Abstract
This chapter scrutinises primary school teachers’ discourse on good and poor parenthood in a disadvantaged area with a high percentage of migrant families. The analysis shows that teachers’ notions of good parenthood are intertwined with their notions of parental involvement. In contrast with much of the existing literature, the analysis illustrates how the teachers repeatedly justify and excuse inadequate parental involvement. Moreover, they repeatedly reflect on how they, as teachers, can adapt their activities to suit the needs and wishes of parents. The study proposes that activities and informative measures, which facilitate parents’ influence, contribute to parental involvement. Since parents are a heterogeneous group, school leadership and teachers have to take a flexible stance regarding involvement and good parenting. The results indicate that it is important to further investigate reciprocity in home–school relations and parental involvement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The data collection was funded by the Swedish National Institute of Public Health. The author wishes to thank the teachers who took part in the study.
References
Baez, B., and S. Talburt. 2008. “Governing for responsibility and with love: Parents and children between home and school”. Educational Theory 58(1): 25–43.
Bergnehr, D. 2012. ”Barnet, hemmet och skolan i ett socioekonomiskt utsatt bostadsområde”. In Familjeliv och lärande [Family life and learning], edited by L. Aarsand and P. Aarsand, 87–103. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Bergnehr, D. 2015a. “Advancing home-school relations through parent support?”. Ethnography and Education 10(2): 170–184.
Bergnehr, D. 2015b. “Föräldrastöd genom skolan: Diskursiva tillämpningar av nationell politik inom en svensk kommun”. Nordic Studies in Education 35(1): 70–83.
Bergnehr, D. 2016. “Mothering for discipline and educational success: Welfare-reliant immigrant women talk about motherhood in Sweden”. Women’s Studies International Forum 54: 29–37.
Bergnehr, D., and K. Zetterqvist Nelson. 2015. “Where is the child? A discursive exploration of the positioning of children in research on mental-health-promoting interventions”. Sociology of Health and Illness 37(2): 184–197.
Bouakaz, L. 2008. Föräldrasamverkan i mångkulturella skolor. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Bridges, D. 2008. “Educationalization: On the appropriateness of asking educational institutions to solve social and economic problems”. Educational Theory 58(4): 461–474.
Coffey, A. 2001. Education and social change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Crozier, G. 1998. “Parents and schools: Partnership or surveillance?”. Journal of Education Policy 13(1): 125–136.
Crozier, G., and J. Davies. 2007. “Hard to reach parents or hard to reach schools? A discussion of home-school relations, with particular reference to Bangladeshi and Pakistani parents”. British Educational Research Journal 33(3): 295–313.
Dahlstedt, M., and F. Hertzberg. 2011. Skola i samverkan: Miljonprogrammet och visionen om den öppna skolan. Malmö: Gleerups.
Edwards, R. 2002. Children, home and school. New York: Routledge.
Lareau, A. 2000. Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Lareau, A. 2011. Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. 2nd edition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
López, G. R., J.D. Scribner, and K. Mahitivanichcha. 2001. “Redefining parental involvement: Lessons from high-performing migrant-impacted schools”. American Educational Research Journal 38(2): 253–288.
Reay, D. 2004. “Education and cultural capital: The implications of changing trends in education policies”. Cultural Trends 13(2): 73–86.
Skolverket [The National Agency for Education]. 2009. What influences educational achievement in Swedish schools? Stockholm: Skolverket.
Statistics Sweden. 2007. Children, segregated housing and school results: Demographic reports 2007:2. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.
Taylor, S. 2001. “Locating and conducting discourse analytic research”. In Discourse as data: A guide for analysis, edited by M. Wetherell, S. Taylor and S.J. Yates, 5–48. London: Sage.
Van Den Berg, M., and R. Van Reekum. 2011. “Parent involvement as professionalization: Professionals’ struggle for power in Dutch urban deprived areas.”. Journal of Education Policy 26(3): 415–430.
Wells, M.B., and D. Bergnehr. 2014. “Family and family policies in Sweden”. In Handbook of family policies across the globe, edited by M. Robila, 91–107). New York: Springer.
Woods, P, and M. Hammersley. 1993. Gender and ethnicity in schools. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bergnehr, D. (2016). Limited But Committed Parents: Primary School Teachers Negotiating Good Parenthood in a Disadvantaged Area. In: Sparrman, A., Westerling, A., Lind, J., Dannesboe, K. (eds) Doing Good Parenthood. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46774-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46774-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46773-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46774-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)