Abstract
As one of very few authors in the Anglo-American tradition, Andrew Feenberg, has pointed out, the early development of critical theory and Lukács’ philosophy cannot be understood without reflecting on the historically rich network between phenomenology , Neo-Kantianism, and social theory. Moreover, in contradistinction to many contemporary critical theorists, Feenberg, following Lukács, is not hostile to epistemological and ontological questions in social theory. In this vein, the main term that Feenberg introduces in his interpretation of Lukács is Gegenständlichkeit (objectivity). Although I agree with Feenberg’s claim that this term is central for understanding Lukács’ understanding of social entities as culturally meaningful entities, I argue that we can find this broader social meaning of entities already foreshadowed in Chap. 1 of Marx’s Capital if we read Capital as a theory of society. Unfortunately, traditional Marxist discourses tend to reduce Capital to an “economic” theory and Feenberg seems to follow this tradition, that is, he seems to dismiss the critique of political economy as the primary horizon for a critical theory of society. However, as I will demonstrate, Marx’s project cannot be reduced to a labor theory of value and, instead, it should, from the beginning, be understood as a social theory based on social categories; and Gegenständlichkeit serves as the central element for translating epistemological concepts into social concepts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Bonefeld, Werner. Critical Theory and the Critique of Political Economy: On Subversion and Negative Reason. London: Bloomsbury Press, 2014.
Engster, Frank. Das Geld als Maß, Mittel und Methode. Das Rechnen mit der Identität der Zeit. Berlin: Neofelis Verlag, 2014.
Feenberg, Andrew. “Reification and its Critics.” In “György Lukács Reconsidered: Essays on Politics, Philosophy and Aesthetics.” Edited by Michael M. Thompson. London: Routledge, 2011, 172–194.
———. The Philosophy of Praxis: Marx, Lukács, and the Frankfurt School. London: Verso, 2014.
Harvey, David. Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Heidegger, Martin. Supplements: From the Earliest Essays to Being and Time and Beyond. Edited by John van Buren. New York: SUNY Press, 2002.
Lask, Emil. Die Logik der Philosophie und die Kategorienlehre. Eine Studie über den Herrschaftsbereich der logischen Form. Siebeck: Tübingen, 1911/1993.
Lotz, Christian. The Capitalist Schema. Time, Money, and the Culture of Abstraction. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2014.
———. “An der Oberfläche der Tauschgesellschaft. Kritik der Kritischen Theorie,” Prokla. Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft, 180, 2015, 453–469.
——— “Critical Theory and the Critique of Political Economy: On Subversion and Negative Reason.” Radical Philosophy Review, 18/2, 2015, 337–342.
Lukács, György. Geschichte und Klassenbewusstsein, Werke, Frühschriften, Band II. Bielefeld: Aistheis, 2013.
Marx, Karl. Capital, Volume I. Translated by Ben Fowkes. London: Penguin, 1990.
———. Grundrisse. Translated by Martin Nicolaus. London: Penguin, 1993.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lotz, C. (2017). Gegenständlichkeit—From Marx to Lukács and Back Again. In: Arnold, D., Michel, A. (eds) Critical Theory and the Thought of Andrew Feenberg. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57897-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57897-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57896-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57897-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)