Abstract
Atypical Parkinsonism encompasses four separate diseases (Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB), Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP), Corticobasal Degeneration (CBD), and Multiple System Atrophy (MSA)) with overlapping clinical features but unique underlying pathologies. Unlike Parkinson’s disease, these disorders are less responsive to levodopa therapy and have a more rapid and severe disease progression.
Certain clinical features can be used to differentiate these disorders, and are important in making an early and accurate diagnosis. Although largely unresponsive to levodopa therapy, there are motor and non-motor (i.e. autonomic, psychiatric, gastrointestinal) features in each disorder which are amenable to treatment.
This chapter provides an overview of the diagnosis and management of PSP, CBD, and MSA. Specific diagnostic criteria are provided for each disorder, along with a diagnostic algorithm to aid in differentiating these disorders in the clinical setting. An atypical parkinsonism care path outlines the various modalities that can be used to improve motor and non-motor symptoms.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Parkinsonism
- Progressive supranuclear palsy
- Corticobasal degeneration
- Multiple system atrophy
- DaT scan
- Falls
- Tremor
Clinical Pearls
-
Slowing of vertical saccades or restricted downward gaze can differentiate PSP from other parkinsonian disorders
-
Postural instability and falls are not commonly an early feature in Parkinson’s disease but are prominent in PSP
-
Midbrain atrophy on mid-sagittal MRI gives the characteristic “Hummingbird sign”, which may help differentiate PSP from other forms of parkinsonism
-
Unilateral “hand clumsiness” is the most common presenting motor symptom in CBD.
-
Markedly asymmetric upper limb apraxia, rigidity, and dystonia help differentiate CBD from other forms of parkinsonism
-
Early and pronounced autonomic dysfunction differentiate both forms of MSA from all other forms of parkinsonism and most adult onset cerebellar ataxias
-
Lack of resting tremor, cerebellar ataxia, rapid progression, poor response to levodopa, and MRI abnormalities are useful in differentiating MSA from PD
-
MSA patients need comprehensive care involving multiple medical disciplines (urology, cardiology, sleep medicine, gastroenterology)
Atypical Parkinsonism
Introduction
Parkinsonism refers to a variety of syndromes unified clinically by the presence of bradykinesia —a disorder of motor function resulting in slow, small amplitude movements [1]. The most common form of parkinsonism is Parkinson’s disease (PD), while other forms are considered “atypical parkinsonism”, and are divided into sporadic, familial, and secondary etiologies [2]. The sporadic forms of atypical parkinsonism consist of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP), Corticobasal Degeneration (CBD), Multiple System Atrophy (MSA), and Dementia with Lewy Bodies [2, 3]. This chapter will focus on the diagnostic criteria and care paths for PSP, CBD, and MSA. DLB is discussed in a separate chapter. Figure 11.1 shows a summary approach to atypical parkinsonism.
Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP)
Introduction
Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) is a sporadic atypical parkinsonian disorder which manifests as progressive bradykinesia and rigidity, ocular motility disturbances, and early falls [4]. Although rare in the general population, it is the most common atypical parkinsonian disorder—approximately 6% of all parkinsonian patients evaluated at a specialty clinic are diagnosed with PSP [2].
Since the initial recognition of the classic PSP syndrome (also called “Richardson syndrome” or “PSP-RS”), several clinical variants have been identified and are commonly referred to as “Atypical PSP” [5]. This sub-classification is based on the initial predominance of symptoms and includes speech/language disorders (PSP-SL) including progressive apraxia of speech (PSP-AOS) and nonfluent/agrammatic primary progressive aphasia (PSP-nfaPPA), cerebellar ataxia (PSP-C), corticobasal syndrome (PSP-CBS), frontal lobe cognitive of behavioral presentations (PSP-F) including behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), ocular motor dysfunction (PSP-OM), parkinsonism resembling idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (PSP-P), postural instability (PSP-PI), primary lateral sclerosis (PSP-PLS), and progressive gait freezing (PSP-PGF). The unifying pathology of these disorders includes intracellular neurofibrillary tangle collection; the pathologic distribution and clinical severity differs with each subtype.
Clinical Manifestations
History
The average age of onset for PSP is 63 years old, a few years later than the average age of onset for Parkinson’s disease [6]. The disease is rarely, if ever, seen in pa tients before age 40 and its diagnosis should be called into question in this age range [7]. The hallmar ks of PSP are early postural instability with falls within the first year of disease onset, and vertical supranuclear gaze palsy [8].
Patients may initially experience personality changes, difficulty with balance, or vision disturbance. Bilateral bradykinesia is a common presenting symptom, seen in up to 88% of PSP patients presenting for the first time [8]. Most eventually pursue medical care after the onset of falls.
PSP patients experience their first fall a median of 16.8 months after onset of symptoms, falls after symptom onset take approximately 30 months in CBD, 40.8 months in vascular parkinsonism, 42 months in MSA, 54 months in DLB, and 108 months in PD [9]. Signs and symptoms shown to be associated with earliest falls (<2 years from symptom onset) include early cognitive dysfunction, symmetrical disease onset, axial rigidity, dysphagia, and eye movement abnormalities. Frontal lobe dysfunction manifesting as impulsivity and lack of insight further increases the risk of falls. Unexplained falls backwards, not associated with a loss of consciousness, are the most common clinical presentation of PSP.
Dystonia most commonly presents as blepharospasm, but may present as asymmetric limb or hemi-dystonia, or as axial dystonia [10]. Cervical dystonia is a common feature later in the disease, and can manifest as retrocollis, anterocollis, or torticollis [11]. Dystonia may be present as part of the natural course of the disease, or develop in response to levodopa administration. Dopaminergic medications may briefly improve the motor symptoms in the early stages of PSP, but more commonly there is little to no effect, and it may worsen gait abnormalities and balance [11].
Most patients eventually lose the ability to read or maintain persistent eye contact, and approximately 1/3 initially describe having blurred vision, eye discomfort, or double vision [10]. Patients rarely present with blatant complaints of being unable to look up or down. Eyelid dysfunction (ranging from a decreased blink rate to involuntary eyelid closure (blepharospasm), or failure to open upon command (eyelid freezing or apraxia of eyelid opening)) and difficulties with horizontal eye movements are markers of advanced stages of disease [12].
Early cognitive dysfunction is common in PSP, and may be the presenting symptom in up to 10% of patients [13]. Cognitive dysfunction seen in PSP usually manifests with impaired abstract thought, executive dysfunction, decreased verbal fluency, behavioral disturbances, and motor perseveration [14].
The disease progression in PSP is more severe and rapid than that seen in PD, with median survival ranging from 5 to 8 years [2]. With time, verbal fluency declines, axial rigidity and progressive immobility result, complete ophthalmoplegia may occur, and dysphagia worsens. Subsequently, death is most commonly secondary to respiratory complications, such as aspiration pneumonia or pulmonary emboli [15].
Physical Examination
The standard neurologic e xamination, with a focus on oculomotor evaluation, should be performed. Saccades, rapid eye movements to move the line of sight directly on the fovea, are evaluated by eliciting optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) . This is commonly performed using a strip containing squares of alternating colors, asking the patient to look straight ahead while monitoring saccadic eye movements. Slowing of vertical ocular saccades (downbeat and upbeat) present early in the course of the disease, while horizontal saccades are affected later [16]. Vertical gaze paralysis occurs as the disease progresses, and may initially be overcome by the oculocephalic maneuver [11]. Patients may present with the “procerus sign”: a wide-eyed look of astonishment or worry due to a combination of oculomotor abnormalities and rigidity, bradykinesia, and hypertonicity of the facial muscles [17].
The motor portion of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) and/or the Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale (PSPRS) are commonly administered. Patients with bradykinesia demonstrate delayed initiation of movement, progressive slowing, and/or decrement in amplitude with repetition [1]. Axial rigidity (clinically assessed by passive neck movement) is more pronounced than limb rigidity (tested by passive movement of the wrists, elbows, knees, and ankles). Patients are assessed for tremor at rest, with arms outstretched (postural tremor), and with movement (kinetic tremor). Tremor is a rare clinical feature of PSP-RS, but may be seen in PSP-P [1]. The classic gait seen in PSP is characterized by a stiff, broad-based posture, knee and trunk extension, and bilateral upper extremity abduction. Instead of the “en-bloc” turns seen in PD patients, PSP patients often pivot when they turn, which further increases the risk of falls [2]. Postural instability, an early and severe component of PSP, is assessed by the “pull test” (patients stand with feet apart and are pulled backwards at the shoulders by the examiner).
Cognition is typically assessed via the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) or Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE). Cognitive and behavioral changes are common in PSP, with deficits seen in numerous domains. Executive dysfunction is prominent, but memory and visuospatial deficits also occur. Apathy is frequently seen in PSP and patients may present concomitantly with impulsivity [18]. The severe episodic memory deficit observed in Alzheimer’s disease is not typically present in PSP, and recognition usually is largely preserved [13].
Diagnostic Approach for PSP
The clinical diagnosis of PSP is based primarily on history and physical examination, with supportive evidence provided by imaging. The definitive diagnosis is based on pathologic confirmation at autopsy. Figure 11.2 provides a diagnostic algorithm for parkinsonism.
Key history, examination, laboratory, and imaging criteria include:
History
-
Prominent postural instability and falls within the first year of onset of symptoms
-
Progressive onset of Parkinsonism (bilateral and symmetric bradykinesia, stiffness/rigidity, absence of tremor (unless PSP-P), worsening gait)
-
May complain of blurred vision or difficulty reading (rarely complain of difficulty looking up or down)
-
Early cognitive and behavioral abnormalities
-
Rapid onset and progression of symptoms
-
Limited or no response from levodopa
Neurologic Exam
-
Slowing of vertical saccades or vertical supranuclear gaze palsy
-
Prominent postural instability on pull test
-
Bilateral and symmetric bradykinesia
-
Axial > Limb rigidity
-
Executive dysfunction, memory and visuospatial deficits on cognitive testing
-
Table 11.1 shows the core clinical features of PSP
Imaging
MRI Brain
-
(Fig. 11.3) Mid- sagittal MRI showing atrophy of the rostral midbrain tegmentum, caudal midbrain tegmentum, base of the pons, and cerebellum giving the appearance of the bill, head, body, and wing (respectively) of a hummingbird (“Hummingbird sign”) [19]
-
A study using the A-P diameter of the midbrain and pons on mid-sagittal MRI, showed a midbrain measurement of <9.35 mm had 83% sensitivity and 100% specificity for PSP [20].
-
A midbrain to pontine ratio of <0.52 had 67% sensitivity and 100% specificity for PSP compared to MSA [20].
-
-
Cortical atrophy with a frontal predominance is generally present as well
DaT Scan
-
FDA indicat ed for detecting loss of functional dopaminergic neuron terminals in the striatum [21]
-
Reduced uptake is indicative of Parkinsonism, but does not differentiate PD, PSP, CBD, MSA, or DLB
Laboratory Testing
-
Blood tests are t ypically of limited utility in diagnosing PSP
-
CSF biomarkers are promising but need further validation
Genetic Testing
-
Although c onsidered a sporadic disorder, recent findings suggest there are likely predisposing genetic factors which are triggered in response to environmental factors such as oxidative stress [22].
-
Currently, there are no genetic tests readily available to support or confirm a diagnosis of PSP.
Pathology
-
Diagnosis of definite PSP can only be made by pathologic analysis upon autopsy
-
Pathologically, PSP is characterized by aggregated tau protein forming neurofibrillary tangles in predominantly subcortical neurons, tufted astrocytes, and oligodendroglial inclusions [23]
Table 11.2 presents the diagnostic criteria for PSP.
Case Example
Example using the 2017 Movement Disorder Society Criteria for the Clinical Diagnosis of PSP:A 64 year old gentleman presents to your office for evaluation of frequent falls. His first fall occurred two years ago - he was playing tennis and fell backwards after reaching up to hit the tennis ball. Since then he has had gradually increasing falls, many backwards, mainly due to imbalance and inability to react quickly. He is now afraid to walk, especially as occasionally his feet will ‘stick to the floor’ and he is unable to move. This happens most frequently when he starts to walk or goes through a narrow space. On examination, he exhibits bilateral symmetric bradykinesia, axial and limb rigidity, vertical supranuclear gaze palsy, and difficulty moving his feet when first starting to walk or going through a doorway.Diagnosis: Probable PSP with progressive gait freezing.Explanation: The patient has a gradually progressive worsening of gait with falls and freezing of gait within the first three years of symptom onset (A1). With evidence of vertical supranuclear gaze palsy (01), he meets criteria for probable PSP-PGF.
Corticobasal Degeneration
Introduction
Corticobasal degeneration (CBD) is a pathologic diagnosis which encompasses the clinical phenotypes of corticobasal syndrome (CBS), frontal behavioral-spatial syndrome (FBS), nonfluent-agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia (naPPA or NAV), and progressive supranuclear palsy syndrome (PSPS, a subtype of CBD with overlapping features of CBS and PSP) [24]. There is significant variation and overlap between these subtypes, with features of each seen as the disease progresses. CBD, along with PSP, is a four-repeat tauopathy classifi ed as a sporadic form of atypical parkinsonism.
Clinical Manifestations
History
CBD rarely manifests before 50 years of age, and the mean age at onset is 60 years ± 9.7 years [25]. Patients may develop cognitive, language, or behavioral changes before the onset of motor symptoms, leading to a misdiagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease or frontotemporal dementia until approximately 3 years after symptom onset [2]. Initial motor symptoms of CBS include markedly asymmetric upper limb bradykinesia, rigidity, dystonia, and myoclonus [1]. Limb apraxia is pronounced in CBD—patients often describe an inability to perform gross or fine motor movements with the affected limb. Asymmetric “hand clumsiness” is the most common presenting symptom, seen in approximately 50% of patients. [2].
Based on a large series of pathologically confirmed cases of CBD, the most common abnormalities of higher cortical function include cognitive impairment, behavioral changes, limb apraxia, aphasia, depression, cortical sensory loss, and alien limb phenomenon. The most common motor findings include unilateral limb rigidity, bradykinesia/clumsy limb, postural instability, falls, abnormal gait, axial rigidity, tremor, limb dystonia, and myoclonus [24].
Speech difficulties are common in CBD, with dysarthria and progressive aphasia being the most common disturbances [24]. Nonfluent aphasia typically accompanies right sided motoric symptoms, while visuospatial deficits are associated with left sided motoric symptoms [1]. Left sided motoric symptoms are also more commonly associated with the ‘alien limb’ phenomenon (involuntary limb movements accompanied by a sensation that the limb had a will of its own), indicative of right parietal lobe involvement [26].
As with other forms of atypical parkinsonism, CBD progresses rapidly. Mean duration from symptom onset to death ranges from 5.5 to 7.9 years in various studies [27, 28]. Death is usually secondary to pulm onary complications or sepsis in the setting of prolonged immobility [27].
Physical Examination
Patients with bradykinesia demonstrate delayed initiation of movement, progressive slowing, and/or decrement in amplitude with repetition [1]. Unilateral limb rigidity (clinically assessed by passive movement of the wrists, elbows, knees, and ankles) is prominent in the affected upper limb, while lower limb and eventually axial rigidity tend to occur later in the course of the disease [24]. Tremor and focal myoclonus are both seen in CBD, the latter characterized by irregular, non-rhythmic jerking motions of extremities, most commonly induced by touch (‘stimulus-sensitive myoclonus’) [2, 24].
The combination of upper limb rigidity and dystonia at rest often presents as arm elevation, while the affected upper limb is often flexed and held against the body during ambulation. Aside from minimal to no arm swing in the affected limb, the gait in CBD resembles the ‘shuffling gait’ seen in PD, due to decreased stride length and diminished step amplitude [29]. Postural instability is assessed by the “pull test” (patients stand with feet apart and are pulled backwards at the shoulders by the examiner). Severe postural instability should alert the examiner for the possibility of the PSPS phenotype of CBD.
Oculomotor abnormalities in CBD are common and include saccadic rather than smooth pursuit [30]. Slowing of vertical sacc ades and vertical supranuclear gaze palsy are rare except in the PSPS phenotype of CBD.
Specific tests should be performed to evaluate for abnormalities of higher cortical function. Ideomotor apraxia (inability to perform goal-oriented movements) is tested by asking patients to imitate simple motions (such as giving a ‘thumbs up’). Ideational apraxia (inability to coordinate sequential motor movements) is tested by showing pictures of common objects, such as a comb, and asking the patient to pantomime their use [31]. Cortical sensory loss may manifest as agraphesthesia (inability to recognize numbers or letters written on one’s palm), astereognosis (inability to identify a common object when placed in the affected hand with eyes closed), or extinction (intact sensation of the affected limb unless touching the opposite limb at the same time) [32,33,34].
Cognitive assessment via MoCA or MMSE typically demonstrates deficits in attention and visuospatial domains, with executive dysfunction most pronounced in the FBS phenotype of CBD [24].
Diagnostic Approach for CBD
The clinical diagnosis of CBD is based primarily on history and physical examination, with supportive evidence provided by imaging. The definitive diagnosis is based on pathologic confirmation at autopsy. The essential features of CBD are summarized here (see also Fig. 11.1 and Tables 11.3, 11.7, 11.8).
History
-
Lateralized difficulty using upper limb often described as “hand clumsiness”
-
Gradual onset of asymmetric parkinsonism (bradykinesia, rigidity, less commonly tremor)
-
Progressive language, cognitive, and behavioral decline
-
Rapid onset and progression of symptoms
-
Limited or no response from levodopa
Physical Exam
-
Striking asymmetry, initially involving upper limb
-
Apraxia (most commonly ideational, with ideomotor apraxia seen in later stages)
-
Cortical sensory loss consisting of agraphesthesia, astereognosis, or extinction
-
Minimal to absent arm movement of involved limb on gait assessment
-
Upper limb rigidity and dystonia contributing to arm levitation at rest
-
Focal myoclonus that is most commonly stimulus-sensitive
-
Deficits in attention and visuospatial domains, as well as executive function
Imaging
MRI Brain or CT Head (Fig. 11.4)
Although imaging findings vary based on the CBD phenotype, there is typically asymmetric atrophy of the posterior frontal and parietal lobes, along with dilatation of the lateral ventricles in the affected hemisphere [35].
DaT Scan
-
FDA indicated for detecting loss of functional dopaminergic neuron terminals in the striatum [21]
-
Reduced uptake is indicative of Parkinsonism, but does not differentiate PD, PSP, CBD, MSA, or DLB
FDG-PET Scan
-
Hypometabolism i n the frontal, parietal lobes, and subcortical structures (thalamus, caudate nucleus, and putamen), with marked asymmetry between the two hemispheres [36]
Laboratory
-
Blood tests are typically of limited utility in diagnosing CBD
-
CSF biomarkers are promising but need further validation
Genetic Testing
-
Genetic testing is unnecessary as virtually all cases of CBD are sporadic
Pathology
-
Definitive diagnosis of CBD can only be made by pathologic analysis upon autopsy. Pathologically, CBD is characterized by tau-positive neuronal and glial lesions in the cortex and striatum, particularly astrocytic plaques and thread-like lesions in both white matter and gray matter. Neuronal loss is also seen in focal cortical regions and in the substantia nigra [37]
Diagnostic Criteria
Corticobasal degeneration remains a neuropathologic diagnosis performed at autopsy. Clinical diagnostic criteria to incorporate the most common phenotypes associated with CBD were recently developed (Table 11.7, 11.8) [24].
Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis of PSP, CBD, and MSA is shown in Fig. 11.1 and Table 11.3.
Therapeutics (Treatment Care Path)
The therapeutic approach to atypical parkinsonism including CBD is shown in Tables 11.4, 11.5, and 11.6.
Multiple System Atrophy
Introduction
Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) is a sporadic adult-onset neurodegenerative disorder consisting of autonomic failure and varying degrees of parkinsonism or cerebellar ataxia. Recently revised diagnostic criteria identifies two forms of MSA, both of which require autonomic dysfunction for diagnosis: MSA presenting with predominant parkinsonism (MSA-P; also known as “striatonigral degeneration”) or with predominant cerebellar ataxia (MSA-C; also known as “olivopontocerebellar atrophy”) [38]. Parkinsonism with early severe dysautonomia, cerebellar symptoms, gait disturbance, and lack of early cognitive impairment are most predictive of MSA [39].
Clinical Manifestations
History
The onset of MSA is generally in the sixth decade, and the disease rarely if ever presents before 30 years or after 75 years [2].
The initial symptom in males is typically erectile dysfunction, while most patients present to a physician with urinary disturbances (consisting of urgency, frequency, nocturia, incomplete bladder emptying, and incontinence) [40]. Other autonomic symptoms include orthostatic hypotension, “cold hands and feet” (Raynaud phenomenon), respiratory dysfunction (sleep apnea, inspiratory stridor), cardiac arrhythmia, and constipation.
Motor symptoms, consisting of parkinsonism (bradykinesia and rigidity, tremor, or postural instability) and/or cerebellar ataxia, typically develop after the onset of dysautonomia.
In contrast to Parkinson’s disease, motor symptoms tend to progress rapidly, and only approximately 30% of MSA patients have a clinically significant response to levodopa [1]. Bulbar dysfunction manifesting as dysphonia, dysarthria, and dysphagia is a prominent and rapidly progre ssing feature of MSA [41].
Although prominent cognition dysfunction is not an early feature of MSA, most patients eventually develop prefrontal dysfunction, which is more frequent and severe in MSA-P than MSA-C [42]. Pseudobulbar affect with emotional incontinence (inappropriate laughing or crying) is seen more commonly than in Parkinson’s disease.
The symptoms of MSA progress rapidly, and most patients become wheelchair bound within 5 years of symptom onset [41]. The median survival is 7–10 years (although wider ranges have been reported), and predominant cerebellar features and a younger age of onset (<60) predict a slightly better prognosis. Death is most commonly due to aspiration, sleep apnea, or ca rdiac arrhythmia [43].
Physical Examination
Standard clinic al assessment of patients with suspected MSA should include general neurologic examination with focus on evaluation for pyramidal and Parkinsonian signs, cognitive testing and orthostatic vital signs.
Patients with bradykinesia demonstrate delayed initiation of movement, progressive slowing, and/or decrement in amplitude with repetitive movement of the hands, legs or feet [1]. Bradykinesia and rigidity are typically more symmetric in MSA than in PD. Resting tremor is infrequently seen in MSA (found in 13–29% of patients. [43, 44]. Patients are assessed for tremor at rest, with arms outstretched (postural tremor), and with movement (kinetic tremor). Postural and kinetic tremor, as well as stimulus-sensitive myoclonus (irregular twitching movements elicited by tapping on the patients fingers with their arms outstretched and palms facing up) are seen more commonly [1].
Cerebellar dysfunction man ifests on examination most commonly as a wide-based, ataxic gait with severe postural instability (assessed by the “pull test”, patients stand with feet apart and are pulled backwards at the shoulders by the examiner). Limb ataxia is seen less frequently, but can be a prominent feature of MSA-C. Cerebellar oculomotor dysfunction can present as nystagmus, square wave jerks, jerky pursuit, and dysmetric saccades (in contrast to the slowing of vertical saccades and decreased range of extraocular movements in PSP) [38]. Patients most commonly present with a mixed cerebellar dysarthria with combinations of hypokinetic, ataxic, and spastic components of speech [45].
Dystonia is a frequent feature of MSA if anterocollis (forward flexion of the neck) is considered a form of cervical dystonia. Laryngeal dystonia manifesting as inspiratory stridor can occur, and levodopa therapy may result in facial and oromandibular dystonia [2]. Abnormal contractures of th e hands and feet may be seen on examination, and patients may present with cold, violaceous extremities. The “Pisa syndrome” (severe lateral flexion of the spine causing the patient to lean sideways) or camptocormia (severe anterior flexion of the spine) may present as well [41].
Degeneration of the corticospinal tracts in MSA may manifest as pyramidal signs including spasticity, hyperreflexia, and the Babinski sign [46].
Cognition is typically assessed via MoCA or MMSE. Patients with MSA-P exhibit executive dysfunction with severe involvement of verbal fluency, visuospatial and constructional function. Cognitive impairment is mild er in MSA-C, generally impacting only visuospatial and constructional function [42].
Orthostatic Vital Signs
Blood pressure a nd heart rate are assessed after the patient lies supine for at least 3 min, then again 3 min after standing. Diagnostic criteria for MSA defines orthostatic hypotension as a drop in blood pressure of at least 30 mm Hg or of diastolic blood pressure by at least 15 mm Hg with an undefined compensatory increase in heart rate [38].
Diagnostic Approach for MSA
The clinical diagnosis of MSA is primarily based on history and physical examination, with supportive evidence provided by imaging. The definitive diagnosis is based on pathologic confirmation at autopsy. The key features of MSA are shown here:
History
-
Early severe autonomic dysfunction (erectile dysfunction, urinary disturbances, lightheadedness upon standing, respiratory difficulty, constipation, and/or cardiac arrhythmias)
-
Rapid progression of parkinsonism (that is rarely responsive to levodopa) or cerebellar ataxia
-
Postural instability and early falls (30 months after symptom onset on average) [9]
-
Limited cognitive impai rment relative to other forms of parkinsonism
-
Lack of family history of similar symptoms
Neurologic Examinat ion
-
Orthostatic hypotension
-
Typically bilateral and symmetric bradykinesia and rigidity
-
Postural and kinetic irregular tremor (more common than resting tremor)
-
Stimulus sensitive myoclonus
-
Cerebellar features (wide-based ataxic gait, limb ataxia, oculomotor dysfunction, and dysarthria)
-
Anterocollis, forward or sideward flexion of the spine, abnormal contractures of the hands or feet
-
Cold hands and feet, with a dusky, purplish discoloration
-
Pyramidal sig ns
Laboratory Testing
-
Lab values are typically of limited utility in diagnosing MSA
Imaging
MRI Brain
-
MSA-P and MSA-C:
-
MSA-P (rarely MSA-C):
-
Putaminal atrophy and occasionally T2 hypointensity in the posterolateral putamen with slit-like hyperintensity of the surrounding rim [48]
-
DaT Scan
-
FDA in dicated for detecting loss of functional dopaminergic neuron terminals in the striatum [21]
-
Reduced uptake is indicative of Parkinsonism, but does not differentiate PD, PSP, CBD, MSA, or DLB
FDG-PET Scan
-
Hypom etabolism in the putamen, brainstem, or cerebellum [38]
Genetic Testing
-
Genetic testing is unnecessary as virtually all cases of MSA are sporadic
Ancillary Testing
-
Cardiovascula r and sudomotor autonomic testing may aid in differentiating MSA from PD and other adult onset cerebellar ataxias
-
Urologic evaluation and urodynamic testing to identify the type of neurogenic bladder dysfunction
-
Sleep study to evaluate for obstructive sleep apnea, nocturnal inspiratory stridor, and REM behavioral disorder (RBD)
-
Cardiologic evaluation of arrhythmia and/or refractory orthostatic hypotension
Pathology
Diagnosis of definite MSA can only be made by pathologic analysis on autopsy. Pathologically, MSA is characterized by alpha-synuclein glial cytoplasmic inclusions leading to degeneration of striatonigral or olivopontocerebellar structures [49]. Definite MSA remains a neuropathologic diagnosis with features described above. Recently revised diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of probable MSA (Table 11.9) and possible MSA (Table 11.10) are shown below.
Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis of MSA is shown in Fig. 11.1 and Table 11.3.
Therapeutics (Treatment Care Path)
The treatment approach to MSA atypical parkinsonism is shown in Tables 11.4, 11.5, and 11.6. The treatment algo rithm for symptomatic neurogenic orthostatic hypotension is shown in Fig. 11.7.
ICD 10 Codes
-
MSA Diagnosis: G90.3
-
PSP Diagnosis: G23.1
-
CBD Diagnosis: G31.85
Disclosures
Dr. Bluett reports no disclosures.
References
Williams DR, Litvan I. Parkinsonian syndromes. Continuum. 2013;19(5 Movement Disorders):1189–212. doi:10.1212/01.CON.0000436152.24038.e0.
Fahn S, Jankovic J, Hallett M. Principles and practice of movement disorders. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier/Saunders; 2011.
Lippa CF, Duda JE, Grossman M, Hurtig HI, Aarsland D, Boeve BF, et al. DLB and PDD boundary issues: diagnosis, treatment, molecular pathology, and biomarkers. Neurology. 2007;68(11):812–9. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000256715.13907.d3.
Williams DR, de Silva R, Paviour DC, Pittman A, Watt HC, Kilford L, et al. Characteristics of two distinct clinical phenotypes in pathologically proven progressive supranuclear palsy: Richardson’s syndrome and PSP-parkinsonism. Brain. 2005;128(Pt 6):1247–58. doi:10.1093/brain/awh488.
Hoglinger GU, Respondek G, Stamelou M, Kurz C, Josephs KA, Lang AE, et al. Clinical diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy: the Movement Disorder Society criteria. Movement Disorders 2017;32(6):853–64.
Maher ER, Lees AJ. The clinical features and natural history of the Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome (progressive supranuclear palsy). Neurology. 1986;36(7):1005–8.
Kristensen MO. Progressive supranuclear palsy—20 years later. Acta Neurol Scand. 1985;71(3):177–89.
Litvan I, Agid Y, Calne D, Campbell G, Dubois B, Duvoisin RC, et al. Clinical research criteria for the diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome): report of the NINDS-SPSP international workshop. Neurology. 1996;47(1):1–9.
Williams DR, Watt HC, Lees AJ. Predictors of falls and fractures in bradykinetic rigid syndromes: a retrospective study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77(4):468–73. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2005.074070.
Daniel SE, de Bruin VM, Lees AJ. The clinical and pathological spectrum of Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome (progressive supranuclear palsy): a reappraisal. Brain. 1995;118(Pt 3):759–70.
Litvan I, Mangone CA, McKee A, Verny M, Parsa A, Jellinger K, et al. Natural history of progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome) and clinical predictors of survival: a clinicopathological study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996;60(6):615–20.
Krack P, Marion MH. “Apraxia of lid opening,” a focal eyelid dystonia: clinical study of 32 patients. Mov Disord. 1994;9(6):610–5. doi:10.1002/mds.870090605.
Litvan I, Mega MS, Cummings JL, Fairbanks L. Neuropsychiatric aspects of progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology. 1996;47(5):1184–9.
Brown RG, Lacomblez L, Landwehrmeyer BG, Bak T, Uttner I, Dubois B, et al. Cognitive impairment in patients with multiple system atrophy and progressive supranuclear palsy. Brain. 2010;133(Pt 8):2382–93. doi:10.1093/brain/awq158.
Nath U, Thomson R, Wood R, Ben-Shlomo Y, Lees A, Rooney C, et al. Population based mortality and quality of death certification in progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76(4):498–502. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2004.039370.
Chen AL, Riley DE, King SA, Joshi AC, Serra A, Liao K, et al. The disturbance of gaze in progressive supranuclear palsy: implications for pathogenesis. Front Neurol. 2010;1:147. doi:10.3389/fneur.2010.00147.
Romano S, Colosimo C. Procerus sign in progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology. 2001;57(10):1928.
Burrell JR, Hodges JR, Rowe JB. Cognition in corticobasal syndrome and progressive supranuclear palsy: a review. Mov Disord. 2014;29(5):684–93. doi:10.1002/mds.25872.
Kato N, Arai K, Hattori T. Study of the rostral midbrain atrophy in progressive supranuclear palsy. J Neurol Sci. 2003;210(1–2):57–60.
Massey LA, Jager HR, Paviour DC, O’Sullivan SS, Ling H, Williams DR, et al. The midbrain to pons ratio: a simple and specific MRI sign of progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology. 2013;80(20):1856–61. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318292a2d2.
Bajaj N, Hauser RA, Grachev ID. Clinical utility of dopamine transporter single photon emission CT (DaT-SPECT) with (123I) ioflupane in diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84(11):1288–95. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2012-304436.
Hoglinger GU, Melhem NM, Dickson DW, Sleiman PM, Wang LS, Klei L, et al. Identification of common variants influencing risk of the tauopathy progressive supranuclear palsy. Nat Genet. 2011;43(7):699–705. doi:10.1038/ng.859.
Hauw JJ, Daniel SE, Dickson D, Horoupian DS, Jellinger K, Lantos PL, et al. Preliminary NINDS neuropathologic criteria for Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome (progressive supranuclear palsy). Neurology. 1994;44(11):2015–9.
Armstrong MJ, Litvan I, Lang AE, Bak TH, Bhatia KP, Borroni B, et al. Criteria for the diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration. Neurology. 2013;80(5):496–503. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827f0fd1.
Riley DE, Lang AE, Lewis A, Resch L, Ashby P, Hornykiewicz O, et al. Cortical-basal ganglionic degeneration. Neurology. 1990;40(8):1203–12.
Graff-Radford J, Rubin MN, Jones DT, Aksamit AJ, Ahlskog JE, Knopman DS, et al. The alien limb phenomenon. J Neurol. 2013;260(7):1880–8. doi:10.1007/s00415-013-6898-y.
Wenning GK, Litvan I, Jankovic J, Granata R, Mangone CA, McKee A, et al. Natural history and survival of 14 patients with corticobasal degeneration confirmed at postmortem examination. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998;64(2):184–9.
Murray R, Neumann M, Forman MS, Farmer J, Massimo L, Rice A, et al. Cognitive and motor assessment in autopsy-proven corticobasal degeneration. Neurology. 2007;68(16):1274–83. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000259519.78480.c3.
Litvan I, Grimes DA, Lang AE. Phenotypes and prognosis: clinicopathologic studies of corticobasal degeneration. Adv Neurol. 2000;82:183–96.
Stover NP, Watts RL. Corticobasal degeneration. Semin Neurol. 2001;21(1):49–58.
Barbieri C, De Renzi E. The executive and ideational components of apraxia. Cortex. 1988;24(4):535–43.
Drago V, Foster PS, Edward D, Wargovich B, Heilman KM. Graphesthesia: a test of graphemic movement representations or tactile imagery? J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010;16(1):190–3. doi:10.1017/S1355617709990762.
Gerstmann J. Pure tactile agnosia. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2001;18(3):267–74. doi:10.1080/02643290042000116.
Vaishnavi S, Calhoun J, Southwood MH, Chatterjee A. Sensory and response interference by ipsilesional stimuli in tactile extinction. Cortex. 2000;36(1):81–92.
Savoiardo M, Grisoli M, Girotti F. Magnetic resonance imaging in CBD, related atypical parkinsonian disorders, and dementias. Adv Neurol. 2000;82:197–208.
Ishii K. PET approaches for diagnosis of dementia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(11):2030–8. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3695.
Dickson DW, Bergeron C, Chin SS, Duyckaerts C, Horoupian D, Ikeda K, et al. Office of Rare Diseases neuropathologic criteria for corticobasal degeneration. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2002;61(11):935–46.
Gilman S, Wenning GK, Low PA, Brooks DJ, Mathias CJ, Trojanowski JQ, et al. Second consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. Neurology. 2008;71(9):670–6. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000324625.00404.15.
Litvan I, Goetz CG, Jankovic J, Wenning GK, Booth V, Bartko JJ, et al. What is the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of multiple system atrophy? A clinicopathologic study. Arch Neurol. 1997;54(8):937–44.
Kirchhof K, Apostolidis AN, Mathias CJ, Fowler CJ. Erectile and urinary dysfunction may be the presenting features in patients with multiple system atrophy: a retrospective study. Int J Impot Res. 2003;15(4):293–8. doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3901014.
Kollensperger M, Geser F, Seppi K, Stampfer-Kountchev M, Sawires M, Scherfler C, et al. Red flags for multiple system atrophy. Mov Disord. 2008;23(8):1093–9. doi:10.1002/mds.21992.
Kawai Y, Suenaga M, Takeda A, Ito M, Watanabe H, Tanaka F, et al. Cognitive impairments in multiple system atrophy: MSA-C vs MSA-P. Neurology. 2008;70(16 Pt 2):1390–6. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000310413.04462.6a.
Wenning GK, Ben Shlomo Y, Magalhaes M, Daniel SE, Quinn NP. Clinical features and natural history of multiple system atrophy. An analysis of 100 cases. Brain. 1994;117(Pt 4):835–45.
Colosimo C, Albanese A, Hughes AJ, de Bruin VM, Lees AJ. Some specific clinical features differentiate multiple system atrophy (striatonigral variety) from Parkinson’s disease. Arch Neurol. 1995;52(3):294–8.
Kluin KJ, Gilman S, Lohman M, Junck L. Characteristics of the dysarthria of multiple system atrophy. Arch Neurol. 1996;53(6):545–8.
da Rocha AJ, Maia AC Jr, da Silva CJ, Braga FT, Ferreira NP, Barsottini OG, et al. Pyramidal tract degeneration in multiple system atrophy: the relevance of magnetization transfer imaging. Mov Disord. 2007;22(2):238–44. doi:10.1002/mds.21229.
Bhattacharya K, Saadia D, Eisenkraft B, Yahr M, Olanow W, Drayer B, et al. Brain magnetic resonance imaging in multiple-system atrophy and Parkinson disease: a diagnostic algorithm. Arch Neurol. 2002;59(5):835–42.
Seppi K, Schocke MF, Wenning GK, Poewe W. How to diagnose MSA early: the role of magnetic resonance imaging. J Neural Transm. 2005;112(12):1625–34. doi:10.1007/s00702-005-0332-2.
Papp MI, Kahn JE, Lantos PL. Glial cytoplasmic inclusions in the CNS of patients with multiple system atrophy (striatonigral degeneration, olivopontocerebellar atrophy and Shy-Drager syndrome). J Neurol Sci. 1989;94(1–3):79–100.
Broustal O, Camuzat A, Guillot-Noel L, Guy N, Millecamps S, Deffond D, et al. FUS mutations in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;22(3):765–9.
Maetzler W, Nieuwhof F, Hasmann SE, Bloem BR. Emerging therapies for gait disability and balance impairment: promises and pitfalls. Mov Disord. 2013;28(11):1576–86. doi:10.1002/ mds.25682.
Zampieri C, Di Fabio RP. Balance and eye movement training to improve gait in people with progressive supranuclear palsy: quasi-randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2008;88(12):1460– 73. doi:10.2522/ptj.20070302.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bluett, B. (2017). Atypical Parkinsonism. In: Tousi, B., Cummings, J. (eds) Neuro-Geriatrics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56484-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56484-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56483-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56484-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)