Abstract
In his chapter, Mark Rowlands examines the political turn in interspecies ethics. He considers the idea that ethical approaches alone cannot provide a successful framework to tackle the issues nonhuman animals currently face efficiently. Rowlands criticizes this position on two fronts. First, he observes that ethical and political theories about nonhuman animals have been distinguished in a problematic way. For such a distinction often fails to capture what really matters in this debate. Second, he points out that it is rather unclear whether political accounts are a superior approach to traditional ethical views, and argues that the latter may have a much more sophisticated conceptual apparatus to handle nonhuman animals issue than previously assumed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Bekoff, M. & Pierce, J., 2009. Wild Justice: The Moral Lives of Animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
de Waal, F., 2006. Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dixon, B. A., 2008. Animals, Emotion and Morality. New York: Prometheus Books.
Donaldson, S. & Kymlicka, W., 2012. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kymlicka, W., 1989. Contractarianism. In P. Singer, ed., A Companion to Ethics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Kymlicka, W., 1990. Contemporary Political Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rawls, J., 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Regan, T., 1983. The Case for Animal Rights. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
Rowlands, M., 1997. Contractarianism and Animal Rights. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 14(3), pp. 235–47.
Rowlands, M., 1998. Animal Rights: A Philosophical Defense. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rowlands, M., 2002. Animals Like Us. London: Verso.
Rowlands, M., 2009. Animal Rights: Moral Theory and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Second, heavily revised, Paperback Edition of Rowlands (1998).
Rowlands, M., 2012. Can Animals Be Moral?. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rowlands, M., 2013. Animal Rights: All That Matters. London: Hodder.
Singer, P., 1975. Animal Liberation. New York: Harper Collins.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rowlands, M. (2017). Making Light of the Ethical? The Ethics and Politics of Animal Rights. In: Woodhall, A., Garmendia da Trindade, G. (eds) Ethical and Political Approaches to Nonhuman Animal Issues. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54549-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54549-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54548-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54549-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)