Skip to main content

Philosophical Aspects of an Alleged Connection Between the Axiom of Choice and Predicting the Future

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applications of Formal Philosophy

Part of the book series: Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning ((LARI,volume 14))

  • 398 Accesses

Abstract

In 2008 Christopher Hardin and Alan Taylor published an article titled “Peculiar connection between the axiom of choice and predicting the future” in which they claim that if some system can be described as a function from a set of some instants of time to some set of states, then there is a way to predict the next value of the function based on its previous input. Using their so-called \(\mu \)-strategy one can randomly choose an instant t and the probability that the strategy is correct at t (i.e. that the output for a strategy for input t is exactly the same as the value of the function) equals 1. Mathematical aspects of this article are sound, but the background story about the correlation between theorems and philosophical aspects of predicting the future faces certain problems. The goal of my paper is to bring them up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    All proofs can be found in [4].

  2. 2.

    Where \(\epsilon >0\) and \([t,t+\epsilon )\) is some small interval of time. For every t such \(\epsilon \) exists in the sense that given t we can match a suitable \(\epsilon \).

  3. 3.

    The most popular one is the Blum-Shub-Smale (BSS) machine.

  4. 4.

    There is no point to talk about the computability of \(\mu \)-strategy when it is defined on natural numbers because when time is not dense the strategy does not predict with probability 1.

References

  1. Braverman, M., & Cook, S. (2006). Computing over the reals: Foundations for scientific computing. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 53, 318–329.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Devlin, K. (1994). The joy of sets: Fundamentals of contemporary set theory. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  3. George, A. (2007). A proof of induction? Philosophers’ Imprint, 7(2), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hardin, C. S., & Taylor, A. D. (2008). A peculiar connection between the axiom of choice and predicting the future. American Mathematical Monthly, 115, 91–96.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I want to thank Rafal Urbaniak for his time and endless comments concerning this paper. I would also thank two anonymous referees, whose comments were very helpful. This research has been funded by Research Foundation Flanders (FWO).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pawel Pawlowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pawlowski, P. (2017). Philosophical Aspects of an Alleged Connection Between the Axiom of Choice and Predicting the Future. In: Urbaniak, R., Payette, G. (eds) Applications of Formal Philosophy. Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58507-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics