Abstract
Sweatman examines the transcript of the November 1972 trial in Bobigny, France, in which Gisèle Halimi defended four women charged with procuring and performing an abortion. The Bobigny trial became a national media affair and facilitated the decriminalization of abortion in the Veil law of 1975. Sweatman argues that the defense used tactics of civil disobedience and radical feminist epistemology to challenge the strictly legal standards of evidence. The success of this strategy created a discursive space in which the court and a range of expert witnesses expanded the definition of expertise in ways that facilitated a feminist notion of “distress” that included social, psychological, and moral, and not only physiological, harm, leading to broader social acceptance of abortion as a right for women.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sweatman, J.L. (2017). “It Is Not Your Personal Concern”: Challenging Expertise in the Campaign to Legalize Abortion in France. In: Stettner, S., Ackerman, K., Burnett, K., Hay, T. (eds) Transcending Borders. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48399-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48399-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48398-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48399-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)