Abstract
Diverging integration efforts or capacities may lead to more economic heterogeneity among countries, thereby challenging present and future steps of European integration. This is why the author measures the general integration efforts of the EU Member States by elaborating composite indicators. There are four dimensions to the indicators: acquis communautaire (measured by “EU Compliance”), Single Market integration (“EU Openness and EU Importance”), Economic and Monetary Union (“EU Symmetry”), and finally, economic convergence (“EU Homogeneity”). The results of the index (based on data for the post-2000 period) indicate an improvement in most of the dimensions, whereas economic convergence has slightly decreased. The analysis reveals that the EU has evolved into a multi-speed Europe, where there are relatively homogenous groups of countries (the core group, EMU opt-outs, CEECs and GIIPS) within a heterogeneous setting.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
According to the WTO website, http://rtais.wto.org/UI/PublicMaintainRTAHome.aspx, there are currently 6 CUs (besides the EU) out of 211 FTAs notified under GATT Art. XXIV or GATS Art. V: the Caribbean Community and Common Market (CARICOM), the Southern African Customs Union (SACU), the Eurasian Economic Community (EAEC), the Central American Common Market (CACM), the East African Community (EAC) and the Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR).
- 2.
See also Fernández Moriana, Vida and De Lombaerde (this volume) on the legal compliance of the EU member states.
- 3.
- 4.
Such as the emerging markets of BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) and MIST (Mexico, Indonesia, South Korea and Turkey).
- 5.
See also Cuerpo and Fischer (this volume) on the measurement of macroeconomic imbalances within the EU.
- 6.
For more information on the EU Index see www.eu-index.org.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
Negative correlation values are tolerated here because a value of less than zero represents an anti-cyclical behavior of a country’s figures and should therefore be treated as disintegration.
- 10.
See, for instance, the index of Economic Freedom by the Fraser Institute, the CSGR Globalization Index or the KOF Index of Globalization.
- 11.
Other common measures such as the Kaiser-Guttman criterion or the Parallel Analysis do not lead to reasonable results here as there are too many components with eigenvalues close to 1.
- 12.
The original EU Index developed by König and Ohr (2013) was calculated for the EU-15 countries over the period 1999–2010. As Luxembourg shows many extreme values (e.g. GDP per capita) it is not considered in either EU Index.
- 13.
Among the CEECs, Hungary and Poland have made the lowest integration efforts since 2004. For a more elaborate view on the integration profiles for Hungary and the CEECs see Palankai and Miklos (this volume).
- 14.
GIIPS (Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Spain).
References
Badinger, H., & Breuss, F. (2011). The quantitative effects of European post-war economic integration. In M. N. Jovanovic (Ed.), International handbook on the economics of integration (Vol. III, pp. 285–315). Cheltenham: Elgar.
Balassa, B. (1961). The theory of economic integration. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin.
Baldwin, R. (1989). The growth effects of 1992. Economic Policy, 9, 247–281.
Boltho, A., & Eichengreen, B. (2008). The economic impact of European integration, CEPR Discussion Paper, (6820). London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276.
Cecchini, P., Catinat, M., & Jacquemin, A. (1988). The European challenge, 1992: The benefits of a single market. Aldershot: Gower.
Crowley, P. M. (2006). Is there a logical integration sequence after EMU? Journal of Economic Integration, 21, 1–20.
De Grauwe, P. (2013). The political economy of the Euro. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 153–170.
European Commission. (2013). Internal market scoreboard, (26). Brussels.
Frankel, J., & Rose, A. (1998). The endogeneity of the optimum currency area criteria. Economic Journal, 108, 1009–1025.
Hotelling, H. (1933). Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24, 417–441.
Ilzkovitz, F., Dierx, A., Kovacs, V., & Sousa, N. (2007). Steps towards a deeper economic integration: The internal market in the 21st century, European Economy – Economic Papers, (271). Brussels: European Commission.
König, J., & Ohr, R. (2013). Different efforts in European economic integration: Implications of the EU Index. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51, 1074–1090.
Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99, 483–499.
Lockwood, B. (2004). How robust is the Kearney/Foreign policy globalization index? The World Economy, 27, 507–523.
Lucas, R. (1990). Why doesn’t capital flow from rich to poor countries? American Economic Review, 80(2), 92–96.
Molle, W. (2006). The economics of European integration. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Mundell, R. (1961). A theory of optimum currency areas. American Economic Review, 51, 657–665.
Ohr, R. (2009). European monetary union at ten: Had the German Maastricht critics been wrong? (Cege-Discussion Paper, 141).
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and users guide. Paris: OECD.
Pearson, K. (1901). On lines and places of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazine, 2(6), 559–575.
Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–1037.
Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65–94.
Spearman, C. (1904). ‘General intelligence’, objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.
Swan, T. W. (1956). Economic growth and capital accumulation. The Economic Record, 32, 334–361.
Tinbergen, J. (1954). International economic integration. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
König, J. (2017). The EU Index of Integration Effort. In: De Lombaerde, P., Saucedo Acosta, E. (eds) Indicator-Based Monitoring of Regional Economic Integration. United Nations University Series on Regionalism, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50860-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50860-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50858-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50860-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)