Abstract
In an academic career spanning over 40 years, Jeffrey Ford has repeatedly questioned taken-for-granted truths or recognized something so obvious it begs further thought and study. Seminal contributions on change management from the second period of his career (starting in 1989) are the focus of this chapter. Management, networks, and conversations are the commonalities of his scholarship, and each is evident in a body of work that enhances our understanding of intentional change management through his scholarly contributions – with his wife, Laurie Ford – on the logics of change, the role of conversations in producing intentional change, and the resistance to change. For managers and leaders, Ford’s work continues to focus our attention as scholars and practitioners on the ongoing day-to-day efforts to bring about organizational change.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). Has management studies lost its way? Ideas for more imaginative and innovative research. Journal of Management Studies, 50(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01070.x.
Ashforth, B. E. (2005). Becoming vanilla pudding: How we undermine our passion for research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(4), 400–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492605280783.
Bobbitt, H. R., Jr., & Ford, J. D. (1980). Decision maker choice as a determinant of organization structure. Academy of Management Review, 5(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1980.4288839.
Ford, J. D. (1980a). The administrative component in growing and declining organizations: A longitudinal analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 23(4), 615–630. https://doi.org/10.2307/255552.
Ford, J. D. (1980b). The occurrence of structural hysteresis in declining organizations. Academy of Management Review, 5(4), 589–598. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1980.4288964.
Ford, J. D. (1985). The effects of casual attributions on decision makers’ responses to performance downturns. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 770–786. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1985.4279100.
Ford, J. D. (1994). Management education: Shifting our assumptions. Journal of Management Education, 18(2), 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256299401800206.
Ford, J. D. (1999a). Organizational change as shifting conversations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12(6), 480–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534819910300855.
Ford, J. D. (1999b). Conversations and the epidemiology of change. In W. Pasmore & R. Woodman (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 12, pp. 480–500). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-3016(99)12002-0.
Ford, J. D., & Backoff, R. W. (1988). Organization change in and out of dualities and paradox. In R. Quinn & K. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Towards a theory of change in organization and management (pp. 81–121). Ballinger Publishing.
Ford, J. D., & Baucus, D. A. (1987). Organization adaptation to performance downturns: An interpretation based perspective. Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 366–380. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1987.4307976.
Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (1994). Logics of identity, contradiction, and attraction in change. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 756–785. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1994.9412190218.
Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (1995a). The role of conversations in producing intentional change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 541–570. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080330.
Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (1995b). Getting caught in our point of view: A response to Carini et al. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 785–787. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.28081370.
Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (2008). Conversational profiles: A tool for altering the conversational patterns of change managers. Journal of Applied Behavior Science, 44(4), 445–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886308322076.
Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (2009). Decoding resistance to change. Harvard Business Review, 87, 99–103.
Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (2010). Stop blaming resistance to change and start using it. Organizational Dynamics, 39(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2009.10.002.
Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (2012). The leadership of change: A view from recent empirical evidence. In W. Pasmore, R. Woodman, & A. Shani (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 20, pp. 1–36). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0897-3016(2012)0000020004.
Ford, J. D., Ford, L. W., & D’Amelio, A. (2008). Resistance to change: The rest of the story. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 362–377. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.31193235.
Ford, J. D., Ford, L. W., & McNamara, R. (2002). Resistance and the background conversations of change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(2), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810210422991.
Ford, J. D., Ford, L. W., & Polin, B. (2014). Leadership in the conduct of organization change: An integrative view. Paper presented at the 2014 annual meeting of the academy of management.
Ford, J. D., & Hagerty, W. H. (1984). Decision makers’ beliefs about the causes and effects of structure: An exploratory study. Academy of Management Journal, 27(2), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/255925.
Ford, J. D., & Schellenberg, D. A. (1982). Conceptual issues of linkage in the assessment of organizational performance. Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1982.4285450.
Gergen, K. J. (1978). Toward generative theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(11), 1344–1360. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.11.1344.
Goodman, P., & Kurke, L. (1982). Studies of change in organinsations: A status report. In P. Goodman (Ed.), Change in organisations (pp. 1–46). Jossey-Bass.
House, R. J., & Aditya, R. N. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis? Journal of Management, 23(3), 409–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300306.
Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment. Irwin.
March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. Wiley.
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge University Press.
Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations (4th ed.). Macmillian.
Spreitzer, G. M., & Sonenshein, S. (2004). Toward the construct definition of positive deviance. The American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 828–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203260212.
Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. McGraw-Hill.
Watzlawick, P. (1978). The language of change: Elements of therapeutic communication. Basic Books.
Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J., & Jackson, D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interpersonal patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. W.W. Norton & Co.
Yukl, G., Gordon, A., & Taber, T. (2002). A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a half century of behavior research. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190200900102.
Further Reading
Mawhinney, T. C., & Ford, J. D. (1977). The path goal theory of leader effectiveness: An operant interpretation. Academy of Management Review, 2(3), 398–451. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1977.4281817.
Schrage, M. (1989). No more teams! Mastering the dynamics of creative collaboration. Currency Paperbacks.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Stackman, R.W. (2020). Ford, Jeffrey, and the Seemingly Invisible Made Obvious: Pushing Change Scholars and Practitioners to Rethink Taken-for-Granted Truths. In: Szabla, D.B. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49820-1_78-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49820-1_78-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49820-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49820-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Ford, Jeffrey, and the Seemingly Invisible Made Obvious: Pushing Change Scholars and Practitioners to Rethink Taken-for-Granted Truths- Published:
- 05 March 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49820-1_78-2
-
Original
Jeffrey Ford and the Seemingly Invisible Made Obvious: Pushing Change Scholars and Practitioners to Rethink Taken-For-Granted Truths- Published:
- 23 February 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49820-1_78-1