Abstract
Theories of international relations may soon confront a crisis of explanative power . This crisis emerges from a shift in how policymakers determine policy decisions to effectuate outcomes consistent with global policy objectives. International relations theory is a composite of heterodox traditions many of which are in disagreement but nonetheless share a common objective: the explanation of human decision-making under certain conditions. The emergence of information technologies has inundated policymakers with data derived from tracking, recording, and analyzing information technology user behavior. This data deluge has spawned new data analysis techniques and technologies leveraged when making and automating policy decisions. Automated systems are consequential actors in global politics. International relations theory must account for the agentive capacity of automated systems through reflexivity .
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Åkersten, S.I. 1987. The Strategic Computing Program. In Arms and Artificial Intelligence: Weapon and Arms Control Applications of Advanced Computing, ed. A.M. Din, 87–99. SIPRI: Stockholm, Sweden.
Angell, N. 1913. The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power to National Advantage. New York: GP Putnam’s sons.
Baldwin, D.A. 1993. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.
Barkin, S. 2009. Realism, Prediction, and Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis 5 (3): 233–246.
Bennett, J. 2009. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.
Bonvillian, W. 2006. Power play. The American Interest 2: 39–48.
Brewer, J. 1989. The Sinews of Power: War, Money, and the English State, 1688–1783. New York: Harvard University Press.
Brown, C. 2013. The poverty of grand theory. European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 483–497.
Bryant, L.R. 2011. The Democracy of Objects. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.
Burchill, S., et al. 2013. Theories of International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Buzan, B.G.L. 2012. Rethinking Benchmark Dates in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations: 1354066112454553.
Carr, E.H., and M. Cox. 2001. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. Palgrave: Basingstoke.
De Mauro, A., et al. 2015. What is Big Data? A Consensual Definition and a Review of Key Research Topics. AIP Conference Proceedings.
Din, A.M. 1987. Arms and Artificial Intelligence: Weapon and Arms Control Applications of Advanced Computing. Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
Dunne, T., et al. 2013. The End of International Relations Theory? European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 405–425.
Ferguson, Y.H. 2015. Diversity in IR Theory: Pluralism as an Opportunity for Understanding Global Politics. International Studies Perspectives 16 (1): 3–12.
Figliola, P.M., and E.A. Fischer. 2015. Overview and Issues for Implementation of the Federal Cloud Computing Initiative: Implications for Federal Information Technology Reform Management, 1. Washington: C. R. Service, US Congressional Research Service (CRS).
Fischer, B.B. 2006. The Soviet-American War Scare of the 1980s. International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence 19 (3): 480–518.
Fong, G.R. 2001. ARPA does Windows: The Defense Underpinning of the PC Revolution. Business and Politics 3 (3): 213–237.
Gantz, J., and D. Reinsel. 2012. The Digital Universe in 2020: Big Data, Bigger Digital Shadows, and Biggest Growth in the Far East. https://www.emc.com/collateral/analyst-reports/idc-digital-universe-united-states.pdf. Accessed 2 Sep 2016.
Grudin, J. 2009. AI and HCI: Two Fields Divided by a Common Focus. AI Magazine 30 (4): 48.
Guzik, K. 2009. Discrimination by Design: Predictive Data Mining as Security Practice in the United States’ ‘War on Terrorism’. Surveillance & Society 7 (1): 3–20.
Guzzini, S. 2013. The ends of International Relations theory: Stages of Reflexivity and Modes of Theorizing. European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 521–541.
Harris, S. 2014. @War: The Rise of the Military-Internet Complex. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Harrison, E., and S.M. Mitchell. 2013. The Triumph of Democracy and the Eclipse of the West. New York: Springer.
Hoffmann, S. 1977. An American Social Science: International Relations. Daedalus: 41–60.
Howard, P.N. 2015. Pax Technica: How the Internet of Things May Set Us Free or Lock Us Up. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hu, H., et al. 2014. Toward Scalable Systems for Big Data Analytics: A Technology Tutorial. IEEE Access 2: 652–687.
Ikenberry, G.J. 2012. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jackson, P.T. 2010. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. Oxon: Routledge.
Jackson, P.T. 2015. Must International Studies Be a Science? Millennium-Journal of International Studies 43 (3): 942–965.
Keohane, R.O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
King, G., Keohane, R.O., and Verba, S. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press: xi, 245 p.
Kodratoff, Y. 2014. Introduction to Machine Learning. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann.
Kuhn, T.S. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lake, D.A. 1996. Anarchy, Hierarchy, and the Variety of International Relations. International Organization 50 (1): 1–33.
Lake, D.A. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Lake, D.A. 2011. Why “isms” Are Evil: Theory, Epistemology, and Academic Sects as Impediments to Understanding and Progress. International Studies Quarterly 55 (2): 465–480.
Lake, D.A. 2013. Theory is Dead, Long Live Theory: The End of the Great Debates and the Rise of Eclecticism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 567–587.
Mayer-Schönberger, V., and K. Cukier. 2013. Big Data: A Revolution that will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Mearsheimer, J.J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Mearsheimer, J.J., and S.M. Walt. 2013. Leaving Theory Behind: Why Simplistic Hypothesis Testing is Bad for International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 427–457.
Milner, H. 1991. The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory: A Critique. Review of International Studies 17 (1): 67–85.
Mitchell, T.M. 2006. The Discipline of Machine Learning. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Machine Learning Department.
Monahan, T. 2010. The Future of Security? Surveillance Operations at Homeland Security Fusion Centers. Social Justice 37 2/3 (120–121): 84–98.
Monahan, T., and N.A. Palmer. 2009. The Emerging Politics of DHS Fusion Centers. Security Dialogue 40 (6): 617–636.
Moses, J., and T. Knutsen. 2007. Ways of Knowing: Competing Methodologies in Social and Political Research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Newkirk, A.B. 2010. The Rise of the Fusion-Intelligence Complex: A Critique of Political Surveillance After 9/11. Surveillance & Society 8 (1): 43–60.
Nikutta, R. 1987. Artificial Intelligence and the Automated Tactical Battlefield. In Arms and Artificial Intelligence: Weapons and Arms Control Applications of Advanced Computing, ed. A.M. Din, 100–134. SIPRI: Stockholm, Sweden.
Oren, I. 2003. Our Enemies and US: America’s Rivalries and the Making of Political Science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Oren, I. 2006. Can Political Science Emulate the Natural Sciences? The Problem of Self-disconfirming Analysis. Polity 38 (1): 72–100.
Oren, I. 2009. The Unrealism of Contemporary Realism: The Tension between Realist Theory and Realists’ Practice. Perspectives on Politics 7 (02): 283–301.
Owen, T. 2015. Disruptive Power: The Crisis of the State in the Digital Age. USA: Oxford University Press.
Peled, A. 2014. Traversing Digital Babel: Information, e-Government, and Exchange. Cambridge: MIT Press.
PFAIB. 1990. The Soviet ‘War Scare’. Washington: The White House: 109.
Popper, K. 2005. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge.
Pouliot, V. 2016. International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Roland, A., and P. Shiman. 2002. Strategic Computing: DARPA and the Quest for Machine Intelligence, 1983–1993. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Rollins, J. 2008. Fusion Centers: Issues and Options for Congress. DTIC Document.
Schmidt, B.C. 1998. The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations. Ithaca: SUNY Press.
Schneier, B. 2015. Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World. New York: WW Norton & Company.
Singer, P.W. 2009. Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century. New York: Penguin.
Singer, P.W., and A. Friedman. 2014. Cybersecurity: What Everyone Needs to Know. New York: Oxford University Press.
Skinner, Q. 1990. The Return of Grand Theory in the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, S. 1989. Paradigm Dominance in International Relations: The Development of International Relations as a Social Science, 3–27. The Study of International Relations: Springer.
Smith, S. 2000. The Discipline of International Relations: Still an American Social Science? The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 2 (3): 374–402.
Snyder, Q.Z. 2013. Taking the System Seriously: Another Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Studies Review 15 (4): 539–561.
Solomon, T., and B.J. Steele. 2016. Micro-moves in International Relations Theory. European Journal of International Relations: 1–25. doi:10.1177/1354066116634442.
Sylvester, C. 2013. Experiencing the End and Afterlives of International Relations/Theory. European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 609–626.
Tickner, A.B., and D.L. Blaney. 2013. Thinking International Relations Differently. London: Routledge.
Turton, H.L. 2015. International Relations and American Dominance: A Diverse Discipline. London: Routledge.
Waever, O. 1998. The Sociology of a Not so International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations. International Organization 52 (04): 687–727.
Walker, R.B.J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Waltz, K.N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Ward, J.S., and A. Barker. 2013. Undefined by Data: A Survey of Big Data Definitions. arXiv:1309.5821. Accessed 2 Sep 2016.
Wendt, A. 1992. Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization 46 (2): 391–425.
Wendt, A. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wight, C. 2006. Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Winch, P. 1990. The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Zehfuss, M. 2002. Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zetter, K. 2015. Countdown to Zero Day: Stuxnet and the Launch of the World’s First Digital Weapon. New York: Broadway Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kiggins, R.D. (2018). Big Data, Artificial Intelligence, and Autonomous Policy Decision-Making: A Crisis in International Relations Theory?. In: Kiggins, R. (eds) The Political Economy of Robots. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51466-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51466-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51465-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51466-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)