M. (1973). Islam and capitalism. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, O. (2012). The transformation of the Arab world. Journal of Democracy, 23(3), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salaita, S. (2012). Corporate American media coverage of Arab revolutions: The contradictory message of modernity. Interface, 4(1), 131–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt, J. (2012). Containing the “Arab Spring”. Interface, 4(1), 54–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samaan, J.-L. (2013). The rise and fall of the “Turkish Model” in the Arab world. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 12(3), 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayyid, B. S. (1997). A fundamental fear: Eurocentrism and the emergence of Islamism. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shihade, M. (2012). On the difficulty in predicting and understanding the Arab Spring: Orientalism, Euro-centrism, and modernity. International Journal of Peace Studies, 17(2), 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shihade, M., Fominaya, C. F., & Cox, L. (2012). The season of revolution: The Arab Spring and European mobilizations. Interface, 4(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shilliam, R. (2011). International relations and non-Western thought: Imperialism, colonialism and investigations of global modernity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, U. (1927). Oil! New York: Albert & Charles Boni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. C. (1985). Subaltern studies: deconstructing historiography. In R. Guha (Ed.), Subaltern studies IV (pp. 330–363). Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In D. Brydon (Ed.), Postcolonialism: Critical concepts in literary and cultural studies (pp. 1427–1477). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taşpınar, Ö. (2011). The Turkish model and its applicability. In Turkey and the Arab Spring: Implications for Turkish foreign policy from a transatlantic perspective (pp. 7–14). Washington: German Marshall Fund of the United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taşpınar, Ö. (2014). The end of the Turkish model. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 56(2), 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tekdemir, O. (2016). Conflict and reconciliation between Turks and Kurds: The HDP as an agonistic actor. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16(4), 651–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tekdemir, O. (2017). Constructing a social space for Alevi political identity: Religion, antagonism and collective passion. National Identities [Online]. Accessed February 14, 2017, from http://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/6YJFmsS7CnX3JxApysfZ/full

  • The Economist. (2011, February 3). An end or a beginning?

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuğal, C. (2016). The fall of the Turkish model: How the Arab uprisings brought down Islamic liberalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ülgen, S. (2011). From inspiration to aspiration: Turkey in the New Middle East. Brussels: Carnegie Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voskressenski, A. D. (2017). Non-Western theories of international relations: Conceptualizing world regional studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, P. (2012). Modernity: Understanding the present. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-systems analysis: An introduction. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oğuzhan Göksel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Göksel, O. (2018). Eurocentrism Awakened: The Arab Uprisings and the Search for a “Modern” Middle East. In: Işıksal, H., Göksel, O. (eds) Turkey’s Relations with the Middle East. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59897-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics