Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Ethics ((BRIEFSETHIC))

  • 613 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter the focus is on integrity testing of police officers; roughly, setting ‘traps’ for police officers suspected of corruption. This practice raises the important moral (and legal) issue of entrapment. I argue that targeted integrity tests are morally permissible under the following three conditions (assuming other more general conditions are met, such as the condition that the method of integrity testing is the only feasible method available to law enforcement agencies in relation to a certain type of offence, and that the offence type is a serious one). First, the integrity test should be the targeted testing of an officer (or group of officers) who is/are reasonably suspected of engaging in crimes of the relevant kind. Second, the suspect is ordinarily presented with, or typically creates, the kind of opportunity that they are to be afforded in the integrity test scenario. Third, the inducement offered to the suspect is: (a) of a kind that is typically available to the suspect and; (b) such that an ordinary police officer would reasonably be expected to resist it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An earlier version of the material in this section appeared in Miller and Blackler (2005, Chap. 5).

  2. 2.

    For example, the Ethical Standards Department (ESD) of Victoria Police in Australia in the past.

References

  • Harfield, Clive, and Karen Harfield. 2012. Covert investigation, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinig, John. 1996. Ethics of policing. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Gary T. 1988. Undercover: Police surveillance in America, 1988. Berkeley L.A.: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Gary T. 1992. Under-the-covers undercover investigations: Some reflections on the state’s use of sex and deception in law enforcement. Criminal Justice Ethics 11(3): 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Seumas, and John Blackler. 2005. Ethical issues in policing. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Seumas, and Ian Gordon. 2014. Investigative ethics: Ethics for police detectives and other criminal investigators. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prenzler, T., and C. Ronken. 2001. Police integrity testing in Australia. Criminal Justice: The International Journal of Policy and Practice 1(3): 319–342.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seumas Miller .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miller, S. (2016). Integrity Testing. In: Corruption and Anti-Corruption in Policing—Philosophical and Ethical Issues. SpringerBriefs in Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46991-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics