Abstract
Contemporary international communication and development studies have been grappling with philosophical divides. The controversial concept of neoliberalism has been conspicuously intensifying the dichotomy between (dematerialized) poststructuralism and political economy perspectives, making the most of the development endeavors perceived as either top-down (non-participatory) or bottom-up (participatory). In particular, the latter perspective tends to champion participatory approaches, perhaps because non-participatory development has manifested formidable failures. Through a discursive approach, this chapter presents a sketch of debates and concerns that have led to conceptual dichotomies and controversies in the field of development and related communications. Then, within the context of international development aid and by considering neoliberalism as discourse, the discussion explores a more encompassing way of understanding neoliberalism and recommends an integrative or holistic approach, since development is a fleeting concept.
Jean-Claude Kwitonda
research interests include global neoliberalism, especially its various meanings. In this chapter, he suggests a way to redefine and understand neoliberalism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asante, K. Molefi. 1993. Malcolm X as a Cultural Hero and other Afrocentric Essays. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.
Asante, K. Molefi. 2003. Afrocentricity: The Theory of Social Change. Chicago, IL: African American Images.
Brenner, N., and N. Theodore. 2002. Cities and the Geographies of ‘Actually Existing Neoliberalism. Antipode 34: 349–379. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00246.
Burke, K. 1984. Permanence And Change. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Chukwuokolo, J.C. 2009. Afrocentrism or Eurocentrism: The Dilemma of African Development. OGIRISI 6:24–34. http://www.ajol.info/index.php/og/article/view/52333/40958.
Cornwall, A. 2007. Buzzwords and Fuzzwords: Deconstructing Development Discourse. Development in Practice 17: 471–484. doi:10.1080/09614520701469302.
Cotoi, C. 2011. Neoliberalism: A Foucauldian Perspective. International Review of Social Research 1 (2): 109–124. http://www.irsr.eu/issue02/07_Cotoi_p109-124.pdf.
Dutta, M. 2004. The Unheard Voices of Santalis: Communicating about Health from the Margins of India. Communication Theory 14 (3): 237–263. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00313.x.
Dutta, M. 2006. Theoretical Approaches to Entertainment Education Campaigns: A Subaltern Critique. Health Communication 20 (3): 221–231. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc2003_2.
Escobar, A. 1995. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Escobar, Arturo. 2000a. Place Power and Networks in Globalization and Post Development. In Redeveloping Communication for Social Change: Theory Practice and Power, ed. K.G. Wilkins, 89–102. Oxford, England: Rowman & Littlefield.
Escobar, Arturo. 2000b. Redeveloping Communication for Social Change: Theory, Practice, and Power. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Escobar, Arturo. 2001. Culture Sits in Places: Reflections on Globalism and Subaltern Strategies of Localization. Political Geography 20: 139–174. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(00)00064-0.
Fals Borda, O., and M.A. Rahman (eds.). 1991. Action and Knowledge: Breaking the Monopoly with Participatory Action Research. New York, NY: Apex.
Ferguson, J., and A. Gupta. 2012. Spatializing States: Toward Ethnography of Neoliberal Governmentality. American Ethnologist 24: 981–1002. doi:10.1525/ae.2002.29.4.981.
Foucault, M. 1991. In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, ed. G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, 87–104. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Fox, E. 2012. Rethinking health communication in aid and development. In The handbook of global health communication, ed. S. Waisbord, and R. Obregon, 52–69. Malden, MA: Wiley.
Gilbert, E. 2005. The Inevitability of Integration? Neoliberal Discourse and the Proposals for a New North American Economic Space After September 11. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95: 202–222. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00456.x.
Gudynas, E. 2011. Buen Vivir: Today’s Tomorrow. Development 5 (4): 441–447. doi:10.1057/dev.2011.86.
Jacobson, T.L., and J.D. Storey. 2004. Development Communication, and Participation: Applying Habermas to a Case Study of Population Programs in Nepal. Communication Theory 14 (2): 99–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00307.x.
King, S. 2008. Pink Ribbons Inc: Breast Cancer and the Politics of Philanthropy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Klepeis, P., and C. Vance. 2003. Neoliberal Policy and Deforestation in Southeastern Mexico: An Assessment of the PROCAMPO Program. Economic Geography 79: 221–240. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2003.tb00210.x.
Leal, P. 2007. Participation: The Ascendancy of a Buzzword in the Neo-liberal Era. Development in Practice 17: 539–548. doi:10.1080/09614520701469518.
Lemke, T. 2002. Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique. Rethinking Marxism 14: 49–64. doi:10.1080/089356902101242288.
Lerner, D. 1958. The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.
Martinez, E., and A. Garcia. 2000. What is Neoliberalism? A Brief Definition for Activists. CorpWatch. http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=376.
McCarthy, J., and S. Prudham. 2006. Neoliberal Nature and the Nature of Neoliberalism. Geoforum 35: 275–283. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.07.003.
Ngwainmbi, E. K. 2005. Globalization and NEPAD’s Development Perspective: Bridging the Digital Divide with Good Governance. Journal of Black Studies 35 (3): 284–309. doi:10.1177/0021934704266080.
Papa, M.J., A. Singhal, and W.H. Papa. 2006. Organizing for Social Change: A Dalectic Journey of Theory and Practice. New Delhi, India: Sage.
Prahalad, C.K. 2014. Social Enterprise: Can it Succeed Where Traditional Development Has Failed? The Guardian. (2 Feb 2014). http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2014/feb/25/social-enterprise-succeed-traditional-development-failed.
Raco, M. 2005. Sustainable Development, Rolled-out Neoliberalism and Sustainable Communities. Antipode 37: 324–347. doi:10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00495.x.
Rahnema, M. 1990. Participatory Action Research: The “Last Temptation of a Saint”. Development Alternatives XV: 199–226. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40644681.
Sachs, W. 1991. The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. London: Zed Books.
Sastry, S., and M.J. Dutta. 2011. Postcolonial Constructions of HIV/AIDS: Meaning, Culture, and Structure. Health Communication 26: 437–449. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.554166.
Sastry, S., and M.J. Dutta. 2013. Global Health Interventions and the “Common Sense” of Neoliberalism: A Dialectical Analysis of PEPFAR. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 6 (1): 21–39. doi:10.1080/17513057.2012.740682.
Springer, S. 2012. Neoliberalism as Discourse: Between Foucauldian Political Economy and Marxian Post-structuralism. Critical Discourse Studies 9 (2): 133–147. doi:10.1080/17405904.2012.656375.
Storey, D. 2000. A Discursive Perspective on Development Theory and Practice: Reconceptualizing the Role of Donor Agencies. In Redeveloping Communication for Social Change, ed. K.G. Wilkins, 103–118. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
The World Bank. Development Goals in an Era of Demographic Change. http://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/global-monitoring-report. Accessed 12 Dec 2016.
Tufte, T. 2001. Entertainment-education and Participation. Journal of International Communication 7 (2): 25–51. doi:10.1080/13216597.2001.9751908.
Ugboajah, F.O. 1985. Oramedia in Africa. In Mass Communication, Culture, and Society in West Africa, ed. F.O. Ugboajah. London: WACC. Reprinted in A. Gumucio-Dagron & T.
Waisbord, S. 2008. The Institutional Challenges of Participatory Communication in International Aid. Social Identities 14 (4): 505–522. doi:10.1080/13504630802212009.
Waisbord, S., and R. Obregon. 2012. Theoretical Divides and Convergence in Global Health Communication. In The Handbook of Global Health communication, 9–33. Malden, MA: Wiley.
Ward, K., and K. England. 2007. Introduction: Reading Neo-liberalization. In Neo-liberalization: States, Networks, Peoples, ed. K. England, and K. Ward, 1–22. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Waters, J. 2000. Power and Praxis in Development Communication: Discourse and Methods. In Redeveloping Communication for Social Change, ed. K.G. Wilkins, 89–102. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
Wilkins, K.G. 2000. Introduction. In Redeveloping Communication for Social Change: Theory, Practice, and Power, ed. K.G. Wilkins, 1–4. Oxford, England: Rowman & Littlefield.
Williams, K. 2003. Understanding Media Theory. London: Hodder Arnold Publication.
Young, R. 2006. Putting materialism back into race theory: Towards a transformative theory of race. In Race and the foundations of knowledge: Cultural Amnesia in the academy, ed. J. Young, and J.E. Braziel, 32–45. Chicago: The Board of Trustees of the University Of Illinois.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kwitonda, JC. (2017). Navigating the Development Aid Challenge: Toward a More Encompassing Framework. In: Ngwainmbi, E. (eds) Citizenship, Democracies, and Media Engagement among Emerging Economies and Marginalized Communities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56215-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56215-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56214-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56215-5
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)