Abstract
The article addresses the complex relationship between practice theory and actor-network theory (ANT). It closely examines the similarities and differences between the two and asks how the ANT perspective can be beneficial for practice theory. Drawing on Pierre Bourdieu, Anthony Giddens and Theodore Schatzki’s work, this study briefly identifies the theoretical and methodological standpoint of practice theory. It then turns to Bruno Latour’s ANT, discussing his methodological approach towards the social. Next, it identifies the differences between the two approaches, offering a critique of ANT from the perspective of practice theory. In the conclusion, the contribution identifies the potential of ANT approaches for practice theory at the methodological level. It argues that the methodological principles of ANT can integrate with practice theory to form what I call a ‘transitive methodology’. This analytical perspective does not locate subjectivity and agency at a single spot. Instead, it situates them in a heterogeneous network of practices and materialities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
References
Akrich, M., & Latour, B. (1992). A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and nonhuman assemblies. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society. Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 259–264). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bongaerts, G. (2007). Soziale Praxis und Verhalten – Überlegungen zum Practice Turn in Social Theory. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 36(4), 246–260.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste. New York: Routledge.
Callon, M. (1991). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 132–161). London/New York: Routledge.
Callon, M. (1994). Four models for the dynamics of science. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 29–63). London/Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Clarke, A. E. (2005). Situational analysis. Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. London/Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Derrida, J. (1982). Margins of philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Derrida, J. (1988). Limited Inc. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Garnham, N., & Williams, R. (1980). Pierre Bourdieu and the sociology of culture: An introduction. Media, Culture and Society, 2(3), 209–223.
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution Of Society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hillebrandt, F. (2009). Praxistheorie. In G. Kneer & M. Schroer (Eds.), Handbuch Soziologische Theorie (pp. 368–394). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
ICOMOS. (1964). International charter for the conservation and restoration of monuments and sites (The Venice Charter 1964). Venice: ICOMOS.
Jenkins, R. (2002). Pierre Bourdieu. London/New York: Routledge.
Lash, S. (1993). Pierre Bourdieu: Cultural economy and social change. In C. Calhoun, E. LiPuma, & M. Postone (Eds.), Bourdieu: Critical perspectives (pp. 193–211). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Latour, B. (1992a). One more turn after the social turn. Easing science studies into the non-modern world. In Ernan M. (Ed.), The social dimensions of science (pp. 272–294). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Latour, B. (1992b). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society. Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2004). How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body & Society, 10(2–3), 205–229.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Law, J. (2004). After method. Mess in social science research. London/New York: Routledge.
Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117.
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices. A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 245–265.
Schäfer, H. (2012). Kreativität und Gewohnheit. Ein Vergleich zwischen Praxistheorie und Pragmatismus. In Udo Göttlich & Ronald Kurt (Eds.), Kreativität und Improvisation. Soziologische Positionen (pp. 17–43). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Schäfer, H. (2013). Die Instabilität der Praxis. Reproduktion und Transformation des Sozialen in der Praxistheorie. Weilerswist: Velbrück.
Schatzki, T. (2001). Practice theory. In Ibid., Karin Knorr-Cetina, Eike v. Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). London/New York: Routledge.
Schatzki, T. (2002). The site of the social. A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State Univ. Press.
Schatzki, T. (2010). The timespace of human activity. On performance, society, and history as indeterminate teleological events. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Schinkel, W. (2007). Sociological discourse of the relational: The cases of Bourdieu & Latour. The Sociological Review, 44(4), 707–729.
Schmidt, R. (2012). Soziologie der Praktiken. Konzeptionelle Studien und empirische Analysen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Shove, E., & Pantzar, M. (2007). Recruitment and reproduction: The careers and carriers of digital photography and floorball. Human Affairs, 17(2), 154–167.
Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice. Everyday life and how it changes. London: SAGE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schäfer, H. (2017). Relationality and Heterogeneity: Transitive Methodology in Practice Theory and Actor-Network Theory. In: Jonas, M., Littig, B., Wroblewski, A. (eds) Methodological Reflections on Practice Oriented Theories. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52897-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52897-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52895-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52897-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)