Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Limits of Religious Indifference

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Religious Indifference

Abstract

This essay explores religious indifference as an example of that which stands beyond the scope of social scientific knowledge production. In turn, it uses religious indifference to consider the social scientist’s role in constituting the religion-related field. The literary character Bartleby and the ethnographic character Gino provide two case studies for examining particular types of religious indifference that cannot be known to the researcher. As fictions, they offer a way to explore that which would otherwise remain illegible, and they serve as humbling reminders of the inescapable limits of inquiry. To better understand the role that researchers play in constituting the religion-related field, this essay relies on other ethnographic examples to compare differing notions of “entanglement” and their implications for the study of nonbelievers and the nonreligious. The essay concludes by offering researchers a choice: to pursue religious indifference or to leave it alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Althusser, Louis. 1971. Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation). In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Trans. B. Brewster, 127–186. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad, Talal. 1993. Genealogies of Religion. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Formations of the Secular. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, Jean. 1985. The Masses: The Implosion of the Social in the Media. Trans. M. Maclean. New Literary History 16:3 (Spring 1985): 577–5589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, Courtney. 2003. Heaven’s Kitchen: Living Religion at God’s Love We Deliver. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. The New Metaphysicals: Spirituality and the American Religious Imagination. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Things in Their Entanglements. In The Post-secular in Question, ed. Philip S. Gorski, David Kyuman Kim, John Torpey, and Jonathan VanAntwerpen, 43–76. New York: NYU Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blankholm, Joseph. ’I Study Religion,’ or: How to Start an Awkward Conversation. The Immanent Frame, June 15, 2010. Accessed October 21, 2014. http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2010/06/15/i-study-religion-or-how-to-start-an-awkward-conversation/

  • ———. 2014. The Political Advantages of a Polysemous Secular. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 53:4 (December 2014): 775–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Making the American Secular: An Ethnographic Study of Organized Nonbelievers and Secular Activists in the United States. PhD diss., Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Forthcoming. Secularism, Humanism, and Secular Humanism: Terms and Institutions. In The Oxford Handbook of Secularism, ed. Phil Zuckerman and John Shook. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1988. Homo Academicus. Trans. P. Collier. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Sociologists of Belief and Beliefs of Sociologists. Trans. V. Altglas and M. Wood. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society 23(1): 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullivant, Stephen. 2012. Not so Indifferent After All? Self-Conscious Atheism and the Secularisation Thesis. Approaching Religion 2(1): 100–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, Michel. 2007. What Does It Mean to Say That Economics Is Performative? In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativitymics, ed. Donal of Econod MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 311–357. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, Michel, and Vololona Rabeharisoa. 2004. Gino’s Lesson on Humanity: Genetics, Mutual Entanglements, and the Sociologist’s Role. Economy and Society 33(1): 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. The Growing Engagement of Emergent Concerned Groups in Political and Economic Life: Lessons from the French Association of Neuromuscular Disease Patients. Science, Technology, and Human Values 33(2): 230–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cimino, Richard, and Christopher Smith. 2007. Secular Humanism and Atheism Beyond Progressive Secularism. Sociology of Religion 68(4): 407–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. The New Atheism and the Formation of the Imagined Secularist Community. Journal of Media and Religion 10(1): 24–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, Abby. 2011. Believing in Belonging: Belief and Social Identity in the Modern World. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Yes, but Not in the North: Nuances in Religion and Language Cultures. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism 13(1): 105–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, Abby, and Lois Lee. 2014. Making Sense of Surveys and Censuses: Issues in Religious Self-Identification. Religion 44(3): 345–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel. 2006. Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doe v Acton Boxborough Religion School District . 468 Mass. 64. 8 N.E.3d 737. 2014 Mass. LEXIS 300. LexisNexis Academic. Accessed October 14, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, Timothy. 2007. Discourse on Civility and Barbarity: A Critical History of Religion and Related Categories. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2002. Archaeology of Knowledge. Trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk, Cary, Greg Smith, and Luis Lugo. 2012. “Nones” on the Rise: One-in-Five Adults Have No Religious Affiliation. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life. Retrieved November 24, 2012 http://www.pewforum.org/uploadedFiles/Topics/Religious_Affiliation/Unaffiliated/NonesOnTheRise-full.pdf.

  • Gorski, Philip S. 2012. Recovered Goods: Durkheimian Sociology as Virtue Ethics. In The Post-secular in Question, ed. S. Philip, David Kyuman Kim, John Torpey, and Jonathan VanAntwerpen, 77–104. New York: New York University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guenther, Katja M., Kerry Mulligan, and Cameron Papp. 2013. From the Outside In: Crossing Boundaries to Build Collective Identity in the New Atheist Movement. Social Problems 60(4): 457–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1977. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Trans. W. Lovitt, 3–35. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Hout, Michael, and Claude S. Fischer. 2002. Why More Americans Have No Religious Preference: Politics and Generations. American Sociological Review 67(2): 165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane, Webb. 2007. Christian Moderns: Freedom and Fetish in the Mission Encounter. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettell, Steven. 2014. Divided We Stand: The Politics of the Atheist Movement in the United States. Journal of Contemporary Religion 29(3): 377–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korzybski, Alfred. 1958. A Non-Aristotelian System and Its Necessity for Rigour in Mathematics and Physics. In Science and Sanity, 747–761. Brooklyn: Institute of General Semantics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Trans, C. Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Lois. 2012a. Research Note: Talking About a Revolution: Terminology for the New Field of Non-religion Studies. Journal of Contemporary Religion 27(1): 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012b. Being Secular: Towards Separate Sociologies of Secularity, Nonreligion and Epistemological Culture. Unexamined PhD thesis. University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Secular or Nonreligious? Investigating and Interpreting Generic ‘Not Religious’ Categories and Populations. Religion 44(3): 466–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeDrew, Stephen. 2013. Discovering Atheism: Heterogeneity in Trajectories to Atheist Identity and Activism. Sociology of Religion 74(4): 431–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melville, Herman. 1949. Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall-Street. In The Complete Stories of Herman Melville, ed. Jay Leyda, 3–47. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modern, John Lardas. 2011. Secularism in Antebellum America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Niose, David. 2012. Nonbeliever Nation: The Rise of Secular Americans. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olds, Mason. 1996. American Religious Humanism, Rev. ed. Minneapolis: Fellowship of Religious Humanists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasquale, Frank L. 2007. Empirical Study and Neglect of Unbelief and Irreligion. In The NewEncyclopedia of Unbelief, ed. Tom Flynn, 760–766. Amherst: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D., and David E. Campbell. 2010. American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quack, Johannes. 2012. Disenchanting India: Organized Rationalism and Criticism of Religion in India. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Outline of a Relational Approach to ‘Nonreligion. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 26: 439–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quack, Johannes, and Cora Schuh. 2017. Embedded Indifference and Ways to Research It. In Religious Indifference: New Perspectives from Studies on Secularization and Nonreligion, ed. Johannes Quack and Cora Schuh, 259–269. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Christian, Brandon Vaidyanathan, Nancy Tatom Ammerman, José Casanova, Hilary Davidson, Elaine Howard Ecklund, John H. Evans, Philip S. Gorski, Mary Ellen Konieczny, Jason A. Springs, Jenny Trinitapoli, and Meredith Whitnah. 2013. Roundtable on the Sociology of Religion: Twenty-Three Theses on the Status of Religion in American Sociology. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 81(4): 903–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Christopher, and Richard Cimino. 2012. Atheisms Unbound: The Role of the New Media in the Formation of a Secularist Identity. Secularism and Nonreligion 1(1): 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Jesse M. 2011. Becoming an Atheist in America: Constructing Identity and Meaning from the Rejection of Theism. Sociology of Religion 72(2): 215–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Creating a Godless Community: The Collective Identity Work of Contemporary American Atheists. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 52(1): 80–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Jonathan Z. 1978. Map Is Not Territory. In Map Is Not Territory: Studies in the History of Religions, 289–398. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Mark C. 1993. Nots. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Denegating God. Critical Inquiry 20(4): 592–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voas, David. 2014 Afterword: Some Reflections on Numbers in the Study of Religion. Diskus 16(2): 116–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voas, David, and Rodney Ling. 2010. Religion in Britain and the United States. In British Social Attitudes: The 26th Report, ed. A. Park, J. Curtice, K. Thomson, M. Phillips, E. Clery, and S. Butt, 65–87. London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, Simeon. 2014 Ticking ‘No Religion’: A Case Study Amongst “Young Nones.” Diskus 16(2): 70–87.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Religious Studies, MC 3130 University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-3130, USA

    Joseph Blankholm

Authors
  1. Joseph Blankholm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Blankholm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Anthropology and Cultural Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Johannes Quack

  2. Emmy Noether-Project “The Diversity of Nonreligion”, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Cora Schuh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blankholm, J. (2017). The Limits of Religious Indifference. In: Quack, J., Schuh, C. (eds) Religious Indifference. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48476-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48476-1_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48474-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48476-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation